Queen's University creche fees rise may force some students out, says union
A decision to more than double childcare fees at a Queen's University Belfast's creche could lead to some students dropping out, a student's union president has warned.Queen's students with children will have to pay £66 a day for full-time childcare from September, compared to £28 a day at present.Queen's Students' Union president Kieran Minto said some students had told them the rise was unaffordable.A spokesperson for Queen's said "the difficult decision to increase childcare fees highlights the significant financial pressures facing the higher education sector".
What childcare does the university provide and what does it cost?
The university has had a creche for students and staff with children for more than half a century.It means that students with children can have them cared for while they are at classes and studying.In 2024-25, students had to pay £28 a day for full-time childcare and £31 a day for part-time childcare.But in 2025-26, students will have to pay £66 a day for full-time childcare and £69 a day for part-time childcare.There is an additional £2-a-day fee if a child is under two.Full-time fees for staff are £62 a day and they are going up by £4 from September.As students are not in full-time work, they cannot claim existing childcare subsidies set up by Stormont.
What has been the reaction to the rise in childcare fees?
Mr Minto told BBC News NI the rise would particularly affect PhD students."It's a lot of folks, international PhD students that have decided to pick up with their family and move across the world to take part in cutting edge and really important research," he said."They're coming to us and saying 'I might have to drop out of my PhD, I'm two years in, I can't afford this anymore'."A lot of these students are working with very fine margins, they can't afford a small increase let alone a massive increase."One student who got in touch with BBC News NI said that they were facing an increase of more than £800 a month for childcare from September.
The welfare officer at Queen's Students' Union, Jess Hindley, said she had probably received more queries on this issue that any other during her time in the role."They've just been coming to us and talking about how completely unsustainable this rise is for them," she said."Most of the students who've come to us have been international students who don't have access to any additional supports over here."Their cost of living is astronomical, and there's just nowhere for them to go."
What has Queen's said?
In a statement to BBC News NI, a Queen's spokesperson said they remained the only higher education provider in Northern Ireland to offer on-site childcare specifically for students."The university continues to provide a £300,000 annual subsidy to support this service, helping to keep fees broadly in line with other providers in south Belfast," they continued."To support those most impacted by the fee increase, all returning student users will receive a 25% discount on the new rate."The context for this decision is based on the university facing significant cost pressures, including a £4.6m annual increase in national insurance contributions, reduced public funding and ongoing budget uncertainty."These challenges made it impossible to maintain the service at its previous cost level."
What is the situation with university funding?
Leaders of Northern Ireland's five universities and university colleges had called for tuition fees to rise by more than £1,000 a year.They said there had been a "real-terms loss caused by a legacy of sub-inflationary uplifts" in funding for higher education.But Economy Minister Caoimhe Archibald subsequently decided not to increase university tuition fees above the usual level of inflation.Mr Minto said he recognised Queen's was facing "a very, very difficult financial position"."They are facing an unsustainable financial model that simply doesn't work," he said."We're expecting our universities to provide more and more every day."However, the university also has choices to make on how it spends its budget and how it allocates its budget."Unfortunately in this case, the choice they've made is massively negatively impacting a small but really important core of our students."It's going to have a massive detrimental effect without really saving a lot on the budget."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
29 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
We will do everything we can to save Alexander Dennis jobs, vows Swinney
The company announced on Wednesday it is proposing to consolidate its UK operations at a single site in Scarborough, North Yorkshire. The decision puts 400 jobs at risk at its facility in Falkirk in another blow to the Forth Valley, which has already seen more than 400 jobs go at the Grangemouth refinery this year. Speaking at First Minister's Questions on Thursday, John Swinney said he is 'deeply concerned'. John Swinney said the Scottish Government will support jobs at Alexander Dennis (Andrew Milligan/PA) He told the chamber: 'This issue has been occupying a great deal of the focus and the attention of the Deputy First Minister and I and the UK Government ministers since we became aware of the situation over the last few weeks, and then ultimately to the decision that was announced yesterday.' He said his Government has 'supported' the manufacturer. But Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar accused Holyrood ministers of overlooking Scottish industry in favour of ordering buses from China, while pointing to the order from Alexander Dennis of around 160 vehicles by the publicly-owned network in Greater Manchester. In Scotland, public service buses are procured by private operators, who then run them on routes across the country. Labour leader Anas Sarwar said the Government has not supported Scottish industry (PA) Mr Swinney said state aid regulations – in the form of the UK-wide Subsidy Control Act – prevent the Government from directly procuring from a single supplier like Alexander Dennis. He quoted a joint letter from the UK and Scottish governments, which pledged to 'work closely with Alexander Dennis at this challenging time'. He added: 'That's us indicating that we're keen to do everything we can to find a way through the Subsidy Control Act provisions, so the Government can continue to operate within the law, which we must do, but also, we can support manufacturing in Scotland, which is my priority.' Responding, Mr Sarwar said: 'If John Swinney can't figure out a way to order buses in Scotland, I suggest he picks up the phone to (Greater Manchester Mayor) Andy Burnham and see how he managed to do it. Greater Manchester's Bee Network buses were made at Alexander Dennis (PA) 'Almost five times as many bus orders from Manchester.' Mr Sarwar's claim stems from the second phase of the Scottish Government's green bus initiative ScotZEB, which ordered 44 buses from Alexander Dennis. However, according to a press release from the time, 137 buses were ordered from the firm in the first phase, amounting to a total of 181. In a statement, Mr Burnham – who has visited the Falkirk site – said: 'Our iconic Bee Network buses are a bit of Scotland right here in Greater Manchester. 'We have over 160 Alexander Dennis buses criss-crossing our city-region every day – connecting our communities to opportunity. 'If Greater Manchester can invest in world-class Scottish bus manufacturing, then why can't the SNP Scottish Government?'
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tax hikes ‘almost certainly' to come if economy worsens, IFS says
The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) warned that further negative economic news will 'almost certainly' lead to more tax increases, putting pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves. Council tax is projected to rise at its fastest rate in 20 years, with potential annual increases of up to 5 per cent as local governments struggle to close funding gaps. The IFS suggested more people may be forced to pay higher income tax rates due to 'fiscal drag,' potentially generating an additional £10bn a year by 2029. Government sources did not deny the possibility of extending the freeze on tax thresholds, stating that future tax decisions will be made at the Budget. IFS director Paul Johnson criticised the Treasury for 'making up the numbers' and described Chancellor Reeves' recent speech as 'baffling,' while also expressing concerns about the cost of Labour's childcare promises.
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ben Wallace accuses Labour of ‘conning' public over defence spending boost claim
Former defence secretary Ben Wallace has branded Labour's claims that it has boosted military spending 'a con' after concerns were raised over how the figures are being calculated. The row has exploded following Rachel Reeves' spending review on Wednesday where she boasted that defence spending would be 2.6 per cent of GDP. But this included wrapping in security and intelligence spending for the first time. Earlier this year prime minister Sir Keir Starmer controversially slashed international aid to boost defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027, two years ahead of schedule. At the time he also promised it would rise to 3 per cent by 2034. However, since then the 3 per cent pledge has been qualified to 'if economic circumstances allow', while the new calculation on defence spending has left questions over whether the boost is as big as first claimed. According to the spending review, in 2027/28, Defence is £71bn and the security and intelligence is £5.1bn, making a combined total of 76.1bn, which was cited as '2.6 per cent of GDP.' However, the Tories noted that security and intelligence element equated to 0.186 per cent of that total GDP number as opposed to 0.1 per cent suggesting defence spending would below 2.5 per cent. Added to that there was nothing in the spending review about spending for the Chagos deal could cost as much as £30bn over 99 years, according to some estimates. Sir Ben Wallace, respected former Tory defence secretary who criticised his own government for not investing in the military enough, posted: 'As Rachel Reeves tries to con us all with her Defence GDP definition it is worth reading NATO's guidelines on what can count. 'If you claim other forces/police or intelligence you can only do so if, 'In such cases, expenditure is included only in proportion to the forces that are trained in military tactics, are equipped as a military force, can operate under direct military authority in deployed operations.'' He added: 'I'd like to be in the room when someone tells the workforce of MI6, GCHQ and MI5 they are about to be conscripted and go through military training .' Ms Reeves was challenged on LBC over whether her new calculations were 'trying to pull the wool over people's eyes.' She responded: 'No. Our commitment is to get to 2.5 per cent. We have not included all intelligence spending. We have [included some] under the Nato definition because obviously intelligence is an important part of our defence.' However, it was pointed out that according to its guidelines NATO defines defence spending as 'expenditure as payments made by a national government specifically to meet the needs of its armed forces, those of Allies or of the Alliance.' The explanation was not accepted by political opponents. Tory shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said: 'Labour promised to spend 2.5 per cent of GDP on Defence- but it already looks like they won't even deliver that- and that's before factoring in the potential cost of the Chagos settlement, which could strip hundreds of millions from the Defence budget in this spending review.'
