Facing heated questions, P.E.I. government pauses tiny-home project in Miltonvale Park
The P.E.I. government is pausing its plan to create a tiny-home development in the municipality of Miltonvale Park, just outside Charlottetown.
That plan includes upwards of 200 tiny home units — typically defined as less than 500 square feet but containing traditional kitchens and bathrooms — to go on 65 acres of land the province owns on Sleepy Hollow Road, past the Provincial Correctional Centre.
The province applied to the Rural Municipality of Miltonvale Park recently for a permit for the first 62 units.
Announced in February, the tiny-home development is a collaboration between the province and the Construction Association of P.E.I., with Holland College students and apprentices gaining experience building the homes while helping Islanders listed on the social housing registry.
In the legislature Wednesday, Liberal Opposition Leader Hal Perry said the government failed to consult local residents in District 15 about the project.
"Islanders support building more housing, but they also expect open communication and responsible decision-making," Perry said.
"What process did your government follow in deciding to develop 65 acres in Sleepy Hollow and how were residents engaged before the decision was made?"
Premier Rob Lantz responded: "We've heard some concerns from the community. We're willing to work with the communities, so that it's a development that everybody can all be proud of."
"But that's not happening in District 15," Perry said. "This is a 65-acre development that could add hundreds of homes, so why are we hearing from dozens of residents who say your government failed to consult or listen?"
Housing, Land and Communities Minister Steven Myers shot back, saying that it's "categorically false" to say the government was not listening to feedback.
"We've paused development; we're going back to incorporate the feedback that we've received," he said.
"This is exactly how a government should be run. Take note, because when you guys sat over here, you didn't do any of that stuff," Myers added.
'A land-use issue'
Perry said this is not just a transparency issue.
"It's a land-use issue. This government has earned a failing grade on that for the past six years. This land was active farmland; now it's being converted into residential sprawl," he said, referring to the fact that agricultural acreage is becoming more expensive as farms give way to housing developments.
"To the minister of agriculture: You're a farmer, why are you sitting back while farmland is taken out of production to make way for another sprawling development. Doesn't this concern you?"
Agriculture Minister Bloyce Thompson replied by saying he supports protecting farmland across the Island but population growth brings the need for more housing.
"It's a balance here that we have to be very due-diligent about and I'll support protecting as much farmland on this Island as possible," Thompson replied.
How can you claim to defend farmland, then turn around and pave over it? — Interim Liberal Leader Hal Perry
Perry didn't agree, calling that a bad answer.
"How can you claim to defend farmland, then turn around and pave over it?" he asked. "How do you justify reducing P.E.I.'s agricultural land base at a time when the loss of farmland is one of the biggest concerns facing Island farmers?"
Thompson said he's looking forward to a new pilot project to protect farmland.
"We are working with the minister of land, communities and housing to protect this farmland," Thompson said. "We've discussed this with the Federation of Agriculture, they're excited about this, we're doing a pilot project in Belfast this year."
Cost and safety questions raised
On another point, Perry said the province has not stated how much the Miltonvale Park development is going to cost.
"What is the total projected cost of the Sleepy Hollow development, including infrastructure, maintenance and services, and how has that been communicated with the public?"
Lantz did not answer the question, but mentioned that the property inquestion has been zoned residential for years.
"This was a property that we identified at the height of the housing crisis here as a development where we would situate affordable-type homes, that missing-middle type of home, where we could provide a product for people to get into the housing market," he said.
"This was a vision to help address part of the housing market that's lacking in this province and this was something that we made a commitment to invest in for that purpose."
Perry again said the issue is about sprawl, adding that Sleepy Hollow Road already has safety concerns.
"The issue isn't about building more houses; it's about sprawling as opposed to density, which is protecting our land," he said.
"Sleepy Hollow Road already has safety concerns and we know that. To the premier: Will you commit to upgrading the road, including paving and shoulders, before this development goes ahead, and have residents been given any assurances this is going to be happening?"
This was a property that we identified at the height of the housing crisis... as a development where we would situate affordable-type homes, that missing-middle type of home.
Myers pushed back, saying the area is under the City of Charlottetown's jurisdiction.
"Not only is this a piece of land in Charlottetown, the roads belong to Charlottetown, the upgrades belong to the City of Charlottetown," he said.
"We just gave them more money in their new arrangement with the City of Charlottetown. They're more than capable of making these decisions," Myers added.
"For us, we follow the process that was laid out in front of us. There's never one time we didn't follow the process. It's them who holds the public meetings, not us. It's them who receive the feedback and… we've incorporated the feedback into it."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
9 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
As a generation of gay and lesbian people ages, memories of worse – and better – times swirl
WASHINGTON (AP) — David Perry recalls being young and gay in 1980s Washington D.C. and having 'an absolute blast.' He was fresh out of college, raised in Richmond, Virginia, and had long viewed the nation's capital as 'the big city' where he could finally embrace his true self. He came out of the closet here, got a job at the National Endowment for the Arts where his boss was a gay Republican, and 'lost my virginity in D.C. on August 27, 1980,' he says, chuckling. The bars and clubs were packed with gay men and women — Republican and Democrat — and almost all of them deep in the closet. 'There were a lot of gay men in D.C., and they all seemed to work for the White House or members of Congress. It was kind of a joke. This was pre-Internet, pre-Facebook, pre-all of that. So people could be kind of on the down-low. You would run into congresspeople at the bar,' Perry says. 'The closet was pretty transparent. It's just that no one talked about it.' He also remembers a billboard near the Dupont Circle Metro station with a counter ticking off the total number of of AIDS deaths in the District of Columbia. 'I remember when the number was three,' says Perry, 63. Now Perry, a public relations professional in San Francisco, is part of a generation that can find itself overshadowed amidst the after-parties and DJ sets of World Pride, which wraps up this weekend with a two-day block party on Pennsylvania Avenue. Advocates warn of a quiet crisis among retirement-age LGBTQ+ people and a community at risk of becoming marginalized inside their own community. 'It's really easy for Pride to be about young people and parties,' says Sophie Fisher, LGBTQ program coordinator for Seabury Resources for Aging, a company that runs queer-friendly retirement homes and assisted-living facilities and which organized a pair of Silver Pride events last month for LGBTQ+ people over age 55. These were 'the first people through the wall' in the battle for gay rights and protections, Fisher says. Now, 'they kind of get swept under the rug.' Loneliness and isolation The challenges and obstacles for elderly LGBTQ+ people can be daunting. 'We're a society that really values youth as is. When you throw in LGBTQ on top of that, it's a double whammy,' says Christina Da Costa of the group SAGE — Services and Advocacy for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Elders. 'When you combine so many factors, you have a population that's a lot less likely to thrive than their younger brethren.' Older LGBTQ+ people are far more likely to have no contact with their family and less likely to have children to help care for them, Da Costa says. Gay men over 60 are the precise generation that saw their peer group decimated by AIDS. The result: chronic loneliness and isolation. 'As you age, it becomes difficult to find your peer group because you don't go out to bars anymore,' says Yvonne Smith, a 73-year-old D.C. resident who moved to Washington at age 14. 'There are people isolated and alone out there.' These seniors are also often poorer than their younger brethren. Many were kicked out of the house the moment they came out of the closet, and being openly queer or nonbinary could make you unemployable or vulnerable to firing deep into the 1990s. 'You didn't want to be coming out of a gay bar, see one of your co-workers or one of your students,' Smith says. 'People were afraid that if it was known you were gay, they would lose their security clearance or not be hired at all.' In April, founders cut the ribbon on Mary's House, a new 15-unit living facility for LGBTQ+ seniors in southeast Washington. These kind of inclusive senior-care centers are becoming an increasing priority for LGBTQ+ elders. Rayceen Pendarvis, a D.C. queer icon, performer and presenter, says older community members who enter retirement homes or assisted-living centers can face social isolation or hostility from judgmental residents. 'As we age, we lose our peers. We lose our loved ones and some of us no longer have the ability to maintain our homes,' says Pendarvis, who identifies as 'two-spirit' and eschews all pronouns. 'Sometimes they go in, and they go back into the closet. It's very painful for some.' A generation gap Perry and others see a clear divide between their generation and the younger LGBTQ+ crowd. Younger people, Perry says, drink and smoke a lot less and do much less bar-hopping in the dating-app age. Others can't help but gripe a bit about how these youngsters don't know how good they have it. 'They take all these protections for granted,' Smith says. The younger generation 'got comfortable,' Pendarvis says, and sometimes doesn't fully understand the multigenerational fight that came before. 'We had to fight to get the rights that we have today,' Pendarvis said. 'We fought for a place at the table. We CREATED the table!' Now that fight is on again as President Donald Trump's administration sets the community on edge with an open culture war targeting trans protections and drag shows, and enforcing a binary view of gender identity. The struggle against that campaign may be complicated by a quiet reality inside the LGBTQ+ community: These issues remain a topic of controversy among some LGBTQ+ seniors. Perry said he has observed that some older lesbians remain leery of trans women; likewise, he said, some older gay men are leery of the drag-queen phenomenon. 'There is a good deal of generational sensitivity that needs to be practiced by our older gay brethren,' he says. 'The gender fluidity that has come about in the last 15 years, I would be lying if I said I didn't have to adjust my understanding of it sometimes.' Despite the internal complexities, many are hoping to see a renewed sense of militancy and street politics in the younger LGBTQ+ generation. Sunday's rally and March for Freedom, starting at the Lincoln Memorial, is expected to be particularly defiant given the 2025 context. 'I think we're going to see a whole new era of activism,' Perry says. 'I think we will find our spine and our walking shoes – maybe orthopedic – and protest again. But I really hope that the younger generation helps us pick up this torch.'
CBC
3 days ago
- CBC
Conference in P.E.I. urges Canada to ACT on basic income guarantee
Women's Network P.E.I. is hosting a conference at Holland College this week called ACT BIG, which stands for Advocating Canada Towards a Basic Income Guarantee. CBC News: Compass host Louise Martin sat down with Tracy Smith-Carrier, a professor at Royal Roads University in Victoria, B.C., who's one of the guest speakers at the event.
CBC
16-05-2025
- CBC
P.E.I. Legislature to continue sitting Friday after dust-up between Opposition, premier
Despite hope that the spring sitting of the P.E.I. legislature would close Thursday, an exchange between Premier Rob Lantz and Official Opposition Leader Hal Perry during question period made it clear that MLAs would be back for another day on Friday. For the spring sitting to close, all MLAs in the legislative assembly would have needed to provide unanimous consent to push through the remaining pieces of legislation. Without that unanimous consent, those laws would not be able to pass third reading until Friday. Following questions from Perry, the interim Liberal leader, about the Progressive Conservative government's spending on its multimillion-dollar tourism deal with the National Hockey League, Lantz fired back with his own questions about the P.E.I. Liberal Party's spending. "I would be remiss if I didn't point out that the office of the Opposition — a three-member caucus — is allotted a budget of hundreds of thousands of dollars and they could not stay within the budget," Lantz said. "They overspent their own office budget by almost 50 per cent, Mr. Speaker. If this government spent like that office does, we'd have a deficit of $1.5 billion, so I won't be lectured about fiscal responsibility by a leader of the Opposition who can't stay within the budget of his tiny Opposition office." In his response, Perry said Lantz's statement was not true. "We will be back here tomorrow, and there will be an apology made by the premier," he said. Perry then called a point of order, which allows any member to stop what's happening in the house and alert the Speaker that they believe a rule has been broken. "I, as a member, find it deeply offensive that the premier would make statements about our budget accounting that are inaccurate, and if further clarification is needed, please contact the clerk of the legislative assembly," Perry said. "I'd like to ask the premier at this time to retract his statement and apologize." Speaker Sidney MacEwen said he would take the point of order under advisement. Inaccuracy in annual report Joey Jeffrey, the clerk of the legislative assembly, said in an email to CBC News that an annual report appears to show the Official Opposition overspent its budget by nearly $100,000. The report shows the Liberals had a budget of $250,000 and spent $346,131. Jeffrey said that was a mistake. To sum up, they were within their budget. — Joey Jeffrey, clerk of the legislative assembly The figures in the annual report do not reflect a funding increase that was given to the Opposition after the budget had already gone through, he said. "The number in the annual report doesn't reflect that because those numbers are taken directly from the accounting system as it can't be updated after [the] fact. The Standing Committee on Legislative Assembly Management has the authority to change the caucus amounts but not to override the accounting system," Jeffrey said. "To sum up, they were within their budget." What's next for the legislature? While Perry made it clear that he would not be willing to provide unanimous consent to push the remaining pieces of legislation through until Lantz apologizes, the P.E.I. Green Party was the firstto reject the call. For weeks, Green MLAs have been asking the PCs to table documents related to spending on Health P.E.I.'s executive leadership contracts. The PCs originally said they would table some of those documents, but have not done so. The provincial government does not need permission or unanimous consent to call the remaining pieces of legislation forward for a third reading on Friday. The legislative assembly adjourned Thursday at 7:17 p.m. and will return Friday morning at 10 a.m.
