
DeepSeek aids China's military and evaded export controls, U.S. official says
AI firm DeepSeek is aiding China's military and intelligence operations, a senior U.S. official said, adding that the Chinese tech startup sought to use Southeast Asian shell companies to access high-end semiconductors that cannot be shipped to China under U.S. rules.
The U.S. conclusions reflect a growing conviction in Washington that the capabilities behind the rapid rise of one of China's flagship AI enterprises may have been exaggerated and relied heavily on U.S. technology.
Hangzhou-based DeepSeek sent shockwaves through the technology world in January, saying its artificial intelligence reasoning models were on par with or better than U.S. industry-leading models at a fraction of the cost.
"We understand that DeepSeek has willingly provided and will likely continue to provide support to China's military and intelligence operations," a senior State Department official said in an interview.
"This effort goes above and beyond open-source access to DeepSeek's AI models," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity in order to speak about U.S. government information.
The U.S. government's assessment of DeepSeek's activities and links to the Chinese government come amid a wide-scale U.S.-China trade war.
Among the allegations, the official said DeepSeek is sharing user information and statistics with Beijing's surveillance apparatus.
The big three U.S. cloud providers Amazon, Microsoft and Alphabet's Google offer DeepSeek to customers.
Chinese law requires companies operating in China to provide data to the government when requested. But the suggestion that DeepSeek is already doing so is likely to raise privacy and other concerns for the firm's tens of millions of daily global users. The U.S. also maintains restrictions on companies it believes are linked to China's military-industrial complex.
U.S. lawmakers have previously said that DeepSeek, based on its privacy disclosure statements, transmits American users' data to China through "backend infrastructure" connected to China Mobile, a Chinese state-owned telecommunications giant.
DeepSeek did not respond to questions about its privacy practices.
The company is also referenced more than 150 times in procurement records for China's People's Liberation Army and other entities affiliated with the Chinese defense industrial base, said the official, adding that DeepSeek had provided technology services to PLA research institutions.
The official also said the company was employing workarounds to U.S. export controls to gain access to advanced U.S.-made chips.
DeepSeek has access to "large volumes" of U.S. firm Nvidia's high-end H100 chips, said the official. Since 2022 those chips have been under U.S. export restrictions due to Washington's concerns that China could use them to advance its military capabilities or jump ahead in the AI race.
"DeepSeek sought to use shell companies in Southeast Asia to evade export controls, and DeepSeek is seeking to access data centers in Southeast Asia to remotely access U.S. chips," the official said.
The official declined to say if DeepSeek had successfully evaded export controls or offer further details about the shell companies.
DeepSeek also did not respond to questions about its acquisition of Nvidia chips or the alleged use of shell companies.
When asked if the U.S. would implement further export controls or sanctions against DeepSeek, the official said the department had "nothing to announce at this time."
China's foreign ministry and commerce ministry did not respond to a request for comment.
"We do not support parties that have violated U.S. export controls or are on the U.S. entity lists," an Nvidia spokesman said in a prepared statement, adding that "with the current export controls, we are effectively out of the China data center market, which is now served only by competitors such as Huawei."
DeepSeek has said two of its AI models that Silicon Valley executives and U.S. tech company engineers have showered with praise — DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1 — are on par with OpenAI and Meta's most advanced models.
AI experts, however, have expressed skepticism, arguing the true costs of training the models were likely much higher than the $5.58 million the startup said was spent on computing power.
DeepSeek has H100 chips that it procured after the U.S. banned Nvidia from selling those chips to China, three sources familiar with the matter said, adding that the number was far smaller than the 50,000 H100s that the CEO of another AI startup had claimed DeepSeek possesses in a January interview with CNBC.
"Our review indicates that DeepSeek used lawfully acquired H800 products, not H100," an Nvidia spokesman said, responding to a query about DeepSeek's alleged usage of H100 chips.
In February, Singapore charged three men with fraud in a case domestic media have linked to the movement of Nvidia's advanced chips from the city state to DeepSeek. China has also been suspected of finding ways to use advanced U.S. chips remotely.
While importing advanced Nvidia chips into China without a license violates U.S. export rules, Chinese companies are still allowed to access those same chips remotely in data centers in non-restricted countries.
The exceptions are when a Chinese company is on a U.S. trade blacklist or the chip exporter has knowledge that the Chinese firm is using its chips to help develop weapons of mass destruction.
U.S. officials have not placed DeepSeek on any U.S. trade blacklists yet and have not alleged that Nvidia had any knowledge of DeepSeek's work with the Chinese military.
Malaysia's trade ministry said last week that it was investigating whether an unnamed Chinese company in the country was using servers equipped with Nvidia chips for large language model training and that it was examining whether any domestic law or regulation had been breached.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

an hour ago
Some Japanese Parents Turn to AI for Childcare Support
The parenting support website Baby Calendar conducted a survey in late May on parenting and the use of AI. The survey targeted 564 men and women with children under the age of 18. Among those 564 respondents, 251 or 25.5% said that they 'frequently use' AI or AI-related apps, while another 41.0% said they 'sometimes use' them. The most common use was for 'consulting about parenting problems,' mentioned by 42.7% of the respondents. In particular, parents made use of AI when faced with issues that are difficult to discuss with others, such as discipline, child development, or handling the difficult toddler years. These are the sorts of problems that can be tough for a household to resolve on its own. Another popular use, mentioned by 37.6%, involved 'keeping records on childcare and managing daily routines.' Specific examples included using AI to predict when a child is likely to become cranky based on previous situations. In addition, 33.5% used AI for 'consulting about a child's health,' such as asking for advice on what to do when a child has a fever. These examples show that people often turn to AI when it comes to daily decisions. The top benefit of using AI as a parent, mentioned by 49.5% of the respondents, is the ability to obtain information quickly, but the survey also revealed that making use of AI can reduce stress. This was reflected in benefits chosen by respondents like not having to do everything alone, being able to rely on it at night or in spare moments, and being able to ask things that they couldn't ask other people about. Some commented on how AI provided emotional support, such as a respondent who said: 'AI encouraged me at times when I was feeling down.' (Translated from Japanese. Banner photo © Pixta.)


Japan Times
4 hours ago
- Japan Times
Japan protests new Chinese construction in East China Sea
China has stepped up construction of drilling rigs and other platforms off its east coast to tap into maritime resources such as natural gas and fish, raising the ire of Japan and South Korea and fanning fresh concerns about Beijing's regional ambitions. In the latest development, Japan said on Tuesday it lodged a protest with China after observing a new structure in a natural gas field in the East China Sea. Tokyo reported finding another similar Chinese structure in the same area in May. South Korea, meanwhile, has protested in recent months about three structures that China built for aquaculture in the Yellow Sea, which separates the Korean peninsula from mainland China. Ambiguous boundaries are part of the problem. Neither Japan or South Korea have agreed maritime borders with China, raising the prospect that Beijing is looking to exert de facto control over a widening swath of the ocean by staking a claim with new structures. Such a move could have parallels with China's building of artificial features in the South China Sea to expand its area of control there. "Pending maritime boundary delimitation, it is extremely regrettable that China is advancing unilateral development,' Japan's Foreign Ministry said in a statement, adding that the government strongly requested China to cease such activities. Asked about the Japanese protest, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said: "China's oil and gas development activities in the East China Sea are located in the undisputed waters under China's jurisdiction' and entirely within the scope of its sovereign rights and jurisdiction. He said Beijing doesn't accept Japan's assertions. Japan wants the geographical median line in the East China Sea to be recognized as the maritime border, but China claims exclusive economic development rights extending further east, closer to the Japanese island of Okinawa. Between 2013 and 2015 China erected a dozen drilling rigs just west of the median line, before later adding six more. The two newly discovered structures are also located just west of the median line. The dispute comes as Japan is also concerned about the increasing frequency of Chinese coast guard patrols around uninhabited islands in the East China Sea that are controlled by Tokyo but also claimed by Beijing. Earlier this week, the number of consecutive days that Chinese ships have circled the islands, known as the Senkakus in Japan and Diaoyu in China, reached a new record of 216 days. On Monday, South Korea's parliamentary agriculture and maritime affairs committee passed a resolution strongly condemning China for installing the Yellow Sea structures. It also urged Beijing to immediately withdraw them and take steps to prevent recurrence, while asking its own government to tighten regular marine surveys and devise countermeasures. China and South Korea held more than a dozen rounds of discussions aimed at demarcating their maritime border between 2015 and 2024, with little progress. In 2001, South Korea and China agreed a large section of the Yellow Sea would be kept free of permanent construction because the two sides hadn't reached an agreement on a maritime border. The three platforms are within the area that was to be kept clear under that pact. In April, South Korea's foreign ministry said Chinese officials had informed Seoul that the structures were built purely for fishery purposes and had nothing to do with territorial or maritime delimitation issues. Satellite images suggest the structures include aquaculture cages. Some regional analysts have raised the possibility that China may be following a similar playbook to its expansionism in the South China Sea, where it claims almost complete control. After creating artificial features there, Beijing later established military outposts. China rejected an international tribunal ruling in 2016 that its claim to the region was groundless. "Concerns that the platforms may be dual-use are not unfounded, given China's track record in the South China Sea, where what were originally weather stations later developed into major military outposts,' analysts at the Center for Strategic and International Studies wrote recently about the platforms in the Yellow Sea. In 2008, Japan and China agreed on joint development of gas fields in the East China Sea, but talks have stalled since then. Tomohisa Takei, a senior fellow at the Sasakawa Peace Foundation in Tokyo, said Japan had little option but to hope for a diplomatic breakthrough to resolve the standoff over East China Sea rigs. "China is not going to stop its development. If they have resources to invest, they'll keep building,' he said. Japan's complaint comes as it steps up efforts to deter China's military ambitions in the region. In recent years Tokyo has increased its defense spending and sent destroyers through the Taiwan Strait for the first time.


NHK
12 hours ago
- NHK
US Fed chair reiterates cautious stance on rushing to cut interest rates
US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has reiterated his cautious stance on rushing to cut interest rates. He cited the need to assess how tariff measures by President Donald Trump's administration will affect the economy. Powell told a House committee on Tuesday that "increases in tariffs this year are likely to push up prices and weigh on economic activity." He said, "The effects on inflation could be short-lived," but added, "It is also possible that the inflationary effects could instead be more persistent." Powell continued, "For the time being, we are well-positioned to wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policy stance." He argued that the Fed does not need to rush to reduce interest rates because the economy and the labor market are "strong." Trump has repeatedly called on the Fed to slash rates since the start of his second presidential term. Two senior Fed officials have also expressed support for rate cuts as early as the July policy board meeting, if certain conditions are met. They are Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and board member Christopher Waller. Upcoming data on prices and employment are expected to be closely watched as key indicators for the direction of monetary policy.