'Don't see as competition': VinFast Asia CEO on rivaling Tesla with premium EV launch plans in India
VinFast, the electric vehicle arm of Vietnam's Vingroup, is preparing a bold entry into the Indian market- setting the stage for direct competition with Tesla. With bookings for its vehicles scheduled to open this month, VinFast is banking on its VF7 and VF6 models to establish itself as a premium EV brand in one of the world's fastest-growing auto markets.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Pham Sanh Chau, CEO of VinFast Asia and Vietnam's former ambassador to India, confirmed that the company aims to launch its vehicles ahead of the upcoming festive season. "We have our products in 16 countries, including Southeast Asia, the Middle East, the US… and VinFast will come to India with an entire ecosystem. Our first target is to position ourselves as the premium EV car in India through the VF7 and VF6, which we plan to roll out in the country by the festival season this year," said Chau, as quoted by news agency PTI.
Though Tesla is widely expected to enter the Indian market with fanfare, Chau downplayed notions of rivalry. 'We don't see Tesla, or even BYD for that matter, as competition. Our mission is green mobility. Anyone who shares that dream will be our friend,' he said. Still, VinFast's plans clearly signal its intent to compete in the same space Tesla is eyeing- affluent urban buyers willing to pay a premium for electric innovation.
"In Vietnam, we are the biggest selling car company, the largest charger and taxi service provider. We have done everything in Vietnam, and this is the time for us to go global. We wanted to enter India as it is a growing, dynamic automobile market," Chau announced talking about expanding in India.
VinFast has already invested $500 million in its new manufacturing facility in Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu, with a total outlay of $2 billion committed by 2030.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The plant, completed in just 15 months with strong state and central government support, will serve both the Indian market and export destinations in the Middle East and Africa. Initial production capacity is pegged at 50,000 units annually, with a ramp-up to 150,000 planned based on demand.
To support its launch, VinFast will showcase its models at high-traffic locations such as shopping centres and airports before bookings open.
The VF7 and VF6, currently manufactured in Vietnam, will be imported initially, though localisation is central to the company's long-term strategy. 'Localisation will help with government incentives, reduce costs, and make us more competitive,' Chau also said, adding that the company does not currently benefit from duty exemptions in India.
Pricing has not yet been finalised, but Chau promised it would be 'affordable' despite the premium positioning.
'India is a sensitive market, and we will have an affordable price,' he said, while stressing the VF7 and VF6 will be 'premium vehicles.'
Beyond manufacturing, VinFast is laying the foundation for an EV ecosystem in India. This includes dealer networks, authorised service centres, charging infrastructure, and a used vehicle exchange program. Talks with state governments are underway to establish charging stations, with Chau expressing confidence in attracting support from Indian investors as well.
By 2030, VinFast expects to employ up to 3,500 local workers, having already interviewed hundreds of engineering graduates from Tamil Nadu, accordingto Chau's statement to PTI. The company's expansion plan reflects a deep commitment to India, which Chau described as a 'growing, dynamic automobile market.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Lower duty on edible oils, nuts; target growth in spice, rice in US deal: Niti Aayog
India should offer concessions on agricultural products from US such as edible oils and nuts where domestic supply gaps exist, and explore duty concessions to boost high-performing exports — including shrimp, fish, spices, rice, tea, coffee, and rubber — in the US market during the Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) negotiations, a Niti Aayog working paper has argued. The need for calibrated negotiations on agricultural trade relations between India and the US arises as India has traditionally maintained relatively high tariffs on politically sensitive agricultural sectors to protect farmers, but the US, under President Donald Trump, has been aggressively pushing for greater market access and lower tariffs, posing a challenge for developing countries such as India. The working paper dated May said India can offer some concessions to the US in the 'import of soybean oil' to meet US demands to reduce the trade imbalance, without harming domestic production, as India is the largest importer of edible oil in the world and the US has a huge export surplus of soybean. 'Import soybean seed from US 'We should also explore the option of importing soybean seed and using it for extracting oil in the coastal areas, then selling the oil in the domestic market and exporting the meal, for which there is adequate overseas demand. This will avoid genetically modified (GM) feed entering the Indian market,' the paper, authored by Senior Adviser at NITI Aayog, Raka Saxena, and Member of NITI Aayog, Ramesh Chand, said. 'Similarly, corn may be imported for ethanol blending, and its by-products — like Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) — can be entirely exported to avoid GM feed in the country. US corn is cheaper and can be used to meet India's biofuel targets without disrupting local food and feed markets,' the paper said. Notably, soybeans and corn are among the US top exports to China, where a trade war may affect agricultural trade between the two countries. According to a Reuters report, US soybean exports may drop 20 per cent and prices could plunge if the United States and China fail to resolve their trade dispute, limiting US soybeans from accessing their largest market. Ease US apple imports 'Indian producers already enjoy supply advantages in commodities like rice and pepper. High tariffs on such products by India, which are regularly exported by the country, can be easily lowered or even removed in the bilateral trade accord. Such tariffs are not relevant for trade with countries like the US,' the paper said. The Niti Aayog paper said India can consider lower tariffs on agricultural commodities where either domestic production is small or imports do not compete with domestic production due to different quality grades and seasons. 'For example, US apples sell at a premium price in Indian retail markets due to different quality, long shelf life, and off-season availability.' Boost exports of fish, spices & coffee 'India should negotiate more access to the US market for high-performing exports like shrimp, fish, spices, rice, tea, coffee, and rubber. India earns approximately $5.75 billion annually from agri-exports to the US. Expanding this through duty waivers or TRQs should be part of trade talks,' the paper said. The authors said that US is expected to remain a big market for export of surplus food from India and all efforts need to be made to keep favorable environment for export to US. 'This should include strategic opening for US imports into India to achieve larger gains in exports. The ongoing negotiations between the two countries for a bilateral trade accord seem to be the best option for resetting long term trade relationships'. 'Export basket should emphasize both, traditional products like fishery and rice sold in large volume and a large number of high value products, differentiated products, ethnic products, attribute-based products, health foods, processed food etc. which are individually small but cumulatively quite large,' the paper said. In the last 10 years, India's agricultural exports to the US grew nearly fivefold, from $1.18 billion to $5.75 billion and the share of the US in India's total agricultural exports saw a slight decline, dropping from 11.5 per cent in 2004 to 9.8 per cent in 2024. Meanwhile, India's agricultural imports from the US increased even faster, rising from $291 million in 2004 to $2,217.9 million in 2024. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
US dismisses India's steel tariff challenge at WTO on legal, procedural grounds
The United States has rejected India's notice at the World Trade Organization (WTO), which proposed retaliatory action against the 25 per cent US tariffs on steel and aluminium, arguing that the tariffs were imposed on national security grounds. The US also pointed out procedural errors in India's case. In its note dated May 23, the US stated that India is wrongly treating the tariffs on steel and aluminium as safeguard measures. It clarified that these duties were imposed under US law (Section 232), which allows such action if imports are considered a threat to national security. This development is significant as US President Donald Trump on Friday announced a move to double import tariffs on steel to 50 per cent — a step Indian exporters have called 'unfortunate', warning that they have already lost $5 billion in exports due to earlier tariffs, and further hikes could deepen losses. 'The United States will not discuss the Section 232 tariffs under the Agreement on Safeguards as we do not view the tariffs as a safeguard measure,' the US told the WTO Council for Trade in Goods in response to India's challenge. In FY2025, India exported $4.56 billion worth of iron, steel, and aluminium products to the US, including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in articles of iron or steel, and $860 million in aluminium and related goods. These exports now face sharply higher US tariffs, threatening the profitability of Indian producers and exporters. The US also claimed that India had committed procedural errors. 'India never acknowledged the United States' offer to discuss these tariffs in our response dated 16 April 2025. Accordingly, India has not complied with the obligations under the Agreement on Safeguards, the agreement that it mistakenly contends applies to the tariffs in question,' the US note said. Ajay Srivastava, former trade officer and head of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), said India now has several options. One is to launch a formal WTO dispute, not under the Safeguards Agreement, but under broader GATT rules, challenging the Section 232 tariffs as disguised protectionist measures. 'India could argue that the US is abusing the national security exception, referring to earlier WTO rulings that limit how Article XXI can be invoked. However, this legal path carries risks, as the US has a track record of disregarding WTO rulings on national security,' GTRI said. A more forceful approach would be for India to impose retaliatory tariffs on its own, even without WTO authorisation, Srivastava said. He noted that other countries such as the EU, Canada, and China have already done this in response to the US Section 232 tariffs, as a political signal of resistance. 'While this sends a clear message, it also risks US countermeasures and potential legal battles. GTRI believes that although India has legal and diplomatic options, it may decide not to act immediately,' Srivastava said. GTRI suggested that a pragmatic path would be for India to use the ongoing bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations with the US as the main platform to resolve the issue. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
IndiGo to end Turkish airlines lease within three months after final extension from Indian govt
New Delhi: IndiGo will terminate its leasing agreement with state-backed Turkish Airlines within three months after the pact was granted a final extension, India's aviation regulator said on Friday, a move that will push the carrier to seek alternatives. The agreement has come under criticism in India after Turkey came out in support for Pakistan during the recent conflict between the two South Asian neighbours. The pact has also been opposed by IndiGo's rival Air India, which has lobbied the Indian government to end the deal, citing business impact and security concerns, Reuters has previously reported.
