Home Office accused of ‘racist crackdown' on Nigerians after denial of visit visa
The Home Office has been accused of a 'racist crackdown on Nigerians' after refusing a visa to a man who runs one of the west African country's top security firms for a holiday to see his family.
Samuel Onyekachi Ibeawuchi runs BKay Security Ltd, which provides close protection for high-profile people in Nigeria and abroad. He and his wife, a successful businesswoman, had applied to come to the UK with their 18-month-old child for three weeks in the summer so they could spend time with his sister, Hope Ibeawuchi-Beales, and her husband, Nick Beales, who is head of campaigning at Ramfel, which supports vulnerable migrants.
Despite Ibeawuchi-Beales and Beales undertaking to support the family during their trip, a Home Office official turned down the visit visa application. The refusal letter states: 'This sponsorship does not satisfy me of your own intention to leave the UK on completion of your visit.'
It adds that future visits are also likely to be refused. Officials also queried how Ibeawuchi, who provided the Home Office with his business registration certificate, derives an income from his business as a self-employed person.
BKay Security has provided services to the former Nigerian president Goodluck Jonathan, senior UK and US politicians, celebrities and international footballers including Alex Iwobi, the former Arsenal and Everton player who currently plays for Fulham and Nigeria.
It was reported last month that the government was planning to clamp down on visa applications for people from several countries, including Nigeria. Beales said: 'There's no doubt that the UK government refused these visa applications as part of their overtly racist crackdown on Nigerians.
'Samuel and his wife both run successful businesses in Nigeria and have no interest in remaining here after visiting my family, and had we applied for their visas a year ago I have no doubt they'd have been granted. It sadly says a lot though when the Labour party is even more hostile to families such as ours than their Conservative predecessors.'
Ibeawuchi said he was very disappointed that the Home Office was barring him and his family from coming to the UK. 'I feel very bad that the Home Office refused us. I really wanted to take my family to the UK for a visit and we submitted all the necessary documents and photos of the two families spending time together.
'We do not want to stay in the UK, just to come here to visit our family for three weeks.'
Ibeawuchi-Beales said: 'Our two kids were so excited for their little cousin, aunty and uncle to visit and had already planned all the things they wanted to show them in London. How do we explain to them that the UK government won't let their family visit them because they've decided to target Nigerians like their mother?
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'I've previously sponsored several family members and all have come and gone without any problems. My brother would without question not stay here after his family holiday. I don't believe the invite letter we provided to the Home Office was even read by the person who refused the applications.'
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'Each application is assessed on its individual merits, based strictly on the evidence provided and in accordance with detailed guidance for decision-makers. If an application is refused, the reasons are clearly explained.'
According to Home Office sources those whose visit visas have been refused can reapply addressing the concerns in the refusal notice. Financial circumstances were one of the factors considered before refusing the Ibeawuchi family's visa.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rayner faces Labour backbench call to ‘smash' existing housebuilding model
Angela Rayner could face a backbench rebellion from MPs demanding a 'progressive alternative to our planning system'. Labour's Chris Hinchliff has proposed a suite of changes to the Government's flagship Planning and Infrastructure Bill, part of his party's drive to build 1.5 million homes in England by 2029. Mr Hinchliff has proposed arming town halls with the power to block developers' housebuilding plans, if they have failed to finish their previous projects. He has also suggested housebuilding objectors should be able to appeal against green-lit large developments, if they are not on sites which a council has set aside for building, and put forward a new duty for authorities to protect chalk streams from 'pollution, abstraction, encroachment and other forms of environmental damage'. Mr Hinchliff has told the PA news agency he does not 'want to rebel' but said he would be prepared to trigger a vote over his proposals. He added his ambition was for 'a progressive alternative to our planning system and the developer-led profit-motivated model that we have at the moment'. The North East Hertfordshire MP said: 'Frankly, to deliver the genuinely affordable housing that we need for communities like those I represent, we just have to smash that model. 'So, what I'm setting out is a set of proposals that would focus on delivering the genuinely affordable homes that we need, empowering local communities and councils to have a driving say over what happens in the local area, and also securing genuine protection for the environment going forwards.' Mr Hinchliff warned that the current system results in 'speculative' applications on land which falls outside of councils' local housebuilding strategies, 'putting significant pressure on inadequate local infrastructure'. In his constituency, which lies between London and Cambridge, 'the properties that are being built are not there to meet local need', Mr Hinchliff said, but were instead 'there to be sold for the maximum profit the developer can make'. Asked whether his proposals chimed with the first of Labour's five 'missions' at last year's general election – 'growth' – he replied: 'If we want to have the key workers that our communities need – the nurses, the social care workers, the bus drivers, the posties – they need to have genuinely affordable homes. 'You can't have that thriving economy without the workforce there, but at the moment, the housing that we are delivering is not likely to be affordable for those sorts of roles. 'It's effectively turning the towns into commuter dormitories rather than having thriving local economies, so for me, yes, it is about supporting the local economy.' Mr Hinchliff warned that the 'bottleneck' which slows housebuilding 'is not process, it's profit'. Ms Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary, is fronting the Government's plans for 1.5 million new homes by 2029. Among the proposed reforms is a power for ministers to decide which schemes should come before councillors, and which should be delegated to local authority staff, so that committees can 'focus their resources on complex or contentious development where local democratic oversight is required'. Natural England will also be able to draft 'environmental delivery plans (EDPs)' and acquire land compulsorily to bolster conservation efforts. Mr Hinchliff has suggested these EDPs must come with a timeline for their implementation, and that developers should improve the conservation status of any environmental features before causing 'damage' – a proposal which has support from at least 43 cross-party MP backers. MPs will spend two days debating the Bill on Monday and Tuesday. Chris Curtis, the Labour MP for Milton Keynes North, warned that some of Mr Hinchliff's proposals 'if enacted, would deepen our housing crisis and push more families into poverty'. He said: 'I won't stand by and watch more children in the country end up struggling in temporary accommodation to appease pressure groups. No Labour MP should. 'It's morally reprehensible to play games with this issue. 'These amendments should be withdrawn.'
The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
Peacocks launches huge clearance sale ahead of closing much-loved shop
PEACOCKS has launched a huge clearance sale ahead of one of its much-loved shops shutting its doors. The branch in Northfield, Birmingham, has items on sale with an extra 30 per cent discount on top, a shopper has claimed. 3 3 3 The shopper took to the Extreme Couponing and Bargains UK Facebook page to share the unbelievable shop discovery. She said: "Peacocks in Northfield is now a clearance shop, everything is SALE an addition 30% sale prices! "I got tops for £2.10 black ankle boots for £3.50! "Jeans that was £25 for £8.40! And loads more they had loads of stock. "Run don't walk." Facebook users shared their excitement on the sale - but their sadness on the shop closure. One shopper said: "Why are all the shops closing in Northfield?" And tagging a pal, one commenter asked: "Fancy an hour out in Northfield tomorrow?" In July last year Peacocks announced they would be strategically closing stores as they launched a new website. Poundland to be sold for JUST £1 as frontrunner for shock takeover is revealed after wave of store closures The fashion retailer revealed an annual turnover of £238million for the year to February 2023, with £14.65million in profits for the same period. Peacocks was originally bought out of administration in 2021, saving 2,000 jobs. The brand was saved by investors led by Edinburgh Woollen Mill's chief operating officer Steve Simpson. It comes as closures have rocked high streets across the UK in recent years. Devastated shoppers cried "what a tragedy" as a beloved shop of 33 years is set to pull down the shutters for good. Why the high street still rules! Fabulous' Fashion Director, Tracey Lea Sayer shares her thoughts. I WAS 10 when I first discovered the utter joy of high-street shopping for clothes with my mum and nan. Going into town on Saturday became a family tradition – a girls' day out we would look forward to all week. My mum's favourite shop was M&S, where she would gaze at jackets with big shoulder pads and floral sundresses, while my nan would make a beeline for John Lewis and their classic coats and elegant court shoes. I was all over Tammy Girl – Etam's little sister – and Chelsea Girl, which was later rebranded to high-street fave River Island. I would spend hours in the changing rooms, watched keenly by my two cheerleaders, who gave the thumbs up – or thumbs down – on what I was trying on. Frilly ra-ra skirts, duster coats, polka dot leggings, puff balls, boob tubes… I tried them all, often making my nan howl with laughter. Fashion wasn't so fast back in the 1980s and every item was cherished and worn until it fell apart – literally – at the seams. At 18, I went to art college and my tastes became more refined. Extra cash from a part-time job in a bar meant I could move on to slightly more expensive stores, like Warehouse, Miss Selfridge and the mecca that was Topshop. I knew at this point I wanted to work in fashion because the high street had totally seduced me. One day, I wrote an article for a competition in a glossy mag about my love of retail therapy and my favourite LBD – and I won! That led me to where I am today – Fashion Director of Fabulous. It's not just me that loves the high street – big-name designers are fans, too. When Cool Britannia hit in the '90s, they all turned up in one big store. Designers at Debenhams was a stroke of genius by Debenhams CEO Belinda Earl, designer Ben de Lisi and fashion director Spencer Hawken, who introduced diffusion ranges from John Rocha, Matthew Williamson and Betty Jackson, to name a few. This meant we could all afford a bit of luxury and wear a well-known designer's signature style. Years later, I hosted a night with Debenhams and Fabulous for 250 readers, who were in awe meeting all the designers. It was a real career highlight for me. In 2004, H&M started rolling out their international designer collabs. Karl Lagerfeld was first, followed by Roberto Cavalli, Marni, Stella McCartney, Maison Martin Margiela, Sonia Rykiel, Comme des Garçons, Balmain, Versace and many, many more. I could barely contain myself! Then in 2007, Kate Moss launched her first collection with Topshop, with thousands queuing along London's Oxford Street. I remember sitting behind Ms Moss and Topshop boss Philip Green at a London Fashion Week Topshop Unique catwalk show. I had my three-year-old daughter, Frankie, in tow and we both made the news the next day after we were papped behind Kate, my supermodel girl crush. At the time, the high street was on fire. Who needed designer buys when Mango stocked tin foil trousers just like the designer Isabel Marant ones and you could buy a bit of Barbara Hulanicki's legendary brand Biba from Topshop? High street stores even started to storm London Fashion week. Although Topshop Unique had shown collections since 2001, in 2013 River Island showed its first collection in collaboration with global superstar Rihanna, who was flown in by a friend of mine on a private jet. KER-CHING! A whole new generation of high profile high street collabs followed. Beyoncé created Ivy Park with Topshop's Philip Green and I even flew to LA for Fabulous to shoot the Kardashian sisters in their bodycon 'Kollection' for Dorothy Perkins. I am pleased to say they were the absolute dream cover stars. Fast forward to 2024 and while the high street doesn't look exactly like it did pre-Covid, it has made a gallant comeback. Stores like M&S, Reserved and Zara, and designer collabs like Victoria Beckham X Mango and Rochelle Humes for Next are giving me all the feels. The supermarkets have really come into their own, too, smashing it with gorgeous collections that look expensive, but at prices that still allow us to afford the weekly shop. The last 30 years of high street fashion have been one big adventure for me. Bring on the next 30!
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Father of stabbed Nottingham student Barnaby Webber reveals his guilt and anger that he couldn't protect his boy - and the intolerable strain grief has had on his marriage
Tomorrow David Webber will watch his 17-year-old son Charlie play cricket in a match at Nottingham University in memory of his brother Barney who was senselessly killed there two years ago at the age of 19. Charlie will wear his 'brilliant, sporty' older brother's number 53 shirt. Barney's mother Emma, who crusades relentlessly to find justice for him and dulls her pain with medication on particularly 'difficult days', says 'sadly, it's too much for me' to be there, too. By rights, David and Emma should be proudly anticipating their dearly loved eldest son's graduation from this university next month. But, as David says, 'Barney will never take his degree in history, never have his 21st birthday, never grow into the man he was becoming.' Instead, he says, 'Barney is trapped at 19 for ever and left there while everyone else is moving on', following his vicious stabbing in the early hours of the morning on June 13, 2023, as he and close friend Grace O'Malley-Kumar walked back to the halls after a night out. Their monstrous killer Valdo Calocane went on to slaughter 65-year-old school caretaker Ian Coates and tried to kill three other people. Today, after admitting three counts of manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility owing to paranoid schizophrenia, as well as three counts of attempted murder, Calocane is able to watch DVDs, build Lego and play musical instruments in his cell at the 'soft' NHS psychiatric Ashworth Hospital where he is detained. Meanwhile, Barney's ashes remain in an urn at the funeral directors. 'We've not been able to pick him up,' says David. 'Emma and I have talked about it and both of us have said we really can't at the moment. 'I can't explain why. I think a big part of us knows it's just another tick to say, 'He's gone'. Even though you know he has, maybe it puts another layer of confirmation on it.' Similarly, they can't bring themselves to touch Barney's bedroom which is as it was on the day he returned to Nottingham for a cricket match at the end of the summer term two years ago, while his post piles up and remains unopened in the kitchen. 'We're both petrified of seeing something, like a letter to Barney or a bank statement, that will trigger us,' says David. 'There are lots and lots of memories that suddenly come back that you try to push away to hold yourself together. I remember him in this kitchen, there.' He points to the wooden dining table, gesturing to four chairs. 'Barney would sit there, Emma there, Charlie there and I'd sit there. Now I tend to sit there more.' His hand rests on the back of Barney's seat. By rights, David and Emma (pictured) should be proudly anticipating their dearly loved eldest son's graduation from this university next month. But, as David says, 'Barney will never take his degree in history, never have his 21st birthday, never grow into the man he was becoming' David looks at me. 'I feel like I let him down because I'm his father and I didn't protect him,' he says. 'But how could I? What could I have done? 'I know that's the logical response but there's a part of you, especially as a bloke – some primeval part of your brain – that goes, 'I should have been there and stood in front of the saber-toothed tiger and stopped him from attacking Barney.' 'You find yourself fantasising about inventing a time machine, to return to that day and stop him being there. 'The dreams I have are horrible. One quite frequent one is where he's there. I know he's there.' David reaches out his arm in front of him to demonstrate. 'I'm trying to get to him and I can't. I just keep trying to grab him, but I can't.' He clutches at emptiness in front of him as tears roll down his face. 'You know something awful is about to happen, but I can't reach him. You wake up in a cold sweat. It's horrible.' We pause for David to collect himself. It's a miracle he can. For in truth, his family – just like those of Grace and Ian – have been appallingly let down by the police, the NHS, the justice system, the government and just about every public servant whose duty it is to protect us all from monsters like Valdo Calocane. This is the first in-depth interview David has given in the terrible two years since the savage killer shattered so many lives. His pain remains raw. 'We try for Charlie, to have a normal – as much as it will ever be normal – life going forward. Part of that is to have a nice family holiday every year. We have just got back from Morocco. Charlie took a friend with him because it used to be him and Barney – but it's difficult. 'You can see in his eyes he struggles with it. Emma struggles with it. I struggle with it. He wants his brother with him. We all do. 'Charlie's at an age now where Barney would find him interesting instead of thinking he was a pain in the arse. He would be Barney's drinking buddy. They'd be out having a laugh. He always looked up to his brother and that's the bit he wanted' David, 53, has been diagnosed with severe depression, anxiety and complex PTSD. He was unable to even attempt to return to work as a director of an IT company until January this year. He says his co-director has been nothing short of 'a saint' holding the fort, but David continues to find concentrating on anything other than his son's killing 'very difficult'. 'I still have lots of flashbacks of when I saw him in the hospital [in Nottingham] just lying there and his face, the beauty of it – that lovely smile he had still there. 'I held his hand, talked to him, kissed his head and told him I loved him. The hardest part was walking out because you know that's the last time you're physically going to see them. It's unbelievable pain. 'You walk out and that's the last image. It just haunts me because you can't unsee it. It never disappears from my mind.' For the past six weeks David has been undergoing tests for an undiagnosed heart condition. He suffers with a pain on the left side of his chest. The consultant cardiologist has ruled out atrial fibrillation but knows something is 'not right' so David will have an MRI scan in the next few weeks. 'I'd always laughed at the thought of a broken heart before but I don't know any more. The pain is always there. It's there now.' He raises his hand to the left side of his chest. 'I think what happens is you internalise stuff. People ask me how I can look as calm and in control as I do but, God knows, if they knew what was happening up here.' He points to his head. 'And down here.' He holds his stomach. 'It's just churning all the time. I have the ability to mask how I feel but I don't think it's helping because, when you don't let those feelings out, they just tear you about inside.' Barney's shocking death has affected every part of David's life. The many photos from happier times that hang in their home in Taunton, in Somerset, show the sort of loving, stable family many aspire to be. When I first met David and Emma more than a year ago they never imagined they would have to 'dig, push, push and push' for all these months to expose the shocking truth about Barney, Grace and Ian's deaths. This is my third visit to the family's house and each time I see them it's as though a little bit more of the soul of this once happy family has seeped from their home as the fight for justice consumes them. 'It's not easy,' David says of his relationship with Emma. 'You try to stay close but there are times it's very easy to fall out. I suppose we niggle at each other a lot. We're close but we're not close, if that makes sense. 'As a couple, there are times you're sort of paddling your own canoe – going into your own self-protection and your own 'I need to survive' mode. That sort of isolates you in some bizarre way. 'Other times you think, 'Actually, this might have driven us closer.' It changes you as a person. You're not as emotionally attached. It's hard to find the words to explain but your physical relationship is no longer as it was. 'I don't feel particularly handsome and Emma probably doesn't feel particularly sexy or pretty or whatever. You sort of just exist and try to fire yourself up to do what you need to do to find justice for Barney. You feel guilty if you're having a nice time. 'When you find yourself enjoying life you suddenly check yourself and think, 'I shouldn't be doing this.' I suppose, the guilt sits there between you. 'Emma and I are very close. We love each other but there's no sort of spark. 'As for Charlie, he calls me 'creepy dad'. You want to give your children all the freedom in the world but, when you've had this happen to you, you want to know where they are every minute of every day. 'Obviously, you can't live your life that way but if I lost Charlie as well, I think it would just finish me. I can barely function now.' The lives of Barney's and Grace's parents have been consumed with their fight to establish why paranoid schizophrenic Calocane – 'a ticking time bomb' – was free to kill their children, since they learnt he was not to be charged with murder six months after that terrible night. Ian's sons – Darren, James and Lee – are battling with them to seek the truth. Four months ago, an NHS England report was published, finally revealing the catastrophic mistakes that allowed Calocane, who had been sectioned four times, onto the streets of Nottingham. 'He was attacking his flatmates, stalking people. You know he attacked a police officer and had to get tasered? 'They put out a warrant for his arrest but he was never arrested. This report is littered with examples of the number of times he should have been stopped. 'When he assaulted his flatmate, one of the psychiatrists said he believed Calocane could kill. If that's not a red line to lock him up and keep the public safe, what is?' asks David. 'The psychiatrists were just discharging him back onto the streets and he'd stop taking his medication. The fourth time he's sectioned there's talk of 'depot medication' [long-acting, injectable antipsychotics that are slowly released into the body over weeks and months] but he refused because he doesn't like needles. 'He said he'd continue taking his tablets so he's released. Instead of being monitored, he's discharged to his GP when they can't get hold of him. How ludicrous is that? These people weren't doing their jobs properly. They should be held to account.' Indeed, the report also exposes claims made in mitigation of Calocane at his sentencing hearing in January last year to be nothing short of poppycock. 'A mental health nurse assessed him when he was arrested and said he wasn't psychotic. But in court we had an idiot psychiatrist who saw him four or five months afterwards, when he'd been on medication for three months, made an assessment that on that day he was psychotic. How dare he? 'The psychiatrist also said in court that he was treatment resistant. The report shows he was never treatment resistant. The truth is he was sectioned, treated, released, stopped taking his medication, became violent, was sectioned again. This happened four times. Nobody gave a ****.' David's fury is palpable. 'It's impossible to rationalise why nobody is being held accountable for releasing him onto the streets where he's just decided Barney doesn't deserve to live, Grace doesn't deserve to live, Ian doesn't deserve to live. 'I'm not generally an angry person, it's not in my DNA but, when it comes to that monster who killed my son, I have massive anger. What makes my blood boil is that he's got away with murder. If he was in front of me and I had the opportunity to kill him I would, absolutely. 'He made a conscious decision to murder my son. 'Yes, he was ill, but he still made decisions. He was still in control. He could get a train. He could go to a cashpoint and go to buy a sandwich. He could drive a car. Don't tell me you can do all of that but not control yourself. 'Mental health is a reason for someone's behaviour but it's not an excuse.' David remembers every minute of that dreadful day. He was with Emma at the family's holiday lodge in Cornwall when the TV news began to report what was happening in Nottingham. After locating Barney's mobile in Ilkeston Road on his Find My Phone app, he called the police. 'When I said who my son was, I could hear the person on the phone's tone change completely. They said, 'It's really hectic here. We'll get someone to call you back.' Then I saw the phone moving towards the police station. 'Emma was in the middle of a work's team meeting. I said, 'We've got to go now.' 'We chucked the dogs in the car and began driving to Nottingham to my son. 'I didn't know if he was safe or not. Even if I got there and he just fell out of the pub because he's been out all night and had dropped his phone in Ilkeston Road, I'd have been the happiest man alive.' He was haring through Cornwall when his phone rang. It was a policewoman. 'When they won't quite tell you why they are calling, but ask if there's somewhere safe you can pull over, your heart just drops. You know what you are going to hear.' The policewoman could not confirm it was definitely Barney, but they'd found his driving licence in his wallet. Emma got out of the car and fell to her knees. 'I didn't know what to say or do,' says David. 'I couldn't believe it. All I remember is saying, 'I've got to get to my other son.' Charlie was at a school activities week in Torquay. Thankfully, the teacher in charge had separated him from his classmates before he'd seen the news on his phone. David does not know to this day who released his son's name to the media. Charlie was in the minibus when David and Emma arrived. 'Charlie is a very intelligent boy. We thought the best way of dealing with it wasn't to try to sugarcoat it so we told him Barney had been murdered. 'It was awful. He just broke down screaming and ran off.' The family travelled to Nottingham the following day where they met Grace's parents for the first time at a vigil for their children. 'The shock takes over,' says David. 'You can't quite fathom what's happening. There were so many people there crying – bless them.' David stood beside Grace's devastated father, Sanjoy, united in grief as they both addressed the mourning crowd with generous words of love. 'Nothing was rehearsed. I just found myself speaking. Maybe it's the British way.' Today Sanjoy and David speak often. He is, says David, sort of like a brother now. 'We're intrinsically linked for the rest of our lives. Barney and Grace fell together. Bless her, Grace tried to stop him attacking Barney. Emma says it all the time, 'Silly girl, why didn't you run?' But she wasn't that character. She wouldn't let her friend down. 'If it had been the other way round Barney, would never have left her.' Last month, Nottingham announced they would grant posthumous degrees to Barney and Grace, but David says, 'I would struggle to go and collect it as the pain of not seeing him getting it himself would be too much, especially when everyone else is graduating and quite rightly happy to be starting the next chapter of life.' On Friday, Barney and Grace's families will lay a rose where their children fell together on Ilkeston Road. Afterwards, they will walk with Ian's three sons to the place where their father was attacked. All are determined to continue their fight to hold the authorities to account. 'On Monday we see [the Health Secretary] Wes Streeting. 'We've got a statutory public inquiry where all that has happened will come out but that won't be until next year. 'We need change now. The people who allowed this to happen need to be held accountable for their mistakes now. How many more people need to be murdered by those with mental health issues for this to stop? 'We need to make the streets safer and protect all our sons and daughters. If we can do that, in the name of Barney, Grace and Ian, then that, I suppose, is success. But the main problem – the bit that really tears you apart – is that they are not here and we can't bring them back.'
