logo
Nora Roberts is happily defying genres, 250 books in

Nora Roberts is happily defying genres, 250 books in

NEW YORK (AP) — Nora Roberts is so prolific she had to take up a pen name so her publisher could release more books by her each year.
'I'm a fast writer,' Roberts told The Associated Press in a rare interview. She typically releases four books a year, and has for more than four decades.
It's not just about her speed. It's her range, too. She's written more than 250 books, from romantic one-offs and fantasy-themed trilogies to a police procedural series she's been writing for three decades. The 60th book of the 'In Death' series, 'Bonded in Death', is being released in February.
Roberts has left her mark on the literary world, and she has no plans to stop anytime soon. She talked about the art of writing, why she won't have the main characters in her 'In Death' series have kids, and her thoughts on the romance genre — including why she doesn't see herself as part of it anymore.
This interview has been edited for clarity and length.
AP: You write under two different names — Nora Roberts and J.D. Robb. Why?
Roberts: I'm a fast writer.
I didn't like the idea of taking a pseudonym until my agent said to me one day, 'Nora, there's Pepsi, there's Diet Pepsi, and there's caffeine-free Pepsi.' And that hit home. I drink Diet Pepsi and I've realized it's marketing and I could be two brands.
So I said I would do that if I could write something completely different.
AP: You're coming out with your 60 book in the 'In Death' series. You've been writing two books per year for the series since 1995. What is your vision for the series at this point?
Roberts: I can't imagine ending it and I still have ideas for where they're going next. They're not just books about murders. They're about interaction and relationships and the evolution of characters.
AP: Do you have an ending in mind, or was there an ending that you had in mind at one point that you've gone past?
Roberts: I never had an endpoint. It just sort of happened that I got to 60 books. I'm very invested in these characters. So I like to tell their stories.
AP: You've said that if Roarke and Eve were ever to have a child, you would see that as the end of the series because their lives would be so changed by that. Is that true?
Roberts: That is an internet truth. Children change everything. How are they going to be out there in the middle of the night chasing bad guys or working on a case or having that crazy sex?
AP: Speaking of the sex, that's a good transition to romance as a genre. It has evolved a lot in the last couple of years. Where do you see yourself in the pantheon of that genre?
Roberts: I don't at all. My roots are in romance and I have a lot of respect. But I don't write romance anymore. I do write relationships.
I've been writing for a really long time now, and the romance genre evolves and it changes. And it did when I was working in it, and it just got to a point where I didn't want to go where it was evolving. I wanted to go in a different direction. So my roots and foundation are there, and gratitude. But that's not what I'm doing now.
AP: How would you describe what you're doing now?
Roberts: I write novels. It's that simple – suspense, thrillers, fantasy.
AP: You like to write in trilogies. Even with 'In Death,' you sometimes write in threes. Why do you think that works narratively as a writer and for your audience?
Roberts: I think of it as one big book and three parts. Something has to happen that cannot be resolved until the last book. That's when good overcomes evil. Love conquers all and whatever. But you can't do that until book three. It's challenging and it's fun and I hope it's fun for the reader, too.
AP: How many hours do you spend writing on an average day?
Roberts: Six to eight.
Roberts: I can write anywhere, anytime. I like the quiet. That's my favorite.
AP: For 'In Death,' how did you land on a futuristic police procedural?
Roberts: I really wanted to do something different, and I thought it would be fun to go into the future and imagine the world. It could be exactly what I wanted it to be. I didn't have to build on someone else's or make up a little town.
AP: How would you like to be remembered?
Roberts: As a good storyteller.
AP: Are you thinking of retirement at all?
Roberts: Absolutely not.
Roberts: Not having the next idea.
Roberts: 'To Kill a Mockingbird' is probably the most perfect novel I remember. I love 'Catch-22.' And 'Jane Eyre.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Materialists' review: Dakota Johnson goes from ‘Madame Web' to meh matchmaker
‘Materialists' review: Dakota Johnson goes from ‘Madame Web' to meh matchmaker

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

‘Materialists' review: Dakota Johnson goes from ‘Madame Web' to meh matchmaker

movie review MATERIALISTS Running time: 116 minutes. Rated R (language and brief sexual material). In theaters. Watching the new, unromantic, non-comedy 'Materialists' can feel like going on a shaky first date. There's something… off. Advertisement Is it 'Past Lives' writer-director Celine Song's love-triangle script, which is unnatural and stilted even by the standard of rom-coms such as 'Maid in Manhattan' or 'Two Weeks Notice?' Or is it star Dakota Johnson's stainless-steel 'tude as New York matchmaker Lucy? The always cool actress is auditioning to play the Terminator here. If you answered 'all of the above,' you're correct. Advertisement Yet our unease is partly by design. Song isn't so much trying to join the romantic comedy canon as she is firing a cannonball directly at it. 'Materialists' doesn't make you laugh or smile. Of this particular movie experience, Nicole Kidman might say, 'We come to this place to ponder, analyze and wince.' I flipped from being intrigued by the mysterious characters and tantalized by the luxury real estate to sitting there perplexed by the weird plot escalations that, while meant to drag rom-coms down to earth, drag viewers out of the film instead. On rare occasions, I was entertained. 4 Dakota Johnson and Pedro Pascal star in 'Materialists.' AP Advertisement At the start, the pieces are familiar to anybody who's seen 'The Wedding Planner' or 'The Wedding Singer.' There's Lucy, a love-averse young professional who's obsessed with her job in the relationship biz. Her sole criterion for her own future husband is that he be rich. Then — hello! — she meets a millionaire named Harry (Pedro Pascal) at a wedding at the Lotte Palace, and he sweeps her off her feet with his confidence and metal credit cards. Uh oh. At the same fete, she also reunites with a poor but hot former flame named John (Chris Evans). Whoever will she pick?! Advertisement 4 Lucy (Johnson) meets Harry (Pascal) at a wedding, and they start dating. AP The first half goes down as easily as a glass of 1990s bubbly, but there is an undercurrent of darkness. Song throws in cutting, albeit overwritten, observations about modern courtship — a k a you better have looks and money. Lucy adamantly insists, 'It's math,' and compares her job to working at the morgue. She finds matches for clients that 'check most of our boxes': Income, height, age, race, BMI. When Lucy hears about a surgery in which men get their leg bones broken to add six inches of height, she thinks it's a fabulous idea. Her matchmaking process is freakily clinical. It's practically the DMV — the Department of Marriage Vows. And the exercise mirrors the app-centric way people search for significant others nowadays. How depressing. 4 Lucy, a matchmaker, is an off-putting character, by design. AP Indeed, the men and women she works with are uniformly sad, vapid and shallow. There's not a single person in this movie you'll want to spend more than two minutes with. What we assume, of course, is that Lucy will learn that love is an intangible thing — a spark, not arithmetic. Advertisement That sort of happens. While one message is that people are more than numbers, the takeaway is far from upbeat or celebratory. What the statistics actually conceal are ugly, nasty qualities in people. Mostly that they're liars and creeps. Lucy herself is unpleasant-to-odious, again on purpose. The movie acknowledges that she's awful, and we're not meant to like her much at all. But off-putting characters must be more engaging than she is to justify the spotlight. 4 She's torn between Harry and John (Chris Evans). AP 'Materialists' lost me halfway through, admittedly, when it became more ambitious. A traumatic turning point is realistic and jarring; however, the film can't recover from it either. Advertisement Although I admired Song's aims to subvert a glossy Hollywood staple, I longed for the way her 'Past Lives' so simply and poignantly explored our 'what if?'s. Next to that, 'Materialists' is blunt and narratively messy. You can sense Song trying very hard to reach her ultimately unsatisfying and not-so-insightful end destination. En route, the acting is, frankly, ghoulish. Good for Johnson for breaking free from the embarrassing comic-book confines of 'Madame Web.' She still reads lines in a dreamy haze as if there is a crystal ball in front of her. And there's not much chemistry with Pascal or Evans, both of whom are fine, if a smidge somnambulic. Sadly, the follow-up from the director of 'Past Lives' had me dreaming about her past projects.

And the Emmy goes to ... Phillies star Trea Turner? Documentary on Turner's ovation wins Emmy Award
And the Emmy goes to ... Phillies star Trea Turner? Documentary on Turner's ovation wins Emmy Award

San Francisco Chronicle​

time5 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

And the Emmy goes to ... Phillies star Trea Turner? Documentary on Turner's ovation wins Emmy Award

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — And the Emmy goes to ... Philadelphia Phillies shortstop Trea Turner? Turner already won an NL batting title and a World Series championship ring in his 11-year MLB career. How about adding an Emmy Award to that trophy case? 'Trea Turner's an Emmy winner, absolutely,' sports documentary producer Kyle Thrash said. 'He definitely held it up like he owned it.' Turner may not actually have the award in hand to keep for good, but he got to hoist the real deal ahead of Friday's game against Toronto in a short celebration for the Emmy won for a best sports short documentary produced on the 2023 standing ovation credited with turning around his season. 'The Turnaround' won a sports Emmy in May and Thrash and Phillies fan Jon McCann — whose personal struggles with mental health and kinship with Turner were the heart of the film — attended the game to show off their new bling to Turner. 'Cuz, we did it, huh?! 'McCann said as he shook Turner's hand on the field after batting practice. 'Trea Turner, we share an Emmy together.' Turner read the inscription at the bottom of the Emmy and promised the fans he would wave to them in section 301 if he stole a base in Friday's game. 'We get to bring a trophy back to the ballpark tonight and share it with so many people that were involved in the standing ovation. It's pretty incredible,' Thrash said. Philly sports fans — often billed as some of the worst in sports — gave a slumping Turner standing ovations in at-bats throughout the weekend in an August 2023 series to show he had their full support. Turner was in the first season of an 11-year, $300 million deal with the Phillies but was batting just .238 with 11 home runs and 39 RBIs. He was even dropped to eighth in the batting order headed into that series against Kansas City. In three games over the weekend against the Royals, Turner went 4 for 12 with two doubles, a home run and five RBIs and he would eventually help lead the Phillies to the playoffs. MCann, also known as 'The Philly Captain," is a Philadelphia based YouTuber and was one of the fans — along with a Philly sports talk radio host — credited with rallying the fans to get behind Turner. 'During the ceremony, one of the award presenters said, 'wWen you go up against the Olympics, you lose.' So I kind of thought we already lost,' McCann said. 'We didn't. It was a great, great shock.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store