Carney, premiers gather in Saskatoon for first ministers meeting
Prime Minister Mark Carney and Canada's premiers will discuss the future of interprovincial trade and how best to counter U.S. tariffs at today's first ministers' meeting in Saskatoon.
The gathering is usually held in Ottawa. However, the change in venue was made in early May, after Premier Scott Moe invited the prime minister to Saskatchewan with the intention of improving relations between the two governments.
National infrastructure projects, the effects of the ongoing U.S. trade war, and Carney's promise to eliminate interprovincial trade barriers by Canada Day are all on the agenda.
Premier Moe has said he hopes the federal government will support a 'port-to-port' energy corridor to connect provincial resources to Asian and European markets.
The concept was discussed at a meeting of western premiers and territorial leaders in Yellowknife in May.
Moe says this proposed 'generational project' will secure Canada's economic future and transform the country into an energy superpower.
Monday's meeting marks Mark Carney's first visit to Saskatoon following the April 28 federal election – which saw the Liberals increase their seat count and retain a minority government.
The gathering also marks the first time a prime minister along with the premiers have met in Saskatchewan since 1985.
Wildfire emergency
However, the meeting of national and sub-national leaders comes at a time when Saskatchewan is battling a worsening wildfire season which has devastated parts of the province's north.
Premier Moe declared a provincial state of emergency on May 29, which is set to last for 30 days.
As of Sunday afternoon, there were 15 active wildfires burning in the province with only four of them contained. The Shoe Fire remains the largest, currently estimated to cover more than 305,000 hectares.
According to the Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency (SPSA), 20 communities are currently under evacuation orders and over 80 structures have been destroyed.
'We have had 214 wildfires, which is well above the five-year average of 129,' Steve Roberts, vice president of operations with SPSA, said in press conference Sunday afternoon.
According to Roberts, high daytime temperatures, warm evenings, and strong winds are expected to persist - making firefighting efforts more challenging and increasing the risk of fire spread.
'We have had little or no precipitation in weeks in the areas that the fires are burning,' Roberts added.
So far, about 8,000 people have been evacuated, with the most recent additions being the communities of Timber Bay and Malanosa due to the Ditch Fire.
Roberts says the province has mobilized firefighting resources from across Canada and even the United States, with crews arriving from Quebec, British Columbia, Alaska, Oregon, and Arizona.
While the number of those displaced due to wildfires have been increasing, Roberts noted that some communities, such as Canoe Lake, have already begun to see residents return as fire conditions stabilize.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
7 minutes ago
- CTV News
Tesla shares clawed back from steep losses after Trump-Musk war of words
A war of words is beginning to emerge between U.S. President Trump and Elon Musk following the billionaire's White House exit. Joy Malbon has the details. Tesla shares clawed back from steep losses as a war of words between CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump appeared to cool, easing investor worries about the likely political fallout on the electric automaker. Shares rose about five per cent in early trading. Politico had reported Musk and Trump were expected to speak on Friday, but a White House official told Reuters there were no plans for a call. Musk signalled on his X social media platform he was open to easing tensions with Trump, agreeing with comments from hedge fund manager Bill Ackman calling for a detente. The spat between the world's most powerful man and its richest erased more than US$150 billion from Tesla's market value on Thursday, the company's biggest drop in one session. Short-sellers, or investors betting against the stock, pocketed nearly $4 billion from the drop, the second-biggest single-day of profit on record, according to data from Ortex. Tensions escalated after Musk stepped up criticism of Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill, which proposes largely ending the popular $7,500 EV tax incentive by the end of 2025. In response, Trump suggested cuts to the government's contracts with Musk's companies, including rocket maker SpaceX. 'It might be a bit too hopeful to think their relationship will ever go back to what it once was, but if cooler heads prevail and the tension eases, that would definitely be a big improvement for Tesla,' said Tesla shareholder Matthew Britzman, who is an analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown. Lofty stock valuation An open clash with Trump could pose multiple hurdles for Tesla and the rest of Musk's sprawling business empire. The U.S. Transportation Department regulates vehicle design standards and would have a big say in whether Tesla can mass-produce robotaxis without pedals and steering wheels. Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the call. Tesla stock is down 29.5 per cent this year after a 14 per cent drop on Thursday. Still, the shares trade at 120 times expected earnings, a lofty multiple compared to other automakers and even tech giants such as Nvidia. The shares have been on a turbulent ride since last July when Musk backed Trump's White House bid. They surged initially as investors bet on less regulatory pressure for robotaxis, but tumbled due to soft sales and brand fallout from Musk's political stance. Some analysts said the rift was likely to blow over as it would be detrimental to both the president and his biggest backer. 'Those are obviously threats that are unlikely to come into fruition,' said City Index analyst Fiona Cincotta. 'I don't expect this to blow out into anything more serious than a war of words for a couple of days.' (Reporting by Akash Sriram and Shashwat Chauhan in Bengaluru, Amanda Cooper and Samuel Indyk in London; Additional reporting by Purvi Agarwal; Editing by Sherry Jacob-Phillips, Tomasz Janowski and Arun Koyyur)
CTV News
7 minutes ago
- CTV News
Toronto's air quality currently among worst in world due to wildfire smoke
Environment Canada warns wildfire smoke from northern Ontario and out west is reducing visibility and worsening air quality in Toronto. Toronto's air quality is ranked among the worst in the world today as smoke from wildfires drifts into the region. The wildfire smoke has prompted Environment Canada to issue a special air quality statement for the GTA, much of southern Ontario, as well as five other provinces and one territory. Environment Canada's David Phillips said as wildfires ramp up across the country, air quality is deteriorating. He noted that since the beginning of the month, there are 15 new out-of-control wildfires burning in northern Ontario and Western Canada. 'What we've seen this week, of course, in Ontario is a lot of that smoke from fires has come south,' he said. On Friday, Toronto's air quality index is expected to hit a maximum of 7 out of 10, which is classified as 'high risk,' Environment Canada said. As of 11 a.m. on Friday, Toronto's air quality was ranked fourth worst in the world, according to data from Swiss air quality tracker IQAir. The only other Canadian city with worse air quality than Toronto on Friday was Montreal, which was ranked third worst among all cities globally. 'Only a few see the flames but millions smell the smoke,' Phillips said. In areas where the air quality statement is in effect, Environment Canada urged residents to limit their time spent outdoors. In Toronto, the national weather agency warned that smoke levels are expected to rise in the area this morning and into this afternoon before easing this evening. 'As smoke levels increase, health risks increase,' the advisory reads, adding that people should consider reducing or rescheduling outdoor sports, activities, and events. It notes that smoke may cause mild irritation to your eyes, nose, and throat, and may lead to headaches or a mild cough. 'More serious but less common symptoms include wheezing, chest pains or severe cough,' the advisory continued. Those with pre-existing respiratory conditions, pregnant and elderly individuals, as well as young children, are more likely to be impacted by outdoor air pollution. Phillips said while the air quality index is expected to 'bounce around' in Toronto this weekend, 'smelly air' will be sticking around until early next week. 'It took so long for the summer-like weather to come and when it came, not with blue skies… but some cruddy-smelling air that actually almost (makes you wish) spring-like weather was back,' he said.
Toronto Star
20 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Government adviser slams Mark Carney for promoting ‘decarbonized' oil pipelines
OTTAWA — The co-chair of the federal government's climate action advisory group is slamming Prime Minister Mark Carney for using fossil fuel 'marketing speak' at Monday's summit with provincial leaders, when he endorsed the idea of building new pipelines for 'decarbonized' oil. Simon Donner, a climate scientist at the University of British Columbia who co-chairs the Liberal government's Net Zero Advisory Body, alleged the term is misleading because it falsely suggests there is a way to burn fossil fuels without creating greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change. 'There is no such thing as decarbonized oil and gas. Oil contains carbon. It is high school chemistry. And they emit carbon dioxide when they're used,' Donner told the Star. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Prime Minister Mark Carney says there are discussions about building new pipelines to ship what he called decarbonized barrels of oil. But he says the range of the discussion is about more than just pipelines, involving the Western-Arctic corridor to move a broader number of products. (June 3, 2025 / The Canadian Press) 'The government is going to embarrass itself by using such industry and marketing speak.' Leaving a cabinet meeting on Parliament Hill Tuesday, Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson and Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin ignored questions about what the government means by 'decarbonized' oil. Carney made the statement at Monday's meeting with the premiers in Saskatoon, where his plan to fast-track development projects 'of national interest' took centre stage. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith — a staunch promoter of the fossil fuel sector who has long opposed federal climate policies like carbon pricing and regulations to limit emissions — said she was encouraged by the new government's approach. That included what she called a 'compromise' to allow new fossil fuel infrastructure to be built outside the current federal review process, which critics have blamed for blocking projects. Smith also said there was a 'grand bargain,' where the federal government would make it easier for the private sector to build new fossil fuel pipelines, while supporting plans under the 'Pathways Alliance' of oilsands companies to build a huge carbon capture project. During question period in the House of Commons on Tuesday, Hodgson referred to Smith's comments, describing the 'grand bargain' as a plan to 'build our energy superpower in an … environmentally responsible way, in consultation' with Indigenous Peoples. 'We support new pipelines if there is a national consensus,' Hodgson added. With billions of dollars in federal tax credits on the table, the Pathways carbon capture project is meant to reduce emissions from the extraction of fossil fuels, a process that is responsible for the largest share of any economic sector, as measured in Canada's most recent national tally of greenhouse gas pollution. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW In an emailed statement, Pathways president Kendall Dilling said the group is 'encouraged' by recent signs, including at this week's first ministers' meeting. 'We need every industry, including the oilsands, thriving and making vital contributions to the economy,' Dilling said. Janetta McKenzie, director of oil and gas at the Pembina Institute, a climate and environmental policy think tank, said Tuesday that it's important for Canada to press to reduce emissions from the production of oil, as greenhouse gas pollution from oil and gas extraction has increased by 70 per cent from 2005 to 2023, according to the national emissions tally. But with questions about when the Pathways project could come online, McKenzie said policies like carbon pricing and regulations to limit emissions are needed if high levels of production can continue without blowing Canada's effort to hit its emissions targets over the next decade. 'If we do want decarbonized barrels to be moving through this pipeline, there's something missing,' McKenzie said. The discussion highlights a political tightrope for the federal government on climate and energy policies, with pressure from environmentalists and those concerned about climate change to help the global crisis by reducing emissions, and demands from others to promote Canada's lucrative oil and gas sector. The industry generated $187 billion of economic activity in 2022, when it accounted for 30 per cent of Canada's total exports and employed almost 172,000 people, according to Natural Resources Canada. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW The government has said it remains committed to fighting climate change, but early signals of support for potential fossil fuel projects have prompted environmentalists to urge Carney to ' pick a lane ' between increased oil production and serious commitment to reducing emissions. Carney suggested last month that his government could change previous policies like the plan to create a regulatory cap to limit and start reducing emissions from the oil and gas sector to at least 19 per cent below 2019 levels between 2030 and 2032. Carney removed the national requirement for provinces and territories to have a consumer carbon price, while promising to strengthen industrial carbon pricing and other measures to ensure Canada hits its emissions targets. Canada is responsible for 1.41 per cent of global emissions in 2023, according to European Union figures. It has pledged to slash national emissions to 40 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030, and at least 45 per cent below 2005 levels by 2035. Emissions were 8.5 per cent below 2005 levels in 2023, according to the most recent government tally. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.
