logo
Nonprofit leaders say they are bracing for potential targeting by the Trump administration after a controversial tax measure advances in Congress

Nonprofit leaders say they are bracing for potential targeting by the Trump administration after a controversial tax measure advances in Congress

CNN17-05-2025

A House measure that would make it easier to yank the tax-exempt status of nonprofits the Trump administration deems as supporting terrorism marks the latest effort by the president and his Republican allies to hobble organizations that oppose his agenda, some nonprofit leaders argue.
The provision comes as President Donald Trump has used the powers of his office in extraordinary ways to target top law firms, elite universities and other perceived political enemies. Last month, for instance, Trump directed his Justice Department to launch a probe of ActBlue, the main fundraising platform for Democratic candidates and liberal causes.
The language – added this week by the House's tax-writing committee to the massive 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' that's a top priority for Trump – would allow the Treasury secretary to suspend the tax-exempt status of organizations the administration says are 'terrorist supporting.'
More than 200 groups – ranging from the American Library Association to the Sierra Club – recently signed onto a public statement urging the House to remove the provision. They say it's a tool for the president to take aim at his opponents.
'We have seen this administration use every lever of power they have been able to grab to target the people they see as their enemies,' said Cole Leiter, executive director of Americans Against Government Censorship, one of the groups objecting to the House language. 'This is a broad-based weaponization of government, and this is only the latest manifestation of that.'
Nonprofit groups fear more is on the way – with a White House deadline looming for government agencies to identify large publicly traded corporations, foundations and nonprofits, universities and state and local bar and medical associations for potential civil investigations.
In a statement, a White House official contended that Trump is operating within his rights and the law.
'President Trump will always stand for law and order, ending the weaponization of the legal system, and rooting out fraud in the federal government,' said White House spokesperson Harrison Fields in an email to CNN, echoing the president's familiar refrain that the Biden administration used the judicial system against him when Trump was out of office.
'Every action he has taken in his second term reflects these priorities and is authorized by the Constitution,' Fields said. 'Outside groups that ignored the previous administration's egregious legal abuses against President Trump have no credibility today.'
The tax provision, recently added to a nearly 400-page legislative proposal by the GOP-controlled House Ways and Means Committee, hews closely to language in a bill written by New York Republican Rep. Claudia Tenney that the House approved in the last Congressional session but did not pass the Senate.
It would allow the Treasury secretary to suspend the tax-exempt status of charities the secretary determines have provided 'material support or resources' to an organization the government has designated as a terrorist organization.
Aides to Tenney and Ways and Means Chair Missouri Rep. Jason Smith did not respond to CNN's inquiries about the measure. During floor debate on the Tenney bill last November, Smith said lawmakers have a 'duty to make sure that taxpayers are not subsidizing terrorism.'
Groups opposing the measure said it lacks adequate safeguards to protect organizations' due-process rights.
Kia Hamadanchy, a senior policy counsel with the ACLU, noted that it already is illegal to provide material support to a terrorist organization. The new provision, Hamadanchy said, is problematic because gives the Treasury secretary exclusive discretion to designate a group as terrorist-supporting and would allow the agency to suspend a nonprofit's tax-exempt status 'before you've had a chance to go before a neutral decision maker like a judge.'
Lisa Gilbert – the co-president of the liberal watchdog group Public Citizen – said she fears organizations with international networks could unwittingly become ensnared should the provision become law.
'Think about foreign humanitarian aid, for example, or groups that receive funds from foundations that are not solely based in the United States,' he said. 'There is a lot of activity that could be swept up.'
The White House referred questions about the bill's language to the Treasury Department. A Treasury spokesperson declined to comment.
The overall bill currently faces a rocky path in the House, although the chamber's Republican leaders have said they want to bring it to the floor for a vote next week. A group of GOP hardliners on Friday blocked its passage in a key committee as they demanded steeper cuts and changes to its Medicaid provisions.
If the bill passes the House, organizations opposed to the language regarding nonprofits' tax status say they will fight to kill it in the Senate.
The legislation deals with a range of the president's priorities, from tax cuts to immigration enforcement. But to pass it through Congress, where Republicans hold slim majorities in both chambers, GOP leaders are relying on a tool called budget reconciliation – allowing a simple majority to approve it without any Democratic votes.
Under strict Senate rules, however, the chamber's parliamentarian must determine whether its provisions have an actual impact on the budget, not merely an 'incidental' one. An early analysis by a congressional joint taxation panel found the provision has a 'negligible' effect in revenue, buoying opponents' hopes that it could be stripped from the larger bill in the Senate.
Federal law bars the president from ordering tax investigations of specific people or organizations, but Trump has publicly threatened to revoke the tax-exempt status of Harvard University for refusing to accede to his policy demands.
In remarks last month about Harvard's tax status, Trump indicated other organizations could be targeted, and singled out Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, a nonprofit watchdog group that tackles public corruption and has sued the Trump administration over several of its actions.
Some nonprofit leaders now are warily watching for other potential administration moves, arising from executive order that Trump signed January 21, aimed at encouraging the private sector to end what the administration deems as 'illegal discrimination.'
Among other things, the order directed agencies to identify up to nine potential targets among foundations, corporations, colleges and other entities, for 'civil compliance' probes as part of the administration's effort to root out diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility policies. Groups that could be subjected to scrutiny include what the order calls 'large' nonprofits and associations, foundations with assets of at least $500 million and colleges and universities with endowments that top $1 billion.
Attorney General Pam Bondi already has directed the department's Civil Rights Division to review whether universities are trying to skirt a 2023 Supreme Court ruling that said schools could no longer take race into consideration as a specific basis for granting admission. A Justice Department task force aimed at combatting antisemitism on campuses is also investigating nearly a dozen universities and the entire University of California system.
Trump's Jan. 21 order also calls on the attorney general to issue a report to the White House recommending actions within 120 days – a deadline that will arrive next week. But it's not clear whether lists of potential targets have been assembled or will be released publicly.
A DOJ spokesperson did not respond to an inquiry about the report.
Even so, leaders of nonprofit groups are having conversations with their lawyers and looking for ways to avoid risks and prepare for potential audits, several people familiar with internal discussions tell CNN.
'People are trying to brace for it,' said Gilbert of Public Citizen. 'It's very unclear what it will mean to be on a list in Trump's America.'
CNN's Hannah Rabinowitz contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Steel and Nippon Steel say Trump has approved their partnership
US Steel and Nippon Steel say Trump has approved their partnership

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

US Steel and Nippon Steel say Trump has approved their partnership

President Donald Trump has approved a partnership between US Steel and Nippon Steel, the companies said in a release on Friday. 'We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again,' the companies said in a statement. The steelmakers also entered into a national security agreement with the US government, the statement said. This is a developing story and will be updated.

Judge Signals Openness to Granting Bail to Returned Deportee
Judge Signals Openness to Granting Bail to Returned Deportee

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Judge Signals Openness to Granting Bail to Returned Deportee

A federal judge signaled on Friday that she was open to granting bail to Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, one week after he was returned to the United States to face criminal charges following his wrongful deportation to El Salvador. If the judge, Barbara D. Holmes, does end up denying the Justice Department's request to detain Mr. Abrego Garcia as he awaits trial, it would be a significant rebuke of the Trump administration, which has repeatedly accused him of being a dangerous criminal, even a terrorist. But it would also represent a Pyrrhic victory for him and his defense team because, as Judge Holmes pointed out, he would almost certainly be taken into custody by immigration officials. Judge Holmes declined to make a final decision on the question of bail at a daylong hearing in Federal District Court in Nashville where Mr. Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty to a two-count federal indictment unsealed last Friday. The indictment, which was obtained in May while he was being held in Salvadoran custody, charged him with having taken part in a yearslong conspiracy to smuggle undocumented immigrants across the United States as a member of the violent street gang MS-13. The judge said she intended to issue a written decision about Mr. Abrego Garcia's bail 'sooner rather than later.' During the hearing, federal prosecutors threw everything they had at Mr. Abrego Garcia in an effort to persuade Judge Holmes that he was a flight risk and a danger to the community. In an unusual move, the presentation was made personally by Robert E. McGuire, the acting U.S. attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee. Mr. McGuire brought up two domestic violence complaints that Mr. Abrego Garcia's wife had filed against him years ago. He accused the defendant, a Salvadoran man who had been living in Maryland at the time of his expulsion, of transporting children as part of the smuggling operation. And he asserted there was evidence that Mr. Abrego Garcia had sexually harassed some of his young female passengers. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

About 200 Marines begin Los Angeles deployment at Westwood Federal Building
About 200 Marines begin Los Angeles deployment at Westwood Federal Building

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

About 200 Marines begin Los Angeles deployment at Westwood Federal Building

Approximately 200 Marines arrived in Los Angeles to begin an assignment to guard the Wilshire Federal Building on Friday, according to an Army general, marking a rare occasion where military forces will be deployed on U.S. soil. President Trump last \weekend federalized and deployed more than 2,000 National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines to L.A. after protests erupted in the light of immigration enforcement operations throughout the city and nearby areas. The move to send military has been described as "authoritarian" by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, while Mr. Trump said Friday morning that the "city would be burning to the ground right now" had he not activated the troops. Newsom has challenged the decision in a lawsuit. A federal judge sided with Newsom and blocked Mr. Trump from sending troops on Thursday night, but an appeals court temporarily halted the order later that evening. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit scheduled another hearing on the case for June 17. The troops are allowed to stay in L.A. at least until that date. US Marines walk on the parking lot of the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles, California, on June 13, 2025. A judge has ordered Donald Trump to return control of the California National Guard to the state, saying the president's decision to deploy them to protest-hit Los Angeles over Governor Gavin Newsom's objections was "illegal." Protests against Trump's harsh immigration policies spread on June 11 across the United States despite a military-backed crackdown in Los Angeles and threats by the hard-right Republican president to use "heavy force." ETIENNE LAURENT/AFP via Getty Images During a news conference Friday morning, Maj. Gen. Scott M. Sherman said the Marines arrived in L.A. Thursday night. They began their assignment in Westwood around noon on Friday. Sherman added that the sole mission of the deployed Marines is to protect federal property and personnel, like the Federal Building. The Marines will be armed with weapons and wearing crowd control gear such as a riot shield, baton and gas masks. "I would like to emphasize that the soldiers will not participate in law enforcement activities," Sherman said. "Rather, they'll be focused on protecting federal law enforcement personnel." Sherman confirmed that the National Guard soldiers who have been deployed since Sunday have also not participated in law enforcement activity. No troops have been injured since arriving in L.A. "They have watched federal law enforcement arrest personnel as they were protecting," Sherman said. "They have not had to detain anyone at this point." It's not yet clear what assignments the other 500 deployed Marines will receive in L.A. Sherman said he couldn't speculate on future operations, but recent training has centered around defending federal property. "That's the mission we've really focused on them to do," he said. "They've already started with the Wilshire [Federal] Building today, and we will progress from there." As of Friday morning, there were 56,300 individuals in ICE detention centers across the country, a record for the agency, according to internal government data obtained by CBS News. On Thursday and Wednesday, ICE recorded 1,400 and 1,600 nationwide immigration arrests, respectively, the statistics indicate. ICE arrests have increased by more than 100% since President Trump's first 100 days in office, but they remain well below the 3,000 daily arrest rate demanded by the White House. contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store