Minister admits ‘work needed' to improve neurodivergent support
During a ministerial statement in the chamber on Thursday, Mr Arthur said: 'I recognise significant work is needed in this area.
"I do not underestimate how much work is needed to ensure that neurodivergent young people are able to access the support they need when they need it.
'This work will not happen overnight. It will require collaboration and a range of partners working together.'
'I recognise that a formal diagnosis can be important to an individual's identity and understanding of themselves or their child, however, support should be provided on a basis of need not diagnosis.'
Mr Arthur also said the government would provide £500,000 of additional funding this year to deliver improvements to the support and services available to children and families.
Earlier this week, the report, Experiences of Autism Assessment and Diagnosis in Scotland, surveyed 624 people and it paints a stark picture of delays, refusals, and a lack of support in the current system.
Scotland's autism organisations have since warned of a 'highly inconsistent' and 'failing' system with the report pointing to individuals waiting as long as seven years to receive an autism diagnosis.
Some 65% of the 624 respondents to the survey were autistic adults with 35% comprising of family members and carers of autistic people.
Of those surveyed, nearly two-thirds (62%) reported a lack of information about the process, including a lack of guidance and support.
Scottish Labour MSP also hit out at the government for what they named as its "Orwellian" response to the report.
READ MORE:
Individuals in Scotland waiting seven years for autism diagnosis
Labour MSP slams Scottish Government over autism support
Autism crisis in Scotland: Can Scot Gov learn from a golden retriever?
In his response, newly-appointed Wellbeing Minister Tom Arthur said accusations that the Scottish Government has 'removed' children from CAMHS waiting lists are false.
However, Mr Johnson hit back, saying people have been removed from waiting lists for referral.
"They have been removed," he told The Herald, "CAMHS may not be the right service, but they haven't specified what is the right service.
"Right now it is impossible, either as a matter of policy or a matter of fact, to get an assessment for autism or ADHD as a child or adult.
"Health boards have either stopped taking referrals or have such long waits they might as well have.
'It is Orwellian [from the Government]. To say it is false, just on a strict measurement, it is a fact."
Today, Mr Arthur re-iterated his comments that they were "incorrect assertions" that young people are being moved off waiting lists to meet CAMHS waiting times targets.
However, Scottish Labour MSP Paul Sweeney said he was "dismayed" at this statement from the minister as he said "it's a matter of fact not assertion".
"Children get removed off the CAMHS list to different pathways with often indefinite waiting times.
"It's struck me as a bit of Orwellian Double Think."
'Some children are still waiting too long to receive the support they need.'
Data on neurodevelopmental diagnostic waiting times is currently not publicly available.
In the chamber, the minister admitted 'further work is needed' to improve the quality of data in this area.
Conservative MSP Brian Whittle accused the Scottish Government of 'cherry-picking and manipulating' data to 'fit their narrative'.
Later, the party's public health spokesperson added: 'This SNP government are not being honest with the public and families over why there has been such a massive increase in demand for diagnosis in such a short period of time.
'In typical SNP fashion they have failed to be transparent over the data.
'It is a disgrace that fewer than a third of children were seen for a neurodevelopmental assessment within the recommended timescales in March 2024.
'The SNP government must do more to support children with neurodevelopmental disorders by providing more resources to support activities in communities up and down the country.'
The new taskforce on improving neurodivergent support for young people will be chaired jointly by Fiona Davis, chief executive of NHS Highland and Dr. Lynne Binnie, Edinburgh Council's head of Education for Inclusion.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
PM 'agrees' benefit changes deal with Labour rebels
The government is expected to announce a deal shortly with Labour rebels on its planned benefits changes. Multiple sources tell the BBC existing claimants of the Personal Independence Payment (Pip) will continue to receive what they currently get, as will recipients of the health element of Universal Credit. It is also expected that the support to help people into employment will be fast forwarded so it happens concessions amount to a massive climbdown from the government, which was staring at the prospect of defeat if it failed to accommodate the demands of over 100 of its backbenchers. Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Calls for Scotland-wide seagull summit amid warnings someone could be killed
Former Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross, who called a debate on the issue at Holyrood, warned that Scots risk losing their lives over the 'growing problem' of 'nuisance' gulls. Fellow Tory Rachael Hamilton said a nationwide summit must be held to tackle the issue as she warned that Scots are being left 'scared, attacked and traumatised'. Agriculture minister Jim Fairlie had already promised to hold a seagull summit in the north of Scotland but Ms Hamilton, who represents the south of Scotland, said a summit for the whole country is needed. The Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire MSP said 'aggressive' seagulls had attacked seven children in one month last year in Eyemouth, with one girl 'left with gashes to her scalp and blood running down her face'. Tory MSP Rachael Hamilton called for a summit to crack down on gull attacks (Andrew Milligan/PA) She called for action on the 'growing nuisance', which she said posed a health and safety risk to residents. Despite rising complaints from locals, though, she said NatureScot's licensing system to control the birds was bureaucratic and failing to solve the issue. 'I think we need a summit,' she said. 'I don't think we just need a summit in Moray, we need a summit across Scotland.' Ms Hamilton said the debate was 'important' as she criticised what she said was a lack of action from the Scottish Government. She told MSPs: 'Absolutely nothing is getting done. I don't believe the Government are listening to us because the issue continues in my constituency in Eyemouth. 'Aggressive seagull behaviour continues to cause a real concern amongst businesses, amongst tourists, amongst everybody that has anything to do along the harbour. 'And it is not just a seasonal nuisance. It is a serious, growing health risk. It's a safety risk, particularly for children and elderly residents.' She said one business owner had described the situation as 'people being scared, attacked and traumatised'. NatureScot and the SNP have ignored this problem for far too long. I'm bringing forward a debate in Parliament today to demand action to control the menace of gulls in our communities. — Douglas Ross MSP (@Douglas4Moray) June 26, 2025 MSPs debated the issue on Thursday, the last day of Parliament before the summer recess. Opening the debate, Mr Ross said people often 'smirk' when hearing that the Scottish Parliament is debating the problems around gulls – but he said it was an 'extremely serious issue'. The Highlands and Islands MSP said constituents have told him they are worried about leaving their homes for fear of being 'divebombed', while others have suffered mental health issues thanks to a lack of sleep caused by noisy gulls. One resident, he said, is spending £2,000 a year to remove nests from her home. 'People should not have to keep living in fear of being divebombed by these menaces on a daily basis, and are crying out for action,' he said. He accused NatureScot of having a conflict of interest as the body responsible for both the licensing to control birds and to conserve them. He went on: 'The behaviour of the SNP's quango NatureScot confirms they have lost the plot. They have told people to protect themselves with umbrellas and even suggested dogs as a deterrent. 'The time has come to break up NatureScot. There is a clear conflict of interest in the fact they are responsible for considering licences to control gulls but are also responsible for protecting bird numbers. 'If the minister cannot see that is a problem, then he is divorced from reality. 'The strength of the cross-party support in my debate today should be all the SNP Government need to finally act before we see someone killed due to being attacked by a gull.' Jim Fairlie said the issue of gulls is 'deadly serious' (Fraser Bremner/Scottish Daily Mail/PA) Jim Fairlie, the minister for agriculture, said while people often 'chuckle and laugh' about the issue of gulls, he warned it was 'deadly serious'. But he told MSPs that he could not intervene on NatureScot to change the licensing system because it would leave the Government open to judicial review. He urged people to stop feeding the birds, which he said was the primary reason for the issue. The birds have been an increasingly common site in urban areas as they leave their natural habitat in search of food. He said: 'We have to work out what it is that is causing the issue in the first place. 'We are feeding them – it is quite simple. We are creating habitat, and we are creating feeding stations which are allowing gulls to inhabit our space, and that is now quite clearly coming into conflict.' He added: 'We have got to try and limit food waste and public littering. We have got to take away these feeding opportunities.' SNP MSP Christine Grahame warned against 'demonising' gulls (Andrew Milligan/PA) SNP MSP Christine Grahame warned against 'demonising' gulls, which she described as 'clever, adaptable' animals. 'Language such as 'mugging', 'menace' can be applied to us, our fellow counterparts,' she said, 'but it is not appropriate to demonise an animal simply looking for food. 'Anthropomorphising is tempting but not helpful.' A NatureScot spokesperson said: 'We understand gulls can sometimes cause problems in our towns and cities. 'At the same time, gull populations are facing serious declines. NatureScot has a duty to balance health and safety concerns with gull conservation. 'Over the last five years we have supported many individuals, businesses and communities to better manage gulls without the need to kill the birds or destroy their nests. 'As a result, the number of licence applications to destroy nests and eggs and kill chicks has reduced, from 2,633 in 2023 to 1,601 in 2024.' The spokesperson said in the longer term, Scots will 'need to find ways to live with gulls and other wildlife'. They added: 'We will continue to work with local authorities to ensure that collaborative gull management plans are put in place for future years, with a focus on effective preventative measures, deterrents, changes to behaviour and guidance.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer caves in to rebels on benefits
Sir Keir Starmer has caved to welfare rebels by agreeing that existing disability claimants can keep their benefits. In a major concession, The Telegraph understands that the Prime Minister has agreed that nobody currently getting the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) will lose out. Instead, changes to who is eligible for the money, which is given to help people with the extra cost of disabilities, will only apply to new claimants. The change will cost the Treasury around £1.5 billion a year by the end of the decade, slashing the original savings from the welfare cuts plan by a third. The move puts further pressure on Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, to find more money in her autumn Budget, potentially through tax rises. Sir Keir was forced into the change to avoid what looked set to be the first defeat in the House of Commons of his premiership in a crunch vote on welfare on Tuesday. The changes to the overall package have been secured after the leaders of a rebellion, who had attracted backing from more than 120 Labour MPs, held talks with the senior government figures. Sir Keir was understood to have been personally involved. One leading rebel said 'major concessions' had been won. The source said: 'We wanted to unite around something better. We are getting there.' Uprising It is now expected that Labour MPs who led the uprising against the welfare cuts will recommend to fellow rebels that they accept the package and back down. It remains possible that some of the more hardline of the 127 Labour MPs who backed an amendment that would have killed off the welfare legislation could still hold out and vote against it, including members of the Socialist Campaign Group. But leading rebels who are more moderate believe that the new package is different enough to make sure that the legislation is passed with Labour votes on Tuesday. Under the original version of the Personal Independence Payment cut, some 800,000 of the 3.7 million current claimants would lose money. Now they are expected to keep it. The original welfare package, which included changes to Universal Credit, was meant to save the Treasury some £4.6 billion by 2029/30. Letting all current PIP claimants keep their benefits unaffected would see that drop to £3.1 billion, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, a leading economic think tank - a reduction of £1.5 billion. The exact amount the updated package of changes will raise remains to be seen, given a number of different alterations to the plan are understood to have been agreed with rebels.
