
Adjustable Mattress vs. Adjustable Frame: Similar but Not the Same
Many people use these terms interchangeably, but they're totally separate products. Here's what you should be looking for if you're in the market.
All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links.
One of my pet peeves as a professional mattress tester of over five years? Using the titles 'adjustable mattress' and 'adjustable frame' interchangeably when they are, in fact, different things altogether. It doesn't help that these products come up within the same search and are often labeled as the same thing—of course they're going to get mixed up.
It's time to set the record straight and 'adjust' your understanding of all things adjustable mattresses. Under my wing you go to begin this journey. Adjustable Mattresses
What is an adjustable mattress? Simply put, it's designed to let users modify how soft- or firm-feeling they want their bed to be. Adjustable beds don't follow the same layout as a normal mattress, because they involve internal air chambers that help you accomplish the firmness you're seeking. While a glorified air mattress may come to mind (and arguably, that is basically what it is), there is a lot involved in the material makeup here. To pump up these air chambers, there is so much tech, tubing, and incorporated programming by way of embedded computer chips and apps involved with an adjustable mattress. Hence, they aren't budget buys.
Take Sleep Number, for example. While it isn't the only mattress capable of adjusting its own firmness, it is one of the priciest and most renowned given the incorporated apps, sleep tracking, and extra features, depending on the model you go for. For example, the Sleep Number Climate360 (5/10, WIRED Review) is nearly $10,000 and lets you also adjust temperature as well as firmness).
Depending on the brand and model you choose, another common feature among adjustable mattresses is the ability to shift the top and bottom both up and down. Some models may not include this, depending on the brand and iteration, but it's also a driver of cost. This feature is where adjustable frames and mattresses are probably getting confused, as the bed is able to accomplish this range of motion only with the use of an adjustable frame. Adjustable Frames
Many brands (like Sleep Number) will recommend you add an adjustable frame to your purchase so you can enjoy the full offerings of your new mattress. Other times, you can purchase an adjustable frame (also known as an adjustable base) to use with a regular bed-in-a-box mattress.
In these cases, it's absolutely crucial that you confirm the mattress—whether it's memory foam or a hybrid—is able to work with an adjustable frame, lest you break the internal support system. The easiest way to verify is to reach out to a brand's customer service team to confirm whether the bed you're considering works with an adjustable frame. Never assume you're good to go right off the bat. But keep in mind that you will only be able to move the mattress to various angles, not adjust the overall firmness. Also, from experience, let's say you put a hybrid mattress that's approved to use on an adjustable frame—the popping of the pocketed coils within isn't the most pleasant noise to listen to. Or feel, for that matter. Stay Flexible
To recap: You can use an adjustable mattress without an adjustable base. But if your mattress has the capability to move its head and foot in a vertical motion, and you're paying for this feature with the overall cost of the bed, are you truly enjoying the full offerings of the bed (and what you paid for)? Similarly, you can use an adjustable base with an approved mattress, but you'll only get the up-and-down motion and not the variety of firmnesses. Is it worth it to purchase both to use together? It depends, but if you have these options available to you with your bed, I'd say yes. That way, you can get the full enjoyment and offerings from both bed and base.
Aside from the elevated (pun intended) price tags involved with adjustable mattresses and bases, there are some other downsides you need to consider. In my experience, getting adjustable mattresses and bases set up is quite cumbersome, as they're heavy and will involve extra cords and bits required for the electronic portions. The upside, though? Many people who have an adjustable bed, base, or both consider them to be absolute game changers, for situations like reading in bed, watching TV with your feet kicked up, or dealing with medical concerns like acid reflux. That's another angle to consider (I am on a roll with these puns and I will not be stopped!).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump, Musk feud explodes into the open
A clash between US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk burst into the open Thursday, as disagreements over Republicans' spending bill quickly morphed into a personal feud. Musk, once a close Trump ally and adviser, has repeatedly criticized the Trump-backed package. Trump said Thursday that he was 'disappointed' in Musk's pushback, and threatened to cut government contracts and subsidies for the tech mogul's businesses, which include SpaceX and Tesla. Musk said Trump wouldn't have won the White House without his support. 'This tension is about more than just a bromance falling apart,' WIRED wrote: Republicans fear Musk's criticism could drag down a key part of Trump's legislative agenda.


WIRED
15 hours ago
- WIRED
Palantir Is Going on Defense
Jun 5, 2025 3:22 PM Palantir threatened to call police on a WIRED reporter and kicked out other journalists from a recent conference following reports of the data analytics firm's work with the Trump administration. Palantir headquarters in Palo Alto, California. Photograph: DavidPalantir, facing mounting public scrutiny for its work with the Trump administration, took an increasingly defensive stance toward journalists and perceived critics this week, both at a defense conference in Washington DC and on social media. On Tuesday, a Palantir employee threatened to call the police on a WIRED journalist who was watching software demonstrations at its booth at AI+ Expo. The conference, which is hosted by the Special Competitive Studies Project, a think tank founded by former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, is free and open to the public, including journalists. Later that day, Palantir had conference security remove at least three other journalists—Jack Poulson, writer of the All-Source Intelligence Substack; Max Blumenthal, who writes and publishes The Grayzone; and Jessica Le Masurier, a reporter at France 24—from the conference hall, Poulson says. The reporters were later able to re-enter the hall, Poulson adds. The move came after Palantir spokespeople began publicly condemning a recent New York Times report titled 'Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans' published on May 30. WIRED previously reported that Elon Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was building a master database to surveil and track immigrants. WIRED has also reported that the company was helping DOGE with an IRS data project, collaborating to build a 'mega-API.' The public criticism from Palantir is unusual, as the company does not typically issue statements pushing back on individual news stories. Prior to being kicked out of Palantir's booth, the WIRED journalist, who is also the author of this article, was taking photos, videos, and written notes during software demos of Palantir FedStart partners, which use the company's cloud systems to get certified for government work. The booth's walls had phrases like 'REAWAKEN THE GIANT' and 'DON'T GIVE UP THE SHIP!' printed on the outside. When the reporter briefly stepped away from the booth and attempted to re-enter, she was stopped by Eliano Younes, Palantir's head of strategic engagement, who said that WIRED was not allowed to be there. The reporter asked why, and Younes repeated himself, adding that if WIRED tried to return, he would call the police. After the conference ended, Younes responded to a photo from the conference that the reporter posted on X. 'hey caroline, great seeing you at the expo yesterday,' he wrote. 'can't wait to read your coverage of the event.' Palantir did not respond to WIRED's request for comment. Poulson tells WIRED that he, Blumenthal, and Le Masurier were also watching demos at Palantir's booth prior to being kicked out. After a Tuesday panel with Younes and Palantir engineer Ryan Fox, Poulson says Le Masurier approached Younes near Palantir's booth and asked about the company's work for Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. A Palantir employee stepped between them and claimed that Palantir had asked her to leave 'multiple times,' according to a video of the interaction viewed by WIRED, and she was escorted out of the conference hall shortly after. 'Apparently, Palantir was so annoyed that they not only kicked her out, but demanded that Max and I be kicked out as well,' Poulson says. "So the security guards came and got us." The group was allowed back inside the conference hall after explaining their situation to friendly security guards, Poulson says. The guards asked them to respect any requests from attendees to stop filming. Some conference organizers appeared to be on high alert after a pro-Palestine demonstrator interrupted a panel with Palantir's head of defense, Mike Gallagher, on Monday. The demonstrator was subsequently ejected from the conference, Poulson reported. A handful of pro-Palestine activists were also thrown out on Tuesday after disrupting a panel with Eric Schmidt and Thom Shanker, a former Pentagon reporter at the New York Times. (Palantir formed a partnership with the Israeli military in January 2024, and Google is part of a $1.2 billion cloud contract with the Israeli government.) Poulson tells WIRED that on Wednesday, the conference began mandatory bag-checks for every attendee. During Younes' Tuesday panel with fellow Palantir employee Fox, which was focused on what the two men do at Palantir and why they like working there, Younes made passing references to perceived critics of the company. When talking about the reasons he joined Palantir, he said, 'I was sick and tired of people with bad intentions,' Younes said, 'many of them who are actually here.' He later added that he's a 'big believer' in the views of Palantir's cofounders, particularly those of CEO Alex Karp. (Karp is known for his nonapologetic stance toward Palantir's work with military and defense agencies and immigration authorities.) 'Playing a role in helping them, to prove the doubters and the haters wrong, that just feels really good,' Younes said. On Tuesday, Palantir posted on X claiming the Times article was 'blatantly untrue' and said that the company 'never collects data to unlawfully surveil Americans.' The Times article did not claim that Palantir buys or collects its own data, though it's a common misconception that the company does so. The New York Times did not immediately respond to a request for comment by WIRED. On Wednesday, Palantir's official X account continued posting about the Times article on X. 'Want to meet Dr. Karp?' the post read. 'In 90 seconds, identify the technical errors in this article. DM us a video in the next 24 hours - whoever finds the most inaccuracies gets an interview with him.'


WIRED
16 hours ago
- WIRED
Ross Ulbricht Got a $31 Million Donation From a Dark Web Dealer, Crypto Tracers Suspect
Jun 5, 2025 2:50 PM Crypto-tracing firm Chainalysis says the mysterious 300-bitcoin donation to the pardoned Silk Road creator appears to have come from someone associated with a different defunct black market: AlphaBay. Online marketplace Silk Road creator Ross Ulbricht speaks at The Bitcoin Conference at The Venetian Convention & Expo Center on May 29, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Photograph:When Ross Ulbricht received a $31 million bitcoin donation last weekend from an unknown source, many observers saw it as more than a very nice welcome-home gift. Rumors swirled that the creator of the Silk Road, less than five months after receiving a pardon from Donald Trump that saved him from a lifetime in prison, was sending himself a trove of his stashed criminal proceeds from his days running the dark web's first black market more than a decade prior. Now cryptocurrency tracing investigators say they've arrived at a stranger explanation: The money wasn't originally Ulbricht's, and didn't come from the Silk Road. Instead, they suspect it came from a different long-defunct dark web black market: AlphaBay. The crypto tracing firm Chainalysis tells WIRED that, based on blockchain analysis, it has tied the origin of the 300 bitcoins sent to Ulbricht on Sunday to someone involved in AlphaBay, a dark web market that sold a wide variety of drugs and cybercriminal contraband from 2014 to 2017 and eventually grew to be 10 times the size of the Silk Road, according to the FBI. Chainalysis says the funds appear to have emerged from AlphaBay around 2016 and 2017. Given the amount of the donation, Chainalysis suggests it might have come from someone who acted as a large-scale seller on the market. 'We have reasonable grounds to suspect that these funds originated in AlphaBay,' says Phil Larratt, Chainalysis's director of investigations and a former official at the UK's National Crime Agency. 'Looking at the amount, that would suggest they came from someone who was possibly a vendor on AlphaBay back in the early days.' WIRED reached out to Ulbricht for comment about the donation's origin via contacts at the Free Ross campaign that lobbied for his pardon, but didn't immediately receive a response. Prior to Chainalysis's finding that the $31 million donation appears to have originated at AlphaBay, the independent crypto tracing investigator known as ZachXBT had already posted to his account on X his own findings that the money didn't appear to have come from the Silk Road. ZachXBT found that, despite the donor's use of multiple Bitcoin 'mixers' that take in users' coins and return others to obfuscate their trail on the blockchain, he was able to trace the funds to an address that had been flagged in Chainalysis's software tool Reactor as tied to illicit activity. That analysis suggested that the money was a 'legitimate donation but not legitimate funds,' ZachXBT wrote in a text message to WIRED. ZachXBT also found that the same individual who controlled the funds had cashed out other cryptocurrency at an exchange in small, distributed quantities rather than in a single sum, suggesting he or she may have been trying to prevent them being seized or flagged—another sign that the money may have come from criminal origins. 'Usage of multiple mixers, spreading out CEX deposits, etc,' ZachXBT writes to WIRED, using the term CEX to mean a centralized exchange, 'that is done typically if you are trying to avoid getting illicit funds frozen.' Chainalysis declined to offer more information on how exactly it identified the funds as originating at AlphaBay. But the company has built a business around identifying illicit services like digital black markets out of the morass of billions of cryptocurrency addresses. Chainalysis' identification of the AlphaBay cluster of bitcoin addresses, in fact, played a key role in the takedown of the market in a law enforcement investigation known as Operation Bayonet that spanned 2016 and 2017. AlphaBay certainly produced plenty of crypto kingpins who would have the kind of eight-figure sum donated to Ulbricht. Before it was torn offline in an elaborate sting operation in July of 2017, the site was facilitating $2 million a day in sales, largely of illegal drugs although it also offered malware, stolen data, and other cybercriminal wares. AlphaBay's creator and administrator, Alexandre Cazes, died in a Bangkok jail cell under mysterious circumstances following his arrest, but the site's second-in-command, who went by the handle Desnake, appears to have remained at large. Any bitcoins an AlphaBay seller or administrator managed to hold onto since the site's closure would have since appreciated more than 40-fold. Exactly why one of AlphaBay's crypto moguls would donate $31 million to Ulbricht, however, remains a mystery. Speculation on social media has ranged from a fellow black marketeer repaying a favor to a more principled gift intended to thank Ulbricht for blazing a trail with his invention of the Silk Road's crypto-enabled anonymous transactions. That gratitude may also take into account that, while many got rich on the dark web markets that Ulbricht pioneered, he instead spent over a decade in prison, speculates Taylor Monahan, a crypto tracer and security researcher at crypto firm MetaMask. 'People donate when they're deeply inspired by someone and/or grateful and/or have some sort of remorse for the situation,' says Monahan. 'Survivor's guilt is wild.'