
Murder accused ‘dumped victim's phone to put police off trail', court told
Prosecutor Christopher Paxton KC told jurors at Ipswich Crown Court that Roy Barclay, 56, had been 'unlawfully at large' for two years at the time he was said to have killed Anita Rose.
The mother-of-six, aged 57, was found injured by a cyclist near a sewage works in Brantham, Suffolk on July 24 last year.
She died four days later in hospital of traumatic head injuries.
Barclay, of no fixed address, denies her murder.
File handout CCTV images issued by Suffolk Police of Anita Rose. Roy Barclay, 56, is on trial at Ipswich Crown Court accused of murdering the mother-of-six who was found unconscious in Brantham, Suffolk on July 24, 2024 and died four days later on July 28. Issue date: Thursday May 29, 2025.
Mr Paxton, continuing to open the prosecution case on Friday, said Barclay had looked at news articles about the incident in the days after the attack.
He said that in one article viewed by Barclay, senior police officer Mike Brown appealed for information about Ms Rose's iPhone which Mr Brown said could hold 'key information'.
The prosecutor said that 'was a signal to cunning Roy Barclay that he needed to get rid of that phone'.
'Mike Brown was right and that explains what was to follow the very next day in Ipswich town centre on July 27,' Mr Paxton said.
'Roy Barclay dumps Anita's iPhone after Mr Brown has told the public in an article Mr Barclay has viewed about the significance of that phone.'
He said that the 'dropping of Anita's phone in Ipswich' was 'to put the police off the trail'.
The barrister said that Barclay was captured on CCTV footage in Upper Orwell Street in Ipswich on July 27 with a 'carrier bag in his left hand' which prosecutors say contained Ms Rose's phone.
He said that Barclay entered a seating area with the bag and is later seen to emerge from the seating area without the bag.
He said a couple – Mr Ichim and Ms Baiculescu – were captured on CCTV minutes later entering then emerging from the seating area and 'there's an exchange of an item' between them, which Mr Paxton said was Ms Rose's phone.
'Within a minute or so when that phone is switched on, that's Anita's phone, it alerts the police,' Mr Paxton said.
He said that 'numerous police officers flooded the area and found the unsuspecting Mr Ichim and Ms Baiculescu' in a mobile phone and vape shop.
The barrister said 'they had paid for a factory reset of the phone' but police arrived before this was done.
He said Mr Ichim was arrested and later released, adding: 'Many people at times were treated as suspects but were later released without charge.'
He said 'nobody other than Anita knew the password' to the phone, and police have not been able to get into it.
The barrister said Barclay 'played at times a cat and mouse game with police, watching their moves'.
He added that after he was arrested, Barclay denied any wrongdoing in a prepared statement and said: 'I would sometimes sit on the benches on Upper Orwell Street. There is often litter on the seats and in that area.'
Mr Paxton said: 'He knew this was a popular area, that's why he chose it, a busy seating area where he would be able to drop something.'
The prosecutor said Barclay showed an 'arrogance in keeping the items he did as trophies, believing perhaps that he could get away with murder'.
He had earlier told the trial that Ms Rose's pink jacket, phone case and Samsung earbuds were found at camps Barclay had used.
Mr Paxton said Barclay had also searched online for four prisons 'no doubt wondering if caught which prison he would end up in', and that this was done on July 25, the day after Ms Rose was attacked.
He said it took a 'piece of luck for police to have contact with' Barclay, when Detective Constable Barry Simpson 'saw a male walking quickly along the road' on October 15.
The officer, who was in an unmarked car and working on the murder investigation, 'thought the male looked similar to an image he had seen in the murder inquiry' and stopped to speak with him.
Mr Paxton said the man was Barclay, but that he 'lied' to Det Con Simpson and gave his name as John Lesley, providing a false home address and saying he worked as a gardener.
The prosecutor said the officer took photos of Barclay 'surreptitiously' and he was allowed on his way, but a 'manhunt' started the following day when officers determined that the man was not John Lesley.
Barclay was tracked down by police and arrested at Ipswich Library on October 21, said Mr Paxton, adding that Barclay had 'changed his appearance' – with a shaved head and the 'beard's gone'.
The barrister earlier told jurors that Barclay had 'lived off-grid' and slept in 'various makeshift camps'.
'He had been on the run trying to avoid the police and authorities to try and avoid being recalled back to prison,' Mr Paxton said.
He said Ms Rose was subjected to 'numerous kicks, stamps and blows being delivered to her face, head and body' in a 'vicious and brutal attack'.
The trial continues.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
E-bike murder trial driver ‘was not acting like he had hit someone' after crash
Jordan Hind told jurors at Derby Crown Court that she did not hear anyone screaming or think there was anything underneath the Land Rover Discovery being driven by Keaton Muldoon. Muldoon, 23, denies using the vehicle to murder 25-year-old Alana Armstrong but has admitted causing death by dangerous driving and causing serious injury by dangerous driving. The defendant, of Tuckers Lane, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, further denies causing grievous bodily harm with intent to Ms Armstrong's boyfriend Jordan Newton-Kay, whose right leg was amputated 15cm above the knee after the crash. The court heard that Mr Newton-Kay was riding his black, orange and blue off-road bike with Ms Armstrong on the back that evening, while a friend was on another similar bike. Giving evidence from behind a curtain on Tuesday in the third week of Muldoon's trial, Miss Hind said she was the rear seat passenger at the time of the alleged murder in Batley Lane, Pleasley, Derbyshire. Answering questions from defence barrister Adrian Langdale KC, Miss Hind said she was picked up in a pub car park shortly before the fatal collision at about 8pm on November 26 last year, having arranged to buy £30 worth of drugs from Muldoon. She told the court that Muldoon had asked her for her phone and clothes in text messages in the days after the incident, before texting to say he would hand himself in. Miss Hind, who could not be seen from the public gallery or the dock, said: 'Obviously I had been dragged into something I had not done and I was scared and I wanted it to be sorted.' After accepting that she had lied to police by denying she had ever been in the Land Rover when she was arrested at her home on suspicion of murder on November 30, Miss Hind gave jurors her account of the fatal incident. Describing how the incident started shortly after Muldoon pulled into a lay-by, Miss Hind told the jury: 'I jumped out and got into the back to get (drugs from a coat pocket). 'It looked like car lights because there were two lights. I thought it was police or somebody else and obviously I was panicking, so I laid down and I hid.' Muldoon was still in the driver's seat, Miss Hind told the court, and had driven off pretty much as soon as she had started hiding. 'It was just a normal pull away.' Telling the court she had felt no bangs and had not heard the sound of anything being hit by the Land Rover, Miss Hind said: 'It felt like it was going up grass verges and skidding and things like that.' Mr Langdale asked Miss Hind about assertions she had made to police that Muldoon swore while he was at the wheel and had shouted 'move out of the way' and said he had 'only meant to hit the back' of the victims' e-bike. Asked by Mr Langdale if she could recall precisely what was said, Miss Hind responded: 'I can't be sure of exactly what (was said) but it was around that same sort of thing. 'It comes up to the same thing of him knocking somebody off a bike.' The witness maintained that she had not heard any screaming, that she 'didn't hear anything under the car' and said there had been no attempt to ram the rider of the second e-bike. After pulling over following the incident, Muldoon remained calm, was not aggressive or 'acting like he had hit someone,' the court heard. Under re-examination by prosecutor Sally Howes KC, Miss Hind said she had made an internet search for the latest police news in the wake of the incident because of the comments made by Muldoon. 'I didn't feel anything but him saying that – obviously something had happened. It was just a general wanting to know,' she told the court. The trial continues.


Daily Record
5 hours ago
- Daily Record
Liverpool parade crash suspect absent from court as victims named
Paul Doyle has been charged with a series of alleged offencers following the parade in Liverpool city centre. A suspect accused of driving into a crowd at Liverpool's Premier League victory parade was absent from court as a judge ruled that victims could be named as reporting restrictions were lifted. Paul Doyle, 53, from West Derby, has been charged with a series of alleged offences after a car was driven into crowds of fans during last week's Premier League title celebrations in Liverpool city centre. A total of 109 pedestrians, ranging from children aged as young as nine to a 78-year-old casualty, were injured after being struck by a Ford Galaxy on Water Street shortly after 6pm on May 26, with four still in hospital, reports the Mirror. The defendant appeared at Liverpool Crown Court on Friday charged with two counts of wounding with intent, two of inflicting grievous bodily harm, two of attempting to inflict grievous bodily harm and dangerous driving. His case was brought back before to the Crown Court this afternoon, for the Honorary Recorder of Liverpool Judge Andrew Menary KC to consider lifting reporting restrictions which had been imposed on the identities of the six complainants. Doyle was not present during the hearing, either in the dock or via video link, having been excused from attending on the last occasion. Doyle was not required to attend court or be present via video link for the hearing. He is due to appear for a plea hearing in August, with a provisional trial date set for November. Restrictions preventing the media from reporting the names of the casualties, their addresses, places of work, schools, pictures or any other information which could lead to their identities being revealed were imposed by District Judge Paul Healey in the Magistrates' Court last week. An order under Section 45 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, which protects the identity of the two boys, aged 11 and 17, who were named as complainants, has not been challenged by the media and will remain in place indefinitely. But reporting restrictions under Section 46 of the same act, which prevented the four adult casualties from being identified, were opposed. And Judge Menary ruled that the reporting restrictions should be lifted after hearing submissions from Philip Astbury, prosecuting, and Gavin Millar KC, who was instructed to make representations on behalf of organisations including the BBC, ITN, Sky, Associated Newspapers Ltd, Guardian News and Media and the Telegraph Media Group. The four complainants in question can therefore be named as 18-year-old Ethan Gillard, 52-year-old Simon Nash, 66-year-old Christine Seeckts and 77-year-old Susan Passey. Doyle is due to face a three to four week trial before the same court on November 24 this year and has been remanded into custody ahead of a plea and trial preparation hearing on August 14.


Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Liverpool parade crash suspect absent from court as judge issues key ruling
Paul Doyle, 53, is charged with seven offences over a crash during Liverpool's Premier League victory parade where more than 100 people were left injured in the city centre A suspect accused of driving into a crowd at Liverpool's Premier League victory parade was absent from court as a judge ruled that victims could be named as reporting restrictions were lifted. Paul Doyle, 53, from West Derby, has been charged with a series of alleged offences after a car was driven into crowds of fans during last week's Premier League title celebrations in Liverpool city centre. A total of 109 pedestrians, ranging from children aged as young as nine to a 78-year-old casualty, were injured after being struck by a Ford Galaxy on Water Street shortly after 6pm on May 26, with four still in hospital. The defendant appeared at Liverpool Crown Court on Friday charged with two counts of wounding with intent, two of inflicting grievous bodily harm, two of attempting to inflict grievous bodily harm and dangerous driving. His case was brought back before to the Crown Court this afternoon, for the Honorary Recorder of Liverpool Judge Andrew Menary KC to consider lifting reporting restrictions which had been imposed on the identities of the six complainants. Doyle was not present during the hearing, either in the dock or via video link, having been excused from attending on the last occasion. Doyle was not required to attend court or be present via video link for the hearing. He is due to appear for a plea hearing in August, with a provisional trial date set for November. Restrictions preventing the media from reporting the names of the casualties, their addresses, places of work, schools, pictures or any other information which could lead to their identities being revealed were imposed by District Judge Paul Healey in the Magistrates' Court last week. An order under Section 45 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, which protects the identity of the two boys, aged 11 and 17, who were named as complainants, has not been challenged by the media and will remain in place indefinitely. But reporting restrictions under Section 46 of the same act, which prevented the four adult casualties from being identified, were opposed And Judge Menary ruled that the reporting restrictions should be lifted after hearing submissions from Philip Astbury, prosecuting, and Gavin Millar KC, who was instructed to make representations on behalf of organisations including the BBC, ITN, Sky, Associated Newspapers Ltd, Guardian News and Media and the Telegraph Media Group. The four complainants in question can therefore be named as 18-year-old Ethan Gillard, 52-year-old Simon Nash, 66-year-old Christine Seeckts and 77-year-old Susan Passey. Doyle is due to face a three to four week trial before the same court on November 24 this year and has been remanded into custody ahead of a plea and trial preparation hearing on August 14.