Speed bumps removed in Cocoa Beach after city leaders say they never wanted them
The Brief
Speedbumps were installed for only a short period of time in Cocoa Beach. They're being removed this week.
City leaders say they never wanted the speed bumps in the first place.
Taxpayers are wondering why projects have to be done, then redone, in the community.
COCOA BEACH, Fla. - Road crews in Brevard County spent the week removing recently installed speed bumps along State Road A1A, in Cocoa Beach just weeks after their controversial addition sparked backlash from both residents and city officials.
What we know
Road crews were out along State Road A1A this week re-paving parts of the road that had speed bumps put in recently. Cocoa Beach Mayor Keith Capizzi says he was clear with the agency. He never wanted the bumps installed and was surprised when multiple were placed in town.
The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) claims they were in communication with local cities for years planning safety improvements. The bumps were removed after enough pushback from residents and city leaders.
This isn't the first issue like this on the Space Coast. In 2023, officials in Indialantic also had issues with a safety improvement speed bump installed on 5th Ave. That also had to be removed and repaved.
Residents think the agencies and cities need to communicate better to save taxpayers from paying for projects twice. The entire safety improvements in Cocoa Beach were estimated to be $3.9 million in total.
What we don't know
FDOT says they aren't sure how much it will cost to remove the speed bumps.
What they're saying
Mayor Keith Capizzi said he was surprised to see multiple speed bumps — officially referred to as raised crosswalks — installed throughout the city, despite making it clear he opposed them.
"It was surprising because I thought we agreed we weren't going to do that, so it was surprising," said Mayor Capizzi. "I just would like more collaboration."
"I see the point of truing to slow people down, but they're kind of more of a hassle than anything," said resident Jason Anderson.
"Coordination with the City of Cocoa Beach has occurred throughout every stage of this project to incorporate their feedback into the final design," FDOT said, citing multiple meetings, including a City Commission session on Feb. 1 where alternative design options — including raised crosswalks — were presented and discussed.
Read Full FDOT Statement
The agency released a lengthy statement Wednesday detailing its efforts to include Cocoa Beach officials and the public in the design process:
"For any project, FDOT works closely with local municipalities and community stakeholders from the earliest planning stages through project completion."The pedestrian safety improvement project along S.R. A1A in Cocoa Beach is no different. Coordination with the City of Cocoa Beach has occurred throughout every stage of this project to incorporate their feedback into the final design.
Throughout the development and design of the project, FDOT held stakeholder meetings with the city to understand their goals for the project.
A public meeting was held on March 1, 2022, and meeting notifications were sent in advance to local elected officials, city staff, and property owners along the project limits.
Members of the FDOT design project team attended a City Commission meeting on February 1, 2024, to present the proposed improvement options and receive feedback. One of the options proposed were 12 new crosswalks that were not raised. The City Commission then voted unanimously to approve their preferred alternative for the project and provided input on the crosswalks, design features, and signage, including two raised crosswalks at both ends of the project limits.
After further follow-up with city staff after the meeting, FDOT confirmed these changes with a letter to the City and moved forward with construction in line with what was agreed upon by the City Commission and coordinated with staff. See the attached email for reference.
"The 'speed bumps' you refer to are raised crosswalks, and were among the features discussed, revised, and finalized through this collaborative process. The total estimated construction cost for the safety improvements along S.R. A1A in Cocoa Beach is $3.9 million. The specific cost to remove the raised crosswalks is not yet determined.
"FDOT values strong relationships and communication with our local municipal partners, whether a project is underway or not. Local input helps shape our projects and is always welcome. The Department looks forward to the continued partnership with Cocoa Beach and to delivering improvements that benefit all road users."
STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 35 ORLANDO:
Download the FOX Local app for breaking news alerts, the latest news headlines
Download the FOX 35 Storm Team Weather app for weather alerts & radar
Sign up for FOX 35's daily newsletter for the latest morning headlines
FOX Local:Stream FOX 35 newscasts, FOX 35 News+, Central Florida Eats on your smart TV
The Source
FOX 35's Reporter Esther Bower interviewed the mayor and residents on May 21, 2025. She also sent an email and spoke on the phone with reps from FDOT before she was sent a statement from the agency on May 21, 2025. She spoke with some workers in downtown Cocoa Beach who were inspecting the speed bumps.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fed's Waller Outlines Path to Rate Cuts Later This Year
(Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said he continues to see a path to interest-rate cuts later this year amid his expectations that tariffs will boost unemployment and temporarily increase inflation. Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry Where the Wild Children's Museums Are The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move Now With Colorful Blocks, Tirana's Pyramid Represents a Changing Albania NYC Congestion Toll Brings In $216 Million in First Four Months Waller said tariffs will raise inflation in the 'coming months,' but he supports looking through any near-term rise in price growth when setting policy as long as inflation expectations remain anchored. 'Assuming that the effective tariff rate settles close to my lower tariff scenario, that underlying inflation continues to make progress to our 2% goal, and that the labor market remains solid, I would be supporting 'good news' rate cuts later this year,' Waller said in remarks prepared for a Bank of Korea conference in Seoul on Monday. Waller referenced a speech he gave in mid-April, in which he outlined two scenarios for how trade policy may unfold. His 'large-tariff' scenario assumed an average trade-weighted tariff on goods of 25% that remained in place for 'some time.' The 'smaller-tariff' scenario assumed a 10% average tariff, and that higher country and sector-specific duties would be negotiated lower over time. In both scenarios, Waller expects the impact of tariffs on inflation would be temporary. He also anticipates the levies will cause an increase in the unemployment rate that will 'probably linger.' That said, job cuts would likely be 'modest,' he said, under the smaller-tariff option. 'Reported progress on trade negotiations since that speech leaves my base case somewhere in between these two scenarios,' Waller said. He now estimates a 15% trade-weighted tariff on goods imports. During Waller's dialogue with Bank of Korea Governor Rhee Chang-yong, he attributed recent increases in long-term treasury yields to rising concerns over the US fiscal deficit. He said markets had expected some progress toward fiscal consolidation, but estimates now suggest the federal deficit will remain near $2 trillion — about 6% of gross domestic product — for the foreseeable future. 'If there's going to be a lot more debt issuance than the markets thought, they'll buy it — but at a much lower price, unfortunately,' he told Rhee. 'It's not a question of whether it will sell, but the price they're willing to pay.' He added that recent trade and geopolitical developments, including tariff announcements and signals from the White House, have fueled risk aversion among foreign investors. Some institutional buyers are reassessing their exposure to US assets, which could weigh on demand and push yields higher. Inflation Expectations Waller largely dismissed a 2025 surge in the University of Michigan's gauge of consumers' inflation expectations over the next five to 10 years. He said he prefers to look at market-based measures of inflation compensation and professional forecasters' expectations, which have not seen a similar increase. Waller said the 'strong' labor market and recent progress toward the Fed's 2% inflation goal offer policymakers time to see how trade negotiations unfold, echoing many of his colleagues. Fed officials have largely indicated rates are in a good place while they await further clarity on President Donald Trump's policies — particularly tariffs — and their impact on the economy before adjusting borrowing costs. Waller underscored that considerable uncertainty remains around the ultimate level of duties imposed on other countries and sectors. Trump announced Friday that he would be increasing tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50%, from 25%. 'As of today, I see downside risks to economic activity and employment and upside risks to inflation in the second half of 2025, but how these risks evolve is strongly tied to how trade policy evolves,' Waller said. Stablecoin Implications Waller also weighed in on stablecoins, describing them as a potential tool to introduce competition into payments system. While noting he couldn't speak for the US government's stance on legislation, Waller said he views stablecoins as 'just a payment instrument,' one that could be issued by non-bank entities in the same way deposits are used for transactions. 'If stablecoins can help drive down costs, especially for small and medium-sized firms doing cross-border transfers, I'm all for allowing competition rather than having regulators set prices,' Waller said. (Updates with Waller's comments after speech.) YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Harvard Chinese grad speech draws praise and ire
A Chinese Harvard graduate's speech calling for unity in a divided world, delivered days after the US vowed to "aggressively" revoke Chinese students' visas, has sparked mixed reactions in the US and her home country. "We don't rise by proving each other wrong. We rise by refusing to let one another go," Jiang Yurong said on Thursday, the same day a US federal judge blocked the Trump administration's ban on foreign students at Harvard. Her speech went viral on the Chinese internet, with some saying it moved them to tears. However, others said her elite background is not representative of Chinese students. In the US, some have flagged her alleged links with the Chinese Communist Party. In their efforts to restrict Harvard from enrolling foreign students, US authorities had accused the institution of "co-ordinating with the Chinese Communist Party". Ms Jiang, who studied international development, was the first Chinese woman to speak at a Harvard graduation ceremony. In her address, Ms Jiang emphasised the value of Harvard's international classrooms, noting how that taught her and her classmates to "dance through each other's traditions" and "carry the weight of each other's worlds". "If we still believe in a shared future, let us not forget: those we label as enemies - they, too, are human. In seeing their humanity, we find our own," said Ms Jiang, who spent her final two years of school at Cardiff Sixth Form College in Wales before going to Duke University in the US for her undergraduate degree. A conservative X account, with the handle @amuse, criticised Harvard for choosing a graduation speaker who is "a representative of a CCP-funded and monitored non-government organisation", alleging that her father works for a non-government organisation that "serves as a quasi-diplomatic agent for the [party]". The account, which has 639,000 followers, has previously posted pro-Donald Trump content, such as the US leader fighting Darth Vader and sexualised imagery of former Vice-President Kamala Harris. Some Chinese social media users, on the other hand, allege that the organisation Ms Jiang's father works for is backed by prominent American companies and foundations. The BBC has not independently verified these allegations. "This is why she could get a scholarship to go to the UK for high school, and later also to Harvard," wrote a user on China's X-like platform, Weibo. Others called for her to stay on in the US, with comments that reeked with sarcasm. "Such talent should be left to the United States," one wrote. "I hope she will continue to glow abroad and stay away from us!" read another. But Ms Jiang's vision of a "shared humanity" also struck a chord. "That she is able to stand on an international stage and speak the heart of Chinese students has moved me to tears," wrote a user on Red Note, another Chinese social media platform. Another user defended Jiang by hitting back at those who criticised her: "You may not have changed them, but they've heard you... As more and more people speak out like you, you will eventually move and change others." There are around 6,800 international students at Harvard, who make up more than 27% of its enrolments in the past academic year. About a third of these foreign students are from China, and more than 700 are Indian. Students or spies? The young Chinese caught in Trump's crosshairs 'We did not sign up for this': Harvard's foreign students are stuck and scared
Forbes
28 minutes ago
- Forbes
China Accuses US Of Violating Trade Pact—Rejects Trump's Allegation
Chinese authorities on Monday accused the U.S. of violating a recent trade pact that both agreed to in Geneva last month, as they dismissed President Donald Trump's allegation about Beijing breaching the agreement, a move that could signal a further escalation in trade tensions between the two countries, which could potentially jeopardize last month's tariff truce. China's Commerce Ministry accused the U.S. of violating a trade deal agreed in Geneva by imposing ... More additional chip restrictions and canceling Chinese student visas. In a press briefing, a Chinese Commerce Ministry spokesperson dismissed Trump's comments accusing China of violating the agreement, saying Beijing has worked 'to strictly implement and actively safeguard the Geneva deal.' The spokesperson noted that China had acted in accordance with the deal to cancel or suspend 'relevant tariffs and non-tariff measures' it had taken as retaliation against the U.S. government's reciprocal tariffs. The spokesperson then accused the U.S. of introducing ' a number of discriminatory restrictive measures against China' after the talks, citing expanded export controls on AI chips and other chip-building technology. The official also criticized the U.S. government's crackdown on Chinese student visas, saying these actions violated the consensus reached between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in a phone call on January 17. The spokesperson then warned that if the U.S. continues to take actions that damage China, Beijing will 'take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' In a post on his Truth Social platform on Friday, Trump said: 'China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' without specifying how it had done so. The president then signalled that the U.S. may retaliate against this alleged non-compliance, saying: 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' In his post, the president claimed his tariffs had put China in 'grave economic danger' and he made a 'FAST DEAL' in Geneva, 'in order to save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation.'
