Iran calls NATO chief remarks on US strikes ‘disgraceful'
TEHRAN: Iran on Wednesday branded NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte's gushing note to President Donald Trump on US strikes targeting key nuclear sites as 'disgraceful, despicable and irresponsible'.
On Tuesday, Rutte hailed in a pre-NATO summit note to Trump what he called his 'decisive action' in Iran, days after the United States conducted unprecedented strikes on its nuclear facilities.
Rutte said the move 'was truly extraordinary and something no one else dared to do. It makes us safer.'
Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei hit back, saying it was 'disgraceful, despicable and irresponsible for #NATO's SG to congratulate a 'truly extraordinary' criminal act of aggression against a sovereign State.'
Whoever 'supports a crime is regarded as complicit,' Baqaei said in a post on X.
The US strikes on Sunday hit key sites of Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz, and came 10 days after Israel launched a major bombardment campaign on Iran.
Israel's attack on June 13 targeted Iranian nuclear facilities and killed top military commanders and nuclear scientists.
Iran retaliated with waves of missiles strikes before a ceasefire took hold on Tuesday.
Trump said the US strikes had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear capabilities, and on Wednesday he insisted the strikes set the country's atomic programme back 'decades'.
Leaked US intelligence cast doubt on the damage caused by American strikes, saying they had set back Tehran's nuclear programme by just a few months.
Iranian officials have yet to disclose the exact scale of the damage resulting from the US and Israel strikes on the sites.
In an interview with Al Jazeera English, Baqaei said they had been 'badly damaged'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
19 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Terror nexus
Listen to article Pakistan has flagged an existential threat that it faces from a fugitive and outlawed organisation based in Afghanistan. The United Nations Security Council has once again been informed that Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, the TTP, is freely operating from the West Asian state, and all efforts on the part of Islamabad to persuade the authorities in Kabul to move against them have fallen on deaf ears. This past Tuesday, it was brought on record before the 15-member world body by Pakistan's envoy that the TTP is the largest UN-designated terrorist group operating from Afghan soil with an estimated strength of around 6,000 fighters, posing a direct threat to Pakistan's national security. The spike in terrorist activities inside Pakistan during the last two years is a case in point, and the TTP has now struck a nexus with other non-state actors including Al-Qaeda and Baloch militant groups. Pakistan is in a catch-22 situation as it confronts terrorism from its western and eastern frontiers, and the new revulsion on the Iranian front has made the strategic equation more worrisome. The intensity could be gauged from the fact that Pakistan has confiscated a huge cache of modern weapons abandoned by the US forces while leaving Afghanistan in a state of lurch. Unscrupulous entities have laid their hands on this armament which has led to massive bloodshed in Pakistan, especially in the restive provinces of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. This is where Kabul's cooperation is desired along with a trans-regional counter-terrorism understanding to exterminate the terror nexus. The role of the US and the UNSC is essential if this simmering threat perception has to be dealt with in a sophisticated manner so that the evolving geo-economics is saved from waywardness. The mushrooming of terrorists, incidentally, has taken a new turn as India-backed proxies are now raising their ugly head. The killing of 11 'khwarij' at the hands of security forces yesterday during intelligence-based operations in K-P amplifies the threat module, and is in need of being tackled lethally. This evolving trepidation must come to an end.
Express Tribune
27 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
The war is over — for now
The writer is a retired major general and has an interest in International Relations and Political Sociology. He can be reached at tayyarinam@ and tweets @20_Inam Listen to article Finally, at the desperate urging of PM Netanyahu, the US on June 21, 2025, in a complex attack involving around 125 aircraft, including seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, and one submarine bombed three Irani nuclear sites at Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan. The US dropped fourteen 30,000 pounds GBU-57 bunker busting MOP (massive ordnance penetrator) at Fordow and Natanz and fired around 75 BGM-109 Tomahawk cruise missiles, mainly at the Isfahan site. The Virginia-based B-2s flew in two directions on takeoff, one component heading towards Guam for deception, and the other towards the Middle East. The sites already pulverised by the IAF revisits were described as 'obliterated' by President Trump. Fordow, containing around 3,000 sophisticated centrifuges in two enrichment halls, was attacked through ventilation shafts at two points, and GBU-57s seems to have "severely damaged but not destroyed" it, as per US officials. Iran claims the site was already evacuated. Natanz, the largest uranium enrichment centre, had earlier sustained 11 explosions in Israel's clandestine operation in 2020. IDF destroyed its above ground structures and electric supply on June 13. The US strikes extensively damaged its underground enrichment centrifuges. The Isfahan complex, outside the ancient Isfahan capital, was a storage site for the near bomb-grade nuclear fuel. IDF struck its laboratories that convert Uranium gas into the substance needed to produce a weapon. IAF jets again targeted it on June 21, before the US bombing. Satellite images show extensive damage. Israel's no-holds-barred illegality aside, the US attack on another country's nuclear sites was unprecedented, and sets a new normal by the sole superpower, that can and would be emulated in future conflicts with immense consequences. It renders the sanctity of nuclear sites even during active hostilities, null and void. India Pakistan regularly exchange the locations of their nuclear installations to avoid even accidental targeting. This situation under Modi's India, following Netanyahu's template, now stands altered. The question whether the US attack destroyed Iran's nuclear programme is debatable. The main site at Fordow is reportedly hardened using steel and concrete and is around 800 metres deep. It has uninterrupted and multiple sources of power for the thousands of humming centrifuges, that so far has provided Tehran with over 400 kg of Uranium (enough for some 9 nuclear bombs), reportedly enriched up to 60%, a little below the weapons grade enrichment of around 80-90%. At that depth, even tandem employment of GBU-57 at the same point of application may not have caused the desired damage. Iran would have stored the enriched uranium safely elsewhere, and most likely shifted some critical infrastructure to other unknown, undeclared and undetected sites beforehand. So, it is safe to assume that Iran's nuclear programme is mauled, delayed but probably not eliminated. So, the next logical step for the West Plus is to pressurise Iran to sign the much-touted nuclear deal, and force Tehran to agree to cap and roll back its nuclear programme. For this, Iran will continue to be threatened using all means, with or without the US involvement. Iran was politically compelled to respond to the US aggression especially for regime survival, by considering: a) a limited and calibrated response, without undue escalation; b) escalating and targeting some of the 19 US bases in the Middle East, especially in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and GCC etc; and c) blocking the Strait of Hormuz, carrying over 20% global oil flows, to upend the world energy market. Iran wriggled out of its 'response dilemma' by hitting the sprawling Al Udaid US base in Qatar on Monday, pre-coordinated with Qatar and the US. This limited response avoided further retaliatory strikes and enables Iran to undertake legal, diplomatic and political recourse and advantage, subsequently during negotiations. On June 24, President Trump dramatically announced a complex ceasefire deal after extensive behind-the-scenes parleys during the 12-day crisis. Israel emerged neither victorious nor unscathed from the relentless Irani hypersonic missile response, lately penetrating through its multi-layered AD system, comprising Arrow Missiles, David's Sling and Iron Dome. The system, reportedly, showed signs of wear and tear, and suffered from non-availability of required munitions even with the US. This costly AD system (costing some 167 million USD per engagement) was swarmed, saturated and exhausted repeatedly by low-cost Irani drone and missile combos, in layers. Deterioration of the AD situation was compelling IDF to let some missiles through, to focus on the incoming warheads against critical assets. The estimated percentage of such uncontested and otherwise penetrating ballistic missiles remained over 11% — very significant for a small country like Israel. On June 23, immediately after the US strikes, Irani onslaught continued for the longest time — some 40 minutes. Iran also successfully targeted Israeli settlements on occupied lands, causing mass exodus of Jewish settlers. Besides, many Israelis were fleeing to Ukraine, Poland, etc, to a not very warm welcome. Antisemitism spiked high for the 'child killers of Gaza' as reported by the international press. The over 600-day wars left deep scars on the already stressed Israeli state, society, psyche and armed forces. This exhaustion was to naturally lead to a ceasefire. As a consequence, the regime in Tehran is more firmly entrenched for now, Iran's nuclear programme seems to have survived the strongest possible challenge, and its missiles proved decisive. The US-Israeli nexus does not seem to have achieved the intended military objectives of war. This intense conflict again demonstrated, like the Afghan wars, the success of mass against technological superiority in a modern conflict. This carries profound lessons for countries like Pakistan. This conflict also validates the age-old dictum of 'might is right', demonstrating to the week that rules, regulations and statutes are only for them. The strong can trample them with impunity. This war will, heretofore, intensify the race to acquire nuclear weapons globally, hitting at the very basis of non-proliferation. Iran may be restrained for some time, but a nuclear Iran in the mid to long-term is a reality, that Israel will have to live with, with or without the Ayatollahs in power. For Pakistan, investment in drone and missile technologies, asset hardening especially the nuclear sites, counterintelligence, AD and PAF are critical now, like never before.
Express Tribune
28 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
When facts are rumoured to be conspiracy theories
Listen to article Journalists and book authors have spent a considerable amount of time and writing to teach us all about how to do authentic research so as not to consider conspiracy theories as facts. Conspiracy theories are usually designed in such a way that they're not only entertaining for the human mind to quickly embrace it but also are quite unintelligent and helps lazy minds to settle an issue without much thinking to do about it. There's more entertainment in them than any rationality. However, understanding the reverse is perhaps equally, if not more, important. What if certain facts are wrongly understood to be conspiracy theories because they're too cheesy and too unrealistic. Before I delve into that, let me give you a bit of a context. I grew up in Pakistan watching Hollywood movies. There would be violent scenes of guns being used and serial killers killing innocent people without reason or remorse. I always thought movie makers had to spice things up for entertainment purposes and that in the real world things weren't this extreme. Then I came to America. After more than a decade of living here, I realised what they showed in the movies didn't even amount to 10% of the truth. The truth here is a lot more violent and a lot worse. When it comes to Israel and America, I always heard from almost all sources that usually spin out conspiracy theories that America was owned and controlled by the Jewish lobbies. I am sure you've seen the film The Arrivals. It was entertaining but quite conspiracy theories filled. Well, maybe not so much. Israel controls America from within is not a conspiracy theory. Almost every, if not every, politician comes to public office shining up his credentials that he or she will be a fierce and loyal defender of Israel. The United States gives billions to Israel, which uses a good amount of that money to donate to politicians and public officer holders through lobbying groups such as AIPAC. Then they're asked to make policies and laws that will be good for Israel but harmful for America most of the time. It's a vicious cycle. In 2017, there was a massive hurricane that hit Texas. It was called Hurricane Harvey. Businesses and personal properties were damaged. My business, car and other items were damaged completely. The state of Texas was providing relief help only to those who'd pledge not to boycott Israel. I mean think about it for a minute; I being an American citizen and an American business am required to show loyalty to a foreign country in order to get help from my own country. That fact alone is crazier than the most bizarre conspiracy theories that ever existed. Israel uses American money to control America. One might conclude that it's money. Not so fast. Because the Saudis have a lot more money than a mere few billions. No American politician sticks a Saudi flag outside their office with the text "I stand with Saudi Arabia". The Israelis have spent almost half a century, if not more, in creating this false narrative and convinced the American people of it that the Holy Bible commands that Israel must be protected, that American values align very neatly with Jewish teachings, that the interests of America and Israel are one and the same, that Israel is the victim, that they are the chosen people who are the rightful owners of that land because they were there 2000 years ago. None of it is true but these falsehoods are enough tools to scare any politician who might have funny ideas about the freedom of Palestine. AIPAC uses scare tactics to remind such politicians about the money and the zombified, if you will, electorate that stays high on the 'chosen ones' nonsense. Once this chokehold is understood, then every nonsense that America does starts making sense.
