Tory Senedd leader Darrren Millar defended after Trump trip criticism
It is "unfair" to criticise the Tory Senedd leader for missing a vote on the Welsh government's draft budget after going to the United States for a prayer meeting, one his Cardiff Bay colleagues has said. Darren Millar and Montgomeryshire MS Russell George are attending the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, where President Donald Trump is expected to give a speech.The pair missed the first opportunity to vote on Labour ministers' spending plans for next year.Millar's Senedd Conservative colleague Natasha Asghar said he is a "very religious person" and it is "unfair" to use the US trip "as a political football".
Labour won the vote on Tuesday, assisted by the abstention of Welsh Liberal Democrat Jane Dodds, as well as the absence of the two senior Conservatives.The governing party has half the seats in the Senedd and cannot win if the opposition is united in voting against it.Before the news emerged that Millar and George would not be not present the vote had looked difficult for the government, as it was not clear what Dodds would do until late on Tuesday.The vote was largely symbolic ahead of a final budget vote in March, but losing on Tuesday would have embarrassed the government.No member of the Conservative group in the Senedd would give an interview to BBC Wales on the pair's absence.However, speaking on ITV's Sharp End on Tuesday night, shadow education minister Natasha Asghar defended Mr Millar's trip to the US."He is a very religious person. He always has been, and from my understanding, the commitment he's gone to has been linked his faith," she said."Now I can't condemn somebody for being religious, I never, ever will. I would never expect anyone to, but I do know that it's a genuine reason why he's there."The Welsh Conservative South Wales East MS added: "The way it has been played as a political football today I think is very unfair, particularly when someone has gone for religious reasons. "It should not be something that's used as a political football as it has been today, which is a real shame."
The National Prayer Meeting on 6 February is an important date in the US political calendar and the first since Trump's resignation.Both Tories are trustees of a Christian charity, the Evans Roberts Institute. Last year, the institute funded Rhys ab Owen to go to the same American event, while he was under investigation for his conduct.Newport Conservative councillor David Fouweather told BBC Radio Wales Breakfast on Wednesday he was unhappy with the US trip taken by Millar and George."President Trump isn't here in Wales with this disastrous Labour budget.""Darren needs to be here. When you take on the role and responsibility of leader, then you have get your priorities right. "His priorities are here in Wales, leading the Conservatives, hoping to be the next first minister. "If you are leader of the opposition, you need to be there making your points".He added: "It wasn't long ago, last July, that he was aiming to be a member of [the UK] parliament, so there wasn't a commitment then to the Senedd"."He should have been there."However, the Conservative Senedd leader was backed by former north Wales Tory MP Robin Millar."I think Darren made the right decision actually. Power and proximity to power is everything and right now Donald Trump is making the news around the world and it's absolutely right," he told the programme.
Analysis
By Gareth Lewis, BBC Wales political editorAfter a day of taking stock - and criticism - some Conservatives are now coming out in support of Darren Millar.Two defences of the Trump trip are emerging.One, that Millar is a devout Christian and his religious beliefs should not be made political.Two, that the budget vote was non-binding so not consequential.The second argument is not consistent with the Conservative stance on the non-binding vote of confidence they called last year in former first minister Vaughan Gething. He lost it and the Tories called for him to go.Not all Tories have leapt to Millar's defence with worries at grassroots level, no doubt with an eye on next year's Senedd election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
15 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Rayner faces Labour backbench call to ‘smash' existing housebuilding model
Labour's Chris Hinchliff has proposed a suite of changes to the Government's flagship Planning and Infrastructure Bill, part of his party's drive to build 1.5 million homes in England by 2029. Mr Hinchliff has proposed arming town halls with the power to block developers' housebuilding plans, if they have failed to finish their previous projects. He has also suggested housebuilding objectors should be able to appeal against green-lit large developments, if they are not on sites which a council has set aside for building, and put forward a new duty for authorities to protect chalk streams from 'pollution, abstraction, encroachment and other forms of environmental damage'. Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner is fronting the Government's plans for 1.5 million new homes by 2029 (Jordan Pettitt/PA) Mr Hinchliff has told the PA news agency he does not 'want to rebel' but said he would be prepared to trigger a vote over his proposals. He added his ambition was for 'a progressive alternative to our planning system and the developer-led profit-motivated model that we have at the moment'. The North East Hertfordshire MP said: 'Frankly, to deliver the genuinely affordable housing that we need for communities like those I represent, we just have to smash that model. 'So, what I'm setting out is a set of proposals that would focus on delivering the genuinely affordable homes that we need, empowering local communities and councils to have a driving say over what happens in the local area, and also securing genuine protection for the environment going forwards.' Mr Hinchliff warned that the current system results in 'speculative' applications on land which falls outside of councils' local housebuilding strategies, 'putting significant pressure on inadequate local infrastructure'. In his constituency, which lies between London and Cambridge, 'the properties that are being built are not there to meet local need', Mr Hinchliff said, but were instead 'there to be sold for the maximum profit the developer can make'. Asked whether his proposals chimed with the first of Labour's five 'missions' at last year's general election – 'growth' – he replied: 'If we want to have the key workers that our communities need – the nurses, the social care workers, the bus drivers, the posties – they need to have genuinely affordable homes. 'You can't have that thriving economy without the workforce there, but at the moment, the housing that we are delivering is not likely to be affordable for those sorts of roles. 'It's effectively turning the towns into commuter dormitories rather than having thriving local economies, so for me, yes, it is about supporting the local economy.' Mr Hinchliff warned that the 'bottleneck' which slows housebuilding 'is not process, it's profit'. The developer-led housing model is broken. It has failed to deliver affordable homes. Torching environmental safeguards won't fix it—the bottleneck isn't just process, it's profit. We need a progressive alternative: mass council house building in sustainable communities. — Chris Hinchliff MP (@CHinchliffMP) June 6, 2025 Ms Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary, is fronting the Government's plans for 1.5 million new homes by 2029. Among the proposed reforms is a power for ministers to decide which schemes should come before councillors, and which should be delegated to local authority staff, so that committees can 'focus their resources on complex or contentious development where local democratic oversight is required'. Natural England will also be able to draft 'environmental delivery plans (EDPs)' and acquire land compulsorily to bolster conservation efforts. Mr Hinchliff has suggested these EDPs must come with a timeline for their implementation, and that developers should improve the conservation status of any environmental features before causing 'damage' – a proposal which has support from at least 43 cross-party MP backers. MPs will spend two days debating the Bill on Monday and Tuesday. Chris Curtis, the Labour MP for Milton Keynes North, warned that some of Mr Hinchliff's proposals 'if enacted, would deepen our housing crisis and push more families into poverty'. He said: 'I won't stand by and watch more children in the country end up struggling in temporary accommodation to appease pressure groups. No Labour MP should. 'It's morally reprehensible to play games with this issue. 'These amendments should be withdrawn.'
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Family SUVs face road tax hikes under new proposals pushed by Labour politicians
Family SUVs could be targeted with hikes in road tax and parking permits under proposals being pushed for by Labour politicians. The call for higher levies on large SUVs, often chosen by families for their space, came from Labour and Green party members of the London Assembly. The motion was passed this week amid concerns about 'car-spreading' – where more road space is taken up by larger vehicles – and calls on London mayor Sir Sadiq Khan to write to the Treasury and ask for vehicle excise duty (VED, or road tax) to incorporate a 'progressive' element that includes the vehicle's weight. If introduced, this would mean SUV-driving families in the UK face being hit with much larger road tax bills. Many SUV drivers already pay £600 for the first five years on new models under the premium car tax fee, which levies more against vehicles worth over £40,000. The standard road tax rate is £195 per year. The motion also asked London councils to look at hiking the cost of parking permits in the capital for SUVs, so as 'to account for pressure they put on road space and local parking spaces'. But critics accused Labour of declaring war on drivers, with AA president Edmund King, saying: 'It is up to Londoners to choose the type of vehicle that best fulfils their needs.'
Western Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Rayner faces Labour backbench call to ‘smash' existing housebuilding model
Labour's Chris Hinchliff has proposed a suite of changes to the Government's flagship Planning and Infrastructure Bill, part of his party's drive to build 1.5 million homes in England by 2029. Mr Hinchliff has proposed arming town halls with the power to block developers' housebuilding plans, if they have failed to finish their previous projects. He has also suggested housebuilding objectors should be able to appeal against green-lit large developments, if they are not on sites which a council has set aside for building, and put forward a new duty for authorities to protect chalk streams from 'pollution, abstraction, encroachment and other forms of environmental damage'. Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner is fronting the Government's plans for 1.5 million new homes by 2029 (Jordan Pettitt/PA) Mr Hinchliff has told the PA news agency he does not 'want to rebel' but said he would be prepared to trigger a vote over his proposals. He added his ambition was for 'a progressive alternative to our planning system and the developer-led profit-motivated model that we have at the moment'. The North East Hertfordshire MP said: 'Frankly, to deliver the genuinely affordable housing that we need for communities like those I represent, we just have to smash that model. 'So, what I'm setting out is a set of proposals that would focus on delivering the genuinely affordable homes that we need, empowering local communities and councils to have a driving say over what happens in the local area, and also securing genuine protection for the environment going forwards.' Mr Hinchliff warned that the current system results in 'speculative' applications on land which falls outside of councils' local housebuilding strategies, 'putting significant pressure on inadequate local infrastructure'. You can't have that thriving economy without the workforce there, but at the moment, the housing that we are delivering is not likely to be affordable for those sorts of roles. It's effectively turning the towns into commuter dormitories Labour MP Chris Hinchliff In his constituency, which lies between London and Cambridge, 'the properties that are being built are not there to meet local need', Mr Hinchliff said, but were instead 'there to be sold for the maximum profit the developer can make'. Asked whether his proposals chimed with the first of Labour's five 'missions' at last year's general election – 'growth' – he replied: 'If we want to have the key workers that our communities need – the nurses, the social care workers, the bus drivers, the posties – they need to have genuinely affordable homes. 'You can't have that thriving economy without the workforce there, but at the moment, the housing that we are delivering is not likely to be affordable for those sorts of roles. 'It's effectively turning the towns into commuter dormitories rather than having thriving local economies, so for me, yes, it is about supporting the local economy.' Mr Hinchliff warned that the 'bottleneck' which slows housebuilding 'is not process, it's profit'. The developer-led housing model is broken. It has failed to deliver affordable homes. Torching environmental safeguards won't fix it—the bottleneck isn't just process, it's profit. We need a progressive alternative: mass council house building in sustainable communities. — Chris Hinchliff MP (@CHinchliffMP) June 6, 2025 Ms Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary, is fronting the Government's plans for 1.5 million new homes by 2029. Among the proposed reforms is a power for ministers to decide which schemes should come before councillors, and which should be delegated to local authority staff, so that committees can 'focus their resources on complex or contentious development where local democratic oversight is required'. Natural England will also be able to draft 'environmental delivery plans (EDPs)' and acquire land compulsorily to bolster conservation efforts. Mr Hinchliff has suggested these EDPs must come with a timeline for their implementation, and that developers should improve the conservation status of any environmental features before causing 'damage' – a proposal which has support from at least 43 cross-party MP backers. MPs will spend two days debating the Bill on Monday and Tuesday. I won't stand by and watch more children in the country end up struggling in temporary accommodation to appease pressure groups ... It's morally reprehensible to play games with this issue. These amendments should be withdrawn Labour MP Chris Curtis Chris Curtis, the Labour MP for Milton Keynes North, warned that some of Mr Hinchliff's proposals 'if enacted, would deepen our housing crisis and push more families into poverty'. He said: 'I won't stand by and watch more children in the country end up struggling in temporary accommodation to appease pressure groups. No Labour MP should. 'It's morally reprehensible to play games with this issue. 'These amendments should be withdrawn.'
