logo
Finding hope this Earth Day: innovations and recoveries in climate action

Finding hope this Earth Day: innovations and recoveries in climate action

IOL News24-04-2025

Polar bear fur could help scientists determine how to replace human-made fibers often treated with toxic 'forever chemicals
Image: Bonnie Jo Mount/The Washington Post
Yes, the headlines are bleak. Yes, scientists are sounding the alarm. Yes, a growing pile of studies warn that the world is 'on the brink of irreversible climate disaster,' as a recent 'State of the Climate' report put it.
It's easy to feel like the planet is on fire - because, well, sometimes it literally is.
But even amid the floods, droughts and devastating forecasts, it's not all doom: Innovators are reimagining how we power our lives, nature is pulling off surprising comebacks, cities are cleaning their air, and nations are opening their wallets.
This Earth Day, take a break from the doomscrolling. Here are five reasons to hope - and maybe even feel a flicker of optimism. New technology and clean-energy breakthroughs
The future isn't just solar panels and wind turbines anymore. Innovations that sound like they're pulled from a sci-fi script are already hitting streets, factories and even seas.
In Stockholm, the world's first electric flying ferry is now transporting commuters across the water - gliding above the surface to reduce drag, slash emissions and cut commute times in half. New electric-vehicle batteries made with abundant iron, instead of expensive nickel or cobalt, are making EVs cheaper, safer and less flammable. Some companies are scaling up 'flow batteries,' refrigerator-size units that store renewable energy and could eventually replace gas and coal as reliable backup power.
Even concrete - one of the most polluting materials on Earth - is getting a green makeover, with start-ups using everything from carbon-infused mixes to construction waste to lower emissions. And for those facing longer wildfire seasons, an $85 DIY air purifier built from a box fan and a furnace filter is proving surprisingly effective at scrubbing indoor air.
None of this on its own solves for climate change. But it's the kind of forward momentum that, multiplied at scale, could help reshape the energy economy.
Nature's unexpected tools to fight climate change
Not all climate solutions are made by people. Some are hiding in plain sight - buried in rocks, growing in the ocean or clinging to the fur of a polar bear.
Scientists have found a way to supercharge ordinary rocks to trap carbon pollution. When heated to extreme temperatures, common minerals like olivine transform into materials that can soak up carbon dioxide from the air and transfer it deep into Earth's oceans - speeding up a natural geological process that would otherwise take millennia.
In the Arctic, researchers have turned their attention to polar bear fur, which repels water and ice so efficiently that it's inspiring new materials that could one day replace the advanced human-made fibers often treated with toxic 'forever chemicals.' And in Greenland, teams are harvesting glacial 'rock flour' - fine sediment ground by ancient ice - to absorb carbon.
Then there's seaweed - a fast-growing, carbon-hungry crop that could soon fertilize soil, replace plastic and fuel cars and power grids. In the Caribbean, where sargassum invasions are overwhelming beaches, entrepreneurs are racing to turn a problem into a planet-friendly product.
They're not silver bullets. But these natural systems could become some of the most powerful - and least invasive - climate tools we have. Species bouncing back
Not every climate headline ends in extinction. Around the world, animals once written off are making slow, determined comebacks - with help from scientists, conservationists and communities.
Sea turtles, for one, are slowly swimming back from the brink. A sweeping global survey published this month found that more than half of the world's populations are showing signs of recovery, thanks to decades of conservation work and legal protections.
In Brazil's Cerrado grassland, the great-billed seed finch has returned after more than 50 years. Nearly driven out of existence by the illegal pet trade, the bird species is breeding and nesting in the wild after conservationists released more than 300 captive-bred birds since 2018, conservation news outlet Mongabay reported.
Further south in Brazil, giant anteaters were recently spotted in the state of Rio Grande do Sul for the first time in more than 130 years. Researchers see the sightings as a hopeful sign that rewilding efforts in nearby Argentina - where the species has been gradually reintroduced since 2007 - are beginning to pay off.
They're not alone. The Iberian lynx, once down to a few dozen individuals, now roams Spain and Portugal in growing numbers. The scimitar-horned oryx, declared extinct in the wild, has returned to the African Sahel. The mountain chicken frog - yes, that's a real name - is hopping its way back in Dominica. And the greater one-horned rhino is making a slow but steady return in Nepal and India.
None of these species are out of the woods yet. But their rebound is a reminder that with time, funding and fierce commitment, nature can heal - sometimes faster than we expect. Big moves to reduce pollution
From sweeping legislation to car-free streets, some cities and states are taking aggressive - and effective - steps to clean up.
In Paris, what started as a fight against traffic has turned into a blueprint for cleaner air. Since 1990, the city has cut car use by about 45 percent, Bloomberg reported. Pollution levels dropped alongside it: Fine particulate matter is down 55 percent, and nitrogen dioxide - a pollutant linked to asthma, heart disease and lung cancer - has fallen by half.
The changes aren't just in the air. Paris has ripped out 50,000 parking spots, turned the banks of the Seine into car-free promenades, banned most traffic from the Rue de Rivoli and built miles of new bike lanes. Voters recently approved turning 500 more streets over to pedestrians. And if you drive an SUV? Expect to pay triple to park.
Two decades ago, pollution maps glowed red across the city. Now, just a few major roads light up.
In California, the chemical warning labels on coffee cups, parking garages and just about everything in between might actually be working - and encouraging manufacturers to reduce their products' toxic footprint.
Under Proposition 65, companies have to warn consumers if their products contain certain harmful chemicals. Rather than slap on a scary label - or risk a lawsuit - many manufacturers are quietly reformulating instead.
A recent study found that 78 percent of interviewed businesses had changed their product ingredients to avoid the label. The result? A reduction in the use of chemicals linked to cancer, birth defects and reproductive harm in everyday items like furniture, food packaging and personal care products. Countries are mobilizing
Under President Donald Trump, the United States is withdrawing from the Paris climate accord as well as two global programs it had once deemed critical to reining in fossil fuels and the dealing with the consequences of climate change. Other countries have been stepping up. At COP29 - the latest United Nations climate summit - nearly 200 countries agreed to dramatically scale up financial support for developing nations facing the worst of the climate crisis. The deal calls for at least $300 billion a year by 2035 to help vulnerable countries adapt to rising seas, extreme heat and other growing threats.
At COP16, the U.N. biodiversity conference, in October, negotiators struck a parallel deal to protect nature itself. Countries committed to investing $200 billion annually in preserving ecosystems and preventing species loss - a key step toward delivering on a global goal to protect 30 percent of the planet's land and water by 2030.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We finally may be able to rid the world of mosquitoes. But should we?
We finally may be able to rid the world of mosquitoes. But should we?

IOL News

time2 days ago

  • IOL News

We finally may be able to rid the world of mosquitoes. But should we?

Women and children wait in line for malaria medication at a health center in Nametil, Mozambique, in 2023. Image: Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post Dino Grandoni They buzz, they bite, and they cause some of the deadliest diseases known to humanity. Mosquitoes are perhaps the planet's most universally reviled animals. If we could zap them off the face of the Earth, should we? The question is no longer hypothetical. In recent years, scientists have devised powerful genetic tools that may be able to eradicate mosquitoes and other pests once and for all. Now, some doctors and scientists say it is time to take the extraordinary step of unleashing gene editing to suppress mosquitoes and avoid human suffering from malaria, dengue, West Nile virus and other serious diseases. 'There are so many lives at stake with malaria that we want to make sure that this technology could be used in the near future,' said Alekos Simoni, a molecular biologist with Target Malaria, a project aiming to target vector mosquitoes in sub-Saharan Africa. Yet the development of this technology also raises a profound ethical question: When, if ever, is it okay to intentionally drive a species out of existence? Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Even the famed naturalist EO Wilson once said: 'I would gladly throw the switch and be the executioner myself' for malaria-carrying mosquitoes. But some researchers and ethicists warn it may be too dangerous to tinker with the underpinnings of life itself. Even irritating, itty-bitty mosquitoes, they say, may have enough inherent value to keep around. Simoni and his colleagues are seeking to diminish populations of mosquitoes in the Anopheles gambiae complex that are responsible for spreading malaria. Image: Supplied How to exterminate mosquitoes Target Malaria is one of the most ambitious mosquito suppression efforts in the works. Simoni and his colleagues are seeking to diminish populations of mosquitoes in the Anopheles gambiae complex that are responsible for spreading the deadly disease. In their labs, the scientists have introduced a gene mutation that causes female mosquito offspring to hatch without functional ovaries, rendering them infertile. Male mosquito offspring can carry the gene but remain physically unaffected. The concept is that when female mosquitoes inherit the gene from both their mother and father, they will go on to die without producing offspring. Meanwhile, when males and females carrying just one copy of the gene mate with wild mosquitoes, they will spread the gene further until no fertile females are left - and the population crashes. Simoni said he hopes Target Malaria can move beyond the lab and deploy some of the genetically modified mosquitoes in their natural habitats within the next five years. The nonprofit research consortium gets its core funding from the Gates Foundation, backed by Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, and Open Philanthropy, backed by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and his wife, Cari Tuna. 'We believe that this technology can really be transformative,' Simoni said. At the heart of Target Malaria's work is a powerful genetic tool called a gene drive. Under the normal rules of inheritance, a parent has a 50-50 chance of passing a particular gene on to an offspring. But by adding special genetic machinery - dubbed a gene drive - to segments of DNA, scientists can rig the coin flip and ensure a gene is included in an animal's eggs and sperm, nearly guaranteeing it will be passed along. Over successive generations, gene drives can cause a trait to spread across an entire species's population, even if that gene doesn't benefit the organism. In that way, gene drives do something remarkable: They allow humans to override Charles Darwin's rules for natural selection, which normally prods populations of plants and animals to adapt to their environment over time. 'Technology is presenting new options to us,' said Christopher Preston, a University of Montana environmental philosopher. 'We might've been able to make a species go extinct 150 years ago by harpooning it too much or shooting it out of the sky. But today, we have different options, and extinction could be completed or could be started in a lab.' Even naturalist EO Wilson once said: 'I would gladly throw the switch and be the executioner myself', referring to malaria carrying mosquitoes. Image: File How far should we go in eradicating mosquitoes? When so many wildlife conservationists are trying to save plants and animals from disappearing, the mosquito is one of the few creatures that people argue is actually worthy of extinction. Forget about tigers or bears; it's the tiny mosquito that is the deadliest animal on Earth. The human misery caused by malaria is undeniable. Nearly 600,000 people died of the disease in 2023, according to the World Health Organization, with the majority of cases in Africa. On the continent, the death toll is akin to 'crashing two Boeing 747s into Kilimanjaro' every day, said Paul Ndebele, a bioethicist at George Washington University. For gene-drive advocates, making the case for releasing genetically modified mosquitoes in nations such as Burkina Faso or Uganda is straightforward. On the continent, the death toll is akin to 'crashing two Boeing 747s into Kilimanjaro' every day, said Paul Ndebele, a bioethicist at George Washington University and UKZN graduate. Image: File 'This is not a difficult audience, because these are people that are living in an area where children are dying,' said Krystal Birungi, an entomologist for Target Malaria in Uganda, though she added that she sometimes has to fight misinformation, such as the false idea that bites from genetically modified mosquitoes can make people sterile. But recently, the Hastings Center for Bioethics, a research institute in New York, and Arizona State University brought together a group of bioethicists to discuss the potential pitfalls of intentionally trying to drive a species to extinction. In a policy paper published in the journal Science last month, the group concluded that 'deliberate full extinction might occasionally be acceptable, but only extremely rarely.' A compelling candidate for total eradication, according to the bioethicists, is the New World screwworm. This parasitic fly, which lays eggs in wounds and eats the flesh of both humans and livestock, appears to play little role in ecosystems. Infections are difficult to treat and can lead to slow and painful deaths. Yet it may be too risky, they say, to use gene drives on invasive rodents on remote Pacific islands where they decimate native birds, given the nonzero chance of a gene-edited rat or mouse jumping ship to the mainland and spreading across a continent. 'Even at a microbial level, it became plain in our conversations, we are not in favor of remaking the world to suit human desires,' said Gregory Kaebnick, a senior research scholar at the institute. It's unclear how important malaria-carrying mosquitoes are to broader ecosystems. Little research has been done to figure out whether frogs or other animals that eat the insects would be able to find their meals elsewhere. Scientists are hotly debating whether a broader 'insect apocalypse' is underway in many parts of the world, which may imperil other creatures that depend on them for food and pollination. 'The eradication of the mosquito through a genetic technology would have the potential to create global eradication in a way that just felt a little risky,' said Preston, who contributed with Ndebele to the discussion published in Science. Researchers said, geneticists should be able to use gene editing, vaccines and other tools to target not the mosquito itself, but the single-celled Plasmodium parasite that is responsible for malaria. Image: File Instead, the authors said, geneticists should be able to use gene editing, vaccines and other tools to target not the mosquito itself, but the single-celled Plasmodium parasite that is responsible for malaria. That invisible microorganism - which a mosquito transfers from its saliva to a person's blood when it bites - is the real culprit. 'You can get rid of malaria without actually getting rid of the mosquito,' Kaebnick said. He added that, at a time when the Trump administration talks cavalierly about animals going extinct, intentional extinction should be an option for only 'particularly horrific species.' But Ndebele, who is from Zimbabwe, noted that most of the people opposed to the elimination of the mosquitoes 'are not based in Africa.' Ndebele has intimate experience with malaria; he once had to rush his sick son to a hospital after the disease manifested as a hallucinatory episode. 'We're just in panic mode,' he recalled. 'You can just imagine - we're not sure what's happening with this young guy.' Still, Ndebele and his colleagues expressed caution about using gene-drive technology. Even if people were to agree to rid the globe of every mosquito - not just Anopheles gambiae but also ones that transmit other diseases or merely bite and irritate - it would be a 'herculean undertaking,' according to Kaebnick. There are more than 3,500 known species, each potentially requiring its own specially designed gene drive. And there is no guarantee a gene drive would wipe out a population as intended. Simoni, the gene-drive researcher, agreed that there are limits to what the technology can do. His team's modeling suggests it would suppress malaria-carrying mosquitoes only locally without outright eliminating them. Mosquitoes have been 'around for hundreds of millions of years,' he said. 'It's a very difficult species to eliminate.'

Oceans feel the heat from human climate pollution
Oceans feel the heat from human climate pollution

eNCA

time5 days ago

  • eNCA

Oceans feel the heat from human climate pollution

PARIS - Oceans have absorbed the vast majority of the warming caused by burning fossil fuels and shielded societies from the full impact of greenhouse gas emissions. But this crucial ally has developed alarming symptoms of stress -- heatwaves, loss of marine life, rising sea levels, falling oxygen levels and acidification caused by the uptake of excess carbon dioxide. These effects risk not just the health of the ocean but the entire planet. - Heating up - By absorbing more than 90 percent of the excess heat trapped in the atmosphere by greenhouse gases, "oceans are warming faster and faster", said Angelique Melet, an oceanographer at the European Mercator Ocean monitor. The UN's IPCC climate expert panel has said the rate of ocean warming -- and therefore its heat uptake -- has more than doubled since 1993. Average sea surface temperatures reached new records in 2023 and 2024. Despite a respite at the start of 2025, temperatures remain at historic highs, according to data from the Europe Union's Copernicus climate monitor. The Mediterranean has set a new temperature record in each of the past three years and is one of the basins most affected, along with the North Atlantic and Arctic oceans, said Thibault Guinaldo, of France's CEMS research centre. Marine heatwaves have doubled in frequency, become longer-lasting and more intense, and affect a wider area, the IPCC said in its special oceans report. Warmer seas can make storms more violent, feeding them with heat and evaporated water. The heating water can also be devastating for species, especially corals and seagrass beds, which are unable to migrate. For corals, between 70 percent and 90 percent are expected to be lost this century if the world reaches 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) of warming compared to pre-industrial levels. Scientists expect that threshold -- the more ambitious goal of the Paris climate deal -- to be breached in the early 2030s or even before. - Relentless rise - When a liquid or gas warms up, it expands and takes up more space. In the case of the oceans, this thermal expansion combines with the slow but irreversible melting of the world's ice caps and mountain glaciers to lift the world's seas. The pace at which global oceans are rising has doubled in three decades and if current trends continue, it will double again by 2100 to about one centimetre per year, according to recent research. Around 230 million people worldwide live less than a metre above sea level, vulnerable to increasing threats from floods and storms. "Ocean warming, like sea-level rise, has become an inescapable process on the scale of our lives, but also over several centuries," said Melet. "But if we reduce greenhouse gas emissions, we will reduce the rate and magnitude of the damage, and gain time for adaptation". - More acidity, less oxygen - The ocean not only stores heat, it has also taken up 20 to 30 percent of all humans' carbon dioxide emissions since the 1980s, according to the IPCC, causing the waters to become more acidic. Acidification weakens corals and makes it harder for shellfish and the skeletons of crustaceans and certain plankton to calcify. "Another key indicator is oxygen concentration, which is obviously important for marine life," said Melet. Oxygen loss is due to a complex set of causes, including those linked to warming waters. - Reduced sea ice - Combined Arctic and Antarctic sea ice cover -- frozen ocean water that floats on the surface -- plunged to a record low in mid-February, more than a million square miles below the pre-2010 average. This becomes a vicious circle, with less sea ice allowing more solar energy to reach and warm the water, leading to more ice melting. This feeds the phenomenon of "polar amplification" that makes global warming faster and more intense at the poles, said Guinaldo.

The surprising climate power of penguin poo
The surprising climate power of penguin poo

eNCA

time25-05-2025

  • eNCA

The surprising climate power of penguin poo

WASHINGTON - Antarctica's icy wilderness is warming rapidly under the weight of human-driven climate change, yet a new study points to an unlikely ally in the fight to keep the continent cool: penguin poo. Published in Communications Earth & Environment, the research shows that ammonia wafting off penguin guano seeds extra cloud cover above coastal Antarctica, likely blocking sunlight and nudging temperatures down. Lead author Matthew Boyer, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Helsinki, told AFP that lab studies had long shown gaseous ammonia can help form clouds. But "to actually quantify this process and to see its influence in Antarctica hasn't been done," he said. Antarctica is an ideal natural laboratory. With virtually no human pollution and scant vegetation -- both alternative sources of cloud-forming gases -- penguin colonies dominate as ammonia emitters. The birds' future, however, is under threat. Shrinking sea ice disrupts their nesting, feeding and predator-avoidance routines -- making it all the more urgent to understand their broader ecological role. Along with other seabirds such as Imperial Shags, penguins expel large amounts of ammonia through droppings, an acrid cocktail of feces and urine released via their multi-purpose cloacas. When that ammonia mixes with sulfur-bearing gases from phytoplankton -- the microscopic algae that bloom in the surrounding ocean -- it boosts the formation of tiny aerosol particles that grow into clouds. To capture the effect in the real world, Boyer and teammates set up instruments at Argentina's Marambio Base on Seymour Island, off the northern tip of the Antarctic Peninsula. Over three summer months -- when penguin colonies are bustling and phytoplankton photosynthesis peaks -- they monitored wind direction, ammonia levels and newly minted aerosols. When the breeze blew from a 60,000-strong Adelie penguin colony eight kilometres away, atmospheric ammonia spiked to 13.5 parts per billion -- about a thousand times the background level. For over a month after the birds had departed on their annual migration, concentrations stayed roughly 100 times higher, with the guano-soaked ground acting as a slow-release fertiliser. Particle counters told the same story: cloud-seeding aerosols surged whenever air masses arrived from the colony, at times thick enough to generate a dense fog. Chemical fingerprints in the particles pointed back to penguin-derived ammonia. - Penguin-plankton partnership - Boyer calls it a "synergistic process" between penguins and phytoplankton that supercharges aerosol production in the region. "We provide evidence that declining penguin populations could cause a positive climate-warming feedback in the summertime Antarctic atmosphere," the authors write -- though Boyer emphasised that this remains a hypothesis, not a confirmed outcome. Globally, clouds have a net cooling effect by reflecting solar radiation back into space. Based on Arctic modelling of seabird emissions, the team believes a similar mechanism is likely at play in Antarctica. But the impact also depends on what's beneath the clouds. Ice sheets and glaciers also reflect much of the Sun's energy, so extra cloud cover over these bright surfaces could trap infrared heat instead -- meaning the overall effect hinges on where the clouds form and drift. Still, the findings highlight the profound interconnections between life and the atmosphere -- from the Great Oxygenation Event driven by photosynthesising microbes billions of years ago to penguins influencing cloud cover today. "This is just another example of this deep connection between the ecosystem and atmospheric processes, and why we should care about biodiversity and conservation," Boyer said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store