Quebec Liberal leadership race: Economist Mario Roy shares his ‘big ideas'
The race to lead the Quebec Liberal Party is winding down. Voting is set to take place between June 9 and 14.
CJAD 800 Radio spoke back to Mario Roy, an economist and a farmer from Beauce, bringing a fresh perspective to the Quebec Liberal leadership campaign, including plans to nationalize seniors' homes.
Some answers have been edited for clarity.
Makos: So what's your big bold idea, your number one big bold idea that you think defines your campaign?
Roy: I started my campaign with one idea, one proposition that is completely different from the others, and that's going to be the number one that I'm bringing you today. I'm suggesting nationalizing residences for older people. The reason is that over the past decade we've lost a number of residences for older people all over the regions but all over Quebec. We've seen a lot of residences that have been closing over the past years, and I'm suggesting to nationalize them for two reasons.
Mario Roy
Mario Roy is vying to be leader of the Quebec Liberal Party. (CJAD 800 Radio)
One, we need to keep residences all over Quebec to make sure that older people can stay closer to their family all their life, basically. And we want people to stay closer to their family to make sure that they can stay in their region. And that's one of the reasons why I'm suggesting it so we need to keep them open.
The second reason is to open more when we see a lack of residences all over Quebec.
Listen on CJAD 800 Radio: Quebec Liberal leadership hopeful Mario Roy wants to nationalize seniors' homes
Makos: Obviously, the population is aging and I think you're speaking to a lot of people when you talk about some of those issues. But I do have to mention this, because the voting is very interesting for the Quebec Liberal Party leadership race, and there's an outside share going to the youth wing of the party. I'm wondering if that may not be something that would resonate with a younger member of the party, and if there is something that you would say that you're offering for that youth wing and for younger members of the Quebec Liberal Party.
Roy: Honestly, I've been clear with the younger people in the party. I'm 31 years old, as Robert Bourassa did in the past. I want to have a clear and big place for young people in the government as [MNA] or minister. But in terms of propositions, we need to have a vision for the future of the party. What I'm suggesting to the members and what will be on the campaign for 2026 is based on a vision for Quebec. It's not based on the percentage of people voting for the party. So it's pretty clear. I understand your reasoning about the fact that, yes, the younger people have a bigger place in the race in terms of voting, but I'm confident that they will see the vision in what I'm suggesting and they will come in.
Makos: I think it is interesting that you're looking towards the vision and the platform to win in a general election, which will happen next year. Part of that is the Liberal Party Quebec needs to reconnect with Quebecers in the regions, also needs to reconnect with francophones. What's your vision there? Your idea there to accomplish that?
Roy: Another really important thing that is happening right now is having access to health-care services. I'm coming from Beauce, I know the reality of the region and for the party. It's clear that we need to reconnect to the people of the region, to the francophones. To do this, we need to bring solutions to what they really care about. And health-care services is one of the big issues happening right now, especially the farther you get from the cities, the higher the difficulty to get services.
I'm suggesting, as the Collège des médecins is suggesting, to bring back people from the private sector to the public health-care sector. Because right now, the public health-care sector is getting destroyed by people leaving the sector, and I can understand this, because they have better working conditions.
Makos: How are you going to get them back?
Roy: We need to have leadership from the provincial party, as they have done for the people finishing their studies, and they are asking them to stay in the public health-care sector for five years. I'm telling all people, as we've done, we have done by Robert Bourassa when we created that public health-care system, we created it for a simple reason: to make sure that everybody receives their health-care service, no matter where they're from, no matter how much money they have, and that's one of the reasons why I'm in the race is to bring to make sure that we save that public health-care system.
To do this, we need to first bring people back to the system because if we want to do surgeries, we need the people. If they leave, there's no way we can solve it. So right now, the CAQ government is trying to basically resolve an issue, but they are not looking at the sources of the problem, which is people leaving. I'm the only one in the race to bring back people in the public health-care system and make sure that everybody has a family doctor.
Makos: Seniors care, health care — these are costly things you're going to need revenues to pay for that. You're an economist. You've got this farming background. What is your bold idea on fixing Quebec's economy to make us a prosperous place that can pay for social programs?
Roy: We need to reduce paperwork, bureaucracy in general, in the government to make sure that we have public services that are efficient, first. Second, we need to create wealth. In order to do this, we have natural resources that we need. I'm suggesting to take them in the here instead of importing them, to create wealth, but in order to create wealth for the government and to pay for our services, I'm suggesting to nationalize natural gas instead of importing it, because right now, there's some conversation about the fact that we should look at a project — and I'm open to it — because everything that is consumed here should be transformed and produced here. That's my vision.
In order to create that wealth for the government, the money needs to stay off the credit cards. And in order to do this, we need to nationalize natural gas. That's one thing that I'm suggesting to make sure that we have money and that that money stays with the Quebecers. I'm also suggesting removing the inter-provincial barriers, and having a real collaboration with the federal government about everything related to natural resources. We have the opportunity right now with the federal government, they are just waiting for us. We need to collaborate to make sure that we have a project that will be beneficial for Quebec, but for all of Canada. And by the way, I'm also suggesting to sign the Quebec constitution, which I'm the only one, again, to do it. The collaboration with the federal government is crucial if we want to have a Quebec that functions within Quebec and with the rest of Canada, because that's basically essential, and there's no reason why we shouldn't have signed this constitution by now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
23 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘Diplomacy ends today': First Nations warn of protests over Ontario mining law
Protesters and community members chant and wave signs, as they listen to speakers during a demonstration opposing Bill 5, outside the Ontario legislature at Queen's Park in Toronto, Monday, June 2, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Cole Burston Ontario Premier Doug Ford's government has given itself the power to suspend provincial and municipal laws for chosen projects in areas it deems to have economic importance, citing the need to speed up development of mines, but First Nations warn confrontation is brewing. Known as Bill 5, the legislation sparked a firestorm of anger among First Nations communities, who say it tramples their rights and ignores their concerns. It may have passed in the legislature Wednesday, but Indigenous leaders say the fight is just beginning. 'Our diplomacy ends today,' said NDP deputy leader Sol Mamakwa, who represents the northern Ontario riding of Kiiwetinoong that is home to many First Nations and the mineral-rich Ring of Fire region. 'You cannot trample on the rights of the people that live on these homelands and get away with it.' Ford has said the bill is needed to speed up large projects, particularly mines, in the face of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war. Jeers from dozens of First Nations members echoed in the legislature as the bill was passed into law. Ford was not there for the final vote. Nishnawbe Aski Nation Grand Chief Alvin Fiddler called the premier a 'coward.' 'This fight is not over, but we will meet you on the ground,' Fiddler said. 'He did not even have the guts to show up for the vote.' Ford was on a call with a Republican congressman during the vote, his office said. Lake Huron Regional Chief Scott McLeod said that shows where the premier's priorities lie. 'His priorities are not with the Indigenous people in this province,' he said. 'They're with business people, and he wants the resources that are in our territories. He's selling our minerals and our resources to Americans, to the world, without our permission and that is what we're not going to stand for.' The government had tried to amend the bill to explicitly include duty to consult provisions, but delay tactics at the committee stage by the Liberals meant that the Progressive Conservatives passed the legislation without that. Ford said earlier in the day that they would consult with First Nations over the summer, but that may now be in question. From now on, Fiddler said, Nishnawbe Aski Nation will not take him or his government seriously, nor will they engage with Indigenous Affairs Minister Greg Rickford. Fiddler called for his resignation. 'He is supposed to be representing Indigenous affairs for our nation, but he failed at every turn, and we will not work with him,' Fiddler said. 'We will not engage with him at all moving forward.' The legislation will create so-called 'special economic zones,' where the province could suspend laws in order to speed up projects such as mines, and the government has said the Ring of Fire would be the first such zone. Chris Moonias, the former chief of Neskantaga First Nation, suggested action will begin by preventing mining companies and others' access to their lands. 'We're going to shut down the Ring of Fire,' he said. 'Whatever that means, whatever we can do, we're going to shut it down. I promise you that.' Earlier in the day, Ford said blockades wouldn't be 'very wise.' 'You can't break the law,' Ford said. 'Simple as that. ... They need to move on or they'll be dealt with appropriately.' When asked to clarify his comments, Ford said he doesn't direct the police and any enforcement would be up to the Ontario Provincial Police or local police services. The premier wouldn't say if he would use the notwithstanding clause to save Bill 5 if it ends up being challenged and found unconstitutional in court. But he said that he would 'cross that bridge' when he comes to it. Civil liberty groups are livid at the prospect of effectively lawless zones, and unions have warned that labour laws would be under threat. The measure is part of an omnibus bill that makes a slew of other changes, including stripping protections for endangered and threatened species. Environmental groups and the Toronto Zoo have warned this will lead to extinctions. Farmers, who largely support the Progressive Conservative government, have also spoken out against the bill. The Ontario Federation of Agriculture said the broad powers 'could override vital protections for farmland and agricultural systems.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 4, 2025. Liam Casey and Allison Jones, The Canadian Press
Globe and Mail
23 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
The tightening of Canada's asylum laws was an inevitability
Michael Barutciski is a professor at York University's Glendon School of Public and International Affairs, as well as a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. The first substantive legislative initiative from Mark Carney's government, Bill C-2, has passed through first reading in the House of Commons. Its short title, the Strong Borders Act, makes explicit the public messaging that underlies the sweeping and multifaceted legislative amendments being proposed. While the bill provides law enforcement with various powers regarding issues such as fentanyl and financial crime, it also addresses immigration-related irritants with the U.S. Concerns have been raised that it includes measures which would restrict asylum claims. But the lax practices of recent years may have left Canadians unaware of the fundamental dilemmas concerning the country's asylum situation, and of the reality that changes to the system were inevitable. The federal government is now proposing new measures that will ultimately make Canada less of an outlier compared to other Western democracies, and beyond the advocates defending the untenable status quo, it should be clear to most Canadians that the asylum system needs to be tightened. Bill C-2 signals that Ottawa is taking the issue seriously. Monthly asylum claims in Canada remain unsustainably high, with nearly 11,000 new claims in April, mostly in Quebec and Ontario; these numbers also come before the summer months, when claims tend to peak. These latest statistics reveal that many claimants are entering at official land border crossings under exceptions to the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA), the responsibility-sharing treaty with the U.S. that is intended to prevent asylum shopping by obliging migrants to claim protection in the first country they enter. These exceptions will eventually need to be reconsidered. At the same time, there are many migrants unlawfully present in Canada; a CIBC report suggests the number might be around one million people. Many more visas granted to temporary residents are set to expire soon, and many, including foreign students, may seek asylum in a desperate bid to prolong their stay. The administrative tribunal that examines asylum claims, the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB), is already overwhelmed by historic backlogs, and current trends suggest pressure will only increase. Part 9 of Bill C-2 addresses an exception in the STCA that allowed asylum seekers to avoid being returned to the U.S. if they enter between official land border crossings and are not detected by Canadian authorities for 14 days. It was an incoherent provision that contradicted the objectives of the STCA and mainly signalled that the authorities did not want to spend a prolonged period tracking down migrants. The bill will make asylum seekers who evade authorities for two weeks ineligible to make an asylum claim, and if it is safe to do so, they should generally be sent back to their home country. Part 9 also makes migrants ineligible for asylum if these claims are made 'more than one year after the day of their entry.' This is the Carney government's initial response to the potential crisis that could emerge if even more visa overstayers try to prolong their stay through asylum. Opinion: Canada has become an immigration irritant for the U.S. Opinion: Trump's policies will send asylum seekers to Canada's border. What's our plan? This is a reasonable response that partially harmonizes the Canadian system with the U.S. system. As controversial as this may seem to some, harmonization is the only way Western countries such as Canada will be able to bring migration under control. Democratic governments are continuing to bleed support because they are unable to assuage populations that are justifiably anxious about uncontrolled migration; the Netherlands is just the latest example. Whether the asylum-related provisions in Bill C-2 become the law of the land will ultimately show how serious the new Liberal government is in correcting immigration policy mistakes made by and acknowledged by the previous prime minister and then-immigration minister. Yet it is one thing to amend laws to restore Canada's seriousness on the immigration file; it is another to actually enforce them. If Ottawa cannot incentivize the large population of overstayers to leave by themselves, it will need to enforce its own laws, potentially with large-scale removals of foreigners who are unlawfully present in Canada. The government could propose a humane yet realistic carrot-and-stick approach involving financial aid to help migrants return home combined with future eligibility for legal residence if they do return. Even assuming the government can resolve this dilemma, it will then have to propose new amendments to address the unmanageable backlogs that remain for the country's largest administrative tribunal. Indeed, the gravity of the challenge is illustrated by the fact that the IRB had already seen both its operating budget and number of employees more than double between 2015 and 2023. Deep reform of Canada's asylum law will have to come sooner rather than later. Bill C-2 is a solid start.
CTV News
24 minutes ago
- CTV News
Saskatchewan MLA recounts ‘scary' evacuation process as wildfires rage
Watch Saskatchewan MLA Jordan McPhail speaks on the 15,000 people, mostly from his constituency, having to evacuate due to raging wildfires.
