
Mint Explainer: What the World Bank's new poverty line means for India
Last week, the World Bank announced a new poverty line to decide how many people worldwide live in 'extreme poverty". The new threshold is higher than the previous one even in inflation-adjusted terms. That means many more people globally will suddenly find themselves below that benchmark and now be counted as 'poor".
However, for India, the estimate has been revised downwards. That's because it's not all about the poverty line itself – other factors are at play, too. Also, 5.3% of Indians are poor by one measure, and 23.9% by another. Let's unpack all this.
First, what is the poverty line?
The poverty line is a minimum level of spending needed to meet one's basic nutrition, clothing and shelter needs. The number of people who cannot afford even that are classified as poor.
One can adopt several standards to set the poverty line, and countries are free to decide those for themselves. But doing so at a global level is complex. A simple exchange-rate adjustment of India's poverty line in rupees per month wouldn't make it comparable with an American spending in dollars or a Kenyan spending in shillings, given the vastly different pricing levels in those countries.
Also read | Himanshu: India needs official poverty data for effective policymaking
To allow international comparisons, researchers created an international poverty line in 1990 that was adjusted for 'purchasing power parity' (PPP) across economies. PPP is an economic concept that compares the cost of a fixed basket of goods and services in different countries to determine the relative value and purchasing power of their currencies. That gave the World Bank its first global standard for a poverty line – $1 a day (at 1985 PPP).
But PPP factors don't stay the same, since inflation is different everywhere, so the World Bank's International Comparison Program (ICP) keeps updating the PPP factors. This necessitates updates to the international poverty line as well. That's what has happened now.
Because of such updates, it's possible that without any remarkable change in standards of living, one can cross the global line or slip under it merely through a methodology update.
So, what did the World Bank say?
Last week, the World Bank applied the 2021 PPP updates (which the ICP released last year) to determine a new poverty line. It also took into account improved data collection methods by several poor countries, which led to new poverty lines for them.
Earlier, anyone who spent less than $2.15 a day on basic needs (at 2017 PPPs) was said to be poor. Adjusted to inflation, it would have been around $2.60 a day in 2021, but the new benchmark (which isn't merely due to PPP changes but also because of improved consumption surveys) is $3 a day at 2021 PPPs.
Also read: India must redraw its poverty line to reflect economic progress
When the World Bank issued its last estimate in September 2024, it counted 9% of people in the world as poor in 2022 based on the $2.15-a-day threshold. Now it reckons the figure was 10.5% (again, in 2022) by the new yardstick. This means 125 million more people were poor in 2022 (the latest reference year for which data is known reliably) than what last year's estimate had said.
But there are two caveats to this. One, this increase doesn't necessarily mean more people are now poor; it means more people will now be classified as poor. Two, this number would have been much higher had the World Bank not applied a new method to come up with India's data (which was an outlier, seeing a decline in poverty rate).
How has India's data helped in the revision of the estimates?
Multiple factors, not just the application of 2021 PPP factors, have come together to influence poverty rates within the space of a few months. A major one is that the World Bank has now taken into account India's first official household consumption expenditure survey (CES) in 11 years, which took place in 2022-23 (and has since also taken place in 2023-24).
When the data was still awaited for long, the World Bank was forced to use alternative sources to issue the best possible estimate of 12.9% for 2021 based on the $2.15-a-day poverty line.
But now, the estimate stands revised to 5.3%. The change is based on both the new poverty line and the new official data that's now available. If we applied the old benchmark ($2.15 a day), around 2.4% of Indians were poor in 2022, as per the World Bank's calculations on that year's CES.
The CES data for the 2023-24 survey is also available, but that doesn't yet reflect in the World Bank data.
Let's apply a like-to-like comparison to summarise this: at the $2.15-a-day poverty line, the poverty rate for 2022 has been revised from 12.9% to 2.4%, thanks to the new official data. Meanwhile, the poverty rate for 2022 has gone up from 2.4% to 5.3% thanks to the changed poverty line.
How has India's poverty rate changed over time?
Any comparison with old data is ill-advised. The two poverty lines retrospectively applied to the CES of 2011-12 puts the somewhat comparable figures at 16.2% ($2.15 a day) and 27.1% ($3 a day). That means in both cases, poverty has shrunk drastically; by the new threshold, an estimated net 269 million Indians exited poverty in these 11 years.
But this comparison isn't that straightforward. The 2011-12 CES is hardly comparable with the new surveys held in 2022-23 and 2023-24. The new ones tend to record higher consumption by Indians due to fundamentally improved data collection practices, and also because they ask them to lay out their spending on 405 items instead of 347 earlier.
Also read: Don't deceive the poor world with an expensive green illusion
The new surveys also assign consumption values to subsidised goods and services obtained from state-run schemes. This, too, raises the value of consumption spending for households.
In summary, the methodology now records Indians as spending more in general, so it's harder to fall below a particular poverty line.
But while a direct comparison isn't advisable, it is evident that poverty rates may indeed have fallen by a lot in the past decade. By how much, it's difficult to say.
What more should one know about this?
One, this is not the only poverty line the World Bank uses globally. This is actually the median of the national poverty lines of only low-income countries. It is applied to all countries under the name 'extreme poverty", meaning that one who is 'poor" even by the standards of low-income countries can be said to be living in 'extreme poverty".
There are two other poverty lines: one for lower-middle-income countries, which has been revised from $3.65 to $4.20 a day, and for middle-income countries, which has been revised from $6.85 to $8.30.
India is a lower-middle income country, so the $4.20-a-day poverty line would be a more relevant one. By that benchmark, 23.9% Indians were poor in 2022, as compared to 28.1% estimated by the old poverty line. The retrospective figure for 2011-12 (not strictly comparable) is nearly 58%.
Also read | Mint Primer: How to read SBI's latest poverty estimates
Secondly, the World Bank report also said there were 'growing concerns" about the CES's inability to capture households at the top of the consumption pyramid, and also observed its own need to exclude certain data captured in the CES—both factors, it said, would underestimate inequality in India.
That said, the new CES methodology is more robust than the earlier one, and could provide more frequent poverty estimates hereon. Comparisons with the past data are impossible, and should ideally not be used to quantify progress over time.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
Extreme poverty in India down to 5.3 pc in 2022-23: World Bank
As against 34 crore people below poverty line (USD 3/per day) in 2011-12, the numbers have come down to 7.5 crore in 2022-23 in absolute numbers. Given India's inflation rate between 2017 and 2021, a revised extreme poverty line of USD 3 would constitute a 15 per cent higher threshold than USD 2.15 expressed in 2021 prices and result in a 5.3 per cent poverty rate in 2022-23, the World Bank said in a report. New Delhi, Jun 7 (PTI) India's extreme poverty rate declined sharply to 5.3 per cent over a decade from 27.1 per cent in 2011-12 even as the World Bank revised upwards its threshold poverty line to USD 3 per day. The World Bank has announced a major revision to global poverty estimates, raising the International Poverty Line (IPL) from USD 2.15/day (2017 PPP) to USD 3/day (2021 PPP), according to a factsheet issued by the Press Information Bureau (PIB) on the report. 'While the change led to a global increase in the count of extreme poverty by 125 million, India emerged as a statistical outlier in a positive direction. Using more refined data and updated survey methods, India not only withstood the raised threshold but also demonstrated a massive reduction in poverty,' PIB said in its factsheet details issued on Saturday. The new poverty line would have increased the count of global extreme poverty by 226 million people. But thanks to India's data revision, the net global increase was only 125 million, as India's revised data reduced the count by 125 million on its own, it said. In India, the World Bank report said, 54,695,832 people lived on less than USD 3 per day in 2024. Thus, the poverty rate at USD 3 per day (2021 PPP — percentage population) is 5.44 per cent in 2024. The extreme poverty rate decreased from 16.2 to 2.3 per cent between 2011-12 and 2022-23, while the poverty rate at the lower middle income country (LMIC) line declined by 33.7 percentage points, it said. Free and subsidised food transfers supported poverty reduction, and the rural-urban poverty gap narrowed. The five most populous states account for 54 per cent of the extremely poor, it said. With regard to economy, the report said, real GDP of India was around 5 per cent below the pre-pandemic trend level as of FY25. Growth should gradually converge back to potential over 2027-28 assuming the current global uncertainties are resolved in an orderly fashion, it said. 'The outlook, however, is subject to significant downside risks, as policy shifts may continue to unfold globally. Elevated trade tensions would dampen demand for India's exports and further delay the recovery in investment,' it said. The current account deficit is expected to average around 1.2 per cent of GDP over FY26-28 and remain adequately financed by capital inflows, it said, adding that foreign exchange reserves are projected to remain stable around 16 per cent of GDP. India has lifted 171 million people from extreme poverty in the decade between 2011-12 and 2022-23, the World Bank said. 'Over the past decade, India has significantly reduced poverty. Extreme poverty (living on less than USD 2.15 per day) fell from 16.2 per cent in 2011-12 to 2.3 per cent in 2022-23, lifting 171 million people above this line, the World Bank had said in its 'Poverty & Equity Brief' on India in April. The rural extreme poverty dropped from 18.4 per cent to 2.8 per cent, and urban from 10.7 per cent to 1.1 per cent, narrowing the rural-urban gap from 7.7 to 1.7 percentage points, it had said. PTI DP TRB This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.


India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
Why is Trump desperate for a trade deal with China? Know the SHOCKING reasons that brought US to its knees due to...
(File) China Rare Earth Elements: After assuming office for his second Presidential term in January this year, Donald Trump instigated a trade war with China by imposing exorbitant import tariffs on Chinese good. However, nearly six months later, the US President is desperately seeking a trade deal with Beijing to prevent key American industries from collapsing. Here's the reason why Trump made a U-turn on China, and is appeasing the Asian power to seek a China-US trade deal. Why US bent the knee to China? China dominates the global supply of rare earth elements, which are used by the US defense industry to manufacture advanced weapons and defense systems like radar systems, fighter jet engines, etc. According to a report by the South China Morning Post, China controls more than 90 percent of the world's processing and refining of rare earth elements, and also leads in other refining an extraction of other critical minerals like refined gallium, of which it controls 98.8 percent of global production. In recent years, Beijing has leveraged its dominance in critical mineral production and refining as a major negotiating point in trade wars, as well as targeting the defence industries of the US and its allies. The US defense industry is majorly dependent on China for rare earth minerals, but the supply has been nearly halted due to the ongoing US-China tariff war. China has imposed an export ban on rare earth elements to the US, effectively weaking the Pentagon's Pentagon's military preparations and weapons manufacturing capabilities. How China pressured the US into submission? In July 2023, Beijing imposed export controls requiring Chinese exporters to seek permission to ship eight gallium-related and six germanium-related products to other countries. In August last year, the list was expanded to include antimony, and in December, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce imposed export restrictions on gallium, germanium and antimony to the United States, as Beijing anticipated a trade war when Trump assumed office. In April this year, Beijing imposed export restrictions, mandating special export licenses for seven categories of medium and heavy rare earth elements (REEs) – samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium – as well as magnets and other finished products containing these REEs to be shipped out of China. China's sweeping restrictions on REEs brought defense manufacturing to a halt in US and its allied countries, as supplies of rare earth minerals required for weapons' manufacturing rapidly thinned out. Why US requires large quantities of REEs? The United States is world's largest arms manufacturer and its defense sector requires a gargantuan amount of rare earth minerals to manufacture advanced modern weaponry such as precision-guided missiles, stealth fighter jets, naval warships, submarines and advanced radar systems. According to various reports, the US-made F-35 stealth fighter incorporates over 400 kg (900 lbs) of REEs in each unit for its jet engines, avionics, munitions and radar systems. The F-47, US' Next-Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) fighter jet, is expected to contain even larger amounts of critical minerals, due to cutting-edge features like unmanned flight, artificial intelligence integration, and next-gen stealth capabilities. Similarly, US navy warships and submarines require giant quantities of REEs, with Virginia-class submarines requiring 4,200 kilograms and Arleigh Burke-class destroyers needing 2,360 kilograms of REEs for their radars, munitions and other technologies. US Predator drones, Tomahawk missiles, Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) smart bombs, and advanced radar systems all rely on rare earth elements for propulsion, targeting, and guidance. According to experts, more than 80 percent of the Pentagon's weapon system supply chains contain antimony, gallium, or germanium. Does US have REE resources? While the US does have rare earth resources, those pale in comparison to China's gigantic hold on global refining and processing of REEs. The US accounts for around 15 percent of global production of REEs, but its not enough to meet the rare earth needs of US industries, especially the defense sector. Since 2020, the Pentagon has invested $439 million to build domestic supply chains in critical minerals, and a $35 million contract was awarded to MP Materials in 2022 for a heavy rare earth processing facility. However, its supply chain is still miniscule compared to China, and thus needs to import a major chunk of REEs from Beijing. In 2024, MP Materials announced a record production of 1,300 tons of neodymium-praseodymium (NdPr) oxide for producing neodymium magnets, while China produced an estimated 300,000 tons of NdFeB magnets in the same year. China's antimony dominance Additionally, the US does not have any mining facilities for gallium, while China reportedly produced 750 of the 760 tons of primary low-purity gallium produced worldwide in 2024 and is known to have production capacity of up to 1,000 tons. China also holds about 48 percent of the world's mined antimony, controls 98.8 percent of refined gallium production, and is responsible for 59.2 percent of refined germanium production. All these critical minerals are used in the manufacturing of advanced weapons, ranging from armor-piercing bullets, night vision goggles and cables, to nuclear weapons and naval warships.


Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
How the Pemmican War prefigured the protein obsessions of today
The news that Canada's Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) was closing its last stores had echoes of another age. HBC was one of 'the corporations that built British colonialism', as Philip J Stern describes in his book Empire, Incorporated .We are most familiar with the East India Company (founded 1600), but HBC (1670) was one of many, like the Muscovy Company (1555), Royal African Company (1660) and Levant Company (1592), which carved the world for commercial interests, often then leading to colonial domination. HBC lasted longer because it ran stores across North America, originally outposts which sold supplies for survival in the harsh terrain. They later became regular department stores, which are now closing their was founded for fur. The far north was full of animals with luxurious pelts, particularly beavers whose thick, waterproof fur was in great demand for making hats. HBC started trading with native American tribes for pelts, but soon Europeans arrived to make their fortunes as fur trappers. But winters were freezing and summers worse, with large parts of the land turning into swamp and mosquito swarms, severely limiting or hunting food in these conditions was hard, so some form of sustenance had to be carried. But the standard travel foods of that time, like salted meats or hard biscuit, proved to be too cumbersome or impractical for conditions when even basic cooking could be hard. This is when Europeans turned to a product that native tribes prepared that was called pemmican. This was the lean meat from animals like bison or caribou, which was carefully dried to make it lighter and less likely to spoil. This was pounded into shreds and melted fat from the same animals was poured over, helping preserve it also made it highly calorific, providing energy from even small amounts. Dried berries pounded in made it taste better and improved its nutritional profile. Pemmican could be fried or boiled into a stew, but also eaten raw, a big advantage in bad weather. It became essential fuel for the fur trade and a major industry grew, with native tribes hunting animals and preparing pemmican to sell to trappers. Vilhjalmur Stefansson, an Arctic explorer who studied tribal diets and writes extensively on pemmican in his book Not By Bread Alone , writes that HBC, which was still controlled from Britain, was initially disdainful of this native changed with the formation of the North West Company (NWC) in Montreal in 1779. As a Canadian enterprise, it knew the value of pemmican and soon was bringing in more fur from regions that HBC considered under its control. This came to a head in what is now Manitoba, where HBC tried to stop sale of pemmican outside its control. Corporate battles today happen in stock markets and courts, but the Pemmican War , as the conflict was called, involved real guns and violence. The NWC enlisted the tribes who made pemmican, and from 1812-1821 a deadly series of skirmishes took place. Finally, the bosses ended the war by agreeing to merge the companies under the HBC name, but making it a Canadian controlled writes that British attitudes to pemmican also changed completely. It was now seen as a wonder food, imperative for polar expeditions and even tried as army rations. It was an early example of the protein bars that are hot products today. It helps that Stefansson's book was eagerly cited by the meat industry and has become the basis of the hugely popular keto and paleo diets today. This is a bit of a distortion, since he was careful to place pemmican, and the high protein diet in the specific context of the climate and communities it came from. But the allure of pemmican has outlasted HBC and the fur trade. Doomsday preppers now stock it, piling up the protein against an apocalypse someday.