Labour MP Leaves Former Tory Minister Speechless By Pointing Out Obvious Fact About Trans Ruling
A Labour MP left a former Conservative minister tripping over his words during a clash over trans rights last week.
After the Supreme Court ruling earlier this month that a woman is defined by biology – and not gender – questions have been raised over exactly how that will impact the trans community.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said last week that trans women should not be 'permitted to use the women's facilities' in workplaces or public-facing services like shops and hospitals – and the same applies to trans men.
The watchdog did acknowledge that trans people still need access to public facilities, but is yet to explain how that would work in practice.
Meanwhile, the government has insisted trans women should use the men's toilets, and trans men use the women's toilets.
But, as backbencher Dawn Butler pointed out on Sky News last week, this decision does not exactly help boost women's safety, despite the government's promises.
She said: 'Trans women, in my opinion, should of course, continue to use women's bathrooms.'
Former chief secretary to the Treasury Simon Clarke began to protest, pointing out this went against the Supreme Court's ruling, but the Labour MP cut in.
'I do not police people in public toilets,' Butler said. 'I think that's where we are getting to as a society, in policing what a woman looks like.
'I have a butch lesbian friend who gets hounded out of women's toilets and it is heartbreaking to the point where we have to escort her into the women's toilets because she's going to be hounded out.'
She continued: 'If trans men then have to use women's toilets, that's going to make women less safe, because how are you going to stop a man – a 'normal' man – going into a women's toilet and saying, 'I am a trans man.''
'I don't follow that logic,' the former MP – who lost his seat in July – said. 'The point is, we're saying that people who are biologically men shouldn't be using the women's toilets, that's the point of this ruling.'
Butler reminded him: 'A trans man is biologically a woman, so they would then have to use women's toilets.'
There was a long pause, before Clarke, looking completely flabbergasted, said: 'I.. I think this...'
'That's the problem. That's what concerns me!' Butler said.
The debate came days before senior Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden told the BBC there would be no policing of public toilets.
"Trans women should of course still continue to use women's bathrooms... I do not police people in public toilets."@DawnButlerBrent sets out the practicalities around the Supreme Court ruling that the definition of a 'woman' is a 'biological woman'.#PoliticsHub ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/Jhc6oy2PHM
— Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge (@SkyPoliticsHub) April 23, 2025
Supreme Court Ruling Is Anything But Clear – And Endangers All Women's Rights, Trans Group Warns
Bridget Phillipson Still Can't Say Which Toilet Trans People Are Meant To Use
'He Doesn't Have The Balls': Kemi Badenoch Hits Starmer With Low Blow Over Trans U-Turn

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump abandons his most impressive presidential legacy: conservative judges
Trump abandons his most impressive presidential legacy: conservative judges | Opinion President Donald Trump has made a point to attack the very conservative judges who helped boost his first term in office. Show Caption Hide Caption Court blocks Trump's tariffs, saying they exceed legal authority A trade court blocked President Donald Trump's tariffs, saying they exceed his legal authority. It's official. President Donald Trump has turned on the conservative legal movement because its activists refuse to put his bidding over the Constitution. Frustration has been building for some time, but late on May 29, Trump posted a lengthy rant about the judiciary to his Truth Social page, criticizing many of the conservative judges he had embraced during his first term. 'I was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges,' Trump said on Truth Social. 'I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations.' With that, Trump shifted from being a Republican president with a strong legacy of appointing conservative judges to a Republican president with a growing legacy of attacking conservative judges. That's a bad sign for any of his upcoming judicial nominations. Trump turns on conservative legal movement he helped build Trump and former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, helped deliver Republicans a 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court. A significant part of that effort was The Federalist Society, a conservative legal organization that advocates for an interpretation of the Constitution that adheres to its original meaning. During his first term, Trump's judicial picks were tightly curated by adviser Leonard Leo, then the executive vice president of The Federalist Society. Most notably, all three of Trump's Supreme Court picks ‒ Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett ‒ all had ties to the organization. Opinion: Vance is doing his best to help Trump tear down the Supreme Court These three justices had a hand in overturning Roe v. Wade, striking down unconstitutional firearm restrictions, striking down racist affirmative action practices, curbing the power of administrative state bureaucrats and blocking much of the illegal Biden agenda. Even beyond the Supreme Court, Trump nominated 226 federal judges during his first term, many of those nominations guided by Federalist Society advisers. When did Trump start to turn on conservative judges? While the beginning of this spiral happened when the Supreme Court refused to entertain his 2020 stolen election claims, things have accelerated in his second term. Now, originalist judges have halted Trump's unconstitutional trade policy and have ruled against parts of Trump's mass deportation attempts. Even so, Trump until now was reluctant to outright condemn The Federalist Society. After all, one of the high points of his conservative agenda was his redecorating of the American courts with top-tier judges. The track record of Federalist Society judges is nothing short of a resounding victory for conservatives and the single best accomplishment of Trump's first term in office. Opinion: Elon Musk is frustrated with Republicans wasting DOGE's effort to cut. So am I. None of that matters now. Trump despises those judges because their loyalty is to the Constitution, not to him. He cannot fathom the discipline or honor required to be committed to preserving America's founding documents, rather than his own self-interest. The partnership between the conservative legal movement and Trump was always a temporary one, and Republicans in Congress had to have known that. While Republicans used Trump to reach their goals within the conservative legal movement, they made the mistake of allowing him to undermine the very accomplishments they made in his first term. Trump's future judicial nominations have judges worried Data from Notre Dame Law professor Derek Muller shows that federal judges are retiring at a record-slow pace at the beginning of Trump's second term. Just 11 vacancies have opened up since January, likely because judges are thinking twice about retiring in the face of who may replace them. Trump's first slate of judicial nominees is taking longer than it did in his first term, with confirmation hearings to take place on June 4, according to Axios. There are also fewer vacancies compared with Trump's first term, when he was handed more than 100 on Day 1 as a result of a stubborn Republican Senate majority in President Barack Obama's second term. Trump appears to be prioritizing his supporters in his early slate of judicial picks. Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, who has previously represented Trump personally, has been nominated to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Courtof Appeals and sparked some concern even among conservatives. Trump's early judicial picks will determine how comfortable more aging federal judges are with retiring under his second administration. Those committed to the Constitution are understandably worried about who may replace them, and his recent rhetoric does not help me feel better. As Trump's brand of the Republican Party drifts from most of the conservative values it once claimed to support, so too does his support for conservative legal philosophy. Now, anything that stands in the way of Trump is bad, even if it is conservative in ideology. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Nigel Farage On Course For Commons Majority According To Latest Polls
Nigel Farage is heading for Downing Street with a comfortable Commons majority, according to the latest opinion polls. A calculation based on the most recent surveys of public opinion suggests Reform UK would end up with 362 seats if a general election was held tomorrow. Labour would have 136 MPs elected, followed by the Lib Dems with 62 and the SNP with 38, the Electoral Calculus assessment suggested. In yet more bad news for Kemi Badenoch, the Conservatives would be the fifth-largest party with just 22 seats. The result would hand Farage a 74-seat majority, big enough for Reform UK to be able to govern without the need to rely on the support of other parties. Electoral Calculus bases its forecast on the latest opinion polls, which have consistently given Reform UK a comfortable lead over Labour. They said the right-wing party has seen 'a positive bounce in the polls' since gaining 677 seats at the local elections a month ago. 'If there were a general election tomorrow (and there will not be), then Reform could expect to have an outright majority in the House of Commons and Nigel Farage would be prime minister,' Electoral Calculus said. 'This is the first time that the polls have indicated that Reform could form a government on its own. The Conservatives would be the fifth largest party at Westminster behind the Liberal Democrats and the SNP.' Keir Starmer last week accused Reform of 'poisoning our politics' and compared Farage to Liz Truss after he pledged to bring back winter fuel payments for all pensioners, lift the two-child benefit cap and cut taxes. Downing Street insiders now believe that Reform UK will be Labour's main rivals at the next election, amid mounting speculation that Kemi Badenoch's time as Tory leader is already running out. 'Dodgy Maths': Farage Slammed After True Cost Of 'DEI' Government Programmes Revealed Keir Starmer Says Nigel Farage Is Trying To 'Poison Our Politics' Keir Starmer Warns Nigel Farage's 'Mad Experiment' Would Ruin Economy Like Liz Truss


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Bangladesh Islamist Party Set For Comeback as Court Removes Ban
Bangladesh's top court has reinstated the registration of Jamaat-e-Islami, paving the way for the country's largest Islamist party to participate in the next election. The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court nullified a 2013 verdict that had revoked Jamaat's registration, Mohammad Shishir Manir, a lawyer representing Jamaat-e-Islami, told reporters in Dhaka on Sunday.