logo
Washington governor rescinds wildlife commission appointments

Washington governor rescinds wildlife commission appointments

Yahoo07-02-2025

Feb. 6—The latest appointments to the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission were sent back to the governor's office on Wednesday, stalling the confirmation process before hearings were scheduled.
The move came at the request of Gov. Bob Ferguson, who sent a letter asking the Senate to return to his office the appointment of Kettle Falls resident Lynn O'Connor and the reappointment of commission co-chair Tim Ragen.
The letter, an undated copy of which was provided to The Spokesman-Review early Thursday, said that the administration had received "multiple letters, emails, and other correspondence from individuals, tribes, and other entities expressing a desire for a more extensive process for these appointments.
"Returning these appointments will enable my office to interview and evaluate the qualifications of these and other candidates for these important Commission positions, before presentation to the Senate for confirmation," the letter said.
The decision rescinds the final two commission appointments made by former Gov. Jay Inslee, who named O'Connor and Ragen to the panel in the final days of his 12 years in office last month.
It also follows the release of a report from the William D. Ruckelshaus Center that found that observers view the commission as "dysfunctional," and that many have concerns with the appointment process.
Brionna Aho, a Ferguson spokesperson, said in an email that the office wanted to call back the appointments "in order to engage in a more thorough appointment process." She also said the new appointments will be due to the Senate in 60 days.
Legislation for the appointments had been referred to the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee. The top Republican on the committee, Sen. Shelly Short, R-Addy, said in a statement that she supported the effort to return the appointments because "the process just didn't sit right to me."
Short added that Ferguson "argues that he should be able to make his own appointments, and I agree with him."
Hunters and others who had been critical of Inslee's decision to name the two members of the commission cheered the news that the appointments had been pulled back this week.
Dan Wilson, co-chair of the Washington chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, said in a statement that his organization is "deeply grateful" to the Senate and the governor's office for pulling back the appointments.
"This presents an opportunity for Governor Ferguson to lead the way in fostering the inclusivity, transparency, and accountability needed for the Commission to effectively manage our natural resources," Wilson said.
Claire Loebs Davis, president of Washington Wildlife First, was a supporter of both appointments. She said she's not quite sure what to think about the decision to return them to the governor's office, but that she doesn't see it as a sign that the Ferguson administration plans to roll back wildlife protections.
Instead, she said it's Ferguson's prerogative to review the appointments, and this week's news amounts to him simply asking the Senate to let him do that. She added that she trusts he'll "do the right thing for wildlife in the end."
"He just got into office, and it might take some sorting out for him to figure out next steps," Davis said. "We should give him the time to do that before rushing to judgment about what's happened, because we don't really know yet."
In the short term, the decision leaves some key questions unanswered, such as who will be at the table when the commission meets next week in Olympia.
The nine-member body oversees the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and has the final say on species protections and hunting and fishing seasons, among other items. It also has the power to hire or fire the WDFW director.
Six commissioners have been confirmed by the Senate in past legislative sessions. Three commissioners were serving terms that expired in January — Ragen, Molly Linville of Douglas County and Jim Anderson of Chelan County.
In mid-January, days before leaving office, Inslee reappointed Ragen and named O'Connor to replace Linville. The administration did not make a decision on Anderson's seat.
Since no decision was made, Anderson has continued serving on the commission.
It's unclear whether Ragen or O'Connor will join the panel when it meets next week.
WDFW officials directed questions about the commission's makeup to the governor's office. The governor's office did not immediately respond.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lombardo notes education, housing advances in statement on Nevada Legislature
Lombardo notes education, housing advances in statement on Nevada Legislature

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lombardo notes education, housing advances in statement on Nevada Legislature

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Gov. Joe Lombardo emphasized progress on education and housing laws as he released a statement Friday on this year's legislative session. Lombardo, a Republican, also touched on decisions he made in vetoing a record 87 bills approved by the Democrat-controlled Nevada Legislature — just over 14% of everything that passed. He signed 518 bills into law. While contentious, this session had a smoother end than in 2023, when Lombardo called two special sessions immediately following adjournment. One session dealt with an unresolved budget that Republicans blocked, and the other passed the A's stadium deal. New Nevada traffic ticket laws to go into effect And despite this year's harsh criticism coming from progressive groups and advocates who cast many of his vetoes as betrayals, he thanked lawmakers for working in good faith toward 'a stronger, safer, and more affordable Nevada for all.' The Governor's Office said ceremonial bill signings are forthcoming for Senate Bill 460, the landmark bipartisan education reform package, and Assembly Bill 540, the Nevada Housing Access and Attainability Act. Lombardo's full statement appears below: I am proud of the meaningful progress we made this session – particularly in the areas of education and housing. Working together, we've taken important steps to expand educational opportunity, begin restoring accountability in our public schools, and make housing more attainable for working families across our said, I did not take lightly the decision to veto 87 bills. I do not enjoy using the veto pen, but as Governor, it is my responsibility to protect Nevadans from legislation that goes too far, expands government unnecessarily, or creates unintended consequences that hurt families, businesses, or our veto was carefully considered. My priority will always be to ensure that every law enacted serves the best interest of the people of Nevada – not special interests, and not bigger the legislators who worked in good faith throughout this session: thank you. I remain committed to working with you to build a stronger, safer, and more affordable Nevada for all. Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo The Nevada Legislature convenes once every two years for a 120-day session. The 83rd session ended on June 2. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Nebraska AG Sues Temu Over Alleged Consumer Protection Violations
Nebraska AG Sues Temu Over Alleged Consumer Protection Violations

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nebraska AG Sues Temu Over Alleged Consumer Protection Violations

Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers announced Thursday that his office had filed a lawsuit against low-priced e-commerce platform Temu. The complaint alleges a host of consumer protection violations, including misrepresentation of goods, greenwashing, embedding illegal malware into consumers' personal devices and sharing Nebraskans' data with the Chinese Communist Party. More from Sourcing Journal France Moves to Curb 'Ultra-fast' Fashion With Bill Targeting Shein and Temu Federal Appeals Court Grants Trump Temporary Relief on Tariff Ruling Labor Department, Which 'Ridiculed Supporting Worker Rights Abroad,' Responds to ILAB Lawsuit The crux of the complaint is centered around consumers' data. Hilgers alleges in the complaint that Temu has illegally 'siphoned' personal information about Nebraskan consumers, leaving them at risk. Hilgers said Temu's famously low-cost products 'come with a one-two punch to Americans.' 'Temu's app operates as malware; its code is designed to exfiltrate an enormous amount of sensitive information, from access to a user's microphone, pictures and messages, to information sufficient to track their movements,' Hilgers alleged in the complaint. 'This sensitive information that is unlawfully exfiltrated to Temu naturally flows to its powerful patron—the Chinese Communist Party. In the United States's great power competition with China, Temu presents yet another way in which China can extract and exploit information about Americans for its own purposes.' Temu was founded in China and is a subsidiary of PDD Holdings, but its headquarters are now located in Boston. A spokesperson for Temu said the claims made in the complaint are untrue. 'The allegations in the Nebraska Attorney General's lawsuit are without merit and appear to be a rehash of misinformation circulated online, much of it originating from a short-seller. We categorically deny the allegations and will vigorously defend ourselves against them,' the spokesperson told Sourcing Journal via email. This isn't the first time Temu has come under fire for the way it handles consumer data; in June 2024, Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin announced that the state had filed a lawsuit against Temu, calling it 'a data-theft business that sells goods online as a means to an end.' Last year, Republican members of Congress asked the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to pursue further information about Temu and its business practices. Throughout the rest of the complaint, Hilgers goes on to allege that the means by which Temu entices Nebraskan consumers are also unlawful. He alleges that the company uses greenwashing to mislead consumers and that it deceives consumers with its local warehousing business model, leading them to believe that they are purchasing from local businesses. 'Temu misleadingly uses the 'local' tag for products shipped from warehouses located in the United States,' Hilgers contended. 'These products could originate from foreign countries, such as China, but Temu passes them off as local goods because the products are temporarily stored for distribution in the United States.' In this section of the complaint, Hilgers is referring to the fact that Temu has been making a push for what it refers to as 'local warehouses.' These warehouses, located in markets of interest, like the U.S. and the EU, make it possible for the company to get products to consumers' doorsteps faster than sending them directly from China. While it has looked to onboard U.S. sellers, many of the sellers who use these local warehouses are based in China. Hilgers further said that the platform is 'awash in products infringing copyrights and other intellectual property.' In the complaint, the attorney general states that Nebraska believes Temu is in violation of multiple state laws, including its Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act and its Consumer Protection Act. Hilgers asks the judge overseeing the case to enjoin Temu from 'continuing to engage in such unlawful acts and practices' and to award affected Nebraskan consumers compensation. Hilgers said the lawsuit is intended to shield the state's residents from unlawful company conduct. 'Temu is putting Nebraskans' privacy at risk and running a platform rife with deceptive listings, unlawful promotional practices, and products that rip off Nebraska brands and creations,' he said in a statement. 'Our office will hold Temu accountable for its exploitation of Nebraska consumers, brands and creators and fight hard for honesty and safety in the online marketplace.'

British investors face £5bn blow from Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
British investors face £5bn blow from Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

British investors face £5bn blow from Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

British investors are facing a $7bn (£5bn) tax blow from Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill', analysts have warned. The UK Government alone could have to pay $400m a year as part of the 'revenge' tax outlined in the Republican tax and spending bill that has recently been passed by the House of Representatives. Mr Trump's bill is set to charge a retaliatory tax on some foreign investments made by entities from countries that the US deems to have 'unfair' tax systems – which includes the UK. The tax, known as Section 899, would levy a 5pc rate on gains made by UK investors – a rate that will increase by five percentage points each year up to a maximum rate of 20pc. Crucially, analysts have warned the wording of the policy documents open the door to taxing interest earned on holdings of US Treasuries, which are usually tax-exempt. The UK will be hit particularly hard if America starts charging a new tax on yields from US Treasuries because of its vast ownership of this debt. Britain recently overtook China as the world's second largest holder of US Treasuries, behind only Japan. UK entities, such as pension funds and private investors, hold a total of $779bn in US government bonds. The UK receives about $35bn a year in earnings, assuming an average interest rate of 4.5pc, according to analysis by the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr). If these yields are taxed at 5pc, this will cost $1.8bn – rising to $7.2bn as the tax rate increases to 20pc in the fourth year. Duncan Hardell, international tax specialist at NYU's Tax Law Centre, said that although it was unclear whether exemptions on Treasuries would still apply, there is a risk the tax rate will go up. 'The statute itself is not clear on this point,' he said. Section 899 has triggered widespread fear across Wall Street and prompted a huge lobbying drive, with dozens of international executives travelling to Washington DC to meet with members of Congress earlier this month to discuss the measure. The UK Government alone holds $55bn in US Treasuries. Niesr estimates yields on these holdings would be liable for a $100m tax charge in the first year, rising to $400m in the fourth year. Stephen Millard, Niesr's deputy director, warned that if this measure was imposed it would likely trigger a fire sale. He said: 'The big thing, of course, is how people would respond if it becomes clear that this income was taxable. You might expect to see holders of US Treasuries try to get out of them as much as they possibly can.' This would mean market turmoil, as a sell-off would drive down the value of the bonds dramatically. In turn, this would trigger a surge in US government borrowing costs as investors demanded higher returns to cover their costs. 'That whole idea of the US as being a safe currency or US Treasuries as being safe assets suddenly changes,' Mr Millard said. Even if Section 899 does not apply to holdings of US Treasuries, economists have warned the measure risks turning the president's trade war into a capital war and would trigger enormous market disruption. Mr Hardell added: 'It could cause chaos. The risk is you're creating a new front in the ongoing tariff war and extending that to taxes and investment. 'There's a real possibility that the US will be fighting the rest of the world all at once, on multiple fronts. Investment, business and talent could just flee to other countries.' Kim Clausing, a tax academic at the UCLA School of Law, said: 'What we're going to do is tax foreign investors at an accelerating rate based on things beyond their control, and we're going to be doing that in a context where we're issuing a lot of debt, erecting trade barriers and eroding a lot of sources of US strength. 'I find it deeply disturbing. It's a big overreach, and it's one that will backfire. We're basically going to shoot ourselves in the foot by making the US a much less attractive place to invest.' The bill is being scrutinised by the Senate and Mr Trump has set a deadline of July 4 to get a finalised version. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store