
How the British Art Market Went From Sublime to Ridiculous
An art dealer I know blames Ozempic for the recent slump in sales: Collectors haven't been hungry.
After reading 'Rogues and Scholars,' James Stourton's erudite and authoritative history of the London art market from World War II to our century, I'm inclined to agree. Stourton, for decades a former chairman at Sotheby's UK, makes clear that, although all buying is appetitive, auctions turn personal cravings into group binges, with global effects.
His Year Zero is 1958, when Sotheby's auctioned the German banker Jakob Goldschmidt's Impressionist paintings. While only seven works were offered, the black-tie crowd and TV cameras made it a spectacle. One Cézanne, sold for 220,000 pounds, set a new auction record. The night was a turning point, Stourton suggests, when auctions, formerly quiet industry affairs supplied mainly by country estates, became celebrity events. It also goaded a rivalry between Sotheby's and Christie's that endures today.
Both houses dated to the 18th century, but Christie's was older, more prestigious, known for its paintings. Sotheby's, initially specializing in books, was transformed under Peter Wilson, who became chairman in 1958. A debonair unmoneyed aristocrat and former MI6 operative, Wilson understood branding and embraced pure commercialism, even licensing the firm's name for cigarettes.
His rival, the Christie's chairman Peter Chance, was a former army officer, and stuffier. His firm fostered client loyalty by retaining staff, but suffered from 'lackluster expertise,' writes Stourton, until they started to recruit Cambridge art history graduates. Stourton reports the industry gossip: 'When somebody died, Peter Chance went to the funeral, and Peter Wilson went to the house.' Chance on Wilson: 'That man is a swine.' Wilson's motto? 'Leave nothing to Chance.'
With improvements in travel and technology, milestones of commerce were vaulted, and each appeared to cheapen a onetime gentleman's sport. Sotheby's 1964 acquisition of the New York firm Parke-Bernet broadcast a message of 'world domination.' To attract reluctant buyers, Wilson began publishing indexes in the London Times stock pages: Renoir up, say, 405 percent, Monet up 1,000. In 1975, Wilson and Chance seemingly conspired to invent the buyer's premium, using the reduced commissions to attract sellers, appalling dealers.
Such changes forced innovation among the London dealers, like the secretive Wildenstein's and Monty Bernard (who had been known to bribe train conductors to waylay rival dealers). A dense account of them canopies Stourton's tale, organized by pecking order and specialty (never have brown furniture and Victoriana read so page-turningly). For Robin Symes, the disgraced dealer of looted antiquities, 'hubris was followed by nemesis, and nobody rose higher or fell faster.'
In general, Stourton lets his quotes do the judging. They spray back at their speakers like birdshot in pheasant season. The dealer Richard Green's favorite painting is 'a sold one.' 'I collect money, not art,' a Marlborough founder said. 'The only decent artist is a dead artist,' quoth the dealer Julian Agnew. An impressive number of sources spoke to Stourton, with a candor only an insider of great principle could have earned. (A dramatis personae — or a map of Mayfair — wouldn't have hurt; at times the book is a surname soup.)
As prices and stakes climbed, questions of transparency, provenance, authenticity, expertise and exhibitions grew more serious. Several young dealers emerged as scrappy, even heroic connoisseurs. Living artists, notoriously risky investments, gained traction through brand-savvy galleries like Marlborough, which championed Francis Bacon and Henry Moore, and Kasmin, whose skylighted minimalist showroom was 'a machine for looking at pictures in.' Auctions began admitting living artists, too.
Wilson retired in 1980, not long after hiring Stourton. By then, Japanese buyers dominated these auctions. Their bubble was to pop with the 1990 invasion of Kuwait, just as the 1970s oil crisis sent Chinese ceramic sales, and some London dealers, to Hong Kong. In 1987 van Gogh set records with a 'Sunflowers' (Christie's) and 'Irises' (Sotheby's). 'Private sales' further supplanted the role of dealers, who crowed when the two houses got caught fixing commissions in 2000, and banded together to form the art fairs we know today.
The Young British Artists (Y.B.A.), Britain's last global movement, brought some American dealers calling in the 1990s, as London saw its 'gradual repositioning into second place behind New York.' But even there the duopoly has held tight, as evidenced by Sotheby's recent sale of a 35-cent banana for $6.2 million.
Though impressively aware of changing tastes, Stourton is not a visual writer, and at certain moments this can frustrate the reader. The achievement of Erica Brausen, the dealer who first sold Bacon to the Museum of Modern Art, pales without a description of that painter's deliberate repulsiveness. Of the globe-quaking Y.B.A. show in 1988, one work is described.
But Stourton's aloofness may be a practiced discretion. 'It would have been an appalling error of taste and intrusion into another man's privacy to go commenting on his possessions,' explains Stourton's onetime colleague Philip Hook in 'Breakfast at Sotheby's.' 'His pictures? His wine? What next, his wife?' (Also compare Stourton's Wilson with the nasty, deceitful version described in 'Rogues' Gallery' by Hook, who began at Christie's.)
Stourton's approach is nonetheless truthful. Stripped of the art lover's gaze, Stourton's taut chapters and business brain probably make a clearer portrait of a traffic that, on paper, can care ironically little for looks. 'A good art dealer,' Arthur Tooth is quoted as saying, 'is a man who can sell a picture he dislikes to a client who dislikes it.'
Outstanding in its own field, 'Rogues and Scholars' nears Anthony Bourdain's tell-all 'Kitchen Confidential,' whose real favor is not worship of food but an honesty about brawls and diarrhea. Perhaps by exempting beauty from his comic-epic of ploys and partners, Stourton creates an inconvenience for the casual reader but ultimately does a courtesy to the artists.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


American Military News
2 hours ago
- American Military News
‘Have a nice day, DJT!': Trump's breakup with Musk devolves into a war of insults
President Donald Trump's friendship and political alliance with Elon Musk, the world's richest man, who fueled Trump's campaign with record amounts of cash before working at the White House by his side until last week, appears to be over, with both men leveling searing criticism against one another in a sharp public row. Musk had been criticizing the Trump administration over its signature legislation, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' for its projected impact on the national debt throughout last week. But his calls to 'kill the bill' on Wednesday prompted Trump, speaking to media from the Oval Office, to respond in kind. 'Elon and I had a great relationship, I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said Thursday. 'And he hasn't said bad things about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm very disappointed in Elon.' Musk, responding on his social media platform, X, took credit for Trump's election victory. The billionaire entrepreneur, whose companies also include SpaceX and Tesla, contributed over $280 million to Trump and other Republicans during the 2024 presidential campaign. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote. 'Such ingratitude.' Matters only deteriorated as the day progressed. After meeting with the German chancellor, Trump wrote on social media that the 'easiest way' to save billions in federal spending would be to 'terminate Elon's government subsidies and contracts.' 'Make my day,' Musk shot back, before claiming in a subsequent post that Trump had withheld the full release of FBI files on Jeffrey Epstein, the late child sex offender, because they would implicate the president himself. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Trump is in the Epstein files,' Musk wrote. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' The exchange broke open a feud that had been simmering for weeks out of public view. In private, Musk had relayed concerns over the bill to the president, while expressing disagreement with several other policies, including the establishment of an artificial intelligence campus in the Middle East and Trump's announcement of global tariffs. 'I agree with much of what the administration does, but we have differences of opinion,' Musk said in a more muted tone last week, speaking in an interview with CBS. 'You know, there are things that I don't entirely agree with. But it's difficult for me to bring that up in an interview because then it creates a bone of contention,' he added. 'So then, I'm a little stuck in a bind, where I'm like, well, I don't wanna, you know, speak up against the administration, but I also don't wanna take responsibility for everything this administration's doing.' In the Oval Office, Trump said he believed that Musk had turned on him after he rejected Musk's recommendation for the head of NASA, a position that could benefit SpaceX, Musk's spaceship company. He also said that Musk opposed provisions of Trump's megabill that would phase out tax credits for electric vehicles. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. Better than you people. He knew everything about it — he had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate, because that's billions and billions of dollars,' Trump said. 'People leave my administration and they love us, and at some point, they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile,' Trump added. 'I don't know what it is.' But Musk denied he had been shown the bill, responding on X that he wouldn't mind if the EV provisions remain in the text so long as others, which he said would balloon annual deficits, are cut. 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Musk wrote. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released an assessment on Wednesday estimating that the 'big, beautiful bill,' which has passed the House and is under consideration in the Senate, would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, and result in 10.9 million Americans losing health insurance coverage over the same period. At the beginning of the administration, Trump put Musk in charge of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, a White House program that intended on cutting federal spending and reducing the deficit. Musk's tenure in the role, designated as a special government employee, ended last week. On X, Musk posted a collection of past remarks from Trump warning against growing deficits and congressional actions increasing the debt ceiling, adding, 'where is this guy today?' 'Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill,' Musk added. 'Slim and beautiful is the way.' ___ © 2025 Los Angeles Times. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sunderland Reject Dortmund's Bid for Jobe Bellingham Amid Ongoing Talks
Sunderland Standing Firm as Dortmund Pursue Jobe Bellingham Quiet Confidence Behind Stubborn Negotiations AFC Sunderland's resolve is being tested, and so far, they're not blinking. According to Sky Sports Germany, Borussia Dortmund's pursuit of Jobe Bellingham is active but far from complete. The Bundesliga giants' latest offer, reportedly under €25 million, has been firmly rejected by the newly promoted Premier League side. The report also states that 'Sunderland is proving to be a tenacious negotiator.' Advertisement Negotiations are ongoing, with BVB representatives Sebastian Kehl and Lars Ricken engaged in discussions with Sunderland's Kristjaan Speakman and Kyril Louis-Dreyfus. The German side is expected to return with an improved offer. Despite the standoff, there is a sense of quiet optimism. 'All parties remain optimistic that the deal will close soon,' Sky reports. The idea of a €30 million package, including add-ons, may yet be the key to unlocking the deal. Photo IMAGO Why Dortmund Are Keen This isn't just about sentimentality. While the Bellingham surname carries immense weight in Dortmund, after Jude Bellingham's outstanding spell before joining Real Madrid, this move is centred on Jobe's potential, not his brother's legacy. Advertisement Now 18, the younger Bellingham has carved his own path. In his first full season at Sunderland, he has shown maturity beyond his years and a versatility that appeals to clubs with high ambitions. He can operate as a central midfielder, No.10, or even in wider areas. Dortmund, famed for developing young talent, see him as another long-term project. Reports from Sky Sports confirm that 'Bellingham has agreed a five-year contract with Dortmund.' Timelines and Club World Cup Planning The deal's timing is crucial. Bellingham has been selected for England's U21 European Championship squad and is due to travel to Slovakia. However, 'If there is a breakthrough in the negotiations – this has been agreed – Bellingham would travel to Dortmund and then also to the Club World Cup in the USA.' Advertisement It's a clear sign of intent from Dortmund, not just for the future but also for the present. They want Bellingham involved immediately, potentially using the Club World Cup as a platform for integration. Photo: IMAGO Sunderland's Position of Strength Sunderland's stance is more than just financial prudence, it's reflective of a club with a long-term vision. Having returned to the Premier League, they are no longer content to be a stepping stone. Jobe Bellingham may ultimately leave, but it will be on Sunderland's terms, at the right price, and with the right future guarantees. This negotiation is not only about one player, it is about perception, leverage, and ambition. Our View – EPL Index Analysis For Sunderland, this negotiation feels like a moment of arrival. For too long, the club has seen talent depart on cut-price deals. Now, they're holding firm. While losing a player of Bellingham's promise would sting, the insistence on a deal that reflects his market value signals real intent. There's belief that this club can both develop stars and drive a hard bargain. Advertisement On the other hand, for Borussia Dortmund, the deal makes perfect sense. It mirrors their usual model, spotting emerging talent, offering a step up, and integrating with patience and purpose. Having Jude's legacy in their locker only adds sentimental weight. But this isn't just a name play, Jobe fits Dortmund's blueprint: young, tactically adaptable, and with significant resale potential. If €30 million is indeed the magic number, it represents a calculated gamble for Dortmund and a statement of growth from Sunderland. One way or another, this is a deal that speaks volumes about both clubs.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance says it's a 'huge mistake' for Musk to 'go after' Trump
Vice President JD Vance has shared his thoughts on the public fallout between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Speaking to podcaster Theo Von, Vance said it was a "huge mistake" for Musk to "go after the president." Musk and Trump have been trading jabs this week after the Tesla CEO criticized Trump's spending bill. Now entering the ring: Vice President JD Vance. Appearing on an episode of "This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von," the vice president weighed in on the public feud that erupted this week between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Musk and Trump became embroiled in the spat after the Tesla CEO called Trump's "big, beautiful" spending bill a "disgusting abomination" on Tuesday. "I think it's a huge mistake for him to go after the president like that," Vance told podcast host Theo Von in the interview, which was recorded Thursday and released Saturday. Vance had posted to X about recording the podcast on Thursday, as the pair's row was escalating, saying, "Slow news day, what are we even going to talk about?" "Elon's entitled to his opinion," Vance told Von in the episode. "I'm not saying he has to agree with the bill or agree with everything that I'm saying, I just think it's a huge mistake for the world's wealthiest man, I think one of the most transformational entrepreneurs ever — that's Elon — to be at this war with the world's most powerful man," he continued. Vance, who said Trump had been getting "a little frustrated" with Musk's recent criticism of him, added that he believed a feud between the pair would be "bad for the country" and that he hoped Musk "figures it out" and "comes back into the fold." While Trump appeared to be holding his tongue about Musk's criticisms at first, he hit back Thursday during a White House event to welcome German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. "I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot," Trump said. "He knew every aspect of this bill — better than almost anybody —and he never had a problem until right after he left," he added, referencing Musk's recent announcement that he was stepping back from his role in the president's administration. Musk then unleashed a whirlwind of X posts directed at the president, saying Trump would have lost the election without his help and accusing him of "ingratitude." The fallout grew progressively uglier, with Trump threatening to cut Musk's government contracts. The pair, who became close allies after Musk endorsed Trump's reelection last year, continued to trade barbs until Friday evening, when their tones appeared to soften. The White House rapid response account posted a clip on X of Trump speaking on Air Force One, saying he wished Musk well. "Likewise," Musk replied late Friday night. Read the original article on Business Insider