ICE Raids Restaurant Owned by CBS News Anchor's Husband
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A popular restaurant owned by CBS News anchor Norah O'Donnell's husband was one of several businesses targeted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Tuesday.
Agents targeted Chef Geoff's, founded by Geoff Tracy, in Northwest Washington D.C., along with multiple other businesses, seeking out I-9 employment authorization documents.
Newsweek reached out to ICE via email and Chef Geoff's via contact form for comment Wednesday morning.
Why It Matters
The District of Columbia is considered a sanctuary city, meaning the heart of a federal government now focused on tougher immigration policy sits within an area where local law enforcement generally does not work with ICE agents.
Geoff Tracy and Norah O'Donnell attend the 2024 Kennedy Center Honors at The Kennedy Center on December 08, 2024 in Washington, DC. Right: A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer.
Geoff Tracy and Norah O'Donnell attend the 2024 Kennedy Center Honors at The Kennedy Center on December 08, 2024 in Washington, DC. Right: A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer.
Taylor Hill/FilmMagic/AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File
What To Know
Reports of planned ICE enforcement action caused concern among Washington, D.C.'s immigrant community Monday, with agents arriving at various businesses across the city Tuesday morning, including Chef Geoff's.
Fox 5 reported that U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials were at the restaurant on New Mexico Avenue at around 10:30 a.m., asking to see I-9 employee forms.
While other restaurants were targeted in the sweep, the links to O'Donnell and CBS News were not lost on social media, with some Trump supporters saying this is what they had voted for. Critics of the president suggested the raid was politically motivated given its connection to CBS News, with whom the president is currently embroiled in a lawsuit, and because no one was taken into custody. The White House has not commented.
I-9 forms are usually issued by employers during the hiring process, to ensure that an individual is legally allowed to work in the U.S. Some managers had to explain that records were not kept on site. Other businesses then reportedly moved to keep their doors closed for the rest of the day.
President Trump has been vocal in his displeasure at how D.C. is currently run, issuing an executive order aimed at the "beautification" of the capital. Immigration advocacy group CASA told ABC News it believed ICE was using this order to back its operation Tuesday.
When the president returned to the White House, the restaurant industry was among those fearful of tougher immigration policies, as a large share of its workers are migrants, and an unknown number do not have legal status.
Some business leaders have said they support stronger border security and vetting measures, while also calling on the administration to create easier legal pathways for workers.
What People Are Saying
The Restaurant Association of Metropolitan Washington, in a statement to Newsweek: "Immigrants make up a significant portion of our workforce at all levels. From dishwashers to executive chefs to restaurant owners, immigrants are irreplaceable contributors to our most celebrated restaurants and beloved neighborhood establishments. The immigrant workforce has been essential to sustaining and growing our local restaurant industry and has been a major contributor to our local economy.
"The metropolitan Washington area's restaurant industry employs over 60,000 people and generates billions in annual revenue. At a time when our economy is already fragile, losing even one staff member at a single establishment has a profound impact on the operations of a restaurant and its ability to serve patrons. Disrupting restaurant staffing across the industry can create a damaging ripple effect felt immediately throughout the entire local economy."
D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, speaking to reporters Tuesday morning: "I have heard those reports, I've been getting them all morning. I am disturbed by them. It appears that ICE is at restaurants or even in neighborhoods, and it doesn't look like they're targeting criminals. It is disrupting. This is not an [Metropolitan Police Department] action, there is no MPD activity involved."
Amy Fischer, of Migrant Solidarity Mutual Aid, in a statement to ABC: "If ICE wants to snatch up every single immigrant working in food service and delivery, then the entire industry will collapse."
President Trump's executive order on D.C.: "It is the policy of the United States to make the District of Columbia safe, beautiful, and prosperous by preventing crime, punishing criminals, preserving order, protecting our revered American monuments, and promoting beautification and the preservation of our history and heritage."
What's Next
ICE is yet to announce the results of its operation, with further operations across the U.S. expected to continue as the Trump administration looks to deliver on its promise of mass deportations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
13 minutes ago
- Politico
George Floyd unrest informs Trump's response to Los Angeles protests
President Donald Trump's response to the Los Angeles protests isn't just an opportunity to battle with a Democratic governor over his signature issue. The president sees it as a chance to redo his first-term response to a wave of civil unrest. As protests broke out after the killing of George Floyd in 2020, Trump's instincts were to deploy thousands of active-duty troops across U.S. cities. But some administration officials resisted the idea and reportedly urged the president against invoking the Insurrection Act to do so. Five years later, Trump sees something familiar as protests rage across Los Angeles in response to the administration's immigration raids. He moved quickly to deploy 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to support law enforcement, a decision he credited on Tuesday with preventing a 'great City' from 'burning to the ground.' And he repeatedly signaled his willingness to invoke the Insurrection Act if protests continue to escalate. There's a chief motivating factor driving Trump's aggressive response: The president is eager to avoid a repeat of the summer of protest that followed a Minneapolis police officer's killing of Floyd. The civil unrest added another layer to the turmoil facing Trump, as the country reeled from the Covid pandemic and voters prepared to return to the ballot box. And this time, he has stacked his Cabinet with loyalists and is less restrained by officials such as those in his first administration who feared deploying active-duty military troops would further inflame tensions and be viewed as a step toward martial law. 'The president is trusting his gut here,' said a person close to the White House, granted anonymity to discuss the president's response, reflecting back to former Chair of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley and former Defense Secretary Mark Esper breaking with Trump's desire to send troops. 'He thinks the Milleys and the Espers of the world, five years ago, they gave him bad advice on that stuff.' Administration officials and allies say the president's hardline approach also sends a warning to other city and state leaders as anti-ICE protests spread beyond Los Angeles. 'In 2020, I was a governor of a neighboring state to Tim Walz and watched him let his city burn,' Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in the Oval Office on Tuesday. 'The president and I have talked about this in the past: He was not going to let that happen to another city and to another community, where a bad governor made a bad decision.' It's yet another example of the president acting on his belief that he has a governing mandate from his 2024 comeback, which aides and allies attribute in large part to immigration and, specifically, the president's vow to deport undocumented immigrants. 'Is the left going to be able to take this over and turn rules-based immigration into yet another fight about how America is racist?' said Matt Schlapp, a Trump confidant and chair of the American Conservative Union. 'The No. 1 reason Donald Trump got reelected was the border. He's implementing exactly what he said he would do, and out of nowhere, there's violence in the streets, there's fire bombs, there's attacks on cops.' A White House official, granted anonymity to discuss the administration's thinking, said immigration enforcement has continued across the country despite the protests: 'Individuals in other cities should realize that rioting will not prevent immigration enforcement operations in their cities as well.' Trump has repeatedly referred to the protesters as 'insurrectionists' and 'violent insurrectionist mobs,' and his rhetoric intensified on Tuesday as he said the protests amount to an 'invasion' that threatens U.S. 'sovereignty' and that he will now allow 'an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy.' He condemned what he called 'lawlessness' and the burning of the American flag, suggesting it should be punished with a year in prison — echoing his rhetoric from June 2020. But he also said the Los Angeles protests are not yet an insurrection — and that he will only invoke the Insurrection Act, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, if it escalates to that point. The president on Sunday directed Noem, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi to take 'all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles' and 'put an end to these Migrant riots.' 'Mark Esper fought like the dickens to avoid the Insurrection Act. He wasn't the only one. So did Attorney General [Bill] Barr, and so forth,' said Ken Cuccinelli, who served as Trump's deputy of Homeland Security during the first term. 'Whereas, Pam Bondi and Pete Hegseth are more along the lines of just giving advice, and 'if it's the route you want to go, Mr. President, we'll salute and we'll move right down that path.' And that speaks to a unity in government that didn't exist in the first term.' The Trump administration's response has alarmed California Democrats, who warn that what's happening in their state paves the way for the president to deploy the military nationwide to enact his immigration agenda. The president has already militarized the border to an unprecedented degree, with military, immigration and legal experts questioning the legality of the approach and warning of potential violations to the Posse Comitatus Act, a federal law that generally prohibits active-duty troops from being used in domestic law enforcement. Trump's decision to deploy troops has also set off a legal firestorm: California sued the administration for deploying the National Guard without consultation, arguing that using the military to quell the immigration protests is illegal and unconstitutional. Gov. Gavin Newsom filed another suit on Tuesday, asking a federal judge for a restraining order to block Hegseth from ordering troops to support immigration raids in the city 'immediately.' 'There is no invasion or rebellion in Los Angeles; there is civil unrest that is no different from episodes that regularly occur in communities throughout the country, and that is capable of being contained by state and local authorities working together,' California Attorney General Rob Bonta and other lawyers wrote in the new motion. Rallies protesting the administration's ICE raids and immigration agenda spread across U.S. cities this week. And so-called 'No Kings' rallies, coinciding with the president's military parade in Washington on Saturday, are planned in more than 1,800 cities across the country, including the nation's capital. Trump warned on Tuesday that any protests during this weekend's parade will be met with 'very heavy force.' 'If there's any protester who wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' the president said in the Oval Office. 'I haven't even heard about a protest, but [there are] people that hate our country.' Dasha Burns contributed to this report.
Miami Herald
14 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Cops beat, tase man having diabetic emergency when he can't respond, NC suit says
Three officers are accused of beating, tasing and arresting a man who couldn't speak or respond to their commands because he was in diabetic shock, according to a North Carolina lawsuit. Now, the man is suing the officers with the Spruce Pine Police Department, the police chief and the town itself, saying the officers violated his civil rights by using excessive force and failed to provide aid during a medical emergency, according to the federal lawsuit filed June 5. The man says he was a law enforcement officer himself and worked as a K-9 officer for the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction. McClatchy News reached out to the defendants named in the filing for comment June 10 but did not immediately receive a response. Arrest during a medical emergency The man, who had been living with diabetes since he was 9 years old, was driving home from seeing his now-wife on Feb. 16, 2024, when he noticed his blood sugar levels dropping, according to the lawsuit. He stopped at a Walmart to get some food, then he wandered around the store before returning to the parking lot, where he sat in his car for over 30 minutes in diabetic shock, the lawsuit says. A Walmart employee came over to the car and asked if he had a pickup order, but he struggled to communicate, so the worker left and alerted a supervisor, who came out and noted the driver was 'twitching' and 'unable to speak,' according to the filing. They asked him to move his car out of the pickup area, but he couldn't, the lawsuit says. The employees called the police for a welfare check, and two Spruce Pine officers arrived and tried to speak with him as well, according to the filing. He couldn't communicate or show his identification as requested, then a third officer arrived and told him to get out of the car because he was under arrest for trespassing, according to the filing. The lawsuit says the officers should have recognized the man was having a medical emergency and provided assistance, but instead, the filing accuses them of opening the car door and pulling him out. In a 'three-on-one assault,' the officers 'threw him to the ground' and told him to put his hands behind his back, which he couldn't do, according to the filing. One of the officers is accused of hitting him at least 11 times while the man was on the ground, then a second officer used his Taser twice to 'drive stun' him, which is a technique sometimes used to make an arrestee comply, according to the lawsuit. The officers handcuffed him and searched his vehicle, but found no evidence of drugs, alcohol or weapons, the filing says. One officer eventually gave him food and a soda, helping him recover from the episode, then he was released from custody and went to a hospital, according to the lawsuit. 'It is well-settled law, policy, custom and tradition that police officers do not brutally beat and humiliate someone in medical distress,' the filing says. Legal fallout The man said the incident left him with lasting trauma and nightmares, as well as damage to his reputation, until the charges were dropped eight months later. According to the lawsuit, the man's employer, the Department of Adult Correction, conducted an internal affairs investigation as a result of his arrest. He said the incident also landed him in a law enforcement database that prevented him from being hired for a position at another sheriff's office. He is suing the officers on accusations of excessive force, failure to render medical aid, gross negligence, false arrest, malicious prosecution, battery and libel. The lawsuit also accuses the police chief and the town of Spruce Pine of failing to have adequate policy and training on use of force, Taser use and rendering medical aid. The District Attorney for the 35th Prosecutorial District declined to press charges against the officers following an investigation, WLOS reported. 'While, with the benefit of hindsight, the failure to involve medical personnel to evaluate (the man's) condition on scene given his apparent symptoms is cause for concern, that omission does not rise to the level of a violation of the criminal law,' District Attorney Seth Banks said, according to WKYK. The man is seeking punitive damages. Spruce Pine is a 50-mile drive northeast from Asheville.
UPI
14 minutes ago
- UPI
Defense Secretary Hegseth defends LA deployments at Capitol Hill hearing
1 of 5 | Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth testifies at a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday. Hegseth argued "ICE has the right to safely conduct operations," as he defended the recent deployment of troops to Los Angeles. Photo by Aaron Schwartz/UPI | License Photo June 10 (UPI) -- Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sparred with Democrats on Capitol Hill on Tuesday over the decision to send 5,000 Marines and National Guard troops into Los Angeles as some protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids turned violent. Hegseth, a former National Guardsman, testified before the House Appropriations subcommittee, where he defended the decision to deploy troops and the role of ICE. "We ought to be able to enforce immigration law in this country," Hegseth testified. "I think we're entering another phase, especially under President Trump with his focus on the homeland, where the National Guard and Reserves become a critical component of how we secure that homeland." "In Los Angeles, we believed ICE had the right to safely conduct operations," Hegseth added. "We deployed National Guard and the Marines to protect them." Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., asked Hegseth why he was sending "war fighters to cities to interact with civilians?" "ICE agents need to be able to do their job," Hegseth responded. "They are being attacked for doing their job, which is deporting illegal criminals. The governor of California has failed to protect his people, along with the mayor of Los Angeles. And so President Trump has said he will protect our agents and our Guard and Marines." Aguilar fired back against Hegseth's answer and said, "The law also says Mr. Secretary that the orders for these purposes shall be issued through governors of the states." Democratic Rep. Betty McCollum of Minnesota also sparred with Hegseth about the cost of deploying the National Guard and Marines, and whether their absence would impact trainings in other parts of the country. The two talked over each other repeatedly as Hegseth referenced the George Floyd murder protests and accused Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz of "abandoning a police precinct" in 2020. "We're both from Minnesota. I was in the Twin Cities during the riots that followed the murder of George Floyd. Tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets for days," said McCollum. "At no point did we need Marines to be deployed. This is a deeply unfair position to put our Marines in. Their service should be honored. It should not be exploited." "You are right," Hegseth testified. "We are both originally from Minnesota. Which is why I recall 2020 quite well, when Gov. Walz abandoned a police precinct and allowed it to be burned to the ground -- and also allowed five days of chaos to occur inside the streets of Minneapolis." "We believe that ICE has the right to safely conduct operations in any state and any jurisdiction in the country," Hegseth continued. "Especially after 21 million illegals have crossed our border under the previous administration. ICE should be able to do their job." "Chairman, I have limited time," McCollum declared. "I asked a budget question." After repeated questioning about the budget by several committee members, Hegseth finally gave an answer. "We have a 13% increase in our defense budget and we will have the capability to cover contingencies, which is something the National Guard and the Marines plan for. So we have the funding to cover contingencies, especially ones as important as maintaining law and order in a major American city," Hegseth testified. During the hearing, Hegseth was also questioned about spending cuts to foreign aid programs, including USAID, and staffing cuts at the Defense Department, to which he argued the administration is reducing any program considered "wasteful and duplicitous."
