Obulapuram Mining Case: Gali Janardhana Reddy, 3 others convicted
Hyderabad: A special CBI court here on Tuesday convicted former Karnataka minister and MLA Gali Janardhan Reddy and three others in the Obulapuram Mining Company (OMC) illegal mining case. The court sentenced them to seven years' imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs 10,000 each.
BRS leader and Telangana former minister P Sabita Indra Reddy, who served as undivided Andhra Pradesh's Mines Minister between 2004 and 2009, and retired IAS officer B Krupanandam, were given a clean chit in the case.
Soon after the judgment, the CBI took Reddy and others into custody. The CBI court delivered the judgement nearly 14 years after the CBI had filed a charge sheet against Reddy and others accusing them of tampering with mining lease boundary markings and carrying out mining illegally in the Bellary Reserve Forest area on the Karnataka-Andhra Pradesh border.
Janardhan Reddy was accused number two. The court imposed a Rs 1 lakh fine on the company.
The court convicted Janardhan Reddy's brother-in-law and Managing Director of OMC Srinivas Reddy (A1) and VD Rajagopal (A3), the then Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Mehafuz Ali Khan (A7), Reddy's personal assistant. The prosecution accused that the illegal mining between 2007 and 2009 caused Rs 884 crore loss to the exchequer.
The CBI had on December 3, 2011, filed the first chargesheet and subsequently three supplementary chargesheets in the case against Reddy, who is also director of the mining company, Srinivas Reddy, Rajagopal, late R Linga Reddy and the OMC (A4).
Senior IAS officer Y Srilakshmi was discharged from the case by the Telangana High Court in November 2022. CBI Public Prosecutor Inderjeet Santoshi and Assistant Public Prosecutor Vishnu Majji argued the case on behalf of the investigating agency.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Free water may soon be only for ‘poor' city areas
New Delhi: Delhi govt is reviewing AAP govt's flagship free water scheme, which provides 20,000 litres of water each month to each household, highly placed govt sources said. The subsidy may soon be available only in low-income family areas, they said. The move is being considered for streamlining resource allocation and reducing the financial burden on Delhi Jal Board . If this comes through, residents of relatively affluent areas will have to pay for water usage based on actual billing. AAP govt had announced the free water scheme in Delhi in Jan 2014 for all households with functional water meters. Consumers who used more than 20,000 litres a month were billed according to the regular water tariff. A senior official said govt wanted to give subsidy benefits only to the needy and deny it to those who could easily afford it, with the aim of reducing DJB's losses. The board's losses had increased from Rs 344 crore in 2019-'20 to Rs 1,196.2 crore in 2021-'22, while its debt was more than Rs 73,000 crore. The losses have mounted since then. The sources said that while a final decision was yet to be taken, the exercise to determine low-income areas would rely on MCD's colony classifications for paying property tax. Delhi's residential areas are included in categories 'A' to 'H'. 'A' represents affluent neighbourhoods; 'H' denotes low-income areas. A senior official said that the scheme could be devised in such a way that upscale colonies might not receive subsidies at all while the less privileged ones would qualify for the benefit. The water utility might include additional criteria, such as property dimensions, in its assessment. However, for this to happen, DJB needs to fix its billing system. "The company that looks after the billing system has said it doesn't want to work with govt anymore. So, we are in the process of engaging a new company after which a final decision will be taken," said a source. In 2019, AAP govt had told the Delhi assembly that around 20,000 litres of free water was provided to each household each month by using nearly Rs 400 crore, benefiting 5.3 lakh consumers. This was in response to a monitoring committee telling National Green Tribunal that the scheme was being misused by several housing societies. "We have seen people installing multiple water meters in a house going by the number of floors so that they can use free water," said an official. "Some even wash their cars using potable water, which is a waste of limited resources." As of now, if more than 20,000 litres and up to 30,000 litres is consumed, Rs 220 is levied as service charge and Rs 26 charged per kilolitre. Those consuming more than 30,000 litres have to pay Rs 293 as service charge and Rs 44 per kilolitre. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
Deccan Herald
35 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Centre eases rules for buying scientific equipment, consumables by R&D institutes
The financial limits for procuring goods using the limited tender enquiry (LTE) and advertised tender enquiry have been increased to Rs 1 crore from the existing Rs 50 lakh.
News18
35 minutes ago
- News18
Siddaramaiah Govt Gave Conditional Nod To RCB's Vidhana Soudha Event, Anticipated Huge Crowd
Last Updated: The victory celebrations for RCB, which lifted the IPL trophy after 18 years, turned tragic on Wednesday as 11 people were killed in a stampede outside Chinnaswamy Stadium The Karnataka government had granted written permission to the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) for an event at Vidhana Soudha to celebrate the victory of Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB) in IPL, a communication accessed by CNN-News18 has revealed. The letter, dated June 4, was a swift response to KSCA's request on June 3, but came with a comprehensive list of stringent conditions, anticipating a large gathering. The victory celebrations for RCB, which lifted the IPL trophy after 18 years, turned tragic on Wednesday as 11 people were killed in a stampede outside Chinnaswamy Stadium near the Vidhan Soudha. Foremost among the government's concerns was the potential for damage to the iconic Vidhana Soudha premises. 'As a large crowd is expected, precautions must be taken to ensure no damage is caused to the grand steps, statues, roads, or gardens," the letter stated, making it clear that KSCA would be liable for full repair costs in case of any mishap. Other key conditions included obtaining prior permissions from the Bengaluru City Police Commissioner, BBMP, and other authorities, ensuring no obstruction to traffic or office work, and maintaining strict cleanliness. Plastic items were strictly prohibited. Financial stipulations were also laid out, requiring a Rs 10,000 advance security deposit for refreshments and a non-refundable Rs 10,000 cleaning fee. Crucially, a substantial security deposit of Rs 15 lakh was mandated for tents and other arrangements. The government also insisted on mandatory certifications for any structural or electrical installations on the grand steps, emphasising the KSCA's sole responsibility for any untoward incidents. Further safety measures included the deployment of firefighters, fire tenders, and health department medical staff. Drone usage was strictly banned as the area is a no-drone zone. The letter also stipulated that furniture must be removed within three hours of the event's conclusion to avoid forfeiture of the security deposit, and that KSCA was responsible for identifying and managing invitees. The letter comes amid a blame-game between the government and the organisers over the event that killed 11 and led to over 45 being injured. CNN-News18 had earlier reported that Bengaluru Police were not in favour of the felicitation ceremony at the Vidhana Soudha. The chaos erupted with RCB announcing the victory parade in a social media post on Wednesday morning. What ensued was utter chaos—uncertainty over the parade's status, conflicting information about ticket requirements, poor communication, multiple rescheduling, and finally the tragedy. The chief minister had then blamed the Karnataka Cricket Association, which had organised the event, saying: 'We did not organise the event, the cricket association did. Our duty was to provide security. The crowd turnout should have been equal to the number of passes given. What can we do if more people come? Let's see what the investigation finds, whether (lapses by) association or police," he said. First Published: June 07, 2025, 13:32 IST
