UP bans animal-drawn carts use above 37°C, limits load
The state government has introduced new guidelines restricting the use of animals for transport and agricultural work during peak heat hours, aiming to protect them from overexertion and cruelty. According to the rules, animals cannot be used between 12 noon and 3 pm in areas where the temperature exceeds 37°C.
Framed under the UP Cow Slaughter Prevention Act, 1960, and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Transport of Animals on Foot) Rules, 1965, the guidelines also cap the maximum load of animals such as bulls, buffaloes, horses, ponies, camels, and donkeys, can pull or carry.
Jaikesh Kumar Pandey, director of animal husbandry, said officials across various departments, including police, transport, health, and local bodies, have been asked to monitor compliance and take necessary action against violations. 'Awareness drives are also planned to inform stakeholders about the new rules.'
A small bull or buffalo can pull up to 1,000 kg on pneumatic tyres, 750 kg on solid tyres, and 500 kg on carts without tyres. Medium bulls or buffaloes may pull 1,400 kg (pneumatic), 900 kg (solid), or 700 kg (no tyres). Horses are allowed to pull 750 kg on pneumatic tyres and 500 kg on solid tyres. Ponies can pull between 400 and 600 kg, while camels have defined limits too.
For animals carrying loads on their back, the weight limit varies by size and species. Small bulls or buffaloes can carry up to 100 kg, medium-sized ones up to 150 kg, and large ones up to 175 kg. Ponies may carry up to 70 kg, camels up to 200 kg, and donkeys up to 150 kg.
In addition, animal-drawn vehicles transporting people, a maximum of four passengers is allowed, excluding the driver and children under six years of age. Animals cannot be used continuously for more than five hours or more than nine hours a day. Their use is banned between 12 noon and 3 pm in areas where the temperature crosses 37°C.
Additionally, the use of harmful tools such as barbed harnesses has been banned, as they can cause injuries and distress to the animals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Dist admin limits estate working hours to curb human-elephant conflict in Belur
Hassan: With the human-elephant conflict increasing in Hassan's Belur taluk, the district administration suggested that coffee plantation workers avoid entering estates before 9am and after 6pm. There were multiple fatal encounters over recent years, with an alarming rise in incidents reported, especially over the last two years. Hence, deputy commissioner C Sathyabhama issued a warning to curb further tragedies. The DC, in a communique, stated that the labourers could work in coffee estates between 9am and 5pm. She issued the order under the provisions of the Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950. The order is applicable to Arehalli hobli, Bikkodu hobli, and Kasaba hobli in the taluk. The order came into effect immediately, and the DC directed the officers of the forest department and police to alert the residents in the area about the initiative. Usually, plantation workers enter estates for work early in the morning and return home by afternoon or by 4pm. However, Sathyabhama noted that elephant herds prefer moving from one place to another between 6pm and 8am. Most of the human-elephant conflicts occurred during this time. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Considering this, the DC passed an order restricting the time for plantation workers. The human-elephant conflict is so severe that several people have lost their lives since Jan 2025. While Dyavamma,74, of Kanakuppe village in Arehalli died in an elephant attack on Feb 13, Anil, 28, of Gujjanahalli died on Feb 24. On March 14, an elephant attacked Susheelamma, 63, of Kogodu village. Chandrakala, 43, of Ankihalli in Bikkodu village died on May 23. However, while planters are accepting the new initiative, the authorities must not escape from their duties by taking new initiatives and must make prompt efforts to prevent human-elephant conflict, said Vishwas, a planter.
Time of India
5 days ago
- Time of India
Only state can decide on declaring Samanatham tank as sanctuary: HC
Madurai: Madras high court on Wednesday observed that it is for the state govt to take a decision to declare Samanatham tank in Thiruparankundram in Madurai district as a bird sanctuary. A division bench of justice S M Subramaniam and justice A D Maria Clete observed that no doubt bird migration activities are going on in Samanatham tank. However, such decisions have to be taken by the govt on the recommendation of the competent authorities and after obtaining reports from the experts. The declaration of a tank as a sanctuary requires certain procedures to be followed under the Statute and Rules in force. The court, not being an expert body, cannot substitute the expert views. Therefore, the court may not be in a position to issue a positive direction to declare the tank as a sanctuary. The court is of the considered view that the authorities may take note of the facts reiterated by the division bench while initiating the suo motu proceedings and, if necessary, process the same in the manner known to law, the judges observed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trending in in 2025: Local network access control [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo The court passed the order while disposing of a suo motu proceeding seeking a direction to the state to declare Samanatham tank as a bird sanctuary in terms of Section 18 of the Wildlife Protection Act. The tank is presently under the control and maintenance of the public works department (PWD). The waterbody provides habitat for more than 150 species of birds. The tank also provides habitat for two vulnerable species, namely the Indian spotted eagle and great spotted eagle. Owing to the biodiversity and, in particular, the unique natural bird habitat, there were various appeals to protect the tank by declaring it as a bird sanctuary. The action is necessitated in light of the fact that the waterbody is vulnerable to poaching, loss of natural habitat, and is easily accessible to the public, which gravely threatens the natural habitat of these birds. If the said waterbody is declared as a sanctuary, it would be subjected to restrictions as to entry in terms of Section 27 of the Act and various other protective measures as envisaged under Chapter IV of the Act of 1972, as a protected area. Earlier, a public interest litigation was filed by R Manibarahti seeking a direction to the govt to declare the tank as a bird sanctuary. The court closed the petition after the state submitted that a proposal was sent in this regard to the govt.
The Hindu
5 days ago
- The Hindu
HMT land: Govt. orders suspension of IFoS officer Gokul
The State government has suspended Additional Principal Conservator of Forests R. Gokul in connection with a case filed in the Supreme Court seeking permission to denotify 443 acres of HMT forest land. The suspension order states that the IFoS officer without obtaining the approval of the then Minister in-charge or sanction from the State Cabinet, filed an interlocutory application (IA) before the Supreme Court seeking permission for denotification of lands granted to HMT measuring 443 acres 6 guntas at Peenya Jalahalli Plantation. Following this the Forest, Ecology and Environment Department issued preliminary notices to former IAS officer Sandeep Dave, then Additional Chief Secretary in the department, former IFoS officer Vijay Kumar Gogi, then Principal Secretary in the department, IFoS officer Smitha Bijjur, then Principal Secretary in the department, and Mr. Gokul, then Chief Conservator of Forests and Litigation Conducting officer, in the said IA. 'The replies received by the said officers have been examined by the department and referred along with the opinion of the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms to examine and initiate necessary action,' stated the order. It further stated that after the issue of preliminary notice by the department, Mr. Gokul wrote to the CBI without prior intimation or obtaining permission of the State government for seeking protection with reference to Belekeri port iron ore theft cases and also to investigate the reasons for issuing a notice and defaming through news articles and to provide him adequate protection. The State government then examined the necessary files and records in the said matter and sought a report on the denotification of lands granted to HMT under Forest Conservation Act, 1980. It also investigated if there are any lapses and any irregularities committed by the officers in the said matter. 'In violation of Rule 17 of A11 India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968 and the State government is prima facie satisfied that it is necessary to place R. Gokul, IFoS under suspension with immediate effect, pending inquiry,' the order stated. It also directed that the officer during the period of suspension to not leave the headquarters without the written permission of the State government.
