Paso Robles releases first batch of Bausch's public records. Here's what they show
The city of Paso Robles released the first batch of public records from Councilmember Chris Bausch's personal devices Friday night, the first step in fulfilling a court order filed in The Tribune's lawsuit against the city and councilman.
In total, The Tribune received 142 documents from the city — 109 emails and 33 emailed attachments — dating back two years.
Bausch said he submitted more than 5,000 emails and texts for the city's review. So this represents only a fraction — about 3% — of the total that Bausch turned over to the city.
The emails — which Bausch delayed turning over for months despite numerous public records requests — overwhelmingly center around the community's disdain for the now-repealed paid parking program in downtown Paso Robles.
Notable communications show Bausch fielding public comments for City Council meetings, communicating with Cal Coast News reporter Karen Velie, and contributing to a cease-and-desist letter served to the city amid the parking controversy.
None of the documents confirm or deny any of the allegations laid out in former city manager Ty Lewis' claim filed against the city — which alleged Bausch harassed him, spread rumors about him and led a concerted effort to oust him from his job — but the documents do shed light into volatility within the city that contributed to the eventual dispute between Lewis and Bausch.
Several show outright disdain for the city manager, who left his position with the city on Jan. 26 after accepting a $365,000 settlement.
The records received by The Tribune on Friday are the first batch to be released by the city after The Tribune filed its lawsuit in March.
The lawsuit was propelled by a string of public records requests that went unfulfilled for months after Bausch 'explicitly refused' to follow the law, according to the city.
The requests covered texts and emails stored on Bausch's personal devices, including conversations leading up to City Council meetings for the last two years, conversations between Bausch and members of the group that allegedly conspired to oust Lewis and conversations referring to Lewis.
The Tribune made the requests in an effort to better understand the circumstances that led to Lewis' claim against the city.
Bausch searched his devices and turned the records over to the city on May 16, following a court order issued by Judge Michael Kelley. Kelley then ordered the city to provide an initial drop of documents to The Tribune by Friday.
He also submitted a signed declaration on May 30 attesting to the thoroughness of his search.
The city noted it did not withhold any records among the batch it released on Friday.
That leaves. more than 4,800 records for the city's lawyers to review, including texts off Bausch's personal phone. They are set to be delivered by June 16.
The majority of emails provided Friday refer to the city's now-repealed paid parking program.
Paid parking was introduced in Paso Robles in 2019, but it grew into a major trigger point after the City Council voted in November 2023 to change the parking rates.
While drivers previously got a free two hours of parking before being charged, the 2023 decision would have charged drivers $1 per hour from the time of their arrival, The Tribune reported at the time.
The outrage over the paid parking program ultimately led Templeton resident Gary Lehrer to send a cease-and-desist letter to the city, alleging the council violated the Brown Act when it voted to approve the rate changes.
The cease-and-desist letter resulted in a temporary pause on the parking program, and the council subsequently voted in May 2024 to repeal the program entirely, The Tribune reported.
While it was no secret that Bausch supported the push to do away with paid parking, emails provided Friday show he had a hand in writing the letter submitted by Lehrer, and helped review citizens' public comments before they were read into the record at council meetings.
The emails also revealed frustration among Paso Robles residents at the time and a sense of distrust in their elected officials — including Lewis.
A thread from December 2023 showed Lehrer and Bausch in the initial stages of planning a legal challenge to the city's parking program.
On Dec. 12, Lehrer emailed Bausch what appeared to be a transcript of the meeting at which the parking rate decision was made.
'I hope what you are looking for is in here,' Lehrer wrote.
Bausch responded: '95% sure, want to take another look at it. I also like the part where it is clarified that this motion only provides direction to staff. This is an AMAZING start. Thank you. It is proof we are on the right track. If we are serious about mounting a challenge to parking, I'd recommend pursuing a court worthy version of a transcript. Thoughts?'
Lehrer responded that he would look into getting a transcript ready for court and planned to speak at the next council meeting. Bausch then gave Lehrer directions on what to do with the transcript, and mentioned Lewis and Paso Robles Mayor John Hamon.
'Any logic in giving Hamon a heads up this is happening?' Bausch wrote. 'As mayor, he should be telling Ty what to do, not the other way around.'
Bausch also appeared to give Lehrer advice on a letter to the editor he intended to submit regarding the parking issue. Similarly, other threads showed Bausch apparently giving people feedback on public comments or other communications to the city about parking before they were submitted.
In a subsequent email, Lehrer said he wasn't sure about telling Hamon and asked Bausch if he thought the mayor was a strong leader.
'Well, I did at one point but I am beginning to think he needs some strong prompts,' Bausch responded.
Another email thread between the two showed that Lehrer sent Bausch a draft of the cease-and-desist letter on January 7, 2024.
To that message, Bausch responded, 'Gary, Received. Thank you for drafting this. First read looks good. Will print, reread and edit if-where necessary tomorrow.'
On Jan. 8, Lehrer responded, 'Here's the word doc, go ahead and edit it!'
Attached to that email was a draft of the cease-and-desist letter that was eventually sent to the city. There did not appear to be a subsequent emails showing any edits made by Bausch in this batch of records.
The allegation that the council violated public meeting law when it approved the parking change was also shared with Cal Coast News reporter Karen Velie by Bausch on Dec. 20, 2023. In that email, Bausch said the minutes from the meeting were 'being twisted and reinterpreted to fit a misappropriated narrative.'
'Why should anyone trust what the mayor, the City Council, the city manager or the city attorney tell us?' Bausch asked Velie.
A similar comment was made by Bausch in a July 17 email to former City Council candidate Linda George.
'Opportunity awaits,' Bausch wrote, linking a Cal Coast News article on paid parking. 'Just a thought but candidates and their managers might want to comment on why the current council chooses to protect the city manager, legal counsel, and paid parking advisers at the expense of taxpaying voters.'
'Receive and disseminated to the proper parties,' George responded. 'Thank you for that.'
Bausch responded: 'Choose your words wisely, sparingly. And please proofread very carefully. Thank you.'
Bausch, Velie, Lehrer and George were all accused in Lewis' claim or addendum documents of being involved in the effort to remove him from office. They all denied the allegations, or declined to comment.
Other parking-related emails also showed hostility toward Lewis.
On March 20, 2024, Park Cinemas owner John Roush — a known opponent to paid parking — forwarded Bausch an email thread between Roush and Lewis. It began with Lewis asking to meet with Roush and another individual named David to discuss issues with the parking referendum.
No meeting was ever set in stone, so Lewis detailed what he wanted to discuss in a later email to Roush and Lehrer. He said the city attorney identified potential problems with the referendum, including details that were out of compliance with elections code.
'Although the city is a neutral party in this process and cannot give legal advice, I felt an obligation to reach out and make you aware of potential areas of concern,' Lewis wrote. 'I realize home (sic) much time, effort and money the group is putting into the referendum effort and I don't want you caught flat-footed.'
The thread does not show Roush responding to Lewis — but it does show that he forwarded the conversation Bausch.
'FYI ONLY. Don't want him to know I sent to you. Hopefully, he'll bury himself,' Roush wrote.
The parking referendum ultimately gained around 2,400 signatures and was submitted to the city in April 2024 in hopes that it would be placed on the November 2024 ballot. Paso Robles rejected the referendum due to mistakes like not including the proper name and ordinance number.
The city ultimately rescinded the parking program on its own in response to the backlash.
Another notable instance of communication between Velie and Bausch included Velie sending Bausch a list of questions on May 8, 2024 — the day Bausch was set to appear on her KPRL radio show, 'Sound Off,' according to its website.
The list included questions about paid parking and the Paso Robles airport, including a few pointed questions at Hamon and Lewis.
'Did Hamon sound irritated?' one of the questions read.
'What did you think of Ty manipulating the council in his response regarding evidence of tickets paid?' said another.
'Why is the city manager not pushing paying back the public?'
Velie then transitioned into questions about the Paso Robles airport and, more specifically, Loyd's Aviation.
'Why do you think there is a lack of transparency? Do you know if Ty Lewis is personal friends with the current owner of Lloyds Aviation?' some of the questions read. 'Do you have concerns that Lloyds Aviation is being sold?'
The questions about Loyd's Aviation are notable because of an allegation in Lewis' claim that said Bausch accused Lewis of being personal friends with the owner and fixing the applicant process to favor him. Lewis denied the allegation.
Instead, the claim said, Bausch was the one who pressured Lewis not to allow the City Council ad hoc committee's recommendation to move forward. Bausch then accused Lewis of 'unethical behavior for personal gain,' the claim said. A similar comment had been made in the media.
Because KPRL's audio files are routinely deleted, it's unclear if that rumor was discussed on May 8 after Velie sent Bausch the questions. However, Bausch was scheduled to discuss the paid parking program and the airport that day, according to the website.
Additionally, Lewis made mention of the rumor just a few days later, an email previously obtained by The Tribune shows.
On May 14, Lewis asked Loyd's Aviation owner Ryan Crowl if his business was being sold, to which Crowl responded with a resounding no.
'I made this pretty clear in public comment at the second Ad Hoc committee meeting. Our company is NOT for sale. We are not and have never actively tried to sell it nor have we expressed a desire to anyone. I cannot say this more emphatically,' he wrote.
Lewis responded: 'I appreciate the clarification and transparency. The city is doing its best to maintain a level playing field. There is much misinformation circulating in the community and hearing it straight from the source is appreciated. I am confident Mr. Bausch and the other council members will accurately convey this to constituents during their future discussions.'
The email also included a post-script: 'PS - The other rumor circulating is that somehow we know each other and I am steering this process in your favor.'
Another pattern visible in the documents provided Friday was Bausch's habit of forwarding emails from his city account to his personal email address.
Several emails between Bausch and Velie or Lehrer were also titled 'private, confidential,' despite having no legal grounds for confidentiality, and then being shared by Bausch himself in response to the Public Records Act.
Some of the emails Bausch forwarded to himself were meeting minutes or agendas. Several show him forwarding city emails to his personal account, then using his personal account to share and discuss the forwarded message with someone else.
For example, on March 7, 2024, Bausch forwarded an email from Ray Katz to Lehrer asking if Katz should be added to the parking referendum committee, to which Lehrer responded 'had really bad experiences with Ray' and 'he just really irritates me.'
Bausch also forwarded the same email to Jan Albin, an opponent of paid parking. The email sent by Ray was the same email that prompted the March 8, 2024, Angela's Pastries meeting, records show, which Bausch recorded but refused to disclose despite The Tribune's Public Records Act request until Velie leaked the recording on her website.
In a Nov. 29, 2023, exchange, Bausch forwarded a conversation between his city email and Lewis to his personal account where he and Lewis discussed whether a parking marketing campaign was approved in a motion.
Bausch used his personal account to send the conversation to Lehrer and wrote, 'This might be interesting to discuss with Karen's guest tomorrow,' and wrote at the top of the message 'private, confidential.'
Clive Pinder, host of KVEC's 'Cease Fire' radio show, was also a recipient of several of Bausch's communications.
Pinder, who appeared to support the parking referendum in his communications with Bausch, later authored multiple columns in the Paso Robles Daily News hashing out Lewis' claim against the city and the ensuing drama. The columns received criticism from Velie, Lehrer, George and others named in Lewis' claim documents.
The columns were quietly retracted in January after the news site received legal threats on behalf of Velie, Pinder told The Tribune at the time.
On Jan. 29, 2024, Bausch forwarded a conversation about parking between him and Lewis from the city server to his personal email, and then shared that thread with Pinder, saying 'FYI.'
On Jan. 30, 2024, Pinder forwarded an email exchange between him, then-assistant city manager Chris Huot and Lewis to Bausch. In the thread, Huot and Lewis both attempted to clear up misinformation about the paid parking program to the limit they were allowed, since the complaints about the program were still under review at the time.
The thread shows that on Jan. 26, Huot denied the allegation that the city violated the Brown Act when it approved the parking changes, but said the inquiries were under review.
Pinder then sent Huot a series of clarifying questions, asking whether or not the city planned to suspend the parking program during the review, and if residents would receive refunds for the fees paid out if the program was indeed approved outside of the law.
Huot responded that he couldn't speculate to answer the questions due to the ongoing review. Pinder pushed Huot on the questions, to which Lewis took over the conversation and responded to several of Pinder's questions.
Lewis added: 'I understand, support and appreciate the need for transparency. With that said, the city needs to understand the legal landscape before responding to the various legal opinions offered by various opponents and news agencies. ... If the city erred, rest assured we will do the right thing and correct any missteps. Alternatively, if there were no errs, we will provide the legal basis for actions to date.'
Pinder forwarded the conversation to Bausch, who made a snarky response.
'What is an 'err'?' the Councilman wrote. 'Tomorrow, let us also discuss Ty's hypocrisy as to the Building & Planning Depts. (Could be your next story).'
Another thread shows the same email chain forwarded by Pinder, but Lehrer is also included.
In that thread, Bausch provided answers to the questions Pinder asked of the city, citing 'a very credible source.' In his answers, Bausch said the decision about refunding fines was unknown at the time, but then asserted that the city wouldn't provide refunds unless ordered to do so by a court.
Bausch then forwarded the exchange to Lehrer, who made comments about the city's chosen parking vendor. Bausch responded that the city and city attorney failed to hold its parking vendor to reasonable standards.
Bausch added: 'Let the chips now fall where they may. May retribution be swift and sure.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
20 minutes ago
- CNN
Catch up on the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial so far
The federal trial of the United States of America v. Sean 'Diddy' Combs has captured much of the world's attention in its first four weeks in session. The prosecution is continuing to present its case, where it is seeking to prove Combs and some in his inner circle constituted a criminal enterprise that used threats, violence, kidnapping and other means to coerce women into 'Freak Offs' with male escorts and to protect his image. Combs has pleaded not guilty to charges of racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. His defense has acknowledged Combs was violent but has questioned the motives of those testifying and has said the accusations fall short of the charges. If convicted on all counts, Combs could face up to life in prison. Here is what we've learned in testimony at this point in the trial, which is expected to continue on for several more weeks.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans and Economists at Odds Over Whether Megabill Will Spur Growth Boom
WASHINGTON—Republicans see a golden age of prosperity ahead, driven by the tax-and-spending megabill they are trying to push through Congress by July 4. Nonpartisan experts project far more modest effects, forecasting a slight near-term economic expansion and larger federal budget deficits. The growth debate is at the core of this summer's fiscal fight. Republicans are trying to focus public attention on growth—from tax cuts, deregulation and fossil-fuel production—and play down the Congressional Budget Office estimate that the bill would increase budget deficits by $2.4 trillion through 2034. The White House highlights growth to bolster congressional support, countering claims from Elon Musk and others that the package irresponsibly darkens America's fiscal picture. 'Sextortion' Scams Involving Apple Messages Ended in Tragedy for These Boys The U.S. Economy Is Headed Toward an Uncomfortable Summer I Got Burned by the 401(k) 'Hierarchy Trap' Test Yourself Against These Teen Personal-Finance Whizzes, Round 2 Republicans and outside economists agree on the basic direction: tax cuts increase consumer spending and business investment, accelerating short-term growth. But they differ vastly on how large and meaningful that jump would be. The bill, according to public- and private-sector economists, would fall far short of Republicans' hoped-for boom. 'We would expect some dynamic revenue, some revenue feedback in that larger economy,' said Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation, which favors lower tax rates and a simpler system. 'But it wouldn't come close to paying for itself.' President Trump said in a social-media post last month that the U.S. annual growth rate would triple or even quintuple the 1.8% in CBO's January forecast, which doesn't incorporate the effects of any GOP policies. Since 2005, real U.S. gross domestic product growth hit or exceeded 3% twice: in 2018 after the 2017 tax cuts, and in 2021 during the recovery from the pandemic. House Republicans assume a 2.6% growth rate, yielding enough revenue to cover the megabill's deficits. 'The economy is going to explode in capital formation. Jobs will increase. Wages will increase,' Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R., Idaho) said after meeting with Trump last week. 'We're going to see the kind of growth and strength that this country wants.' Broadly, economists across the political spectrum discount elected officials' predictions. Tax Foundation: The conservative-leaning group estimates that the bill would boost long-term GDP by 0.8%, generating enough revenue to cover about one-third of its costs. That is compared with doing nothing and letting tax cuts expire Dec. 31. The gain is like adding an average of 0.1 percentage point to the annual growth rate; reaching 3% would require much larger changes, Watson said. Penn Wharton: Its budget model projects a 0.4% increase in GDP over the first decade. That is equivalent to raising the annual growth rate to 1.85% from 1.8%. 'Basically, I would call this flat,' said Kent Smetters, who runs the Penn model. 'We all know this is all going to get swamped by all the randomness.' Joint Committee on Taxation: The nonpartisan congressional scorekeeper projected that the bill's tax components would produce short-run growth through increased labor supply and capital stock. That would be counteracted by rising budget deficits, with a net effect of taking 1.83% annual growth to 1.86%. JCT estimates that the bill's tax provisions would cover less than 3% of their costs with revenue from economic growth. Yale Budget Lab: The think tank says the bill would bump the growth rate roughly to 2% from 1.8% through 2027, before the drag of federal debt weakens and reverses that effect. Those all contrast with the view of the White House's Council of Economic Advisers, which has a far rosier scenario. It projects a 4.2% to 5.2% increase in short-term GDP and a long-term gain of 2.9% to 3.5%. That gain would be three to four times the Tax Foundation estimate, which itself is larger than Penn Wharton, Yale or JCT. Economists caution that tax policy can't move the needle much in the U.S. economy, particularly given higher costs and uncertainty caused by tariffs. Still, putting money in taxpayers' pockets could increase demand for goods and services. Lower business taxes—especially faster write-offs for equipment and factories—encourage investment and have the biggest bang for the buck. Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran said growth after 2017 demonstrates that the Republican formula can work. The economy and incomes grew solidly in 2018 and 2019 before the Covid-19 pandemic scrambled everything. 'When Americans elected President Trump, they did so knowing that he was a pro-growth president,' Miran said. 'The bill is going to create a vibrant, dynamic economy.' Miran added that federal taxes as a share of GDP was barely unchanged from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2024. According to CBO, revenue was 17.3% of GDP in 2017 and 17.1% in 2024. 'There was no long-term hole in revenues,' Miran said. But before the tax cuts passed, CBO forecast revenue increasing to 18.3% in 2024, and the law changed that trajectory. One of the most thorough academic studies found that the 2017 law increased domestic business investment but didn't come close to paying for itself. The Tax Foundation's Watson said policymakers should expect a more muted response from extending the 2017 tax cuts than from creating them. The bill includes new and revived business incentives but schedules them to expire. 'It's pro-growth,' Watson said. 'The more you add in some of these gimmicks and temporary changes, the more watered-down it gets.' Senators including James Lankford (R., Okla.) and Steve Daines (R., Mont.) are seeking changes to encourage growth. They are particularly focused on making permanent some business-tax provisions such as immediate deductions for equipment purchases. 'If you have an expiration, you just don't get predictability,' Lankford said. Capital-investment incentives would be muted because tariff uncertainty complicates business planning, said Seth Carpenter, global chief economist at Morgan Stanley, which estimates that the bill would boost growth in 2026 before turning neutral and then negative. Some projects might make sense with high tariffs but not lower ones. Even with the bill's new deduction for factory expenses, without tariff certainty, Carpenter said, 'I don't think you're going to be in any sort of hurry to start breaking ground.' Kimberly Clausing, a former Biden administration economist now at the University of California, Los Angeles, said she worries about the drag from budget deficits. 'If they failed,' she said, 'I actually think that would be the best possible macroeconomic outcome.' Write to Richard Rubin at How Hydrogen, the Fuel of the Future, Got Bogged Down in the Bayou Chinese-Owned Company Halts Work on Factory to Make Batteries in U.S. It's the Republicans, Not Musk, Who Are Serious About Cutting Spending Trump's New Steel Tariffs Look Vulnerable to a Courtroom Challenge Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lt. Gov. Delgado pitches fundamental change as he challenges his boss for governor
Jun. 7—SCHENECTADY — Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado is pitching himself as a transformative leader who will make fundamental changes to how New York operates and will prioritize issues, blaming "current leaders" — his boss Gov. Kathleen C. Hochul — for failing to effectively respond to the core issues of our time. On Saturday, in a humid half-court YMCA gymnasium to a crowd of about 150 people in his hometown, Delgado spoke of family, of loyalty, of his commitment to representing the people of New York above all, and batted away criticism that he's proven a disloyal No. 2 to Hochul. "Some folks will talk about this idea of loyalty, since I announced my run for governor, loyalty," he said. "But I have to ask, loyal to who? Loyal to what?" "Loyalty to a broken system is why we're in this mess to begin with," he continued. "Don't talk to me about loyalty unless it's loyalty to the people." Delgado didn't name Hochul outright in his speech, but derided many of the policies the Hochul administration has overseen as fundamentally out of touch with good governance. "All New Yorkers, every single New Yorker, deserves better leadership," he said. He criticized programs that funnel public, taxpayer money into private enterprises, both to achieve economic growth and to deliver public benefits like healthcare and public housing. He questioned the financial viability of such programs, which he said have not done much to improve quality of life or boost economic performance. He said New York is the nation's third-largest economy, and would be eighth in the world if identified as its own nation — and with a $254 billion public state budget for the coming year. "Where is the money going?" he asked his supporters on Saturday. Delgado laid out a number of broad policy proposals — just a first look, he said. He called for efforts to address poverty, taking back public housing programs and increasing the income cap to qualify for New York's "Essential Plan" publicly-subsidized health insurance plan. He called for universal pre-school across the state and an increase in the statewide minimum wage "for everyone." He said the state should stand up it's own rental assistance programs, and make efforts to reach the estimated seven out of 10 eligible people who don't take advantage of that and other public benefit programs. He also called for universal childcare beyond universal pre-school as well, and said the state should establish a taxpayer-funded account to pay extra money to childcare workers as well. But when asked if he supported the extra spending that would come with those programs, Delgado said he wasn't backing the bills that currently exist in the state legislature that would enact many of these programs. "What I'm laying out is a vision," he said to gathered reporters after the campaign event. "Then you work with the legislative body to effectuate the vision and figure out what the best way forward is to get there. Delgado's message is one of change, of a departure from the way Hochul and recent governors before her have done things — and he said he has not been a significant part of that governance despite being the No. 2 most senior elected official in the state since 2022, when Hochul appointed him to replace then-Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin. "I've tried very hard to communicate all these things within the administration, I've tried to push to make sure that we take bolder steps," he said. "Now listen, to do that you have to be part of the decision-making process, right. To do that, you have to be included." He said he was not included in that process, despite promises from Hochul before he was appointed that she would take a different approach to governing and would include the lieutenant in more decisions. That's not historically how the job works — for years, the lieutenant governor position has been varying degrees of thankless and responsibility-free. The lieutenant is no longer even regularly handed control of state government when the governor leaves the state, thanks to modern communications technology and the governor's private planes and helicopters. Delgado broke with Hochul nearly a year ago — first by calling for President Joseph R. Biden to step aside from his reelection campaign after his poor debate performance in June of 2024, then on further and further issues. After telling reporters in a rare Capitol news conference that he was working toward a better relationship with the governor, Delgado announced he would step aside and not run for reelection with Hochul. She responded by stripping him of everything but the most basic essentials for his office — taking back his downstate and Capitol second floor office space, a significant amount of his staff, digital devices, executive email and vehicles. Delgado has been left with a skeleton crew for official staff and a rarely-used office off of the state Senate chambers mostly used for ceremonial purposes in typical times. She also took all the duties and initiatives she's assigned to him and his team — a program to boost civic engagement and any assignments to represent the Governor's office at events across the state. All that remains is his constitutional duty to preside over the Senate — another rarely used ceremonial role almost always delegated to the Senate Majority Leader by assigning them as President Pro Tempore. Delgado hasn't done that since the first day of session in January. Delgado has maintained for months, since he started to break with the governor, that his real job is to "get out there and connect with people," a phrase he's repeated often including on Saturday. He, in his capacity as Lieutenant, has held quasi-campaign rallies across the state framed as town hall events, meeting with those in the community who care to show up. Many of those events were filmed and cut together for his campaign announcement video. "As lieutenant governor, I can't control when somebody decides to take a look at my staff, I can't control someone taking my phone, I can't control that," he said. "What I can control is my connection to New Yorkers, and I'm going to continue to lean in on my connection to New Yorkers. New Yorkers, who, by the way, who independently elected me to serve in this capacity." Delgado went on to say that he didn't see that same approach from Hochul — and that's what made him decide to run against her. "I wasn't seeing the plan, on top of that you don't have visibility to where we're going, you don't know exactly what the plan is, what the vision is, this feels more reactive, that's the piece I want to make sure that I change," he said. Delgado's path to victory is far from simple — Hochul has the incumbency advantage, years of fundraising, the support of the state Democratic party and polls better than Delgado in statewide rankings. Shortly after Delgado dropped his announcement video on June 2, a coordinated effort by the state party to shore up local Democratic support resulted with over 40 out of 64 local county Democratic chairs endorsing Hochul. On Friday, three leading Schenectady County Democrats announced they're backing Hochul. Hochul's campaign declined to comment on the lieutenant governor's criticism, or his candidacy in general, but pointed to a handful of news reports detailing those county and local endorsements of her, plus a New York Post article from Saturday with the headline "'No Show' Delgado: NY's lieutenant governor does little to earn $220k paycheck, records show." But Delgado isn't without his support — a handful of Democratic chairs, including from Greene and Otsego counties were at his event on Saturday. They appeared in their personal capacities — many county committees don't endorse before a primary, and others haven't had meetings to decide if they want to endorse, and who to endorse, yet. Greene County Chair Lori Torgerson said her county committee hasn't met yet, but said that for her personally, Delgado represents a good leader with a clear vision. "Antonio has integrity, everything he said today I believe he delivers on, and in my experience he has never been a leader who says one thing and does another," she said. Otsego County chair Caitlin Ogden said her committee generally doesn't endorse a candidate if there's a primary, but said that since Delgado's time in Congress he's demonstrated an ability to flip Republican and Trump-loyal voters and could be the best pick to stop the shift to the right the electorate has demonstrated in recent elections "I feel that he's the one whose got a proven track record doing that, and he has a really good shot," she said.
