Removal of keffiyehs ordered as accused Land Forces protesters and supporters enter Melbourne court
Security staff at Melbourne's busiest court have told people they must remove their keffiyehs before entering.
Court Services Victoria said that staff had discretion to order the removal of the garments, which are often worn by people expressing support for Palestine, under a law which allowed them to 'ensure, maintain, or restore the security, good order and management of court premises'.
The keffiyehs were worn by several of the dozens of people accused of committing offences during the protests against the Land Forces weapons expo in September, and their supporters, during hearings at the Melbourne magistrates court on 21 January.
Related: Ultra-processed food? Forever chemicals? Declining birth rates? What's behind rising cancer in the under-50s?
Those charged face a wide range of offences, including assaulting or hindering police.
A Court Services Victoria spokesperson said that three people wearing keffiyehs were directed to remove them, and a person wearing a T-shirt with a political statement was asked to turn it inside out.
'The Keffiyehs scarves were properly receipted and returned to the court users on exit,' the spokesperson said.
'Court Security Officers are authorised to exercise discretion under Court Services Victoria's Conditions of Entry Policy.'
The court spokesperson declined to comment on whether there was a specific directive banning the keffiyeh in Victorian courts, and whether the state's chief magistrate, Justice Lisa Hannan, supported security ordering the removal of the garments.The lawyer Bernadette Zaydan, who was representing several of the accused at the court on 21 January, said that far more than three people were asked to remove their keffiyehs, saying the number was more than a dozen.
She said she witnessed the security staff, employed by G4S, ordering people to remove them, and questioned them about the directive.
Victoria police have charged or fined more than 100 people in relation to the Land Forces protests.
Many of those involved in the protest wore keffiyehs, and specifically opposed the weapons expo going ahead in Melbourne in the context of the ongoing Gaza conflict.
Security officers ordered the removal of the keffiyehs at the public entrance to the court building.
All members of the public must pass through security to access the court complex, including those accused of offences who are not in custody and have hearings before court that day.
The court rooms are only accessible to the public after passing through this entrance.
Court Services Victoria justified the directive under the Court Security Act.
The relevant sections of the act say an authorised officer can give a reasonable direction to 'ensure, maintain, or restore the security, good order and management of court premises' and that they 'may refuse a person entry to the court premises … if the authorized person believes on reasonable grounds that the person is likely to affect adversely the security, good order or management of the court premises'.
It comes after Victoria's parliament ruled that keffiyehs were political in May last year, effectively banning them from the upper and lower houses.
The president of the upper house, Shaun Leane, told the Greens MP Samantha Ratnam at the time that watermelon earrings, another symbol of Palestinian resistance, could not be worn.
He said that unlike pins worn by MPs to mark events such as Anzac Day and the Cancer Council's Daffodil Day, there was no 'consensus' around the Palestinian symbols.
'If it is a cause we can all get behind or we reasonably think everybody can get behind, we should be relaxed about it,' Leane said.
'If it is symbolism – and I am not making a commentary on the symbolism – that you could reasonably expect the whole chamber is not behind, then I think it is a fair ruling to say that that should not be worn.'
He compared the ruling with a ban on wearing 'Yes' pins during the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Caught on camera: Online outrage won't shortcut Hawaii's legal process
HONOLULU (KHON2) — Recent viral videos on social media have sparked quick action by law enforcement, from alleged abuse to bullying. Viral Wahiawa bully video sparks community outrage It takes more than just likes and shares to move a case forward, however. A recent video showed multiple teenagers attacking a woman on the street — it had gone viral within hours. Over 11,000 were watching a livestream at one point as a crowd went to confront those they believed were responsible. 'I was a little bit surprised that it got that heated that quickly. I think it was because of the fact that the woman was severely beaten on camera. That just elicits an extreme response,' said Stolen Stuff Hawaii creator Michael Kitchens. 'Anything involving animals where they're getting abused or even people who are, for example, disabled or just people that are being unfairly treated in a grandiose way.'Other recent viral videos of alleged animal and child abuse also sparked community concern. KHON2 was told that prosecuting these cases is not as simple as uploading clips to social media. 'As a former prosecutor, we have to have the person that took the video. The person has to say that it's a true and accurate copy of the video he or she took, and he didn't. He or she didn't revise it, change it,' said defense attorney Megan Kau. Legal experts pointed out that the pursuit of justice has its own rules for showing video in court, and the fact that it has been seen by thousands online does not mean that it will be played in front of a judge. 'And moreover, people that take videos don't want to be questioned by the police department. They don't want to have their phones recovered, and they don't want to have their their valuables taken from them so they don't give up the video,' Kau said. 'So we have that disconnect, right? See below the statements from the Honolulu Prosecutor's Office and the Honolulu Police Department: How much weight does your office give to viral social media videos when deciding whether to file charges? Whenever a concern is brought to our office, we will work with our law enforcement partners to ensure that a thorough investigation is conducted to verify information whether received from an individual or through social media. Videos, whether from phones, surveillance cameras on buildings, or on HPD BWC are often useful in proving a case beyond reasonable doubt. That is the standard we use in all cases, not the source of the video. Have you seen an increase in community pressure to prosecute cases that gain traction online — and does that affect how or when you proceed? We have not seen an increase in pressure to prosecute cases that gain traction online. In any case, we will file charges, if, after a thorough investigation by law enforcement, there is sufficient evidence to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt at trial. That standard does not change regardless of how the case came to the attention of law enforcement. Do viral videos ever complicate prosecution, such as by influencing witness cooperation/jury pools or the defendant's right to a fair trial? Viral videos, like media coverage, of any case, may have an impact on the ability to pick an unbiased jury. However, we are confident in our justice system and the judges that oversee these cases to ensure that both sides are able to have a fair trial. Honolulu Department of the Prosecuting Attorney Check out more news from around Hawaii How much weight do viral social media videos carry in the initial HPD investigation? Any social media video which captures a possible crime being committed immediately becomes a vital piece of evidence in the investigative process. As investigators, an important aspect of our job is to understand what is happening in our communities, and certain social media videos become 'viral' due to its content and the shared sense of concern, outrage, and yearning for justice by our community. Once a video in question is brought to the attention of the Honolulu Police Department, our initial goal is to ensure the legitimacy of the content while balancing our obligation to help identify all parties involved to ensure the opportunity for the investigative process to occur. Have you seen an increase in community pressure to investigate cases that gain traction online — and does that affect how or when you proceed? Yes, the Honolulu Police Department has seen an increase in community concern regarding viral social media videos, with many of those videos being directed to our social media pages. By immediately starting the investigative process, it helps to ensure community trust that any victims will be identified while the suspects will be held accountable for their actions. HPD's track record in immediately and successfully addressing recent viral social media videos should also help to underscore the importance of our community to allow us to do our jobs and not allow acts of vigilantism by our community to occur. Do viral videos ever complicate investigations, such as by influencing witness cooperation? Most viral videos are posted to expose a crime or to elicit a response from the viewers. The videos are usually short in nature and may not show the precipitating circumstances that led to the criminal activity. It gives the viewer a limited perspective and does not tell the whole story. Viral videos may reduce our investigation time by identifying victims, witnesses or suspects but HPD detectives do not rely solely on the video itself as probable cause for an arrest. Videos in general are a great tool in the investigators arsenal and can provide an unbiased witness account of the events. Honolulu Police Department Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Belleville man faces child porn charges, Illinois attorney general says
A 22-year-old Belleville man faces eight counts of dissemination of child pornography and two counts of non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images of an adult without consent, the Illinois State Attorney General's Office announced Monday. Owen Corder of the 4500 block of South Park Drive was being held on the felony charges in the St. Clair County Jail, according to a news release from Attorney General Kwame Raoul. Investigators from Raoul's office, along with officers from the Belleville Police Department, conducted a search of Corder's residence and he was after 'investigators discovered evidence of child sexual abuse material,' according to the news release. No other information about the allegations was released. St. Clair County court records did not list a defense attorney for Corder. 'Survivors of child exploitation and their families can face life-long trauma, and the predators responsible for these heinous crimes being held accountable can help them begin the healing process,' Raoul said in a statement. 'My office's Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force will continue to partner with local law enforcement agencies to locate and bring to justice individuals who exploit minors.' The dissemination of child pornography charge carries up to a 30-year prison sentence and the non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images charge has a maximum sentence of three years in prison.
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
Who are the people protesting in Los Angeles?
Estrellazul Corral joined protests outside the Los Angeles Metropolitan Detention Center every day this weekend to demand justice for the dozens of migrants detained by armed ICE agents in armored vehicles who targeted jobsites in the city's predominately Latino communities. After hours of peaceful demonstrations, Corral, a social worker focused on the city's unhoused and undocumented population, said the National Guard began to push back. 'They threw tear gas at us, and we were doing what they were telling us to do,' she said. 'Then people just got really upset and angry. And I think that's where you see things starting to escalate.' As the sun set Sunday evening, CNN correspondents documented how the demonstrations descended into violence. Some protesters torched self-driving cars. Some rained rocks down on police sheltering under a highway overpass after marchers shut down traffic. Others spray painted anti-law enforcement slogans on a downtown federal building. At least 21 people were arrested Sunday, the Los Angeles Police Department said. The raids are in keeping with the Trump administration's hardline approach to illegal immigration. But President Trump's decision to federalize and deploy the National Guard against American citizens — the first time a US president has used such power since 1992, when riots erupted after the White officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King were acquitted — sparked a swift backlash that later grew violent. Indeed, the protests appeared divided into separate groups: progressive citizens who felt called to defend the rights of the undocumented, and protesters who appeared determined to drag the city into violent chaos. Defending 'La Raza' Unión del Barrio, an organization whose members are dedicated to defending the rights of 'la raza' — or Mexican and indigenous people — within the United States, praised the efforts to fight back against ICE and other agencies. The Los Angeles community has 'the moral authority and universal right to defend our people from kidnappings and family separation,' said a spokesman for the organization in a statement on social media. 'What has happened these days weren't acts of vandalism or crime, they were acts of resistance against a government that is kidnapping our fathers, our mothers, our wives, our husbands, our children,' the spokesman said. 'The people did it out of a deep love and sense of justice for our families and our people.' But one county official described Sunday as 'probably one of the most volatile nights' in the city. Jim McDonnell, chief of the Los Angeles Police Department, spoke out against the violent attacks against his officers. At the same time, he drew a distinction between those who protested peacefully during the day and those who stoked the violence at night. 'When I look at the people who are out there doing the violence, that's not the people that we see during the day who are legitimately out there exercising their First Amendment rights to be able to express their feelings about the immigration enforcement issue,' he said. A senior law enforcement source told CNN that intelligence analysts have been conducting assessments on the crowds that gathered Sunday night. They found the many of the protesters were motivated by the recent immigration raids and disdain for the federal government's deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles. But some protesters, the intelligence source said, fit law enforcement profiles of so-called 'professional rioters,' who continually seek out confrontation with law enforcement. The toll of violence on vulnerable communities After being informed ICE agents were questioning workers at a Pasadena hotel, Pablo Alvarado, the co-executive director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, began calling for protests to protect vulnerable immigrant communities throughout the city. 'The Pasadena community showed up in large numbers and the message was loud and clear, we don't want to see your armored vehicles, men in masks coming to our communities to pick people up to rip families apart.' But, Alvarado added, he felt the violence that spread throughout the city in response to the raids was tainting their cause. 'Every time that there's violence the most vulnerable communities pay the price. Every time that there are riots, we see the business of low-income communities get burned down,' he said. 'The anger is understandable because you've seen armored vehicles and ICE agents armed to the teeth come into the neighborhoods,' he said. But while he can understand why protesters are angry, Alvarado said there's no excuse for violence. 'We can send the message that we want to send without attacking anybody,' he said. Families caught in the chaos Blocks away from the charred husks of self-driving cars and graffiti-tagged buildings, the families of the people who were detained in the weekend's immigration raids held a news conference Monday morning to call for their loved ones to be released from ICE custody. Clutching signs with photos of their relatives, they each approached the microphone and asked for their loved one's rights and due process to be respected. A young woman named Julian said her entire family was traumatized by watching her father be shackled and led away by ICE agents, but his arrest has been particularly hard on her 4-year-old brother, who is disabled. Although he struggles to communicate, Julian said, her brother hasn't stopped asking for his dad since he was 'kidnapped by ICE.' 'We've told him 'He's working,'' she said. But the truth, she added, has been far more difficult to explain. 'We live in a city that considers itself to be a sanctuary city, but we've all seen that it is not.' Another young woman named Montserrat told reporters her father, George Arrazola, was among the dozens detained in the raid on Los Angeles' Fashion District. 'I was present,' she said. 'I saw with my own eyes the pain of the families crying, screaming, not knowing what to do, just like me,' she said. She called for Los Angeles' status as a 'sanctuary city' to be respected. 'No matter where a person comes from, or how they arrived in this country, their lives (are) valuable,' she said. 'The treatment they received is not right — we demand justice now.' That's why Corral said she kept coming back — despite being repeatedly tear gassed and kettled by law enforcement — because she wanted the people detained to know someone was there, standing up for them. But after days of inhaling pepper spray, Corral said as she faced down the line of armed US National Guardsmen Sunday, she began to wonder what was happening in her country. 'People were screaming, 'Those are weapons of war. Those are weapons to murder people, to kill people in a war zone — that is not for a situation like this,' she said. 'We stood our ground and were like, 'We're not going to let them intimidate us.'' CNN's Sharif Paget, Alaa Elassar and Jack Hannah contributed to this report.
