
Nuclear Submarine Deal Lurks Below Surface Of Australian Election
A landmark security pact to overhaul Australia's navy with American muscle faces growing scepticism, stoked by its eyewatering cost and growing distrust of US President Donald Trump.
But the sweeping deal, which will see Australia buy nuclear-powered submarines from the United States, is just about the only thing not up for debate ahead of Saturday's closely fought election.
Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom signed the AUKUS agreement to great fanfare in 2021, joining forces in a multi-decade effort to balance China's military might.
AUKUS commits Washington, London and Canberra to the joint development of cyber warfare tools, artificial intelligence and hypersonic missiles.
A key feature is for Australia to acquire a fleet of cutting-edge nuclear-powered submarines from the United States.
Government forecasts estimate the submarine programme alone could cost Australia up to US$235 billion over the next 30 years -- one of its biggest-ever defence investments.
The price, as well as Trump's return as commander-in-chief and his "America-first" foreign policy, has critics questioning the agreement.
"AUKUS is a terrible deal. It is so unfair to Australia," former conservative prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said earlier this year.
"(Trump) will be thinking: who are these dumb guys who agreed to this?"
But both left-leaning Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his conservative challenger Peter Dutton are adamant that -- whoever wins the May 3 poll -- AUKUS is here to stay.
It is almost the sole area of agreement between two leaders with wildly different views on everything from climate change to immigration.
"What we need is certainty, what we need is bipartisanship on issues of defence policy," Albanese said on the campaign trail this month.
Australia plans to acquire at least three Virginia Class submarines from the United States within the next 10 to 15 years.
Eventually, and with American help, Australia aims to manufacture nuclear-powered submarines itself.
These submarines -- a tightly guarded piece of American military hardware -- would prowl the Indo-Pacific, making China think twice before any skirmish in flashpoints like the Taiwan Strait.
The US navy has a fleet of 24 Virginia-class vessels, which can carry cruise missiles, but American shipyards are struggling to meet production targets set at two new boats each year.
Critics question why the United States would sell nuclear-powered submarines to Australia without stocking its own military first.
Others fear a scenario in which Australia forks out hundreds of millions in deposits and down payments, only for a mercurial Trump to tear up the deal on a whim.
"This government has sold out to the United States," another former prime minister, Paul Keating, said in 2024.
"They've fallen for dinner on the White House lawn."
Michael Green, who runs the United States Studies Centre in Australia, said AUKUS was still the best route in the absence of a "credible second option".
"Understandably, there is anxiety in Australia about whether AUKUS can survive Trump. Because nothing seems sacred to him," the former National Security Council advisor told AFP.
"But there is no indication that the Trump administration would change course. So much prestige and so much effort has been put into this."
From World War II to the Iraq invasion in 2003, the United States has long counted Australia as one of its most resolute military allies.
But the longer Trump sits in the Oval Office, the less faith the Australian public seems to have in a nation sometimes dubbed its "greatest friend".
"The unambiguous finding is that Australians have far less trust in the US than there has ever been," said Ryan Neelam, who runs the annual Lowy Institute public poll on Australia's foreign affairs.
Only 36 percent of Australians trust the United States, according to the poll's latest findings from April, down 20 percentage points from 2024 to the lowest in almost two decades of Lowy Institute polling, Neelam said.
Despite misgivings about Trump, however, Neelam said most Australians still put their faith in the longstanding alliance.
"There's strong political bipartisanship on this issue, it's not divisive.
"Albanese and Dutton are united in backing in the alliance. That makes a difference."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Musk Fires Back With Slur After Steve Bannon Called for Trump to Seize SpaceX, Deport the CEO
Elon Musk hurled slurs after former Trump strategist Steve Bannon called for the president to seize SpaceX and deport Musk following his public tirade against President Donald Trump and his support for Republicans' "one big, beautiful bill." Bannon railed against Musk and his work with the Department of Government Efficiency during the Thursday episode of his "War Room" podcast, in which he claimed that Trump was upset that Musk "didn't find any fraud." STEVE BANNON: "President Trump, TONIGHT, should sign an executive order calling up the Defense Production Act, and seize SpaceX TONIGHT, before midnight." — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) June 5, 2025 "When he threatens to take one of the big programs out of SpaceX, President Trump tonight should sign an executive order calling for the Defense Production Act to be called and seize SpaceX tonight before midnight," Bannon declared. Clips of this part of the podcast were then shared to X, Musk's social media platform, where Musk had some choice words to reveal his thoughts toward Bannon's ideas. Bannon is peak retard — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 6, 2025 "Bannon is peak r*****," the Tesla CEO commented after the video was reposted to by the popular X account "R***** Finder." Musk then doubled down on the sentiment hours later in another comment after another user shared the same clip: "Bannon is a communist r*****." Bannon is a communist retard — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 6, 2025 Earlier in the day, Bannon had called for Musk to be deported, telling the New York Times , "They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately." Bannon's support for Trump continued after Musk posted a series of scathing tweets directed at the president over Republicans' "big, beautiful bill" which Trump has expressed support for. Although Musk served as a close ally of Trump for the past several months, he explained that he believes the spending bill would undermine the work of DOGE, as current estimates suggest the bill will raise the national deficit by several trillion dollars. While Musk's tweets initially just railed against the bill and dug up tweets from Trump's past where he expressed opposition to raising the national deficit, the tirade later became more accusatory, claiming that the files on Jeffrey Epstein have not been released yet because Trump's name is in them. Trump and the White House have not addressed this accusation, though he told ABC News Friday that he is "not particularly" interested in talking to Musk anytime soon. Originally published on Latin Times Elon musk Donald trump Spacex


Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Musk's Rage 'Helps Bolster' GOP Senator's Efforts Against Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Lawmaker Says
Sen. Ron Johnson said Elon Musk's explosive criticism of Donald Trump's sweeping tax-and-spending plan helps reinforce Republican opposition to the bill, which some in the GOP warn will worsen the federal deficit. The latest divide within the party comes as lawmakers debate Trump's so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill," a legislative package that his allies say fulfills campaign promises but that fiscal conservatives like Johnson argue is too costly. Musk's public meltdown over the bill, paired with his threats to oust supporters and revelations that he donated over $250 million to Trump's campaign, has further complicated the politics surrounding the measure, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported. In a series of social media posts this week, Musk claimed Trump wouldn't have been reelected without him, accused the former president of ties to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, and called for his impeachment. Trump fired back by threatening Musk's federal contracts and accusing him of trying to sabotage the legislation to protect electric vehicle tax breaks for Tesla. While Johnson welcomed Musk's support in questioning the bill's fiscal impact, other Republicans brushed off the feud. Rep. Derrick Van Orden called the dustup a "tempest in a teapot" and reiterated his loyalty to Trump. "I think it has an impact," Johnson said. "I think it helps bolster, certainly, my case that we have to address this." Rep. Tom Tiffany said Musk's input came too late to make a difference. Still, some lawmakers acknowledged that the billionaire's comments aren't helping the GOP unify behind the bill. Rep. Scott Fitzgerald said Musk's attacks weren't "helpful," and Rep. Troy Nehls accused Musk of having "lost [his] damn mind." Despite the fallout, Van Orden said the legislation will move forward and insisted Trump is still leading the GOP. Originally published on Latin Times


Int'l Business Times
5 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
ICE Detained US Marshal Who Matched the 'General Description' of Person of Interest Inside Arizona Immigration Court
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents detained a deputy U.S. marshal inside the home of Arizona's immigration court after they matched the "general description" of a person of interest agents were looking for. "A Deputy US Marshal who fit the general description of a subject being sought by ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) was briefly detained at a federal building in Tucson after entering the lobby of the building," the U.S. Marshals Service said in a statement obtained by the Arizona Daily Star. "The Deputy US Marshal's identity was quickly confirmed by other law enforcement officers, and he exited the building without incident," the statement continued. The incident reportedly took place in late May, sources told the Daily Star. The building the marshal was detained at both houses deputy U.S. marshals and the state's immigration court. ICE agents have begun turning to immigration courts across the country as spots to detain migrants they accuse of being in the country illegally. However, this incident has caused concern among legal experts as U.S. marshals work for the federal government. "It begs the question of what other situations are happening, what else aren't we hearing about regular people in the community getting mistakenly picked up?" Noah Schramm, a policy strategist with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Arizona, told the outlet. ICE has come under fire several times over the past few months after accidentally detaining American citizens and people in the country legally. One Maryland man, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, made national headlines after he was mistakenly sent to a mega prison in El Salvador. The increase in detainments across the country came as part of President Donald Trump's campaign promise for "mass deportations." Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and Trump adviser Stephen Miller reportedly directed immigration officials to aim for 3,000 arrests per day. This past Tuesday alone, more than 2,200 individuals were detained. ICE has not publicly addressed the incident and the deputy marshal involved has not been identified. Originally published on Latin Times