US officials reverse decision to shut down massive $5 billion wind farm project off New York coast — here's why
Reuters reported that the Trump administration lifted a ban last week on a $5 billion wind energy project off the coast of New York that could bring power to half a million homes as soon as 2027.
Empire Wind, a wind farm project from Norwegian company Equinor, is slated to have over 130 wind turbines and provide renewable power to New York. In Spring 2024, construction began in the South Brooklyn Marine Terminal.
As the fourth largest source of electricity generation in the United States, wind is an important element to our energy systems. Projects like this only help to grow clean energy, as coastal wind farms blend marine engineering with renewable energy technology to power thousands of homes.
Offshore wind is a powerful tool in the fight against climate change. Some opponents to offshore wind farms say that they disrupt the environment. However, according to Environment America, no whales have been harmed by offshore wind and the main issue is the noise during the construction process, which is also an issue with offshore drilling, in addition to the massive additional environmental problems that come with harvesting fossil fuels from the earth — especially the risk for accidental spills or explosions.
The project is also stimulating the economy, as it is anticipated that the wind farm will bring more than 1,000 jobs to the area.
However, alongside this win for wind energy is the potential revival of a natural gas pipeline that had previously been stopped. According to Reuters, the Constitution pipeline would bring gas from Pennsylvania into New York, though it is unclear if the company involved, Williams, will absolutely pursue it. Clean Technica reported on May 24 that the agreement should clear a hurdle for the pipeline, but it's not a certainty that it will proceed.
In order to mitigate the worst effects of human-caused climate change, the world needs to move away from dirty energy sources like gas and embrace cleaner, renewable energy like wind and solar. These processes take advantage of natural energy and do not require constant drilling or mining for new materials to burn into the air.
One of the best ways for individuals to take advantage of clean energy innovations is to install solar panels. Solar panels, especially when coupled with energy storage technology, can significantly reduce your energy bills and make your home more energy resilient.
If you want to take the next step to install solar energy at your own home, EnergySage provides a free platform to compare quotes from vetted local installers and can help to save around $10,000 on installations.
According to Equinor, the Empire Wind project is currently over 30% complete, bringing the farm closer to providing power to many in New York.
"This project delivers on the energy ambitions shared by the United States and New York by providing a vital new source of power to the region," Molly Morris, President of Equinor Wind US, said in a press release.
Should the government be able to control how we heat our homes?
Definitely
Only if it saves money
I'm not sure
No way
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
35 minutes ago
- CBS News
Pennsylvania food banks worry about SNAP cuts in federal government's proposed budget bill
Food banks fear that if the budget bill heading to the U.S. Senate gets passed, thousands of people in Pennsylvania will go hungry. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program helps nearly 2 million Pennsylvanians put food on the table. "For every meal the food bank provides, SNAP provides nine meals," said Jennifer Miller, CEO of the Westmoreland Food Bank. Leaders from the Westmoreland Food Bank and Feed Pennsylvania came together with the secretaries of the Pennsylvania Departments of Human Services and Agriculture to discuss how proposed federal changes would impact the most vulnerable in the state. They said the House-passed reconciliation bill would cut nearly $300 billion from the SNAP program through 2034. "We have existing work requirements in SNAP, but this bill would make them more strict. And as a result, we believe at least 140,000 Pennsylvanians could lose access to food assistance that helps people be healthy enough to go to work in the first place," Pennsylvania Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Val Arkoosh said. Food banks fear they will see substantially more people lining up for food. "We are not equipped to absorb the massive demand that would result from reduced access to federal nutrition programs. Food banks cannot replace the scale, the reach and the stability of the SNAP program," Miller said. "If enacted, these cuts would eliminate more meals per year distributed by the entire charitable food network in this country," said Julie Bancroft, CEO of Feeding Pennsylvania. State Agriculture Secretary Russell Redding said losing SNAP dollars would also hit farm families. "Roughly 25 cents of every grocery dollar spent goes straight back to the farm, 25 cents for every dollar for food purchased at the grocery store," Redding said. Arkoosh said the proposed cuts would cost the state over $1 billion more annually. "The result would be devastating for Pennsylvania families and for our economy," Arkoosh said. Many believe the fight is not over, though. "You all have a role in contacting your senators, your congressperson, letting them know how this impacts our commnity, our neighbors, our friends," Westmoreland County Commissioner Ted Kopas said.
CNN
38 minutes ago
- CNN
Three attacks in two months: Why American Jews are on edge
CNN's Bianna Golodryga breaks down the three high-profile recent attacks on Jewish elected officials, diplomats and community events that are putting American Jews and government officials on edge.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Acting FEMA Chief Told Staff He Didn't Know About U.S. Hurricane Season
The acting head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency told employees on Monday that he did not know the United States has a hurricane season, according to two people who heard the remarks and said it was unclear if he was serious. The official, David Richardson, has served in the Marines and worked in the Department of Homeland Security's Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office. After he joined FEMA in May, some FEMA workers expressed concern about his lack of experience in emergency management. The remark, coming a day after the start of the Atlantic hurricane season, could deepen those concerns. The two people who described the comment asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to speak publicly. The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees FEMA, said in a statement that Mr. Richardson was joking. The agency statement said FEMA would be focused on disaster response this hurricane season and said the Trump administration is in the process of reforming an agency it believes is bloated. Even if the comment was a joke, the timing would be questionable. The hurricane season, which began on Sunday and lasts through Nov. 30, is considered the agency's most challenging period, during which the country is the most vulnerable to large-scale devastating disasters that can overwhelm state and local disaster managers. In addition, FEMA has just gone through a major reduction in staffing. During the same meeting, according to the two people, Mr. Richardson told agency employees that FEMA should plan to respond to this year's hurricane season the same way the agency responded to last year's hurricane season. But employees have expressed concern with that approach because of the agency's reduced staff. Since the start of the Trump administration, FEMA has lost about a quarter of its full-time staff, including one-fifth of the coordinating officers who manage responses to large-scale disasters, according to a former senior official. The departures came after pressure from the Department of Government Efficiency, previously led by Elon Musk, for a massive culling of federal workers. Mr. Richardson's predecessor at FEMA was Cameron Hamilton, who was pushed out in early May, a day after telling members of Congress that FEMA was vital to communities 'in their greatest times of need' and should not be eliminated. The comment appeared to be in conflict with President Trump, who has suggested the agency be eliminated. On his first full day as acting administrator, Mr. Richardson told the agency's employees that if any of them tried to obstruct his agenda, 'I will run right over you.'
