Report criticises ‘major failing' to gather ethnicity data on grooming gangs
The lack of data showing the ethnicity and nationality of sex offenders in grooming gangs is 'a major failing over the last decade or more', a new report has found.
Officials have dodged the issue of ethnicity among the groups of sex offenders for fear of being called racist, even though available data showed suspects were disproportionately likely to be Asian men, the Home Secretary told the House of Commons.
Speaking as a review of grooming gangs by Baroness Casey was published on Monday, Yvette Cooper told MPs: 'While much more robust national data is needed, we cannot and must not shy away from these findings, because, as Baroness Casey says, ignoring the issues, not examining and exposing them to the light, allows the criminality and depravity of a minority of men to be used to marginalise whole communities.'
She said Baroness Casey found examples of organisations 'avoiding the topic altogether for fear of appearing racist or raising community tensions'.
Ms Cooper said: 'These findings are deeply disturbing, but most disturbing of all, as Baroness Casey makes clear, is the fact that too many of these findings are not new.'
Currently ethnicity is only recorded for around 37% of suspects.
The report found that: 'The appalling lack of data on ethnicity in crime recording alone is a major failing over the last decade or more. Questions about ethnicity have been asked but dodged for years.
'Child sexual exploitation is horrendous whoever commits it, but there have been enough convictions across the country of groups of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds to have warranted closer examination.
'Instead of examination, we have seen obfuscation. In a vacuum, incomplete and unreliable data is used to suit the ends of those presenting it. The system claims there is an overwhelming problem with white perpetrators when that can't be proved.
'This does no-one any favours at all, and least of all those in the Asian, Pakistani or Muslim communities who needlessly suffer as those with malicious intent use this obfuscation to sow and spread hatred.'
Yvette Cooper unveiled the findings from the rapid national audit to MPs, after the Prime Minister committed to launching a national inquiry into the abuse.
She repeated previous apologies for abject failures to protect victims.
Ms Cooper told MPs: 'On behalf of this, and past governments, and the many public authorities who let you down, I want to reiterate an unequivocal apology for the unimaginable pain and suffering that you have suffered, and the failure of our country's institutions through decades, to prevent that harm and keep you safe.'
The rapid national audit looking at the scale of grooming gangs across the country was first announced in January as part of a series of measures to tackle the issue.
The Home Office has also said the National Crime Agency (NCA) will carry out a nationwide operation targeting people who have sexually exploited children, and follow up on more than 800 cold cases.
According to the Home Office, the NCA will work in partnership with police forces to investigate cases that 'were not progressed through the criminal justice system' in the past.
On Monday, Ms Cooper said that the number of cold cases to be reviewed again over child sex abuse by grooming gangs is expected to rise to more than 1,000 in the coming weeks.
The harrowing crimes targeted children, mainly girls, as young as 10, some of whom were in care, had physical or mental disabilities, or who had already suffered neglect or abuse.
Baroness Casey's review looked at around a dozen live investigations into grooming gangs, and found 'a significant proportion of these cases appear to involve suspects who are non-UK nationals and/or who are claiming asylum in the UK.'
The Home Secretary has pledged to exclude convicted sex offenders from the asylum system.
In her report, Baroness Casey said it is time to draw a line in the sand and take action over the issue, which she called 'one of the most heinous crimes in our society'.
Her report concluded: 'These actions need to be accompanied by commitments to honesty, transparency and to prioritising the safety of children above all else; by an apology to all the victims of child sexual exploitation who have been let down in the past and by a more rigorous and relentless pursuit of the minority of men who have preyed on vulnerable children and looked for gaps in our safeguarding systems to commit heinous crimes.
'Unless government and all the organisations involved are able to stand up and acknowledge the failures of the past, to apologise for them unreservedly, and to act now to put things right, including current cases, we will not move on as a society.'
The Government has accepted her recommendation that any adult man who has penetrative sexual activity with a child under 16 will face a mandatory rape charge.
Police forces will be made to gather data on the ethnicity and nationality of child abusers, and rules for the licensing of taxi drivers will also be tightened to stop drivers operating outside the area where they are licensed.
The report also recommends that police forces should look at cold cases from the past 10 years to find missed chances for prosecutions and children who may have been abused.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Louise Casey to appear before MPs after major review of child grooming failures
The author of the major review into grooming gangs which found authorities have 'shied away' from the ethnicity of sex offenders will face questions from MPs. Baroness Louise Casey will appear before the Commons Home Affairs Committee on Tuesday morning, after the Government set out plans to launch a new nationwide inquiry into grooming gangs following her rapid review of the scandal. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper claimed officials have dodged the issue of ethnicity among the groups of sex offenders for fear of being called racist, even though available data showed suspects were disproportionately likely to be Asian men. Speaking in the Commons on Monday as the review was published, the Home Secretary said 'much more robust national data is needed' on the ethnicity of offenders, adding that the authorities 'cannot and must not shy away from these findings'. Doing so would allow 'the criminality and depravity of a minority of men to be used to marginalise whole communities', she added. Lady Casey's report found that: 'The appalling lack of data on ethnicity in crime recording alone is a major failing over the last decade or more. Questions about ethnicity have been asked but dodged for years.' It added: 'We found that the ethnicity of perpetrators is shied away from and is still not recorded for two-thirds of perpetrators, so we are unable to provide any accurate assessment from the nationally collected data.' Multiple convictions of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds should have 'warranted closer examination', it said, adding: 'Instead of examination, we have seen obfuscation. In a vacuum, incomplete and unreliable data is used to suit the ends of those presenting it.' Former Tory government adviser Dominic Cummings meanwhile claimed in an interview with Sky News that officials from the Department for Education were supportive of Rotherham Council's suggestion of going to court in 2011 to prevent the Times' initial reporting of the scandal in Rotherham. Lord Michael Gove, then the education secretary, rejected the request for a judicial review on Mr Cummings' advice, the broadcaster reported. Ms Cooper said the Government would take action 'immediately' on all of Lady Casey's recommendations, after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer committed to launching a national inquiry into the abuse. The recommendations included: – Making it mandatory to collect ethnicity and nationality data of all suspects in child sexual abuse cases – A new national inquiry into child sexual abuse with statutory legal powers, which will co-ordinate the efforts of local investigations led by councils and set out 'strict timescales' for them to follow. – A nationwide National Crime Agency operation, targeting people who have sexually exploited children, and following up on an estimated more than 1,000 cold cases where no one was convicted. – A change in the law so that all adult sex with under-16s is considered rape. – A review of criminal records held by victims of child sexual exploitation. In the Commons, Ms Cooper 'unequivocally' apologised for the failings which had led to grooming and child sexual abuse. The Home Secretary also pledged to exclude convicted sex offenders from the asylum system, while the report warned 'a significant proportion' of live investigations into grooming gangs 'appear to involve suspects who are non-UK nationals and/or who are claiming asylum in the UK'. In her report, Lady Casey said it is time to draw a line in the sand and take action over the issue, which she called 'one of the most heinous crimes in our society'. She also urged opposition politicians not to use the scandal as a 'political football', adding there was a chance to 'create a national reset'.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
NYC's failing schools need a mayor who will take on the selfish teachers union
Fixing our public schools is one of the most important jobs facing New York City's next mayor: At $41 billion, education spending is the single largest item in City Hall's gargantuan $115 billion budget. But in both televised debates of the Democratic mayoral primary, my opponents offered only platitudes and teachers-union talking points. Last Thursday, I was the only candidate on stage to argue against the foolish class-size mandate secured by the United Federation of Teachers. Advertisement The policy may sound good, but as I noted it will cost $1.6 billion — and having to suddenly hire thousands of teachers who are less experienced and less qualified than the teachers we have will undercut any possible benefit of smaller classes. When it comes to education, we can't afford to repeat the same tired slogans and tinker around the margins. Advertisement But the UFT's self-interest makes real reform impossible. Fighting for kids — and taking on the adults who run our educational system for their benefit — has been my life's mission. It's why I helped start Teach for America and Democrats for Education Reform, and why I served on the board of NYC KIPP charter schools for more than two decades. Now that I'm running for mayor, I am the only candidate who has made fixing our schools a core part of my pitch to voters. Advertisement I have a simple message to the city's parents: Our Department of Education is ripping you off — and lying about it. The facts are damning: Every year, New York City spends upward of $40,000 per student — more than any other district in the country — but nearly half (46%) of our fourth-graders lack basic reading skills. Shockingly, fourth graders in our nation's poorest state, Mississippi — which spends just $12,000 per student — are now reading at a higher level than their peers in the five boroughs. Advertisement The results for New York City's black and Latino kids are especially alarming. In 2024, 58% of black fourth graders and 62% of Latino fourth graders in New York City public schools lacked basic reading skills, compared with 27% of white students and 25% of Asian students. Fourth grade is a critical time, because that's when the curriculum pivots from learning to read to reading to learn. Most children who struggle to read as fourth-graders fall further and further behind — and end up living lives of poverty and hardship. But to cover up its failure, NYC's public schools lie to parents, telling them their children are doing fine and passing them along year after year. That's why I've pledged to end this 'social promotion' after third grade. If the school system hasn't taught a child to read after five years, it needs to keep trying. The good news is we know what works: Establish high standards and a rigorous curriculum, hold all schools and educators accountable, reward excellence and give parents greater freedom to send their kids to schools of their choosing. Advertisement Against the objections of the UFT, former Mayor Mike Bloomberg expanded high-quality charter schools and other innovative public schools, made all schools take responsibility for their students' performance and greatly expanded parents' choices. The results spoke for themselves: The portion of fourth-graders lacking basic reading skills declined from 53% in 2002, Bloomberg's first year in office, to 38% in 2013. NYC's next mayor should expand on Bloomberg's approach. Charter schools, which educate about 15% of New York City's public-school students, are rigorously evaluated every five years. They must demonstrate that they're delivering for their students — and if they're falling short, they can be put on probation or even closed. Advertisement All public schools should be held to those standards. As mayor, I would establish similar accountability for every school in the system. To make sure we hire and retain the best teachers in the country, we need to pay teachers based on how much they inspire and educate our kids, not on their years in the system or the number of certifications they have. The next contract with the UFT must include differential pay based on merit and other measures that actually benefit our kids. And as mayor, I'd fight to overturn the UFT-engineered class-size mandate. Advertisement Unlike the other candidates, I can make that promise — because I'm not seeking the UFT's endorsement, and therefore I don't owe it anything. It's not too late for my fellow Democrats to join me in standing up to this self-serving special-interest group. Our children's future depends on it. Whitney Tilson, a businessman and education activist, is a candidate in the Democratic mayoral primary.


San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
As National Guard case moves through courts, Trump gains advantage
President Donald Trump's takeover of California's National Guard to fend off immigration protesters in Los Angeles, halted briefly by a federal judge, is starting to climb up the judicial ladder, with a federal appeals court hearing scheduled Tuesday. And the higher it gets, the friendlier the territory would appear to be for Trump. Thursday's ruling by U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer of San Francisco that the president had exceeded his authority was 'probably out of the mainstream' among current U.S. courts, said Anthony Ghiotto, a teaching professor at the University of Illinois College of Law and a former judge in the U.S. Air Force. Ghiotto said he agreed with Breyer's decision, but doubted it would survive in a U.S. Supreme Court that has shielded Trump from criminal prosecution from official acts. It's also a court that in 2018 upheld Trump's ban on travel to the United States from a group of nations, most of them with a majority of Muslim inhabitants, said Jon Michaels, a UCLA law professor. Opponents said the ban was discriminatory, but the court majority deferred to the president's assertion that he was protecting national security — one of his main arguments in the current case, Michaels noted. Breyer, a former Watergate prosecutor appointed to the judiciary by President Bill Clinton in 1997, ruled that Trump had exceeded his authority by taking control of the state's National Guard and sending 4,000 of its members to Los Angeles to combat protests against workplace raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. Breyer said the president had violated a federal law requiring him to consult with Gov. Gavin Newsom before transferring the National Guard from state to federal control. And he said the evidence did not support Trump's claim that the Los Angeles protests amounted to a 'rebellion' against the U.S. government or made it extremely difficult for ICE agents to enforce the law, the grounds specified by U.S. law for federalizing the National Guard. Just over two hours later, a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Trump administration's request to put Breyer's order on hold, allowing the National Guard to return to the streets, while the court considers the administration's appeal. The panel, randomly selected from the court's judges, consisted of two Trump appointees, Mark Bennett and Eric Miller, and Jennifer Sung, appointed by President Joe Biden. They ordered a hearing for Tuesday and are likely to rule within a week or two. The losing side could then ask the full appeals court, whose 29 judges include 16 appointed by Democratic presidents, for a new hearing before an 11-judge panel, also chosen at random. The final appeal would be to the Supreme Court, and if the court agrees to review the case, it may not be resolved until sometime next year. Ghiotto predicted the Supreme Court would take up the case, regardless of the outcome in the 9th Circuit, because of Trump's invocation of national security. 'The court has shown a willingness to tackle these issues,' the Illinois law professor said. And he noted that after federal judges in New York and Washington state issued injunctions against Trump's renewed attempt to ban transgender troops from the U.S. military, the Supreme Court put those rulings on hold and allowed the ban to take effect. 'It's indicative that they'll defer to the president when it comes to federalizing the militia,' Ghiotto said, referring to the state's National Guard. 'I hope I'm wrong.' Breyer said in his ruling that Trump had failed to present credible evidence that the Los Angeles protests were creating a danger of 'rebellion' or were making it unacceptably difficult to enforce immigration laws and protect ICE agents. But Michaels, who teaches constitutional law at UCLA, said the law generally leaves those assessments to the president. 'Members of the court are not experts in issues of security and public safety,' he said. 'I probably would trust Judge Breyer, but that's not how the statute is written. We wouldn't want the typical president to be encumbered in this fashion.' On the other hand, said Rory Little, a law professor at UC College of the Law in San Francisco, Breyer rightly found that Trump had failed to comply with the law by not consulting with Newsom before taking over the National Guard. And he said the judge had a basis for concluding that Trump had failed to meet the law's other requirements for federal control. 'The president has to have some evidence to show a rebellion, and there was none in the record,' said Little, a former Supreme Court law clerk. He said the case was somewhat reminiscent of the Supreme Court's 1952 ruling rejecting President Harry Truman's attempt to seize control of the nation's steel mills during the Korean War. A 6-3 majority found that neither the Constitution nor Congress authorized the takeover of private property. Breyer, in Thursday's ruling, cited Justice Robert Jackson's concurring opinion in that case, which said that 'emergency powers are consistent with free government only when their control is lodged elsewhere than in the Executive who exercises them.' While the current Supreme Court is more conservative, Little said, it is not in 'lockstep' to rule in Trump's favor, and Chief Justice John Roberts might be able to find a compromise. And if Trump was looking for a reasonable solution, Little said, 'he would withdraw the troops and keep his powder dry.'