Travel update: Brussels Airport cancels 30% of flights amid nationwide strike
ADVERTISEMENT
Airports in Belgium are bracing for major service disruptions tomorrow, Tuesday 29 April, amid a nationwide strike of both private and public sector workers.
Brussels Airport and Charleroi Airport have warned travellers to expect cancellations and delays, particularly for departing flights.
The walk-out has been organised by Belgian trade unions CVC/ACV and FGTB/ABVV to protest against government reforms affecting pensions, working conditions and wage regulations.
Brussels Airport strike: 30 per cent of departing flights cancelled
The industrial action is expected to severely impact security and baggage handling at Brussels Airport in Zaventem on Tuesday.
Belgium's main flight hub announced that it has requested
airlines
to limit operations in preparation. At least 30 per cent of departing flights have already been cancelled.
'Significant disruption is expected throughout the day,' the airport has warned. Official advice for passengers is to check flight status updates regularly and prepare for possible delays or last-minute changes.
Arriving flights are expected to run on schedule, although the airport says modifications may occur as the situation develops during the day.
A spokesperson added that further departing
flights
may be scrapped depending on how the industrial action develops over the next 24 hours.
Brussels Airlines cancels 70 flights
Brussels Airlines, which is based at the airport, will be most affected by the strike.
The
carrier
has already scrapped around 70 flights on Tuesday. Passengers are being notified via email and should receive guidance on rebooking or claiming a refund through a dedicated online portal.
'This process takes several hours, as we aim to offer travellers alternative solutions immediately - such as rebooking on a different flight or routing via another airport,' Brussels Airlines spokesperson, Nico Cardone, said.
Charleroi Airport cancels all departing flights
Charleroi Airport (BSCA) will also feel the impact of the strikes. It has scrapped all departing flights on Tuesday, citing insufficient staff "to run operations in complete safety", according to news site Brussels Times.
The latest updates are that arriving
flights
should not experience major disruption, although passengers are advised to monitor updates in the run-up.
Passengers should plan for public transport disruptions
Travellers have also been warned to leave plenty of time for journeys to airports in Brussels.
Public transport across the city will be disrupted by the strikes, with train, metro, tram and bus services all affected.
ADVERTISEMENT
"We will do everything in our power to ensure at least part of the service, and will inform passengers in real time about the situation on the network," public transport operator STIB/MIVB said.
Related
Symbol of a connected Europe: Eurostar's drive for reinvention amid Brexit, competition and strikes
Europe's travel strikes: Flight and train disruption you can expect in 2025
Brussels Airport advises passengers to arrive at least two hours before departure for Schengen destinations and three hours for non-Schengen flights.
The transport hub has urged passengers to follow updates on official communication channels and monitor airline websites closely.
'We are doing our utmost to minimise the inconvenience for our
passengers
, but given the national scope of the strike, disruption will be unavoidable,' the airport added.
ADVERTISEMENT
Nearby airports may experience knock-on effects of the strikes as flights are re-routed or passengers book alternative routes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local France
5 days ago
- Local France
Passenger compensation for flight delays set to decrease in Europe
Airline passengers in the EU enjoy the world's most generous system of compensation if their flight is delayed or cancelled. However these rights seem set to decrease after the European Council agreed to an overhaul of compensation rules, following intense lobbying from the airline industry. The agreement to extend delay times and cut compensation levels was made at a European Council summit, despite opposition from Germany and Spain. Controversially, the Council bypassed discussions with the European Parliament and made its decision legally binding using a process that has not been deployed in more than a decade. Advertisement However the European Parliament can still make changes to the new rules - it has four months to respond with a proposal that must be backed by a majority of 361 MEPs. So what changes? The ruling doesn't scrap all the customer protections, but it changes the rules on compensation payments - changing both the payment amounts and the delay time after which compensation rules kick in. Under current EU Air Passenger Rights Regulation rules, passengers can claim between €250 and €600 in compensation if a flight is delayed by at least three hours, if the delay is the fault of the airline. Under the agreed changes, compensation will only be due after a four-hour delay for flights of less than 3,500 kilometres. For longer flights, airlines would be obliged to pay compensation if flights land at least six hours late, compared to the current three-hour standard. Under the new rules, €300 compensation will apply for delays of more than four hours – while €500 will be payable for delays of more than six hours involving flights of more than 3,500km. In exchange for the higher delay thresholds, airlines will have to streamline the complex and obfuscatory compensation process - in which many airlines make it very complicated to claim financial compensation but very easy to claim airline vouchers. And what doesn't change? Other compensation rules remain unchanged, especially around the 'extraordinary circumstances' definition which covers whether airlines have to provide any compensation at all. Compensation for delays or cancellations is not paid if the problem is due to 'extraordinary circumstances' – the exact definition of this in the legislation is vague but it generally applies to situations like extreme weather, political instability, security risks or problems with air traffic control. Advertisement Strikes are usually not considered to be extraordinary circumstances, neither are routine mechanical problems or staff shortages. The rules cover airlines that are registered in the EU – such as the Ireland-based Ryanair – or flights taking off from an EU or Schengen zone country. Since Brexit the rules no longer apply to the UK, but the British government has mostly "copied and pasted" it into UK legislation. READ ALSO Fears EU plans to 'water down' air passengers' rights in review Also unchanged are rules on flight cancellations and airlines responsibility to provide food, accommodation and alternative travel for passengers whose flights are delayed or cancelled. In truth this is not well policed - passengers are often simply told to make their own arrangements for accommodation and alternative travel and submit compensation claims to the airline later. Airlines do, however, routinely provide refreshments, usually in the form of food vouchers to passengers whose flights are delayed. Why the change? In a word - lobbying. Airlines had argued that the compensation payments were too high, especially for budget airlines where the compensation may be higher than the cost of the ticket. Airlines also said that they were unable to provide a replacement aircraft and crew within three hours in many European locations, and that this can lead to additional flights being cancelled because high compensation payments have already been incurred. READ ALSO What are your rights in Europe if your flight is delayed or cancelled? When does this happen? The change is not immediate, first the European Parliament has four months to stage any objections and if no objection is received, then an introduction date will be set. So we can say for sure that this summer holiday period will still be covered by the old rules.
Euronews
6 days ago
- Euronews
UK trade minister keen to use EU e-gates ‘as soon as possible'
The UK's secretary of state for business and trade has told Euronews he is hoping that British holidaymakers will be able to use e-gates in Europe 'as soon as possible' following the agreement struck with the EU in May. The European Union and the UK announced an agreement on 19 May to strengthen cooperation, the first such deal reached since the UK left the bloc in 2020. Jonathan Reynolds, the UK , delivers a keynote address during the Brussels Economic Security Forum on Thursday. As well as outlining new arrangements linked to travel, defence and fishing, the 'reset' focuses on farming, an industry heavily impacted by Brexit. Under the terms of the new deal, British animal and plant products are expected to face fewer checks when exported to the EU. For example, the UK could once again be allowed to export raw sausages and burgers to the EU for the first time since Brexit — thanks to the proposed SPS (sanitary and phytosanitary) agreement. However, the implementation details are still pending. Under the new deal, British travellers will be able to take advantage of the faster e-gate passport checks at many EU airports, but full details have yet been released on when this will be introduced. 'We hope it is as soon as possible because part of the agreement is the Commission saying there's no legal impediment to the use of e-gates,' Reynolds told Euronews. Reynolds said that the e-gates carried 'huge efficiency advantages', adding: 'I want people who are going on their summer holiday from the UK to have the ease and use of that.' Reynolds said his focus now is on implementing the May agreement, and dismissed opposition arguments against the agreement from the UK's Conservative and Reform parties. 'I think there is a coalition [in the UK] we can build that doesn't want to look to the past,' he said, saying such a coalition recognised the relationship as valuable in terms of trade, rather than revolving around issues of EU membership and constitutional issues. 'Let's not forget on fishing, there is no less access, no diminishing of the UK position from what is already the case and actually what is already the case is better than it had been in some previous years,' Reynolds said. There will 'always be people who want to not move on. That's politics. And my political opponents in the UK have stated that', Reynolds said, but he said he was confident that such arguments would not prevail in a future election. As Germany's new Chancellor Friedrich Merz meets US President Donald Trump for the first time at the White House on Thursday he'll be aware of how predecessors have tackled the transatlantic relationship. The stars don't augur well, however. During his first stint in office, Trump regularly made disparaging remarks about Germany and developed a non-relationship with Chancellor Angela Merkel characterised by mutual personal dislike. Trump's erratic trade policy, which has the EU and Germany specifically in its sights, as well as Trump's retreat from traditionally solid transatlantic positions on common defence and Russia have, challenged Merz before he even moved into the Chancellery. How the mutual relationship between Merz and Trump develops in the future is likely to depend crucially on how the Chancellor completes his first visit to the Oval Office - Volodymyr Zelenskyy sends his regards! Merz's basic problem is that Trump has taken an axe to German-American relations and is not particularly interested in good terms with Berlin. This situation is a novelty for a German chancellor. Merz's predecessors since 1949 have experienced ups and downs in their relations with the respective American presidents, but the close friendship between the two countries has never been called into question. So how did they get along? Konrad Adenauer (1949-63) vs. Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy Konrad Adenauer is 73 when he is elected the first Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1949. Four years after the end of the Second World War, however, the country is not yet a sovereign state. Adenauer is only too aware of this. He seeks a close and trusting relationship with the US and adheres very closely to instructions from Washington. In 1953, Adenauer travels to the USA for the first time - it is the first ever visit by a German head of government to Washington! His talks with US President Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953-61) are friendly. For Adenauer, the protection, aid and military presence of the United States are indispensable for the democratic development of Germany as well as peace and prosperity in Europe. Adenauer develops close personal relations with Eisenhower and especially his Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, which benefits German-American relations as a whole. In contrast, Adenauer's relationship with John F. Kennedy (1961-63) is not without problems. The two are far apart in terms of both age and politics. In 1963, his last year in office, Adenauer is already 87 - and Kennedy, 41 years his junior, sees him as a man of the past. Kennedy feels that the Chancellor's stance on the German question is too rigid and lacks flexibility in the face of changing conditions in Europe. Conversely, Adenauer harbours mistrust of American-Soviet negotiations. He believes that a rapprochement between the two superpowers could only take place at the expense of Germany and its political goal of reunification. Ludwig Erhard (1963-66) vs. Lyndon B. Johnson After the discord between Adenauer and JFK, relations between Chancellor Ludwig Erhard and Kennedy's successor Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-69) become very friendly again. German foreign policy is by now characterised by the conflict between 'Atlanticists' and 'Gaullists', with the latter wanting a close alliance with France, which Erhard rejects in favour of nuclear protection of the US. Erhard and Johnson meet sympathetically from the outset and come together five times during Erhard's short time in office. The first time was just one month after Johnson's inauguration, when the Texan invited the German to his ranch in Texas, a particular honour, especially for a foreigner. Willy Brandt (1969-1974) vs. Richard Nixon Willy Brandt is the first Social Democrat to become Federal Chancellor in 1974. Brandt sees himself as a self-confident partner of the USA. However, his 'Ostpolitik', which seeks an understanding with the GDR, Poland and the Soviet Union, is viewed with great suspicion in Washington. US President Richard Nixon (1969-74) distrusts Brandt, whom he considers to be a 'German nationalist'. Brandt, on the other hand, tries to maintain a good relationship with Nixon and avoids open criticism of the war in Vietnam. Personally, the two have practically nothing to say to each other. Alluding to Brandt's illegitimate origins, Nixon occasionally calls him 'the bastard' behind closed doors. Helmut Schmidt (1974-82) vs. Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter In the mid-1970s, German-American relations are better than ever before. US President Gerald Ford (1974-77) and German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt know and appreciate each other and are close friends in their private lives. There is a great deal of agreement on key issues, as well as a trusting openness in discussing differences. However, Ford loses the 1976 election to his challenger Jimmy Carter (1977-81). Carter is inexperienced on foreign policy and relies on a team of advisors disconnected from the think tanks of the East Coast - where Schmidt has been well connected for decades and enjoys a high reputation. Schmidt, who has a tendency to lecture people, sees Carter as a novice who has only a limited understanding of the world's complex problems. This does not go unnoticed by Carter - relations quickly hit rock bottom. When it comes to the deployment of the neutron bomb, there are serious disagreements. Schmidt, amid great domestic political difficulties, advocates the weapons system desired by Washington. When Carter stops its production at the last minute for domestic political reasons, Schmidt feels exposed and abandoned. Helmut Kohl (1982-1998) vs. Ronald Reagan, George Bush, Bill Clinton Unlike Schmidt, Helmut Kohl has no personal connection to the United States and does not speak English. Nevertheless, he shows transatlantic solidarity from the outset and endeavours to establish a personal relationship with every US president he deals with. His relationship with Ronald Reagan (1981-89) even has friendly traits that outlasts even the embarrassing Bitburg controversy. In 1985, Kohl invites Reagan to visit the Bitburg military cemetery in the Eifel region during his stay in Germany - as a sign of reconciliation between former enemies. When it is discovered that not only Wehrmacht soldiers but also members of the Waffen SS are buried at the cemetery, a storm of indignation breaks out in Washington. The White House wants to cancel the visit, but Reagan remains stubborn and thus supports the German Chancellor. Kohl also develops a friendly and close relationship with Reagan's successor George Bush (1989-93), which facilitates communication between the two governments during the collapse of the GDR and the German reunification process. In the 1990s, German-American relations are determined not least by the question of how much responsibility Germany should assume in the world. US President Bill Clinton (1993-2001), with whom Kohl has an even better relationship than with Reagan, reacts positively to the German decision to send Bundeswehr soldiers to the Balkans as part of an international peacekeeping force. In his memoirs, Clinton speaks almost affectionately and with great respect about his appreciation for Kohl. He was 'not only physically' the most impressive political leader in Europe for decades, according to Clinton. Gerhard Schröder (1998-2005) vs. George W. Bush The relationship between German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder and US President George W. Bush develops quite differently. The atmosphere between Bonn (later Berlin) and Washington is probably never as icy as in those years. The reason: the red-green government's no to the war in Iraq. Mistrust, personal animus, blatant dislike - the rift between the two leaders is total. This becomes apparent again years later, when both are no longer in office and both accused each other of lying on the occasion of the publication of Bush's memoirs in 2010. Angela Merkel (2005-21) vs. Barack Obama Under Chancellor Angela Merkel, German-American relations relax again. Unlike with Schröder, Bush gets on well with Merkel and calls her 'a friend'. In contrast, the Chancellor's relationship with Barack Obama is slow to warm. In 2008, she refuses to allow the then presidential candidate to give a speech in front of the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin - Obama has to make do with the Victory Column. But after Obama's election, the relationship is increasingly characterised by mutual trust. Both cultivate a sober and pragmatic political style and a liberal view of the world, which facilitates cooperation. Olaf Scholz (2021-25) vs Joe Biden In a way, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz is lucky: US President Joe Biden is probably the last great old-school US Atlanticist. This makes cooperation easier. Both like each other, work together in a spirit of trust and describe each other as friends. In fact, Scholz consults with Biden more frequently and more closely than with his European colleagues. When it comes to aid for Ukraine, Scholz does nothing without obtaining Biden's approval. At their last meeting, both warned against ending aid to Ukraine. This is now a matter for their successors.
Euronews
21-05-2025
- Euronews
It could soon be easier for UK travellers to bring pets into the EU
For British travellers, taking a pet abroad to an EU country is now fraught with formalities, from rabies vaccinations to tapeworm treatments. These complicated procedures are a result of Brexit, which introduced several bureaucratic hurdles that previously did not exist. However, the recent negotiations for a 'Brexit reset' deal between the UK and the EU look set to simplify pet travel rules again. Here are the current regulations for bringing a pet into the EU and what is expected to change. Before Brexit, UK residents enjoyed straightforward travel with their pets involving minimal paperwork. Dogs, cats, and other furry companions were stamped in and out using a simple pet passport system. Pet travel between Great Britain and Northern Ireland was completely unrestricted in both directions. But Brexit brought in a host of new bureaucratic requirements for Brits travelling with their animals. The current requirements state that pets must be microchipped. Animals over 12 weeks old must receive a rabies vaccination, and more than three weeks must pass between the jab and travel. Each journey requires a new EU animal health certificate (AHC) confirming both microchipping and vaccination. Dogs need tapeworm treatment one to five days before entering the EU or Northern Ireland, with a health certificate issued within 10 days of entry. Vets charge approximately £200 (€236) per certificate. When entering the EU, travellers must use dedicated entry points where officials will validate and stamp the pet's documentation. When returning to the UK, the same certifications used for departure remain valid. Pet owners report that the paperwork is challenging and prone to errors that can prevent travel altogether. While the certificates remain valid for up to four months for re-entry to Britain, this exceeds the 90-day limit that applies to British citizens in the EU, so it is irrelevant for most travellers. While there are still no restrictions on taking a pet from Northern Ireland to Great Britain, the above rules apply in the opposite direction because of the 'border in the Irish Sea' that Boris Johnson's government negotiated. For direct travel to Ireland, Finland, Malta, or Norway, dogs require veterinarian-administered tapeworm treatment between 24 hours and 5 days before arrival, documented in either the health certificate or a valid pet passport. The UK government is seeking to negotiate with the EU to restore something closer to pre-Brexit ease of pet travel. This would likely involve UK pet passports regaining a similar status to EU documents. While there's a small health risk in facilitating more animal movement between countries, officials believe this is outweighed by both social benefits (allowing more people to travel with their pets) and economic advantages for the tourism industry. If you are looking for a city break on a budget this summer, consider some of Eastern Europe's culture-rich capitals. A new report by the UK's Post Office has ranked the top 10 cities in Europe where you could save money on a holiday. The City Costs Barometer found that prices have fallen in half the cities surveyed. Seven out of 10 destinations are in Eastern Europe, including the top spot. The analysis calculated the costs of 12 common tourist items in 38 cities in Europe. These included consumables like a cup of coffee, a bottle of beer, a can of Coca-Cola or Pepsi, a glass of wine, and a three-course evening meal for two with house wine. Transport costs were also incorporated, such as a return airport bus or train transfer, and a 48-hour travel card. It included the price of a sightseeing city bus tour, a top tourist heritage attraction, a top museum, and a top art gallery. Finally, it added the cost of two nights' accommodation in a three-star hotel for two people. The Latvian capital, Riga, has regained its position as Europe's best value city for a short break for the first time in over a decade. The UNESCO-designated old town is a flourish of carved medieval buildings and pastel townhouses, but you don't have to battle crowds to visit the famous sites. At €300 for 12 tourist items, the city has risen from sixth place last year to top the chart for the first time since 2012. This is because prices in Riga are down 15 per cent year-on-year compared with those in runner-up city, Vilnius, where the total cost of an average break rose 7.5 per cent to €302. The rising cost of accommodation in the Lithuanian capital is the key factor. Prices in the two Baltic states are around 60 per cent lower than in Oslo (€755) and Copenhagen (€747), the most expensive cities surveyed. Poland boasts three cities in this year's city breaks top 10. Warsaw (€329) has moved up from 10th to third place with a price fall of 13.2 per cent, mainly as a result of a €46 fall in accommodation costs (€155 for two nights compared with €201 a year ago). Kraków (€356) again makes the top 10 but has dropped from fourth to eighth place because of a 7.7 per cent price increase. One place higher in seventh position Gdansk, surveyed for the first time this year, costs a total of €352 for the barometer items. From the enormous brick St Mark's Church, whose spires seem to pierce the clouds, to the slender gabled houses lining Long Market, many of the Polish city's attractions don't cost a penny to admire. Also new for 2025, Montenegro's capital, Podgorica, has shot into the top 10 in fourth place. Its overall cost of €335 is 29 per cent lower than Dubrovnik in neighbouring Croatia. Podgorica has an ultra-trendy cafè scene, a historic village-in-the-city neighbourhood and vestiges of its ancient Ottoman past to discover. Rising from 11th last year to 10th position in the new survey, Zagreb (€369) is the fourth new entrant to the best value top 10, gaining its place because of a 4.4 per cent fall in barometer prices. Portugal's two major cities both feature in the ranking. Although prices are up 10.8 per cent in Lisbon (5th, €347), the Portuguese capital remains the highest placed Western European city. Porto (9th, €362) has moved back into the leading 10 cities from 13th place last year after registering an overall price fall of 15.5 per cent, thanks to better hotel availability. Lille, a delight of handsome buildings and heavyweight museums in northern France, comes in 6th place at €348 to complete the top 10 line-up. Post Office researchers found that costs for tourist items have fallen in half of the surveyed cities compared to a year ago. The biggest drop has been in Helsinki, the lowest-priced Scandinavian city in this year's barometer. At €556, prices have plummeted by over 20 per cent to take the Finnish capital to 21st place from 34th last year. Conversely, barometer prices have risen significantly in Berlin, where a 20 per cent increase in tourist costs has seen the city fall from 21st to 34th place with a barometer total of €698. All prices have been converted from Sterling to Euro at the current conversion rate of £1 = €1.19.
