Hundreds of advocacy groups call on Thune to reject House Republicans' budget blueprint
Hundreds of advocacy organizations have called on Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) to reject a budget blueprint from House Republicans.
A letter sent to Thune is led by the liberal health care advocacy group Families USA and features more than 300 organizations, such as Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the NAACP and the ACLU.
'We write to share our deep concerns about the House-passed budget reconciliation resolution—specifically the catastrophic health care cuts it would require and the resulting harm it would impose on families and communities across the country,' the letter, sent Wednesday, reads.
The budget resolution from the House, passed last month, puts forth a $1.5 trillion minimum for spending cuts across committees, featuring a target of $2 trillion. It also places a $4.5 trillion cap on the deficit impact of any Republican plan to continue with President Trump's 2017 tax cuts and includes an extra $300 billion in spending for the border and defense.
The resolution has also put the job on the House Energy and Commerce Committee of identifying a minimum of $880 billion in cuts to programs under its jurisdiction. In early March, the Congressional Budget Office issued a report finding the savings cannot be reached without Medicaid and Medicare.
'At a time when families are already struggling to access affordable health care, moving forward with these cuts would be a betrayal of the very voters that sent leaders to Washington to lower costs, not to shred our nation's social safety net,' the letter reads.
The groups pushed the upper chamber to 'not to take up the House's budget bill and instead commit to protecting Medicaid and the other critical health care programs on which your constituents rely for their health and well-being.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Running a low-turnout Georgia runoff election could cost $100 per vote
ATLANTA (AP) — Miller County Election Supervisor Jerry Calhoun says he's not sure anyone will vote in an upcoming Democratic primary runoff. After all, the southwest Georgia county only recorded one vote in the June 17 Democratic primary for the state Public Service Commission among candidates Keisha Waites, Peter Hubbard and Robert Jones. Two other Democratic ballots weren't counted, probably because voters chose Daniel Blackman, who had been disqualified. Turnout wasn't much higher among Republicans, with 40 votes cast in Commissioner Tim Echols' victory over challenger Lee Muns. 'I'm going to tell you the truth, I'm worried about it for the runoff, but there's nothing I can do about it," Calhoun said of the July 15 Democratic runoff between Waites and Hubbard. Statewide turnout for the primary on June 17 reached just 2.8% of Georgia's 7.4 million active registered voters. That includes more than 15,000 people who likely voted for Blackman and didn't have their votes counted. But the Democratic runoff might struggle to reach 1% turnout statewide. And counties could spend $10 million statewide to hold the election, based on a sampling of some county spending. That could be more than $100 per vote. People who want to change Georgia's runoff system say this election shows how the state spends money only to have decisions made by a fraction of people who voted the first time. 'It's a terrible waste of resources," said state Rep. Saira Draper, an Atlanta Democrat. But key Republicans are opposed to two methods used elsewhere — letting someone win without a majority or using ranked choice voting to determine a majority. In the meantime, some Republican-dominated counties are using a state law to reduce the number of polling places for the runoff. In many states, finishing first is enough to win, even if it's far short of a majority. Georgia is one of only nine states, mostly in the South, that require runoffs. And it's one of only two states, along with Mississippi, that demand a runoff if no candidate wins a general election majority after a partisan primary. Historians say runoffs were created in part to make it harder for Black candidates to win office, giving white voters a chance to unify around a candidate. Georgia legislators in 1995 lowered the threshold to avoid a runoff, requiring a candidate to a earn only a 45% plurality. Republicans changed the threshold back to a majority after a GOP candidate lost a 1996 Senate race. Draper introduced a bill in 2023 to lower the threshold back to 45%, but it went nowhere. House Governmental Affairs Committee Chair Victor Anderson, a Cornelia Republican, is among many who believes a majority is an important electoral mandate. 'To actually win an election you should receive, in one form or fashion, at least 50% plus one of the vote. And so I am not in favor of a plurality system," said Anderson, whose committee oversees election legislation. Another option would be letting voters rank their choices and determining the winner using second or third choices. That's the system New York City voters are using to elect a mayor. Scot Turner, a former Republican state representative who champions that system, said turnout is typically lower for runoffs, silencing voters who don't return. He said ranked choice voting would broaden participation, ensure a majority chooses the winner and save money. 'It's a tweak of our existing system that maximizes turnout and lowers cost,' Turner said. 'Because we see these massive drop-offs in turnout for runoffs, those are disenfranchised voters. Their votes are tossed as if they never were cast.' Georgia issues ranked-choice ballots to military and overseas voters. But many Republicans oppose expansion, with the Georgia Senate passing bills to ban its further use. What some counties are doing is limiting the number of polling places for the runoff. State law allows a county to open only one polling place for a primary runoff if fewer than 1% of a county's registered voters cast ballots in the initial primary. That's likely to apply to some Republican-dominated counties. A few rural counties, including Miller County, already operate only one voting location. Cherokee County, with nearly 208,000 active voters, announced Friday that it would open only one polling place after fewer than 2,000 people cast ballots in the Democratic primary. Elections Director Anne Dover said the decision would cut the cost of the runoff in half, saving about $70,000. Travis Doss, president of the Georgia Association of Voter Registration and Election Officials, said Friday that as many as 20 counties are considering that option.
Politico
23 minutes ago
- Politico
Thomas Massie says he'll withdraw war-powers measure if Iran-Israel cease-fire holds
President Donald Trump already had Republicans scrambling to get their 'big, beautiful bill' to his desk by next week. Now he's got Congress grappling with something even bigger: the aftermath of his airstrikes on Iran. The issue could come to a head with a vote as soon as this week. Sen. Tim Kaine's (D-Va.) resolution requiring congressional approval for military action in Iran ripens Friday but is expected to be on the floor sooner with the megabill set to eat up the back half of the week. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is pushing to move up the vote. He's urging his party to support the measure, but Democrats expect to lose the vote of Sen. John Fetterman (Pa.). On the GOP side, keep an eye on Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), who said Sunday on X 'Congress alone' has the power to authorize war. Lawmakers in both chambers are set to receive briefings Tuesday on the situation in Iran; they were on the books before the strikes. In the House, Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna's (D-Calif.) war powers resolution, which would block U.S. involvement in Iran, will not ripen until next week. But House GOP leadership is considering getting ahead of that: Speaker Mike Johnson could move this week to kill the effort with language getting rid of the privileged nature of the resolution, according to a person granted anonymity to relay the private discussions. Trump and GOP leaders are moving to unify the rank-and-file behind Trump's decision to strike, even as Trump openly muses about pursuing regime change in Iran. Take note of Trump's renewed attacks on Massie — a person familiar with the conversations who was granted anonymity to discuss them tells POLITICO it's part of an effort to keep members in line. Adding to the chaos for Republicans is Trump's Sunday evening musing about pursuing 'regime change' in Iran if its current leaders can't 'MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.' 'This is not America First folks,' Massie said in response to Trump's Truth Social post. House Democrats are less unified. Most are questioning the constitutionality of the strike, but the party is split on where to go from there. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) has brought up impeachment. Others, like Rep. Steny Hoyer (Md.), were more supportive of the strike. That could be a problem for Democrats trying to strengthen their opposition. The top Democrats on Foreign Affairs, Intelligence and Armed Services are drafting their own resolution in response to the strikes, according to a person granted anonymity to discuss the plan. There are likely a handful of pro-Israel Democrats who will vote against any war powers resolution. Even if the bill makes it to a House floor vote there likely won't be enough Republicans. What else we're watching: — Megabill's big week: Republicans will hold a closed-door meeting Monday night after votes for leadership to update members on the GOP megabill and its outstanding issues. Full bill text could land Monday, though it may also slip. While the 'big, beautiful bill' could hit the floor as soon as Wednesday, Thursday is looking more likely. — First Dem oversight vote: House Democrats' steering committee will vote this evening on who should be the party's leader on the Oversight Committee, followed by a full caucus vote Tuesday. California Rep. Robert Garcia, 47, is seen as the favorite in a field split along generational lines. He's running against Reps. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, 44; Kweisi Mfume of Maryland, 76; and Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts, 70. — Slashes to GAO funding: House Republican appropriators are proposing to cut funding for the Government Accountability Office by nearly half. It's the latest in a series of flash points between the GOP and the watchdog agency, which has been involved in clashes this year over DOGE, regulatory rollbacks and Trump's incursions into the power of the purse. Meredith Lee Hill, Jordain Carney, Nicholas Wu and Katherine Tully-McManus contributed to this report.
CNN
29 minutes ago
- CNN
Marjorie Taylor Greene says Trump voters wanted ‘no more foreign wars' and Iran strikes expose MAGA divide
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene made clear she is at odds with the president and other Republicans who support an aggressive posture against Iran, acknowledging that there's a 'very big divide' in the party over the issue and that her position opposing foreign wars is becoming 'more popular' among the base. 'I got elected on the exact same campaign promises that President Trump got elected on. We promised no more foreign wars, no more regime change,' Greene told CNN on Monday. Earlier in the day, she wrote in a lengthy post on X that Trump's decision to authorize US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend 'feels like a complete bait and switch' on the MAGA agenda. The US strikes in Iran further inflamed a growing divide within Trump's party, between those cheering on intervention in the conflict, like Sen. Lindsey Graham, and those warning against engaging in forever wars, like Greene and Rep. Thomas Massie, as well as influential conservative voices like Steve Bannon and Charlie Kirk. Asked if Trump risks alienating his MAGA base, Greene acknowledged a 'very big divide' among Republican voters, noting younger generations are more 'skeptical.' 'We've been lied to too many times, and I think it's right to be skeptical,' she said. Greene, who has consistently opposed funding Ukraine's fight against Russian aggression, said she thinks her position opposing US involvement in foreign conflicts is becoming 'more popular' among Republicans. 'If this war were to continue, and we were to see, sadly, see American troops coming home with on flag-draped coffins, I think you would see Americans totally saying the same thing I'm saying, I hope that never happens again,' she said, adding, 'I think President Trump has us on a path to peace.' She said she hopes the sharp divide in the GOP over involvement in Iran won't hurt the party in next year's midterm elections, but she emphasized that 'Republicans need to earn Americans' votes.' 'I don't think we're earning our votes in the midterm, and that's on Congress,' she said, urging her colleagues to pass Trump's massive domestic policy bill that is the subject of tense negotiations between Republican factions. Greene said she had not yet been briefed on the situation in Iran and the threat posed by its nuclear program, but brought up the start of the Iraq War, which engendered distrust in many Americans after the revelation that Iraq did not have the weapons of mass destruction that the US had used to justify it. 'We have people suffering today with terrible PTSD and lifelong injuries from these wars that we should have never gotten involved in,' she said, emphasizing her belief that entering into foreign conflicts is not at the top of most Americans' minds. 'When most Americans are walking around, they're not thinking about Iran,' she said, later adding, 'They're very much focused on their American life and their American problems and that's exactly what they should be focused on.' Following an Iranian missile strike on a US airbase in Qatar on Monday, Greene said, 'We saw President Trump's measured response,' pointing to the president's online messages urging peace in the region, which she said was 'exactly the same messaging that we elected him for.' She later brushed off the 'no kings' protest movement staged in opposition to Trump earlier this month, 'President Trump is not a king. MAGA is not a cult. And I'm entitled to my own opinion.' 'I can support the president at the same time as I say, I don't think we should have foreign wars. And I can tell you right now, President Trump doesn't want to stay in a foreign war,' she added. Though Greene disagrees with Trump ordering strikes in Iran, she wouldn't go so far as some of her colleagues on both sides of the aisle in saying Congress should have voted to authorize the move, noting that former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush also authorized attacks without congressional approval. 'The president, by law, can lead. He's the commander in chief,' she said. Greene acknowledged that Congress is constitutionally required to authorize military action if the conflict lasts more than 60 days, but she cast doubt on whether lawmakers could get that done now. 'Let's be realistic, Congress isn't very good at doing very many things,' she said, explaining, 'We're fighting over certain parts of the big, beautiful bill and trying to get an appropriations budget passed. So I don't know what a vote would look like here in Congress.' Asked if she had talked to Trump about Iran since he authorized the strikes, Greene answered, 'He's been pretty busy.'
