Biden's COVID czar hammers RFK Jr. over vaccine panel overhaul
Former White House COVID-19 response coordinator Ashish Jha, who served under President Biden, criticized the decision by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to fire all 17 experts on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) vaccine panel.
Kennedy announced the decision in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal Monday, saying, 'A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science.'
But in an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Jha pushed back against Kennedy's reasoning.
'Look what he said in his op-ed was a series of nonsense about a group of individuals, experts…who shape what vaccines, if any, are going to be available to the American people,' Jha said in the interview.
'So obviously this is very concerning,' he continued. 'We'll have to see who he appoints next. But this is a step in the wrong direction.'
Jha said he is concerned about what the move foretells about the secretary's agenda on vaccines. Jha pointed to what he characterized as a lackluster response from the secretary to 'the worst measles outbreak of the last 25 years.' He also expressed concern about Kennedy raising questions about vaccines causing autism, which Jha dismissed and said was 'settled science.'
'Then you put this in the middle of all of that,' Jha said, referring to the vaccine panel sweep, 'and what you have is a pretty clear picture that what Secretary Kennedy is trying to do is make sure that vaccines are not readily available to Americans, not just for kids, for the elderly.'
'He could go pretty far with this move, and I really am worried about where we're headed,' Jha continued.
He said he's particularly concerned about the effect Kennedy's move will have on kids and whether they will continue having access to certain vaccines in the future.
'Kids rely on vaccines. I'm worried about whether the next generation of kids are going to have access to polio vaccines and measles vaccines. That's where we're heading. That's what we have to push back against.'
Kennedy said in his op-ed that he was removing every member of the panel to give the Trump administration an opportunity to appoint its own members. Kennedy has long accused ACIP members of having conflicts of interest, sparking concern among vaccine advocates that he would seek to install members who are far more skeptical of approving new vaccines.
But Jha pushed back against criticism that the panel was all Biden-appointed experts, saying, 'When the Biden administration came in, almost all of the appointees had come from the first Trump administration.'
'That was fine because they were good people,' he said. 'They were experts. Right now, it's the same thing. The people he is firing are experts — like a nurse in Illinois who spent her entire career getting kids vaccinated, cancer doctors from Memorial Sloan Kettering — like these are really good people.'
'And generally, CDC has not worried about when were they appointed. The question is, are they good and are they conflict free.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: Ax to the vax — RFK Jr. continues on his anti-vaccine warpath
It's time for President Donald Trump, despite his own casual relationship with the truth, to stop putting American lives at risk and get rid of his dangerous quack in chief, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. In his latest broadside against science, Kennedy is removing all 17 members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, the CDC's main advisory body, to ostensibly restore 'public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda.' God protect us, as RFK won't. This is how a society becomes undone. Science and reason get stepped on by half-truths and conspiracy theories. Next comes preventable death and disease. The problem is that there is no anti-vaccine side in the legitimate practice of science and medicine. The department's accompanying press release denigrated 'public health ideology' as if the practice of public health wasn't the CDC's only function. Researchers and doctors should be biased in favor of evidence-based therapeutics that save lives. Railing against bias towards vaccines is like a politician condemning researchers biased in favor of seatbelts in cars or keeping lead out of household paint. It's idiotic. We understand that the Make America Healthy Again movement Kennedy leads is all about questioning medical and nutritional practice. On a really abstract level, we are in agreement that no scientific truisms should be entirely above questioning — such a perspective would be anti-science. But there is a specific and long-standing methodology for actually answering those questions, and it is not debate club or who can most incite crowds of followers. It is the scientific method, under which hypotheses can be rigorously tested in ways that are replicable and based on clear and clearly laid out evidence. In that arena — really the only arena that actually matters when it comes to public health — the safety and efficacy of vaccines has been conclusively established. There is no additional discussion necessary or appropriate, particularly when it comes to immunizations that have now been standard-issue for decades and have by all measures radically decreased illness and mortality where they've been successfully deployed. The measles vaccine will always be better for individuals and public health than getting the measles. The same is true for polio, tetanus, COVID and all else. Preying on public skepticism of the pharmaceutical and health industries to hawk alternative approaches that are often unregulated and don't work is damaging it enough. Yet a true believer like RFK is more dangerous, especially now that he stands at the pinnacle of our nation's public health bureaucracy, a position that allows him to substantively impose his own anti-science view on an unsuspecting public and take the choice away from the American people. If RFK's new picks for ACIP — which the secretary falsely promised Sen. Bill Cassidy he wouldn't touch during his confirmation process — step back from recommending various crucial vaccines, this could substantially prevent even those who want to make the informed decision to receive inoculations or have their children vaccinated from being able to do so. As much as Kennedy and his followers emphasize the need for people to be able to make individual choices about their health, they seem hell-bent on taking that choice away entirely, especially given that insurance is not required to cover vaccines that are not CDC-recommended. We wonder what RFK will have to say for himself as once-eradicated diseases begin cutting through the U.S. population again. Is there anything that will get him to veer off this disastrous course? If the answer is no, and we suspect it is, then he must be removed before he can further damage public health. _____
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Not Even Republicans Want to Go to Trump's ‘Goose-Stepping' Parade
Donald Trump is throwing a lavish military parade on his birthday this year, but apparently many of his congressional faithful aren't coming to the party. Politico surveyed 50 GOP lawmakers, only seven of whom said they planned to attend the festivities in Washington, D.C., this weekend. The near $50 million affair, which just so happens to be on Trump's 79th birthday, will celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Army. It's set to feature a daytime festival on the National Mall followed by a 6 p.m. military parade, a concert and fireworks. The Army expects as many as 200,000 people to attend. But apparently, not many Republican leaders will be among them. According to Politico, Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Majority Whip John Barrasso aren't attending, nor is House Majority Leader Steve Scalise. House Speaker Mike Johnson's office didn't respond to Politico's inquiry. Among those who made clear they were not going was Rand Paul, the Kentucky junior senator, who told reporters he was not in favor of 'goose-stepping' parades. 'I've never been a big fan of goose-stepping soldiers in big tanks and missiles rolling down the street,' he said in the Capitol. 'So if you asked me, I wouldn't have done it. We were always different than the images you saw of the Soviet Union and North Korea. We were proud not to be that.' Lawmakers rarely spend time in Washington on weekends, returning instead to their families and districts. Several lawmakers told Politico they're skipping the event because they have prior commitments. Sen. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma told Politico it's his anniversary this weekend, and 'I choose to be married.' Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Rick Scott of Florida are also planning to skip out, as will House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris. Marjorie Taylor Greene, however, plans to show her face. 'Yes, of course,' the Georgia Republican told Politico. 'I'm going to be there for the 250th anniversary of the Army.' Also from the House, Byron Donalds, Cory Mills, Elise Stefanik, Rich McCormick, John McGuire, and Lisa McClaim said they would make an appearance. The White House told Politico that Trump 'looks forward to a historic crowd at the Army Birthday Parade, where he will be joined by top military leaders, administration officials, congressional representatives, and most importantly, thousands of patriotic Americans to celebrate 250 years of honor, courage, and sacrifice by our United States military.' The event is expected to cost up to $45 million, but the spectacle may not get much airtime on several major TV networks that will reportedly stick to sports programming. Trump can rely on Fox News, however, for hours of special coverage. It'll come in the wake of an extraordinary series of events in Los Angeles, where demonstrators protesting federal immigration raids prompted Trump to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines over the past few days California Gov. Gavin Newsom has repeatedly called on the president to rescind his order, on Tuesday calling the deployments a 'brazen abuse of power' that 'inflamed a combustible situation.' Newsom also condemned the upcoming parade, accusing Trump of forcing the military to 'put on a vulgar display to celebrate his birthday, just as other failed dictators have done in the past.' Trump said Tuesday any protesters at the festivities will be met with 'very heavy force.'
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WHO: New coronavirus variant seen only sporadically in Germany
The new coronavirus variant spreading globally, especially in parts of Asia, has not taken hold in Germany, according to the World Health Organization. The variant, known as NB.1.8.1, was first detected in January and has been classified by the WHO as a "variant under monitoring." In Germany, the variant was first detected at the end of March and has so far only appeared sporadically, according to the country's public health agency, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI). "No trend can be derived here; current Covid case numbers are low, and correspondingly less sequencing is being conducted," the institute stated. University of Basel biophysicist Richard Neher said whether this variant "will establish itself [in Germany] depends on how other variants evolve. It is quite possible that NB.1.8.1 will prevail, but it is likely to be relatively insignificant." In the most recent reporting week, which ended on June 8, the RKI recorded 698 Covid cases - a slight increase - but the institute noted this is off a very low base. Many infections are likely going undetected due to limited testing. Slight increase in virus load in wastewater Wastewater monitoring also showed a slight increase in SARS-CoV-2 levels over the past four weeks – albeit still at a low level. The new NB.1.8.1 strain is derived from the XDV.1.5 lineage dominant in East Asia, according to biophysicist Neher. The state-run Chinese news agency Xinhua, citing the National Administration of Disease Control and Prevention, reported that the new strain had become China's dominant variant by the end of May. "The variant is increasing in frequency compared to other variants," Neher noted. NB.1.8.1 is therefore more transmissible in the sense that an infection generates more secondary infections than other strains. No evidence of more severe cases There is no evidence that NB.1.8.1 causes more severe illness, Chinese authorities have said. This aligns with the WHO's assessment that, despite rising case and hospitalization numbers in countries where the variant is widespread, there is currently no indication that it causes more serious illness than other circulating variants. Covid-19 vaccines currently approved are expected to protect against severe illness caused by NB.1.8.1, the WHO said.
