logo
Verstappen 'let himself down' with Russell collision

Verstappen 'let himself down' with Russell collision

BBC News2 days ago

George Russell said Max Verstappen "let himself down" by appearing to drive deliberately into his Mercedes during the Spanish Grand Prix.Red Bull's Verstappen received a 10-second penalty for the incident following the collision with the Briton's car.It dropped the Dutchman from fifth to 10th in the final result, leaving him 49 points behind championship leader Oscar Piastri of McLaren, who won the race from team-mate Lando Norris.Russell said: "Totally unnecessary and sort of lets him down. I don't know what he was thinking."It doesn't really make sense to deliberately crash into somebody and risk damaging your own car, risk a penalty."In the end, I'm not going to lose sleep over it because I ultimately benefited from those antics."Verstappen responded that he would "bring some tissues next time", adding: "He has his view, I have my view."He was reluctant to discuss the incident in detail, but he did say that it was "a misjudgement".
In the incident at Turn Five, stewards decided Verstappen had "significantly reduced (his) speed thereby appearing to allow [Russell] to overtake" but that once Russell was ahead Verstappen "suddenly accelerated and collided with [Russell]".Russell said: "You cannot deliberately crash into another driver. You know, we're putting our lives on the line. We're fortunate the cars are as safe as they are these days. But we shouldn't take it for granted."It's down to the stewards to determine if it's deliberate or not. If they do think it's deliberate, then they need to have a hard precedent."Max is such an amazing driver and so many people look up to him. It's a shame that something like that continues to occur."Verstappen said he had no regrets about his conduct."In life you shouldn't regret too many things," he said. "You only live once."Piastri said: "I need a bit more context on what happened [before commenting], but obviously it was not exactly a small touch. I don't have that much more, but it obviously didn't look great.
Verstappen 'annoyed' and 'frustrated'
The incident happened during an extraordinary final five laps after a late safety car.Until then, Verstappen had been on course for a strong third place, after challenging the McLarens on a three-stop strategy, compared to their two.When the safety car was deployed, all the leaders - and most of the rest of the field - pitted for fresh soft tyres. But because of their three-stop strategy, Red Bull's choices were limited.They had to choose between leaving Verstappen out on his soft tyres, on which he had done eight racing laps; or pitting for either another set of softs that had done one qualifying lap and the in- and out-laps, some practice starts, and the laps to the grid; or a new set of the hard-compound tyres.Red Bull team principal Christian Horner admitted that in hindsight, the best choice would have been to leave him out.This would have put Verstappen in the lead. He would almost certainly have lost out to the McLaren drivers and perhaps Ferrari's Charles Leclerc but that would have left him fourth, one place better than he finished on the road before his penalty.Instead, they brought him for the fresh hard tyres. Verstappen questioned the decision upon returning to the track, and then nearly lost control in a massive moment on the exit of the final corner on the restart as he fought to keep pace with the cars on grippier tyres around him.He was immediately passed by Leclerc on the straight, the two cars lightly touching as their trajectories converged, and then by Russell into the first corner, where they banged wheels.Verstappen accused Russell of barging him off the track, and was also upset about the Leclerc incident. But after stewards launched an investigation into him leaving the track and gaining an advantage, Red Bull decided to ask him to let Russell by to avoid a penalty.Horner admitted Verstappen was "obviously upset and annoyed" and "frustrated" but said they would discuss the matter internally.Verstappen said that he felt the "biggest issue" was with F1's racing guidelines."What is allowed, what isn't, is not very natural," Verstappen said. "And that is quite frustrating. And of course, sometimes it works for you, sometimes it works against you, and today that worked against me."According to the guidelines, Russell was entitled to the corner, because he was more or less completely alongside Verstappen - the rules say that a driver overtaking on the inside has to have his car's front axle at least level with the wing mirror of the one one the outside to be given space.Stewards took no further action over the incident with Leclerc on the straight because "both cars were moving slightly towards each other in the middle of the track and a minor collision occurred as a result."Both drivers were of the view that this was an avoidable collision and could potentially have resulted in a major crash but neither driver was wholly or predominantly to blame."Leclerc said: "Max wanted to bring me towards the inside where there's all the [torn-up used tyre] rubber, so I didn't want to go too much there. So, I was trying to push him to the left. There was a little bit of contact, but fortunately for us, no consequences."
'Great ones need to have world against them'
This is not the first time Verstappen and Russell have been involved in controversy.They had a major row, and exchanged public insults, after the Qatar Grand Prix last year. That was over an incident in which Verstappen felt Russell had overplayed his hand with the stewards in getting his rival a penalty after an incident in qualifying.Before that, there was an incident in the 2022 Azerbaijan Grand Prix, after which they again insulted each other publicly.On Sunday, Verstappen said he had no interest in discussing the incident with Russell. "I have nothing to say," he said.And it's not the first time Verstappen has appeared to let his emotions get the better of him in the car - in last year's Mexico City Grand Prix, he was given two separate 10-second penalties for two incidents on the same lap with McLaren's Lando Norris.After that, he also did not want to discuss the incidents with the media.In these situations, it seems Verstappen's competitive instinct - which is intense - clouds his judgement, and overrides his usual desire to maximise every result.Mercedes F1 boss Toto Wolff said: "The great ones, whether it's in motor racing or in other sports, you just need to have the world against you and perform at the highest possible level."That's why sometimes these greats don't recognise that actually the world is not against you, it's just you who has made a mistake or you've screwed up."This incident could have significant consequences for Verstappen's season.He was already fighting a difficult battle against two drivers performing strongly in a McLaren that has a higher average performance ceiling than the Red Bull, even if Verstappen has been able to challenge them on certain types of circuits.Until now, he has been staying in touch by maximising his results, including two superb victories, in Japan and at Imola.The Suzuka win was founded on a breathtaking pole lap, perhaps one of the greatest ever, and the second on an overtaking move on Piastri into the first corner that Russell, in the midst of his criticisms of Verstappen after the Spanish race, called "one of the best moves that we've all seen in a long time".That had limited Verstappen's deficit in the championship to 22 points heading to Spain.Even so, when he arrived in Barcelona, he said the championship "doesn't really feel like a fight".Now, he has taken an action, influenced by a set of circumstances not all of which were in his control, that has made that more of a self-fulfilling prophecy.Verstappen's response to that?"I never said that I was in the championship fight, first of all," he said."Every race so far, it's been tough. When they get their things right, they're unbeatable. That's quite clear this season."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dutch government collapses as far-right leader pulls party out of coalition
Dutch government collapses as far-right leader pulls party out of coalition

The Guardian

time19 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Dutch government collapses as far-right leader pulls party out of coalition

The Dutch far-right leader Geert Wilders has pulled his party out of the country's four-party ruling coalition in a row over immigration and asylum policy, signalling the imminent end of the Netherlands' 11-month-old government. Wilders, whose anti-Islam Freedom party (PVV) finished first in parliamentary elections in late 2023, said on Tuesday he had informed the prime minister, Dick Schoof, that all PVV ministers would leave the government. The far-right leader had earlier announced on social media after a brief meeting of the four party leaders in the alliance – sworn in only last July – that since there had been 'no sign-off on our asylum plans' the PVV was 'leaving the coalition'. Wilders said the partners refused to adopt his 10-point plan for halting immigration for the purpose of seeking asylum, as he had demanded last week. Legal experts have said several of the proposals are in breach of European human rights laws or the UN refugee convention, to which the Netherlands is a signatory. Dilan Yeşilgöz, the leader of the liberal-conservative VVD party, a coalition member, said Schoof had urged the leaders to act responsibly before Tuesday's meeting. 'The prime minister, who appealed to us this morning, said that we are facing enormous international challenges, we have a war on our continent, an economic crisis may be coming our way,' Yeşilgöz said. She said she was 'shocked' by Wilders's decision, which she described as 'super-irresponsible'. Yeşilgöz added of the far-right leader: 'We had a rightwing majority, and he lets it all go for his ego. He's just doing what he wants.' Another coalition party leader, Caroline van der Plas of the populist Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB), said she was very angry, and also called Wilders 'irresponsible'. Nicolien van Vroonhoven of the New Social Contract (NSC) said it was 'incomprehensible'. Wilders's plan includes enlisting the army to secure and patrol the borders, closing refugee accommodation facilities, sending all Syrian refugees home, suspending EU asylum quotas and banning family members joining refugees already in the country. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion Frustrated by the lack of progress, he warned at a press conference last week that if immigration policy was not toughened up by implementing the points on his list, the PVV – the largest party in parliament with 37 seats – would be 'out of the cabinet'. Schoof is expected to hand his resignation to King Willem-Alexander later on Tuesday, less than a month before the Netherlands is due to host a summit of Nato leaders in The Hague.

French Open quarter-finals: Sabalenka v Zheng, Svitolina v Swiatek, Musetti v Tiafoe
French Open quarter-finals: Sabalenka v Zheng, Svitolina v Swiatek, Musetti v Tiafoe

The Guardian

time23 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

French Open quarter-finals: Sabalenka v Zheng, Svitolina v Swiatek, Musetti v Tiafoe

Update: Date: 2025-06-03T08:53:55.000Z Title: Today's order of play Content: Philippe Chatrier (11am start/10am BST) (1) Aryna Sabalenka (Blr) v (8) Zheng Qinwen (Chn) (13) Elina Svitolina (Ukr) v (5) Iga Swiatek (Pol) (8) Lorenzo Musetti (Ita) v (15) Frances Tiafoe (US) Night match: (12) Tommy Paul (US) v (2) Carlos Alcaraz (Spa)Suzanne Lenglen (11am/10am BST) (6) Veronika Kudermetova (Rus) & Elise Mertens (Bel) v (2) Sara Errani (Ita) & Jasmine Paolini (Ita) Olga Danilovic (Ser) & Anastasia Potapova (Rus) v (4) Mirra Andreeva (Rus) & Diana Shnaider (Rus) (1) Lyudmyla Kichenok (Ukr) & Mate Pavic (Cro) v Desirae Krawczyk (US) & Neal Skupski (GB)Simonne Mathieu (11am/10am BST) (9) Christian Harrison (US) & Evan King (US) v (2) Harri Heliovaara (Fin) & Henry Patten (GB) (8) Joe Salisbury (GB) & Neal Skupski (GB) v (15) Matthew Ebden (Aus) & John Peers (Aus) (4) Taylor Townsend (US) & Evan King (US) v Laura Siegemund (Ger) & Edouard Roger-Vasselin (Fra) Update: Date: 2025-06-03T08:50:32.000Z Title: Preamble Content: Bonjour et bienvenue! After a fourth round featuring surging comebacks, a French revolution from a wildcard ranked 361 in the world, Jannik Sinner in continued cyborg mode and a total wipeout for the Brits, it's time for the quarter-finals to begin. The day session features no less than a four-times French Open champion, a world No 1, an Olympic gold medallist, a mother and honorary Frenchwoman playing some of the best tennis of her career, a stylish Italian who's a new player on the block in the top 10 and a rejuvenated American who's broken new ground on clay this fortnight. Oui, it's Aryna Sabalenka v Zheng Qinwen, Iga Swiatek v Elina Svitolina and Lorenzo Musetti v Frances Tiafoe. All three matches promise much: Musetti and Tiafoe for their charisma, Sabalenka and Zheng for their clinical ball striking and Swiatek and Svitolina for, well, everything if their quarter-final comes anywhere close to matching the drama of their utterly absorbing fourth-round wins over Elena Rybakina and Jasmine Paolini respectively. Play begins at: 11am Paris time/10am BST. Don't go anywhere!

Tax rises are ‘inevitable' after Labour pledges billions for defence, top economist warns
Tax rises are ‘inevitable' after Labour pledges billions for defence, top economist warns

The Independent

time24 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Tax rises are ‘inevitable' after Labour pledges billions for defence, top economist warns

Ministers are facing scrutiny over how the government plans to fund increased military spending, aiming for 3 per cent of GDP, amid warnings of necessary tax rises. Defence Secretary John Healey stated the government will detail how future increases will be funded, similar to reallocating overseas development aid to defence, but did not rule out tax hikes. Economists, including Paul Johnson from the IFS, suggest "chunky tax increases" may be inevitable to meet defence spending goals alongside other financial commitments. The defence review warns current armed forces are unprepared for conflicts with nations like Russia or China, citing inadequate resources and personnel issues. Despite concerns, Healey expressed confidence in achieving the defence spending uplift, banking on economic growth to support the plans, highlighting recent interest rate cuts and revised growth forecasts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store