&w=3840&q=100)
Now, Trump threatens Columbia University's accreditation: How will this impact students?
The Trump administration is escalating its attack on Columbia University, now targeting its accreditation. This could affect the Ivy League school's ability to qualify for federal loans, making it unaffordable to many potential candidates across the country read more
A New York City police officer keeps watch on the campus of Columbia University in New York. File image/AP
Donald Trump's war against US universities is ongoing and escalating. On the day, the US president signed a proclamation to suspend international visas for new students at Harvard University, the Trump administration also escalated its battle with Columbia University, notifying the New York education institution that the school doesn't meet accreditation standards because of its failure to protect Jewish students.
This is a huge move against Columbia University, a decision that could significantly impact students' access to federal loans and aid. This threat also comes after the administration cancelled $400 million in federal grants and contracts to Columbia over its handling of antisemitism claims.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
As Trump keeps up his attack on elite universities, we take a closer look at just what it means if Columbia loses accreditation.
What's the latest in Trump vs Columbia?
On Wednesday, Trump took his fight against Columbia one step ahead with Education Secretary Linda McMahon sending a letter to the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, the non-governmental organisation that accredits Columbia, stating that New York City college 'acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students' in a manner that violated federal anti-discrimination laws.
The letter said that because Columbia was in violation of federal anti-discrimination laws, the Education Department believes it fails to meet the standards for accreditation.
'University accreditors have an obligation to ensure member institutions abide by their standards,' Linda McMahon said in a news release. She said the government looked forward to being 'fully informed of actions taken to ensure Columbia's compliance with accreditation standards, including compliance with federal civil rights laws.'
Students at Columbia's main campus, in Manhattan, New York. The Trump administration has escalated its fight with Columbia University, declaring the school doesn't meet accreditation standards. File image/Reuters
In the statement, the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said that after an investigation, which began in February, the two departments found that 'Columbia failed to meaningfully protect Jewish students against severe and pervasive harassment on Columbia's campus and consequently denied these students' equal access to educational opportunities to which they are entitled under the law'.
'This is not only immoral, but also unlawful,' McMahon further added.
What would it mean if Columbia loses accreditation?
But what exactly does all of this mean? Essentially, Trump is threatening to strip Columbia's accreditation. For those who don't know, accreditation, which is a mundane aspect of higher education, gives a college the ability to qualify for federal student loans and Pell Grants — a source of financial aid.
This means that if the Trump administration through the Middle States Commission on Higher Education does nullify Columbia's accreditation it would be stripping the university's ability to receive federal grants, making it inaccessible to most across the country.
How? With a price tag of more than $71,000 per year for tuition and fees (not including room and board), losing access to federal student loans and Pell Grants would make Columbia unaffordable to most across the US. In fact, the university's website says it awards $225 million each year in scholarships and grants and that 24 per cent of first-year students receive Pell Grants.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Stripping Columbia of its accreditation could take away the school's ability to qualify for federal student loans and Pell Grants. File image/AP
However, some experts note that Trump's latest move poses no immediate risk as revoking accreditation could take years. 'This is another semi-random attack against a celebrity institution,' Ted Mitchell, the president of the American Council on Education, an association that includes many colleges and universities in its membership, told the New York Times. 'They are trying once again to skirt due process in order to score political points.'
Antoinette Flores, the director of higher education accountability and quality at New America, a Washington think tank, also told the New York Times that the letter 'is definitely an escalation. It is trying to weaponise the accreditor to get the institution to bend to its will.'
How has Columbia University reacted?
Columbia University reacting to the Education Department's letter said it is 'aware of the concerns raised' by the agency to the commission, adding, 'We have addressed those concerns directly with Middle States.'
'Columbia is deeply committed to combatting antisemitism on our campus. We take this issue seriously and are continuing to work with the federal government to address it,' reads the statement on the university's website.
What actions have Trump taken against Columbia so far?
The attack on Columbia's accreditation is the latest in Trump's war against the elite educational institutions of America.
Back in March, the Trump administration pulled $400 million in federal grants from Columbia stating that it had failed to squelch antisemitism on campus. It demanded the Ivy League school make numerous changes to disciplinary and other policies to even begin talks of resuming federal funding.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Within two weeks, Columbia met the administration's demands.
The Ivy League university has been on Trump's radar for quite some time — it was the epicentre for anti-Israel student protest movements, with some of the first student encampments cropping up on its lawn in April 2024.
Pro-Palestinian demonstration encampment is seen at the Columbia University. File image/AP
Later, it continued to create buzz with the arrests of its high-profile student activists such as Mahmoud Khalil in March and Mohsen Mahdawi in April. Both have been released, but face deportation proceedings.
Trump's administration accuses the college of permitting demonstrators to create unsafe conditions for Jewish students on campus, something the students and college authorities have denied repeatedly.
With inputs from agencies

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
How much has Tesla lost in 2025 amid Elon Musk's political ambitions and public spat with Donald Trump
The public spat between US President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, which started with criticism of government policy, significantly impacted the world's top EV maker. Amid the ongoing feud, Tesla lost $150 billion in market capitalisation (market cap), and its shares dropped 14% in a day. The market capitalisation of Tesla stood at $917 billion on June 6, 2025, marking a 29.3% decline this year, the largest drop among major companies across the globe, reported Reuters. The EV maker has lost nearly $380 million in 2025 so far, the biggest loss among top companies amid Elon Musk's political ambitions and low demand for Tesla EVs. Till Thursday, the electric vehicle (EV) maker has seen its market capitalisation shrink by approximately $150 billion since the feud began. Tesla share price crashed more than 14% after Musk called out Trump's 'big beautiful bill.' The new bill proposed the elimination of federal EV tax credits, an incentive for Tesla sales. Removing these credits may pose a $1.2 billion challenge for Tesla, which currently faces challenges such as decreasing demand, declining profits, according to JPMorgan analyst Ryan Brinkman, as Mint reported on June 4, 2025. In March, Tesla witnessed a major decline due to concerns about demand for the company's electric vehicles. During this period, Tesla lost $130 billion in market value, Mint reported on March 11, 2025. Reportedly, Tesla chief's prominent involvement in politics has significantly impacted the EV giant's business. Investors previously voiced worries that Musk's role in heading the Department of Government Efficiency to reduce government expenditures is taking his attention away from overseeing his businesses, such as Tesla, SpaceX, X, and xAI. However, Musk officially left DOGE on May 29. The Tesla CEO overlooked its customer base while catering to Trump's administration, US marketing professor Scott Galloway said in a podcast. 'He's alienated the wrong people,' he said. 'Three-quarters of Republicans would never consider buying an EV. So he's cozied up to the people who aren't interested in EVs," Galloway added. Notably, Trump repeatedly championed for 'drill baby drill', advocating to raise domestic oil and gas production, which raised concerns over demand for EV vehicles. Galloway also highlighted how Tesla's sales fell nearly 59% in France, 81% in Sweden, 74% in the Netherlands, 66% in Denmark, 50% in Switzerland and 33% in Portugal. Musk's recent involvement in the political affairs of various European countries, a key EV market, through his social media platform X, has affected Tesla sales region, CNN reported. Meanwhile, Chinese EV maker BYD surpassed Tesla sales in Europe for the first time in April, according to a report from Jato Dynamics. Tesla's profits dropped 71% by the end of April, Musk confirmed in an earnings call that he plans to reduce his involvement with DOGE from May onwards.


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk and Donald Trump's feud was predicted by Barron Trump? Viral video clip that claims it all
Elon Musk and Donald Trump's feud was predicted by Barron Trump? Viral video clip that claims it all In a whirlwind saga that has captured the internet's attention, the long-simmering relationship between former US President Donald Trump and tech mogul Elon Musk has finally imploded—and the timing couldn't have been more theatrical. While political commentators, Musk fans, and MAGA loyalists pick sides, an old resurfaced clip from Trump's 2017 inauguration has become the unlikely centerpiece of the drama. The viral footage shows a teenage Barron Trump standing beside a visibly animated Elon Musk, and internet users are now convinced: Barron knew all along that this bromance was doomed. As the online world spirals into memes, speculation, and mockery, the underlying story has serious political and economic dimensions. From Trump's new tax proposal that threatens Tesla's bottom line to Musk's public fallout with the former president, the Musk-Trump divorce goes far beyond a simple social media spat. Here's a detailed breakdown of what led to the breakup, how Barron's now-iconic reaction became a meme-worthy prediction, and what this all means for the future of the tech-political alliance. Elon Musk and Donald Trump's breakup shocked the internet, but the warning signs were clear Elon Musk and Donald Trump were once considered unlikely allies. During Trump's presidency, Musk served on White House advisory councils and even appeared at several official events. While their ideologies often clashed—Musk being a vocal supporter of sustainable energy and Trump known for climate skepticism—the mutual benefits of their relationship were clear. Trump got to flaunt a high-profile tech billionaire's approval, while Musk hoped to influence infrastructure and space policy. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Despite moments of public camaraderie, friction was always bubbling beneath the surface. Musk resigned from Trump's advisory council in 2017 over the US withdrawal from the Paris climate accord. Still, their interactions remained largely civil—until now. Elon Musk and Donald Trump's feud explodes over brutal tax bill The conflict erupted in earnest when Trump, eyeing a 2024 comeback and eager to boost traditional US industries, introduced a tax overhaul that would cut federal subsidies benefiting electric vehicle makers like Tesla. Musk didn't take it lightly. Calling the legislation a "disgusting abomination" in a series of X (formerly Twitter) posts, Musk accused Trump of sabotaging America's clean energy future. 'This bill is a disaster for innovation. Subsidies cut, investment threatened. The real loser is America,' Musk posted on X. Trump, never one to back down, fired back at a campaign rally in Ohio: 'Elon Musk, great guy when he needed the government's help. Now he cries when the help stops. Sad!' And with that, the bromance publicly combusted. Barron Trump's old clip goes viral In the midst of this drama, a 2017 clip of Barron Trump and Elon Musk at the US Capitol surfaced and quickly went viral. While Musk can be seen excitedly clapping and reacting with animated enthusiasm—especially after Trump vowed to plant the American flag on Mars—Barron stood beside him, calm, unimpressed, and possibly even irritated. The moment passed unnoticed at the time. But in hindsight, internet detectives are convinced that Barron's demeanor foreshadowed the eventual falling out. Barron Trump and Elon Musk Social media reacts: 'Barron Knew!' The reactions on X were instant and hilarious. Users began to speculate whether Barron was always aware of the inevitable rift between his father and Musk. 'Barron knew this was coming. He saw through Musk from day one,' one user wrote. Another joked, 'It's giving 'Attack on Titan' energy. Barron saw it all from the beginning like Eren Yeager.' Someone posted alongside a clip, 'Elon is the over-excited class clown. Barron is the quiet kid who's already judging everyone's future.' Some users went further, suggesting the contrast between Musk's chaotic energy and Barron's composed demeanor was symbolic of the changing tides in Republican politics—young conservatives showing less enthusiasm for tech billionaires. Political implications of the Musk-Trump split Trump's proposed tax cuts are part of a broader economic agenda that appears to favor fossil fuels and heavy industry—policies directly at odds with Musk's clean energy empire. With tax breaks for EVs on the chopping block, Tesla could see a sharp decline in demand in the US market. Adding fuel to the fire, right-wing voices aligned with Trump have begun to question Musk's immigration status. Musk, originally from South Africa, has US citizenship but critics have now raised alarms over his past visas and green card process, accusing him of benefiting from 'elite favoritism.' 'We're looking into all foreign influences. No one gets a pass. Not even Elon,' one Trump ally said on Fox News. This prompted more outrage from Musk's side, with allies claiming that Trump is targeting him because he no longer 'bends the knee.' What did Barron Trump know It's hard to tell whether Barron Trump was merely tired or genuinely unimpressed with Musk. But that hasn't stopped netizens from turning him into a prophetic icon. 'Barron looked like he was already writing the breakup tweet in his head,' one X user quipped. Others interpreted his serious expression as a sign of maturity and a deeper understanding of the political theater unfolding around him. Also read | Elon Musk is an illegal alien...': Donald Trump is urged by former White House official to deport Musk immediately AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump says China's Xi Jinping agreed to let rare earth minerals flow to US
US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to let rare earth minerals and magnets flow to the United States, a move that could lower tensions between the world's biggest economies. Asked by a reporter aboard Air Force One whether Xi had agreed to do so, Trump replied: "Yes, he did." The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump's comment came one day after a rare call with Xi aimed at resolving trade tensions that have been brewing over the topic for weeks. At that time, Trump said there had been "a very positive conclusion" to the talks, adding that "there should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products." In another sign of easing tensions over the issue, China has granted temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers of the top three US automakers, two sources familiar with the matter said. The US president's top aides are set to meet their Chinese counterparts in London on Monday for further talks. "We're very far advanced on the China deal," Trump told reporters on Friday. The countries struck an agreement on May 12 in Geneva, Switzerland, to roll back for 90 days most of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's January inauguration. Financial markets that had worried about trade disruptions rallied on the news. But China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets has continued to disrupt supplies needed by automakers, computer chip manufacturers and military contractors around the world. Trump had accused China of violating the Geneva agreement and ordered curbs on chip-design software and other shipments to China. Beijing rejected the claim and threatened counter measures. Rare earths and other critical minerals are a source of leverage for China as Trump could come under domestic political pressure if economic growth sags because companies cannot make mineral-powered products. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has repeatedly threatened an array of punitive measures on trading partners, only to revoke some of them at the last minute. The on-again, off-again approach has baffled world leaders and spooked business executives.