Seven men convicted of sexual exploitation of two teenage girls in Rochdale
The defendants preyed on the vulnerabilities of the victims to groom them as 'sex slaves' from the age of 13 on various dates in the Greater Manchester town between 2001 and 2006.
Both girls had 'deeply troubled home lives' and were given drugs, alcohol, cigarette, places to stay and people to be with, Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court heard.
Soon after they were expected to have sex 'whenever and wherever' the defendants and other men wanted in filthy flats, on rancid mattresses, in cars, car parks, alleyways and disused warehouses.
Jurors deliberated for three weeks before delivering their unanimous guilty verdicts on Friday.
Three of the abusers, Mohammed Zahid, 64, Mustaq Ahmed, 67, and Kasir Bashir, 50, – all born in Pakistan – were stallholders on the town's indoor market.
Father-of-three Zahid – known as Boss Man – gave free underwear from his lingerie stall to both complainants and also money, alcohol and food in return for the expectation of regular sex with him and his friends.
In 2016, Zahid was jailed for five years in an earlier grooming gang case after he engaged in sexual activity in 2006 with a 15-year-old girl who he met when she visited his stall to buy tights for school.
Bashir did not attend the current trial as jurors were ordered not to speculate why but it can be revealed that he absconded while on bail before the trial got under way.
It can also be reported that co-defendants Mohammed Shahzad, 44, Naheem Akram, 48, and Nisar Hussain, 41, were remanded in custody with their bail revoked in January before the jury was sworn in.
Police received intelligence that the three Rochdale-born taxi drivers were planning to leave the UK and had already paid a deposit for their transport, the court heard.
All three denied the accusation but Judge Jonathan Seely said the court was not prepared to take a risk that they too would abscond.
A seventh defendant, Pakistani-born Roheez Khan, 39, also featured in another previous Rochdale grooming trial in 2013 when he was one of five men convicted of sexually exploiting a 'profoundly vulnerable' 15-year-old girl in 2008 and 2009.
Khan was jailed for six-and-a-half years for engaging in sexual activity with a child and witness intimidation.
Opening the prosecution case in January, Rossano Scamardella KC said Rochdale had been 'blighted' by child sexual exploitation and that one of the two complainants, Girl A, was abused by many other Asian men.
Girl A told the jury she could have been targeted by more than 200 offenders as her phone number was swapped but said 'there was that many it was hard to keep count'.
She told local children's services in 2004 that she was 'hanging around' with groups of older men, drinking and taking cannabis, the court heard.
Giving evidence, Girl B said she was living in a local children's home when she was preyed on by Zahid, Ahmed and Bashir.
She said she presumed various agencies knew what was going on as police regularly picked her up after social workers labelled her a 'prostitute'.
Girl B told the hearing she had since read her file held by Rochdale social services which she said stated she had been selling herself for sex from the age of 10.
Both complainants denied claims from defence barristers that they fabricated the allegations to secure compensation.
Zahid, of, Station Road, Crumpsall, was convicted of raping Girl A and Girl B, who did not know each other.
Jurors also found him guilty of offences of indecency with a child and procuring a child to have sex.
Ahmed, of Corona Avenue, Oldham, and Bashir, of Napier Street East, Oldham, were convicted of multiple counts of rape and indecency with a child, in relation to Girl B.
Shahzad, of Beswicke Royds Street, Rochdale, Akram, of Manley Road, Rochdale, Hussain, of New Field Close, Rochdale, and Khan, of Athole Street, Rochdale, were convicted of multiple counts of rape against Girl A.
Roheez Khan was found guilty of a single count of rape against Girl A.
During the trial the prosecution offered no evidence against an eight defendant, Arfan Khan, 41, of Rochdale, who was cleared of various sexual offences.
All the perpetrators were prosecuted as part of Operation Lytton, an ongoing investigation since 2015 by Greater Manchester Police into historical child sexual exploitation in Rochdale.
A total of 37 individuals have been charged so far, with five more trials scheduled to take place from September onwards.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 hours ago
- The Independent
GCHQ intern jailed over data breach which risked exposing 17 colleagues
A GCHQ intern has been jailed for seven and a half years after he took top secret data home which endangered national security, risked exposing 17 colleagues, and 'threw away' thousands of hours of work. Manchester University computer science student Hasaan Arshad, 25, was in 'flagrant breach' of tight security rules when he used his mobile phone to remove material from a computer system and transfer it to his private computer on August 24 2022. The defendant, who has an autism spectrum disorder, was said to be an academically gifted 'perfectionist' who was motivated by a desire to complete the project he had been tasked with at GCHQ as his placement was coming to an end. But sentencing him on Friday, Mrs Justice McGowan said his was 'intellectual arrogance' and he acted under the belief that the 'rules do not apply to him'. Arshad, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, pleaded guilty to an offence under the Computer Misuse Act which carries a maximum penalty of life in prison. The defendant also admitted two charges of making an indecent photograph of a child in relation to 40 category A videos and four category B videos downloaded from the dark web and found on his personal phone following his arrest. Sentencing, Mrs Justice McGowan jailed Arshad for six years for the data breach and a further year and a half for the sexual offences. She said: 'The risk raised by this conduct was at the highest level. 'I accept there is no evidence of any intention to sell, disclose or ransom the material. 'The risk was obvious and the actual damage that might have followed is incalculable.' The judge went on: 'The consequences are that all the material taken and anything linked to it is now valueless at best and positively dangerous at worst. 'It has been destroyed and alternatives have had to be found. There is a huge economic loss, additionally there is a loss of trust with our allies and damage to the standing of our security which can only be of benefit to others. Additionally these acts have damaged the security of others working for GCHQ.' Part of the hearing – including a detailed assessment of the harm caused – was held behind closed doors in the absence of the press and public. However, the court was told that Arshad's actions 'lost a tool' being developed at GCHQ, risked exposing the identities of 17 GCHQ colleagues, and undermined the trust of partners. Opening the facts in open court, prosecutor Duncan Atkinson KC said the data breach also 'created a significant risk of damage to national security'. The Government Communications Headquarters – known as GCHQ – is the UK's intelligence, security and cyber agency and plays an important role in keeping the country safe, in conjunction with MI5 and the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6). The highest levels of security are needed for GCHQ to carry out its work to gain information about threats to the UK from 'hostile states or terrorists' by using lawful covert tools and techniques, the court was told. Mr Atkinson said: 'Put bluntly, if hostile states or terrorists were aware of how GCHQ was able to gather intelligence about their plans, they would be able to prevent the intelligence community in the UK from learning of those plans at a stage and to an extent that allows the intelligence community to thwart them.' At the time of the offence, Arshad was coming to the end of an industry year placement with a technical development team which required him to work at a secure GCHQ site near Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, and use computer systems. The court heard he was part of a team that worked on the development of 'tools and techniques' to obtain information about threats to the UK. Arshad had undergone GCHQ induction and was required to sign the Official Secrets Act. It was made 'abundantly clear' to Arshad that his access to top secret material had to be in controlled circumstances at 'an extremely secure location', Mr Atkinson said. He went on: 'In flagrant breach of those obvious and necessary restrictions, the defendant used a mobile handset provided for his use whilst on his work placement but with strictly confined scope as to its permitted use, to remove top secret material from the top secret network of the technical development team to which he had been attached. 'He then transported that material from the secure location where he had been working to his home, risking it falling into the wrong hands or being lost, and downloaded it onto a removable hard drive which formed part of the IT system that he used at his home address. 'This significant security breach compromised lawful intelligence-related activity that was being undertaken in the national interest. In doing so, he threw away many thousands of hours of work, and significant sums of taxpayers' money.' Mr Atkinson said his actions had damaged 'confidence in UK security' because the data included the identities of a 'significant number' of GCHQ colleagues and put others' safety at 'direct risk'. Following his arrest, the defendant, who went on to achieve a first class honours degree, admitted removing data without authorisation 'out of curiosity' saying he had no intention to share it. He told police: 'I'm sorry for my actions and I understand the stupidity of what I have done.' Arshad said he 'went out of my way' to ensure the data was stored locally and not in the cloud. Mitigating, Nina Grahame KC said the defendant had been 'reckless' 'thoughtless and naive' and put his 'possessive' desire to complete his project above all else. He took the data home because he wanted to 'continue and complete the most exciting and challenging work the defendant had ever undertaken' in the hope of gaining future employment at GCHQ, Ms Grahame said. The court was told Arshad was driven by ambition and perfectionism having achieved the second highest mark in the country for his computer science A level. His parents were 'distraught and heartbroken' at what happened and 'feared' for his wellbeing in prison, Ms Grahame added. Bethan David, head of the Crown Prosecution Service Counter Terrorism Division, said: 'Hasaan Arshad knew his actions were prohibited after he signed the Official Secrets Act and received his induction training. 'His conduct was deliberate and intentional, and represented a flagrant breach of the obvious and necessary rules in place. 'The Crown Prosecution Service will always seek to prosecute anyone that knowingly jeopardises and endangers the safety of our country.'
The Sun
14 hours ago
- The Sun
Long-awaited Casey grooming gang review links illegal migration with exploitation of British girls
A DAMNING review into rape gangs will directly link illegal migration with the exploitation of British girls, The Sun can reveal. The Home Office is expected to publish the long-awaited National Audit on Group-Based Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse next week. 1 A source familiar with the report said its author, Baroness Louise Casey, specifically links illegal migration with the violence perpetrated against vulnerable girls. The Sun understands there are fears in the Home Office that knowledge of the link between undocumented arrivals and grooming gangs could trigger more civil unrest. The Home Office today refused to deny the involvement of illegal migration in the Casey report. A government spokesperson said: 'Nothing is more important than protecting vulnerable children, and we are determined to crack down on vile grooming gangs once and for all. 'That's why we ordered a rapid national audit to uncover the true scale of this horrific abuse. 'This report – alongside our response – will be published shortly.' The Casey review was tasked with building a 'national picture of what is known about current group-based child sexual exploitation' and to 'identify local and national trends'. It will also 'provide an assessment of what is known about the demographics of grooming gangs and their victims, including ethnicity'. It comes as a grooming gang have been found guilty of raping and abusing two teen girls in Rochdale in a five-year reign of terror. The seven men "passed" the victims around for sex and preyed on them in squalid flats and car parks in the town. They groomed the girls from the age of 13 and made them their "sex slaves" by plying them with gifts, including alcohol and drugs. The victims both had "deeply troubled home lives", which meant they were easy prey for the fiends. During a five-year horror ordeal, the girls were expected to have sex "whenever and wherever" the defendants and other men wanted. As well as flats and car parks, the predators abused the teens on rancid mattresses, in cars, alleyways and disused warehouses. Mohammed Zahid, 64, Kasir Bashir, 50, Mushtaq Ahmed, 66, Roheez Khan, 39, Mohammed Shahzad, 43, Nisar Hussain, 43, and Naheem Akram, 48, were today convicted. Three of the abusers, Zahid, Ahmed and Bashir were born in Pakistan and worked as stallholders on Rochdale's indoor market. Father-of-three Zahid - known as Boss Man - gave free underwear from his lingerie stall to both victims. He was previously jailed for five years after he engaged in sexual activity in 2006 with a 15-year-old girl who he met when she visited his stall to buy tights for school.
Telegraph
14 hours ago
- Telegraph
GCHQ intern who stole ‘top secret' data risked lives of 17 agents
A GCHQ intern endangered national security, risked exposing 17 colleagues, and 'threw away' thousands of hours of work when he took top secret data home, a court has heard. Hasaan Arshad, 25, a Manchester University computer science student, was in 'flagrant breach' of security rules when he used his mobile phone to remove material from a computer system and transfer it to his private computer on Aug 24 2022. Arshad, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, pleaded guilty to an offence under the Computer Misuse Act, which carries a maximum penalty of life in prison. He also admitted two charges of making an indecent photograph of a child in relation to 40 category A images and four category B images found on his phone following his arrest. The court was told that part of the hearing – including a detailed assessment of the harm caused – would be outlined behind closed doors. Arshad was jailed for seven-and-a-half years at the Old Bailey on Friday. Sentencing, Mrs Justice Maura McGowan told him that the 'risk created by this conduct was at the highest level'. 'The risk was obvious', she added, 'and the actual damage that might have followed is incalculable.' The court was told that Arshad's actions 'lost a tool' being developed at GCHQ, risked exposing the identities of 17 GCHQ colleagues, and undermined the trust of partners. Prosecutor Duncan Atkinson KC said: 'His actions created a significant risk of damage to national security for reasons that can only be fully explained in a private hearing. 'In short, however, his actions compromised the security and utility of the material and the role it played in the national interest, and he also in the process put the safety of intelligence agency personnel at risk.' GCHQ is the UK's intelligence, security and cyber agency. The highest levels of security are needed for GCHQ to carry out its work to gain information about threats to the UK from 'hostile states or terrorists' by using lawful covert tools and techniques, the court was told. Mr Atkinson said: 'Put bluntly, if hostile states or terrorists were aware of how GCHQ was able to gather intelligence about their plans, they would be able to prevent the intelligence community in the UK from learning of those plans at a stage and to an extent that allows the intelligence community to thwart them.' At the time of the offence, Arshad was coming to the end of an industry year placement with a technical development team that required him to work at a secure GCHQ site near Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, and use computer systems. 'Extremely secure location' The court heard he was part of a team that worked on the development of 'tools and techniques' to obtain information about threats to the UK. Arshad had undergone GCHQ induction and was required to sign the Official Secrets Act. It was made 'abundantly clear' to Arshad that his access to top secret material had to be in controlled circumstances at 'an extremely secure location', Mr Atkinson said. He went on: 'In flagrant breach of those obvious and necessary restrictions, the defendant used a mobile handset provided for his use whilst on his work placement but with strictly confined scope as to its permitted use, to remove top secret material from the top secret network of the technical development team to which he had been attached. 'He then transported that material from the secure location where he had been working to his home, risking it falling into the wrong hands or being lost, and downloaded it onto a removable hard drive which formed part of IT system that he used at his home address. 'This home computer system wholly failed to match the necessarily exacting security requirements of GCHQ's systems, and therefore exposed this top secret material to the vagaries and risks of an unsecure computer system connected to the internet at an insecure location. 'This significant security breach compromised lawful intelligence-related activity that was being undertaken in the national interest. In doing so, he threw away many thousands of hours of work, and significant sums of taxpayers' money.' 'Out of curiosity' Mr Atkinson said Arshad's actions had damaged 'confidence in UK security' because the data included the identities of a 'significant number' of GCHQ colleagues and put others' safety at 'direct risk'. Following his arrest, the defendant admitted removing data without authorisation 'out of curiosity'. He said in a statement that he had no intention to hand over the data to anyone else. He told police: 'I would like to apologise for my actions. I removed the data simply out of curiosity. 'I'm sorry for my actions and I understand the stupidity of what I have done.' Arshad said he 'went out of my way' to ensure the data was stored locally and not in the cloud. Asked if he had breached the level of trust and confidence by removing the sensitive data without authority, he replied: 'No comment.' Mitigating, Arshad's lawyer Nina Grahame KC said the defendant had been 'reckless', 'thoughtless and naive'. His internship had involved working on a 'specific project', which he had been unable to complete before the end of the placement, she added. He took the data home because he wanted to 'continue and complete the most exciting and challenging work the defendant had ever undertaken' in the hope of gaining future employment at GCHQ, Ms Grahame said.
