logo
Austrian far-right victory foreshadows dystopia for Muslim population

Austrian far-right victory foreshadows dystopia for Muslim population

Middle East Eye26-01-2025

It is a historical novelty.
For the first time since the end of the Nazi regime, the leader of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPO) - a political party that was established by ex-Nazis for ex-Nazis, and that has grown to become a major force in Austrian politics since the early 1990s - has the chance to not only join a government as a partner but to actually lead the government, with its party leader becoming the future chancellor.
This happened three months after the party emerged as the main victor in the national parliamentary elections and the collapse of coalition talks among the conservatives, Social Democrats, and liberals.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
My first and only encounter with Herbert Kickl, the current leader of the far-right FPO, took place in 2009. At the time, he was the party's general secretary, and we debated the Swiss minaret ban during a live TV broadcast.
Kickl was the brainchild of some of the first anti-Muslim slogans the party adopted following its stark focus on Islam in 2005
Unlike many other far-right politicians from his party whom I've debated over the years, Kickl stood out.
Most of them, while espousing controversial views, maintained a level of personal approachability, and their positions seemed calculated rather than deeply held.
Kickl, however, was different.
His rhetoric felt deeply personal, laced with a palpable disdain - if not outright hatred - towards Muslims, accompanied by calls for discriminatory policies.
'Unprecedented triumph'
Since the FPO's coalition with the conservatives collapsed in 2019 due to a corruption scandal, Kickl successfully resurrected the party, surpassing its previous electoral successes.
As a former speechwriter for the infamous long-time FPO leader Jorg Haider and later a minister of the interior from 2017 to 2019 during the coalition with Sebastian Kurz's Austrian People's Party (OVP), Kickl has now fully emerged as the party's leader.
He was the brains behind some of the first anti-Muslim slogans the party adopted following its stark focus on targeting Islam and Muslims in 2005.
An election campaign poster of far-right Freedom Party (FPO) leader Heinz-Christian Strache reads "Islamisation must be stopped", is pictured in Hall in Tirol, Austria, on 11 October 2017 (Dominic Ebenbichler/Reuters)
A talented writer, he came up with campaign slogans such as "Daham statt Islam" (At home instead of Islam) and "Mehr Mut für unser Wiener Blut" (More courage for our Viennese blood), playing with remnants of Nazi vocabulary that have been forgotten for many Austrians.
Arguing that Islam has no home or place in Austria is what has marked the FPO's politics vis-a-vis Muslims since 2005. For the FPO, Muslims can only have a place if they become invisible as such.
Pro-Israel and 'antisemitic': Freedom Party of Austria tasked with forming government Read More »
The year 2024 marked an unprecedented triumph for the far right.
The FPO secured victories in both the European parliamentary elections in July and the national parliamentary elections on 29 September, with nearly 30 percent of the vote.
Despite the president's initial attempt to bypass the FPO by encouraging a coalition between the second-largest party, the OVP, and the Social Democrats (SPO), along with the liberal Neos party, these negotiations collapsed last week.
Indeed, every single party vowed not to build a coalition with the FPO. But given the collapse of negotiation talks, the president had no choice but to invite the FPO to form the government.
The conservative OVP, despite prior declarations to the contrary specifically criticising Kickl as the most radical leader, nevertheless chose to align with the FPO.
Widespread Islamophobia
What is on the horizon might best be understood if one looks back not so far in the past.
Under the previous coalition of the OVP and FPO (2017-2019), Muslims had already become the central scapegoat. New laws and political measures targeting Islam and Muslims surfaced almost monthly.
How Austria made the study of Islamophobia a crime Read More »
Mosques were shut down illegally, various hijab bans were imposed, Muslim educational institutions came under scrutiny, and the Documentation Centre for Political Islam was established to monitor Muslim associations, sometimes even leading to legal action against them.
Although courts, including the Constitutional Court, later overturned many of these measures and laws, their societal impact lingered.
A recent study by scholars from the University of Vienna found that 39 percent of respondents believed Christian and Muslim values were incompatible, and 31 percent supported restricting Muslim religious practices.
Even as the OVP, SPO, and the Neos were negotiating a potential coalition from September to January this year, they had already agreed on a new hijab ban, which shows the extent of widespread Islamophobia in Austria's political class.
A coalition between the FPO and the OVP under the leadership of the first, however, would likely push even further.
Both parties, especially the FPO, see Viktor Orban and his model of "illiberal democracy" as worth emulating, and his tight grip on media and the courts as exemplary.
In Styria, where the FPO recently won the elections and formed a coalition with the OVP, a hijab ban in public service was swiftly implemented.
Harsher policies
The FPO's election platform reveals broader ambitions: banning "political Islam", a euphemism for curbing Muslim civil society and public visibility, defunding Muslim associations, advocating for the "remigration" of Syrian and Afghan refugees, and intensifying the "fight against the hijab".
This includes further tightening the Islam Act of 2015, which governs the relationship between the state and the official Muslim Council that oversees mosques and religious services.
The regional leader of Austrian ÖVP in Lower Austria says that the party should negotiate with far-right FPÖ to avoid new elections, coming with policies to bring the economy forward and 'fight Islam'
Yes, she said: fight Islampic.twitter.com/PaXZgYu8AJ — Nassreddin 🍉 نصر الدين (@Nassreddin2002) January 6, 2025
The FPO's platform is explicit: "Radical Islam currently poses the greatest threat to the homogeneity of the people in the area of immigration. It not only competes with Christianity but also contradicts Austria's democratic values and freedoms. Therefore, Muslims, like all other immigrants, must conform to our culture and value system, avoiding the creation of parallel societies."
Kickl laid the groundwork for several raids against Muslims, notably Operation Luxor, an unlawful assault on Muslim civil society leaders
The statement perfectly sums up how the party conflates what it paints as "political Islam" with average Muslims.
During his tenure as minister of the interior, Kickl laid the groundwork for several raids against Muslims, notably Operation Luxor, an unlawful assault on Muslim civil society leaders that continues to resonate today.
He also raided his own secret service to remove the OVP's grip on it, which makes him particularly dangerous to the political establishment.
Back then, the FPO was a junior partner in a coalition. Now, as the senior partner, the FPO, under Kickl's leadership, is poised to implement even harsher anti-Muslim policies.
With Kickl at the helm, a new dystopia looms for the Muslim population in Austria.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump nuclear proposal allows Iran to enrich uranium: Report
Trump nuclear proposal allows Iran to enrich uranium: Report

Middle East Eye

time9 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Trump nuclear proposal allows Iran to enrich uranium: Report

The US will allow Iran to enrich Uranium at a low level for a predetermined amount of time as part of a nuclear deal, according to a proposal passed to Iran from the Trump administration, Axios reported on Monday. The report could reassure advocates of a deal, given Iran's insistence that it retain the right to enrich Uranium at some level, but is likely going to be met with fiery criticism by Israel and its allies in the US Congress. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been advocating for preemptive military strikes on Iran. Israel says the only nuclear deal it wants is akin to that which former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi agreed to in 2003, which saw the full destruction of Libya's nuclear infrastructure. Trump said last week that he warned Netanyahu not to launch preemptive strikes on Iran. But he also said on Friday that he wanted a deal in which "we can blow up whatever we want, but nobody getting killed". His proposal is a serious climbdown from that kind of talk. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters It would allow Iran to enrich uranium up to three percent within its borders to maintain a civilian nuclear programme. The figure is substantially below the 60 percent level it is currently at, according to Axios. It is close to the 3.67 percent enrichment level the Obama administration agreed to with Iran as part of the 2015 nuclear deal. What we know The previous Trump administration unilaterally withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), in 2018. If the proposal stands as reported by Axios, it would mark a major concession by the Trump administration, which stated its own red line on a deal was preventing Iran from enriching uranium. "An enrichment programme can never exist in the state of Iran ever again. That's our red line. No enrichment," US envoy Steve Witkoff told Breitbart News in May. Like the Obama agreement, Iran would be restricted to enriching at the three percent threshold for a certain time period. The JCPOA imposed a 15-year time limit on Iran's enrichment limit. The Trump proposal leaves the time limit open for the following rounds of negotiations. The US and Iran have held five rounds of talks so far. The negotiations have been mediated mainly by Oman, but Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi have met in person. The Trump proposal reported by Axios also appears to echo the 2015 deal in other areas. Iran will not be allowed to build any new enrichment facilities and must "dismantle critical infrastructure for conversion and processing of uranium", Axios reported. That language is similar to the 2015 nuclear deal, which mandated Iran to dismantle and remove two-thirds of its centrifuges. The Trump proposal calls for Iran to make its underground enrichment facilities "non-operational" for a period of time to be negotiated by the parties. The 2015 deal prevented enrichment at the underground Fordow facility until 2031. Witkoff sent the US proposal to Iran on Saturday. Enrichment Consortium According to Axios, it relies heavily on a "strong system for monitoring and verification" by the International Atomic Energy Agency. One key difference between the 2015 deal and the Trump proposal is that it envisions a regional enrichment consortium including Iran. Several reports have said that Saudi Arabia and the UAE - two key US partners - could join Iran as part of the consortium. The Gulf states vehemently opposed the 2015 nuclear deal, as they were locked in proxy struggles with Iran throughout the region. However, Riyadh and Abu Dhabi have had a rapprochement with the Islamic Republic over the last several years. Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan said after Trump's visit to Riyadh in May that the kingdom 'fully supports' the nuclear talks. The White House neither confirmed nor denied the Axios report. Iran has yet to comment on it. On Monday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told a news conference that Tehran was seeking clarification on debilitating sanctions relief as part of a deal. 'We want to guarantee that the sanctions are effectively lifted,' he said. "So far, the American side has not wanted to clarify this issue.' The Wall Street Journal editorial board published an article on Sunday saying the Trump administration had paused all new sanctions activity toward Iran.

‘Smirker of the genocide': Outrage after Matthew Miller says Israel committed war crimes
‘Smirker of the genocide': Outrage after Matthew Miller says Israel committed war crimes

Middle East Eye

time9 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

‘Smirker of the genocide': Outrage after Matthew Miller says Israel committed war crimes

Former US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller has sparked outrage after saying he believed 'without a doubt" that Israel has committed war crimes. On Monday's episode of Sky News' Trump 100 podcast, Miller, now speaking as a private citizen, said he does not believe Israel is carrying out a genocide, but that it is failing itself as a democracy by not holding soldiers accountable for their actions in Gaza. He added that there were "disagreements all along the way" on how to handle Israel's war on Gaza. Miller served as the State Department spokesperson from 2023 until the end of Biden's presidential term, during which he frequently defended Israel's war on Gaza. When asked if he believed Israel was committing a genocide in Gaza, Miller replied: 'I don't believe it's genocide, but I think it is without a doubt true that Israel has committed war crimes.' The host then pressed on why Miller had publicly denied accusations of war crimes against Israel for more than a year, to which Miller said he was a spokesperson for the US government, not for himself. 'The United States government had not concluded they've (Israel) committed war crimes – they still have not concluded that," he said. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'You are a spokesperson for the president, the administration, and you espouse the positions of the administration. And when you're not in the administration, you can just give your own opinions." Miller continued to specify that it is still open to question whether the Israeli state has committed war crimes, but that there have been 'individual incidents' from soldiers in the Israeli military who undoubtedly committed "war crimes". The responsibility, he said, lies with Israel to hold these individuals accountable, which he believes they have not done. 'Characteristic smirk' Miller took heavy criticism throughout his time at the White House, from both the general public and reporters who attended State Department press conferences. On multiple occasions, reporters pushed back against Miller as he continuously deflected blame from the US or Israel, despite any evidence presented. One viral moment took place when journalist Sam Husseini accused Miller of 'smirking' while he was talking about the death toll in Gaza. This, in particular, has been continuously referenced by social media users who say that Miller's recent admission of Israel's war crimes is not only too late but will not "save him' from complicity in the war crimes he says Israel has committed. Middle East Eye requested comment from Miller regarding the backlash that has ensued, but did not receive a response by the time of publication. Palestinian journalist Abubaker Abed, who recently arrived in Dublin after fleeing Gaza, took to X to respond to Miller, writing: 'You will always be remembered as the smirker of the Gaza Genocide'. We will also never forgive and forget you, and you will always be remembered as the smirker of the Gaza Genocide. You also must be held accountable. — Abubaker Abed (@AbubakerAbedW) June 2, 2025 Another wrote that Miller wore his 'characteristic smirk' while he was 'quite literally the face of the US covering for Israel, denying their war crimes on the podium day in and day out'. 'We're seeing more and more cases like his as the scale of the horrors that happened - and are still happening - in Gaza is becoming more and more impossible to deny,' he continued. 'They're nothing more than opportunists trying to salvage their reputations on the graves of those they helped kill. The lowest of the low.' Others echoed the sentiment that Miller is among the many figures, ranging from journalists to international leaders, who have only recently condemned Israel for its bombardment of the enclave, which has killed over 54,000 Palestinians so far, after defending the state for a year and a half. 'Public opinion has shifted and now everyone needs to get a quote that they can point that says they knew the whole time and were secretly working behind the scenes,' one Reddit user wrote. "At some point, all of these criminals will claim they acted under compulsion," Palestinian-American imam Dr Omar Suleiman wrote in an Instagram post. "We will not let them sanitize their role in this genocide." Popular political commentator and streamer Hasan Piker pointed out that the potential war crimes Israel has committed were done, in part, because of Miller and the US government's constant support. you directly helped cover for those war crimes so we could keep sending more munitions to do new crimes with! — hasanabi (@hasanthehun) June 2, 2025 "How many times did this piece of shit say something like 'we've asked the IDF to investigate these reports and we'll let you know what they say'? How many times did he invoke the phrase 'hamas propaganda' when referring to these reports?" a Reddit user wrote in a thread discussing the podcast episode. Some took it even a step further in pointing the blame back at Miller, saying that he could be tried as a war criminal - like those who were spokespeople for the Nazi party in Germany - for his role in defending Israel. "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him." - Nuremberg Principle IV. Miller is a war criminal! — Sunny Singh (@ProfSunnySingh) June 2, 2025 In an X post responding to Miller's statement, investigative journalist Asa Winstanley wrote: "Matthew Miller without a doubt belongs in jail for the rest of his life."

What we know about the Colorado flamethrower attack
What we know about the Colorado flamethrower attack

Middle East Eye

time10 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

What we know about the Colorado flamethrower attack

Dozens of protesters in Boulder, Colorado, rallying in support of Israeli captives in Gaza, were attacked on Sunday by a man using a makeshift flamethrower and incendiary devices, according to witnesses. At least eight people were injured during the attack, with two left in serious condition. Videos from the scene of the attack on social media showed black smoke clouds billowing in front of the county courthouse. Bystanders are seen running towards the victims lying on the ground. At least one man picks up a piece of clothing to douse a fire on top of what appears to be a moving body. Middle East Eye could not independently verify the videos. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The suspect can be seen shirtless, wearing sunglasses and holding bottles of clear liquid. Pacing back and forth, he argues with several people in the crowd as they wait for the police to arrive. Witnesses say they heard the man shouting "Free Palestine!' during the attack. The suspect The suspect was identified as Mohamed Sabry Soliman. He entered the US from Egypt in August 2022 and stayed illegally after his visa expired in February 2023, according to Tricia McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security. Soliman filed for asylum in September 2022. 'The Colorado Terrorist attack suspect, Mohamed Soliman, is illegally in our country,' McLaughlin said on X. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who has spearheaded US President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, posted on X that the suspect was a foreign national who "illegally overstayed (his) visa". Soliman can be heard in some videos screaming "End Zionists!" and "They are killers!" towards several people in red T-shirts as they tend to a person lying on the ground. Soliman was arrested at the scene and taken to a medical facility, where he was treated for minor injuries. He has been charged with a federal hate crime and murder in the first degree, plus other charges, according to court records. Links to Israel's war on Gaza? The FBI is investigating the attack as an 'act of terror.' Soliman, 45, was working in El Paso County. According to the Boulder County Sheriff's Office, his bail has been set at $10m. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also described the Boulder incident as a "targeted terror attack", while attorney general Pam Bondi termed it "a horrific anti-Semitic attack". Soliman's attack marks the second in less than two weeks within the US where the suspects have invoked Israel's war on Gaza. Two Israeli embassy staffers were shot and killed in Washington, DC, in May by an alleged attacker who shouted 'Free Palestine'. The alleged attacker, 31-year-old Elias Rodriguez, had criticised the Israeli and US governments for the war on Gaza in a social media post on X, titled 'Escalate For Gaza, Bring The War Home.' Israel's war on Gaza started after the Hamas-led 7 October 2023 attacks on southern Israel. Since then, Israel's war on the enclave has killed more than 54,300 Palestinians. Israel has laid siege to the Gaza Strip, and the UN warns that 100 percent of its population is at risk of famine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store