Derry and Strabane: Ratepayers foot £45K Christmas vandalism bill
Ratepayers in the north west will have to pick up the bill of almost £50,000 for the repairs to Christmas decorations damaged by vandals in Londonderry and Strabane.On Wednesday, Derry City and Strabane District Council's environment committee approved a payment of £45,274 to cover the cost of vandalism over the festive period.Trees at Derry's Waterloo Place, Guildhall Square and Ebrington Square and in Strabane and Castlederg were all damaged in separate incidents, the committee was told.A council report also recommended setting aside a further £40,000 to cover the cost of potential repairs this Christmas.
Speaking at the meeting, Ulster Unionist councillor Derek Hussey asked if employing security staff for Christmas trees would be a more cost effective option for the local authority.He said footing the repair bills "prevents other provision that we as a council could be and should be providing throughout the area".Councillors were told that netting had been placed on the trees outside the Guildhall and at Waterloo Place to act as a deterrent.But further damage was caused by people climbing into the trees.The council's report reveals that it cost more than £30,000 to repair the damage to those two trees alone.
Decorations in the centre of Londonderry have been vandalised repeatedly over recent years.The report said "it would be prudent to set aside £40k" to cover cost of Christmas decoration vandalism in the coming year.It also confirmed that over the festive period of 2021/22, the council had paid more than £47,000 to repair damage to Christmas decorations.At that time, the then mayor of the city warned that the council was debating whether barricades could be erected around the civic decorations. The council said it was receiving reports of damage "on a daily basis".
'Thoughtless, careless and irresponsible people'
At Wednesday's meeting, the ongoing seasonal damage was widely condemned.SDLP councillor John Boyle said ratepayers were covering a needless cost due to "a minority of people who can't leave things alone"."It is important the message goes out to people, please just leave these things alone, let everyone have nice things," Boyle said.DUP councillor Julie Middleton said people, many of whom struggle to pay their rates , were being forced to pay for the "actions of a small minority of thoughtless, careless and irresponsible people", while Sinn Féin's Emma McGinley said she was "disgusted"."Those people who go out and decide to ruin things other people really enjoy want to catch themselves on," she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
19 hours ago
- Daily Record
Exam clash fears prompt change to West Lothian school holidays
The changes will see the Easter holiday moved forward, and will also take account of the council election in early May 2027. Easter holiday dates for West Lothian schools are being changed after concerns were raised about the SQA exam dates. West Lothian council has revised its term dates for the new school year in 2026-27. The changes will see the Easter holiday moved forward, and will also take account of the council election in early May 2027. In a report to the Education PDSP Hannah Haywood, Customer Services Manager said: 'Easter is early in 2027.' She added: 'Proposed dates for session 2026/27 were presented to Education PDSP on 1 April. Consultation on the proposed dates was still under way at that time. 'Four responses were received, two expressing satisfaction with the proposed dates, and two requesting that the Easter Break should be later. 'Since the meeting on 1 April 2025, new information about the SQA time-scales has been provided, and it is now clear that the previously proposed timing of the Easter break would potentially negatively impact on students meeting submission deadlines for SQA awards. She added: ' Easter is early in 2027, and the original proposal was for the schools to break up on Friday 19 March, and resume on Monday 5 April, with the Easter weekend in the middle. 'A new proposal is now being presented, which moves the Easter break to make it one week later, starting on Good Friday 26 March, and resuming on Monday 12 April. 'As the Easter break is now two weeks and one day long rather than two weeks, the new proposal removes the Friday from the September weekend to make sure that we provide the required 190 teaching days in the session.' As ever the West Lothian holidays are unlikely to tie with neighbouring councils, many of which have yet to be confirmed. Chairing the PDSP Councillor Andrew McGuire said he and fellow councillors were unlikely to forget to move an in-service day to the first Thursday in May as this marks the end of their current council term. The in-service day in May 2026 has also been moved from Tuesday 5 May to Thursday 7 May to coincide with the Scottish Parliamentary Election. Term dates for 2026/27 are:- Pupils return: Wednesday 12 August September weekend: Monday 21 September October holiday: Friday 16 October-Tuesday 27 October Christmas holiday: Friday 18 December- Tuesday 5 January Mid Term: Friday 5 February - Tuesday 16 February Easter Holidays: Thursday 26 March - Monday 5 April May Day holiday Monday 3 May Staff in-service Thursday 6 May. The new term dates will have to be confirmed by the Education Executive when it meets in two weeks' time.
BreakingNews.ie
21 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Government accused of being ‘all over the place' on its rent control plans
The Government has been accused of being 'all over the place' and 'confused' on its rent control plans. Taoiseach Micheál Martin accused the Opposition of confusing the proposals and said he did not accept that they would lead to an increase in evictions and rent costs. Advertisement The new rent proposals include extending a 2 per cent rent cap for areas of high demand nationwide, with an exception for new developments, which can charge rent increases in line with inflation. New tenancy reforms include six-year-minimum tenancies for the first time, to be rolled out from March 1st, 2026, which will ban no-fault evictions for landlords with four or more tenancies. Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald said the proposals were 'a shambles'. I'm heading into Leaders' Questions to challenge Micheál Martin on his plan to hike up rents again and again! Fianna Fáil are fleecing renters and we must fight back! — Mary Lou McDonald (@MaryLouMcDonald) June 11, 2025 'You are literally all over the place, confused by your own back-of-the-envelope proposal,' she said during Leaders' Questions on Wednesday. Advertisement She said there was 'a very real danger' that the plan will 'tighten' rental supply in the coming months, as landlords could delay putting properties back on the market to charge a higher rent from March next year. Ms McDonald said that the Government was unclear about whether the plan allowed all landlords to set their rents at 'full market' value at the end of the new six-year tenancies. The Sinn Féin leader and other opposition TDs said on Tuesday this would 'jack up' rents either in the coming months or in six years' time, facilitated by government policy. 'This clearly meant people staying in an existing property, signing a new tenancy agreement, along with people moving into a property for the first time. And then, you were caught out. Advertisement 'So throughout the afternoon, you scrambled around denying that this was the case and then sometime in the evening, somebody slipped off and bizarrely changed the press release on the department website with a new wording, a wording that changes nothing.' On Tuesday in the Dáil, Ms McDonald, the Social Democrats and People Before Profit raised concerns about a Department of Housing press release which said that 'all landlords will have the right to reset rent where the rent is below market at the end of each six-year tenancy, unless a 'no-fault eviction' occurs.' On Wednesday, Ms McDonald said that this line had been changed on the department's website to include all landlords 'who have entered into a new tenancy arrangement on or after March 1st 2026' will have the right to reset rent at the end of each six-year tenancy. Taoiseach Micheál Martin accused Ms McDonald of 'bluff and bluster' which he said would contribute 'nothing' to Ireland's housing supply. Advertisement 'You're attacking all of this, and you're making absolutely false assertions, because all you are interested in is the politics of this. 'How can I exploit the housing situation to gain electoral or political gain?' Social Democrats' deputy leader Cian O'Callaghan accused the Government of 'contradictory messages' on its rent control plans. He also asked whether they had 'ditched' the rent reset every six years based on comments given to the Dáil. Advertisement 'You've told it all just a few minutes ago that new tenancies after March 2026 will be capped at CPI (Consumer Price Index), no mention of a reset every six years. No mention of that. Is the reset gone every six years? 'Do you accept now they are going to lead to huge rent increases for most renters, and these measures will increase hardship, poverty, evictions and homelessness for renters?' 'No, I don't deputy,' the Taoiseach replied. 'The bottom line is, I repeat again, all existing tenants will not have their rents increase beyond 2% and no attempts by you to sow confusion will change that reality.' A row ensued in the Dail when Mr Martin accused the Social Democrats of not believing there is 'a role for the market' in housing supply, to which Social Democrat TDs objected.
Edinburgh Reporter
a day ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Report finds inadequacies and lost emails at the City Chambers
The City of Edinburgh Council will next week discuss a report by former Information Commissioner, Kevin Dunion, which he has presented to them after a four month long investigation. In February the council appointed Mr Dunion to report to them on matters surrounding former Council Leader, Cllr Cammy Day, who had resigned as council leader in December 2024 amid allegations of misconduct against him. In the report Mr Dunion suggests ending Christmas parties held by political groups within the City Chambers, questions the working arrangements of the council where officers work in Waverley Court while councillors work in offices on the High Street, and suggests a refreshed induction and training process for new councillors in regard to the Councillors Code of Conduct, with an annual refresher for existing councillors. Mr Dunion said many of his interviewees suggested the practice of holding such social events in the City Chambers should cease. He reminds councillors that the Code of Conduct revised in 2021 states that each one of the 63 elected in Edinburgh gives a personal undertaking: 'I will meet the public's expectations by ensuring that my conduct is above reproach.' There are also declarations on the part of the councillor that they will not engage in bullying or harassment. Chief Executive Paul Lawrence said: 'I want to thank Kevin Dunion for leading this sensitive review and for his report, not least given the complexity of the brief and tight timescales. 'I know this must have been challenging and a difficult experience for many people and I particularly want to thank those who came forward to be interviewed or provided information to the review. Your input is very much appreciated. 'Subject to approval by councillors next Thursday, we will bring a further report back to the Policy and Sustainability Committee in August, outlining our proposed actions in response to Mr Dunion's recommendations.' The Dunion Report Cllr Day denied any wrongdoing, saying that any communication of explicit photos on dating apps, which was the inappropriate behaviour he was accused of, was his personal business, but he stepped down as leader on 9 December 2024. He was also administratively suspended by the Labour Party. Police Scotland said there was not enough evidence to mount an investigation and the Ethical Standards Commissioner confirmed to The Edinburgh Reporter in April this year that there were no other complaints 'currently being investigated against Cllr Day' (except an historic one regarding a Labour Christmas party and whether booking procedures had been followed correctly). That complaint was made against Cllr Day and five of his Labour colleagues but was dismissed. Mr Dunion was charged with considering whether the allegations against Cllr Day were properly considered and investigated in line with the council's policies and procedures. The allegations involved two whistleblowing disclosures made in 2023, a complaint to the Chief Executive, Andrew Kerr, in December 2023 and an anonymous complaint to the then Council Leader, Cllr Adam McVey, in 2018. Regarding this last complaint Mr Dunion writes: 'The Business Manager [to the Council Leader] at the time said that they would deal with it and responded on 17 May 2018 as follows: 'I am very sorry to read your email and as I handle the Leader's emails, I am responding to ask you to contact the police as we cannot take any action on such a serious allegation. Also, I am concerned that you need to approach someone or an organisation to help support you through this.' According to the former Council Leader, he did not see this response sent by his Business Manager until it was published online in 2024.' In relation to the 2018 allegation the finding is that the former council leader (Cllr McVey) 'now accepts that he should, at the least, have informed the Monitoring Officer'. He confirmed reading the email and discussing it with staff. Emails from 2018 – despite extensive investigations by an IT consultancy – could not be recovered, as the Council Leader's Business Manager had left the council by then, and that email account was removed. Although Cllr McVey mentioned the matter to a Chief Superintendent with whom he had a regular meeting, he was told that unless there was someone named (victim or perpetrator) then nothing could be done by the police. Despite allegations on social media and in the press of the content of the complaint, the handling of this is defined by Mr Dunion as inadequate – mainly due to the insufficient records kept by the council. Mr Dunion conducted interviews with 29 people and received 20 written representations from current and former councillors and council staff. All councillors had been invited to interview. Chief Executive Paul Lawrence said in his report to next week's council: 'As part of the remit all elected members and colleagues were invited to participate in the process.' SafeCall The whistleblowing procedure SafeCall deals with allegations of misconduct among council staff, and Mr Dunion suggests extending that to councillors as it might 'discourage unacceptable behaviour'. There is also a suggestion this confidential service could be extended to members of the public who could then use it to retain their anonymity. Mr Dunion said in the report: 'Even if Safecall advised them to go to the police, as the Business Manager did, at least a record of the complaint would exist, and the Monitoring Officer would have been aware of it. Consideration should be given to routing complainants to Safecall for the purpose of confidential information gathering and advice.' Leaks Mr Dunion was also asked to consider apparent leaks of confidential emails to the press and whether safeguards in the council are sufficient to prevent any instances of behaviour such as that alleged against the former council leader. He speculates that leaks may be politically motivated: 'Unfortunately, however, as has occurred there may be a temptation to leak details to cause political or personal embarrassment.' A confidential email from the Chief Executive to political group leaders found its way into the Daily Record in December 2024. As well as this, Mr Dunion found that text from a confidential report dating from May 2024 to the Whistleblowing Sub-Committee was leaked by someone who had access to the report – and who concluded that the unnamed senior individual in question was Cllr Day. Mr Dunion appears quite frustrated by this leak and said: 'I have interviewed the members of the Sub-Committee. They clearly understand the confidentiality requirements placed upon them regarding the reports they receive, as well as the verbal updates and discussions at committee. I have individually challenged each one over the leak, as to whether they are directly responsible for providing it to The Times or have disclosed the information to someone else who may have done so. All have denied doing so. Many have expressed a view on this however there is no evidence which would allow an assertion to be made by me. Nor are there any proportionate means within the limited capacity of this review to do more. 'There is no doubt however that this constitutes an egregious breach of the confidentiality requirements of Councillors Code of Conduct and undermines confidence in the whistleblowing process. It calls into question whether whistleblowing complaints regarding councillors should be investigated or whether the Whistleblowing Sub-Committee has to be provided with information regarding such investigations.' Mr Dunion has also suggested that the council uses the 2025 staff engagement survey for feedback on speaking up and raising concerns about possible bullying and harassment from councillors. Cllr Cammy Day was elected as Council Leader in 2022 Christmas parties The report mentions in particular the Christmas parties held by all political groups within the City Chambers when alcohol is served. There is a council policy on alcohol for staff, but not for councillors, and it advises staff not to allow themselves to become intoxicated or their judgement impaired. If they do then there is a clear warning of disciplinary action. After a 2023 party it is alleged that a young Ukrainian man made a complaint of sexual harassment to a councillor who communicated it to councillors in another political party. 'It referenced unsolicited messages and images being sent through social media which continued even after asking for the behaviour to stop. The recipient was said to be feeling extremely harassed.' There is a complex timeline regarding this complaint and one other which were made anonymously or semi-anonymously. Neither were followed up on by the complainants, with the first unable to provide evidence. As is usual, nothing of these whistleblowing complaints was communicated to Cllr Day until December 2024. The report states: 'The complained of councillor is not mentioned by name in the email exchanges. However, in conversation prior to the formal email being submitted, the Chief Executive was made aware that it related to Councillor Day.' The Chief Executive did raise this matter with police, but they deemed there was insufficient evidence for any investigation to take place. In regard to this complaint Mr Dunion was content that proper procedure had been followed. Mr Dunion has now presented the report in which he outlines in some detail what happened since December 2024, and makes recommendations as to what the council will do about his findings. Recommendations Mr Dunion has made 14 recommendations: (i) Review procedures currently in place for dealing with potentially inappropriate behaviour by Councillors. Clarify and expand routes of complaints. (ii) Ensure, whatever the source, that a record of complaints, and responses to them, are maintained, even if it is informally addressed or resolved, to reflect the Councillors Code of Conduct provisions regarding Bullying and Harassment. (iii) Distinguish between the source of complaints. For staff members, the response should seek to align with HR policies and have a clear escalation and feedback route, as well as consideration of recording and monitoring to allow actions to be agreed and implemented. (iv) Review and communicate safeguarding arrangements for those who raise complaints. (v) Ensure that Council staff, line managers, Speak Up Supporters, Trade Unions and Colleague Networks are aware of the provisions at (iii) and (iv) above. (vi) Where appropriate, details in relation to specific managerial response or handling of complaints to be passed to Service Director – HR for consideration of potential actions in line with relevant HR Policy. (vii) Consider inclusion of relevant speaking up and raising concerns questions to gain wider staff feedback as part of colleague engagement survey due to be conducted during 2025 to allow further actions to be considered. (viii) Review the Whistleblowing policy and the extent to which complaints against councillors from the public will be accepted for information gathering and escalation. (ix) Consideration should be given to referring complainants to Safecall for the purpose of information gathering and advice. (x) Review the scrutiny function of the Whistleblowing Sub-Committee, as to whether or to what extent it can propose operational actions to resolve complaints. (xi) In the event it is decided to accept Whistleblowing complaints against councillors, consider measures to avoid conflict of interest and reduce the prospect of breaches of confidence, such as restricted information being provided to the Whistleblowing Sub-Committee. (xii) Refresh induction and training process for new councillors and undertake annual refresher training for existing Councillors on Councillors Code of Conduct, incorporating the Protocol for Relationships between Councillors and Employees and Advice Note for Councillors on Bullying and Harassment, as well as any other relevant City of Edinburgh Council specific guidance or procedures, including that when agreed at (i) above. (xiii) As part of wider culture and fostering trust, consider the impact of the current working locations, and relationship and networking opportunities with Councillors and staff. (xiv) Consider the appropriateness of social events and hospitality arrangements. Edinburgh City Chambers. Photo: © 2022, Martin P. McAdam Like this: Like Related
