Weinstein case judge declares mistrial on remaining rape charge amid jury issues
The judge in Harvey Weinstein's sex assaults trial declared a mistrial on the remaining rape charge after the jury foreperson said he would not continue deliberating.
Deliberations ended on Thursday, a day after the jury delivered a partial verdict in Weinstein's sex crimes retrial.
Advertisement
The jury foreperson said he would not continue deliberating after claiming he was bullied by another juror (Elizabeth Williams via AP)
The jury got stuck on a third charge – a rape accusation dating to 2013.
The foreperson complained on Wednesday that he felt bullied by another juror and said on Thursday he would not go back into the jury room.
The panel convicted the former studio boss of one charge but acquitted him of another. Both of those charges concerned accusations of forcing oral sex on women in 2006. Those verdicts still stand.
The jury of seven women and five men unanimously reached those decisions last Friday, the foreperson later told the judge.
Advertisement
The verdict was delivered on Wednesday only because Judge Curtis Farber asked whether there was agreement on any of the charges.
The third charge was a rape accusation involving a woman who also said she had a consensual relationship with the Oscar-winning producer.
Under New York law, the third-degree rape charge carries a lesser penalty than the other two counts.
Weinstein denies all the charges.
Advertisement
In an unusual exchange with the judge, Harvey Weinstein told him the judge was 'endangering' him, saying 'I can't be judged by a situation that's going on like this' (Elizabeth Williams via AP)
In an unusual exchange with the judge during some legal arguments before the partial verdict was disclosed on Wednesday, Weinstein insisted it was unfair to continue the trial after two jurors came forward with concerns about the proceedings.
'I can't be judged by a situation that's going on like this,' said Weinstein, 73, claiming the judge was 'endangering' him.
Jury-room strains started leaking into public view on Friday when a juror asked to be excused because he felt another was being treated unfairly.
Then on Monday, the foreperson complained that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges.
Advertisement
The man raised concerns again on Wednesday.
In a closed-door discussion with prosecutors, defence lawyers and the judge, the foreperson said another juror was yelling at him for sticking to his opinion and at one point vowed, 'You going to see me outside.'
'I feel afraid inside there,' the foreperson told the judge and lawyers, according to a transcript.
Weinstein's initial conviction five years ago seemed to cement the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men in a pivotal moment for the #MeToo movement against sexual misconduct.
Advertisement
Harvey Weinstein was convicted of one charge, was acquitted of another and a mistrial ruled on the third (Jefferson Siegel /The New York Times via AP, Pool)
But that conviction was overturned last year and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan courthouse.
Weinstein's accusers said he exploited his Tinseltown influence to dangle career help, get them alone and then trap and force them into sexual encounters.
His defence portrayed his accusers as Hollywood wannabes and hangers-on who willingly hooked up with him to court opportunity, then later said they were victimised to collect settlement funds and #MeToo approbation.
Miriam Haley, the producer and production assistant whom Weinstein was convicted – twice, now – of sexually assaulting, said outside court on Wednesday that the new verdict 'gives me hope'.
Accuser Kaja Sokola also called it 'a big win for everyone,' even though Weinstein was acquitted of forcibly performing oral sex on her when she was a 19-year-old fashion model.
Her allegation was added to the case after the retrial was ordered.
Weinstein also was convicted of raping another woman in California. He is appealing that conviction.
The Associated Press generally does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted, unless they agree to be identified. Ms Haley and Ms Sokola did so.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
US appeals court won't reconsider Trump's $5 million loss to E. Jean Carroll
NEW YORK, June 13 (Reuters) - Donald Trump failed to persuade a federal appeals court to reconsider the $5 million verdict won by E. Jean Carroll after a jury found that the U.S. president sexually abused and defamed the former magazine columnist. A divided 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Friday left intact its Dec. 30 decision upholding the jury award. Carroll, now 81, accused Trump of attacking her around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan, and defaming her in an October 2022 Truth Social post by denying her claim as a hoax. Jurors decided in May 2023 that Trump had sexually assaulted Carroll, and defamed her by lying. They did not find that Trump raped Carroll, as she had claimed. In seeking reconsideration, Trump maintained that the trial judge erred in letting jurors review the 2005 "Access Hollywood" video of him bragging about his sexual prowess, and a "pile-on" of inflammatory evidence that he mistreated two other women. One, businesswoman Jessica Leeds, said Trump groped her on a plane in the late 1970s. The other, former People magazine writer Natasha Stoynoff, said Trump forcibly kissed her at his Mar-a-Lago estate in 2005. Trump has denied their claims. Trump, who turns 79 on Saturday, is separately appealing an $83.3 million jury verdict in January 2024 for defaming Carroll and damaging her reputation in June 2019, when he first denied her claim about the Bergdorf encounter. The president is arguing in that appeal that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision last July providing him substantial criminal immunity shields him from liability in Carroll's civil case. In his 2019 and 2022 denials of Carroll's accusations, Trump said she was "not my type" and had made up the rape claim to promote her memoir.
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Roseanne Barr reveals ABC's humiliating final insult after ending her career
's new documentary Roseanne Is America debuted on Tuesday, where she revealed how ABC asked her back on The Conners after she was killed off. ABC revived the 72-year-old comedienne's iconic 1980s/1990s sitcom Roseanne back in 2018, bringing back the original cast of characters in the fictional Lanford, IL. The original show ran nine seasons from 1988 to 1997, and is widely considered one of the greatest sitcoms of all time. ABC brought the show back for a 10th season in 2018, and while it was renewed for an 11th, the network quickly reversed their decision after Barr tweeted that former Barack Obama administration official Valerie Jarrett was an 'ape.' After ABC called the tweet, 'abhorrent, repugnant, and inconsistent with our values,' they ultimately cancelled Roseanne and brought forth a new show, The Conners, which revealed in the series premiere that Roseanne's character had died from a drug overdose. Now Barr is revealing in her Roseanne Is America documentary - available on DVD and digital formats - that ABC actually wanted to bring her back as a 'ghost' guest star at some point during The Conners' run. 'They called me and asked me if I would like to come back as a guest star. You're coming back as a ghost,' Barr revealed. The comedienne added, 'You're asking me to come back to the show that you f***ing stole from me and killed my a**, and now you want me to show up because you got s**t f***ing ratings and play a ghost?' She added in the film that she turned down the request by telling the network, 'I'm gonna be bowling that f***ing week.' Barr also commented on how her character was killed off in the show mirrors the real-life death of Glenn Quinn, who played Becky's (Alicia Goranson) husband Mark Healy on the original show, and died from an accidental overdose in 2002. 'Within three weeks, they revived the show as The Conners, and of course they killed off my character Roseanne in an opioid overdose,' Barr said in the documentary. 'Which was staggering because Glenn Quinn, who played Becky's husband, actually died of an opioid overdose,' she added. The show would go on to reveal that her overdose came as she was struggling with addiction that was exacerbated by knee pain and insufficient medical coverage. The Conners ran for seven seasons on ABC, coming to a close in late April with the finale, which surprised many fans since it didn't include any footage of Roseanne at all, despite multiple clips from the original show with other characters. Roseanne Is America, from director Joel Gilbert (The Trayvon Hoax: Unmasking the Witness Fraud that Divided America, above left) is available to purchase on DVD or video on demand formats at . Executive producer Dave Caplan explained to Deadline, 'It was contractual,' regarding Roseanne's absence in the finale. Another executive producer, Bruce Helford, added, 'She was very gracious in allowing us to continue the show because she had a say in that.' He added of her exit from the show, 'When she realized it would be putting 300 people out of work when the initial reboot was canceled, she gracefully allowed us to continue without her.' 'It really was about these people. This show was really about the lives of these other people in the family, the Conners, and we wanted to focus on them,' he added. Roseanne Is America, from director Joel Gilbert (The Trayvon Hoax: Unmasking the Witness Fraud that Divided America) is available to purchase on DVD or video on demand formats at
Time Out
36 minutes ago
- Time Out
North by Northwest
Obviously Hitchcock's North by Northwest is a ludicrous film to adapt for the stage, especially for a modestly budgeted touring show with no set changes and a cast of seven. As much as anything else, Alfred Hitchcock's absurdist conspiracy thriller is best remembered for two of the most audacious setpieces in cinema history: an attack by a machine gun-toting crop duster plane on an Illinois cornfield, and a final showdown on top of Mount Rushmore. But whimsical auteur Emma Rice has long abandoned any fear of adapting impossible source material. She doesn't attempt to faithfully recreate a given film or book so much as drag it into her own private dimension, where it's forced to play by her rules. North by Northwes t is an interesting choice nonetheless, because it's so hard to classify. Despite its huge impact on the genre, it's not really an action film. And it's not really a comedy. But there's a definite twinkle in its eyes as it follows Roger Thornhill (Cary Grant in the film, Ewan Wardrop here), a mediocre middle-aged adman who gets dragged into an elaborate conspiracy after being mistaken for George Caplan, a spy who does not in fact exist. Arguably Rice disrupts a delicate equilibrium by making it overtly comic, with dance sequences, miming to '50s pop hits, and a spectacularly knowing, fourth wall-breaking performance from Katy Owen as shadowy spymaster The Professor, who serves as the show's narrator and tour guide. It's jarring at first, but Rice pulls it off because she does it on her own terms: she doesn't really bother with the action stuff that much, instead revelling in the story, which features bland nobody Roger getting sucked into a mountingly ridiculous conspiracy, the absurdities of which are enhanced by its untethering from those big pulse-pounding setpieces Not that Rice's production lacks thrills: Rob Howell's flexible set – basically made up of four '50s New York-style revolving doors – is very effective on the more intimate sections, particularly Roger's early abduction and his tense train journey to Chicago. And the cropduster scene is so obviously beyond the technical scope of the production that it's simply fun that Rice has a go, in adorably lo-fi fashion. The whole story is here, but the emphasis has been changed. And it's tremendous fun, a gleefully Ricean homage to Hitchcock, spy thrillers and generally cool things about '50s America. But then it hits a wall at what should be the most thrilling point. The final confrontation at Mount Rushmore just doesn't work. A pile of suitcases stands in for the monument and it sort of scans in a lo-fi theatre style, but the frantic action is hard to follow in such a confined playing area. Plus the tone becomes abruptly more earnest, which feels almost like a cop out. The trouble is North by Northwest does pretty much depend on Hitchcock's exact climax, and that simply can't be delivered here. I wouldn't say Rice has bitten off more than she can chew: but I would say that a lack of punch to the grand finale is a trade off for the larks we've had up to that point.
