Bail hearing set for Chinese researcher accused of smuggling farm fungus into US
WASHINGTON, June 5 — A Michigan court has scheduled a bail hearing on Thursday for a Chinese researcher accused of smuggling biological samples into the United States.
Yunqing Jian, 33, and her boyfriend Zunyong Liu, 34, who conducted biological studies in the same field, were accused of smuggling a fungus into the United States for research.
Jian, who according to a federal criminal complaint has worked on research projects in the United States since 2022, made her first court appearance on Tuesday.
Liu was denied entry into the United States last July, when the pathogen, a fungus identified by the US Department of Justice as Fusarium graminearum, was found in his luggage. Liu said he wanted to conduct research on the fungus at a University of Michigan laboratory where Jian worked, according to the complaint.
Prosecutors described the fungus as a dangerous biological pathogen that had the potential to be used as an agricultural terrorism weapon. The fungus is already widespread on US farms, tested for and tightly controlled in grains, and is not considered dangerous unless consumed in large quantities.
Clair Keene, an agronomist at North Dakota State University, said she was puzzled by US authorities' description of the fungus.
'It's a common pathogen. We have it here. The claim that Fusarium graminearum can be used as a biological weapon doesn't strike me as accurate,' she said.
The fungus can cause Fusarium head blight, typically known as scab. It is common among wheat, barley and other grains especially during rainy years. The telltale salmon-pink streaks on the grain heads contain a toxic byproduct called vomitoxin, which in high quantities can cause nausea and vomiting when eaten.
Keene said farmers often spray fungicide to protect their crop and researchers have developed strains of wheat that are resistant to the fungus.
Reuters was unable to contact Jian or her lawyer for comment.
The case involving the researchers comes as the University of Michigan and other universities have faced pressure from the Trump administration over allegations they have done too little to combat antisemitism on campus and what the administration depicts as radical ideology in the classroom. Universities' ties to China also have come under scrutiny.
The University of Michigan said in a statement it condemned 'any actions that seek to cause harm, threaten national security or undermine the university's critical public mission.'
'It is important to note that the university has received no funding from the Chinese government in relation to research conducted by the accused individuals,' the university said, adding it will 'continue to cooperate' with federal law enforcement in its ongoing investigation and prosecution.
FBI director Kash Patel said in a post on X that the case was a reminder that China's ruling Communist Party 'is working around the clock to deploy operatives and researchers to infiltrate American institutions and target our food supply, which would have grave consequences... putting American lives and our economy at serious risk.'
The Chinese Embassy in Washington in response to a Reuters request for comment sent a statement from its spokesperson Liu Pengyu.
'I don't know the specific situation, but I would like to emphasise that the Chinese government has always required overseas Chinese citizens to abide by local laws and regulations and will also resolutely safeguard their legitimate rights and interests,' Liu said. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
42 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump-Musk showdown threatens US space plans
Founded in 2002, SpaceX leapfrogged legacy contractors to become the world's dominant launch provider. (File pic) WASHINGTON : SpaceX's rockets ferry US astronauts to the International Space Station. Its Starlink satellite constellation blankets the globe with broadband, and the company is embedded in some of the Pentagon's most sensitive projects, including tracking hypersonic missiles. So when president Donald Trump threatened on Thursday to cancel Elon Musk's federal contracts, space watchers snapped to attention. Musk, the world's richest person, shot back that he would mothball Dragon – the capsule NASA relies on for crew flights – before retracting the threat a few hours later. For now, experts say mutual dependence should keep a full-blown rupture at bay, but the episode exposes just how disruptive any break could be. Founded in 2002, SpaceX leapfrogged legacy contractors to become the world's dominant launch provider. Driven by Musk's ambition to make humanity multiplanetary, it is now NASA's sole means of sending astronauts to the ISS – a symbol of post–Cold War cooperation and a testbed for deeper space missions. The company has completed 10 regular crew rotations to the orbiting lab and is contracted for four more, under a deal worth nearly US$5 billion. That's just part of a broader portfolio that includes US$4 billion from NASA for developing Starship, the next-generation megarocket; nearly US$6 billion from the Space Force for launch services; and a reported US$1.8 billion for Starshield, a classified spy satellite network. Were Dragon grounded, the US would again be forced to rely on Russian Soyuz rockets for ISS access – as it did between 2011 and 2020, following the Space Shuttle's retirement and before Crew Dragon entered service. 'Under the current geopolitical climate, that would not be optimal,' space analyst Laura Forczyk told AFP. NASA had hoped Boeing's Starliner would provide redundancy, but persistent delays – and a failed crewed test last year – have kept it grounded. Even Northrop Grumman's cargo missions now rely on SpaceX's Falcon 9, the workhorse of its rocket fleet. The situation also casts a shadow over NASA's Artemis program. A lunar lander variant of Starship is slated for Artemis III and IV, the next US crewed Moon missions. If Starship were sidelined, rival Blue Origin could benefit – but the timeline would almost certainly slip, giving China, which aims to land humans by 2030, a chance to get there first, Forczyk warned. 'There are very few launch vehicles as capable as Falcon 9 – it isn't feasible to walk away as easily as President Trump might assume,' she said. NASA meanwhile appeared eager to show that it had options. 'NASA is assessing the earliest potential for a Starliner flight to the International Space Station in early 2026, pending system certification and resolution of Starliner's technical issues,' the agency said in a statement Friday to AFP. Still, the feud could sour Trump on space altogether, Forczyk cautioned, complicating NASA's long-term plans SpaceX isn't entirely dependent on the US government. Starlink subscriptions and commercial launches account for a significant share of its revenue, and the company also flies private missions. The next, with partner Axiom Space, will carry astronauts from India, Poland, and Hungary, funded by their respective governments. But losing US government contracts would still be a major blow. 'It's such a doomsday scenario for both parties that it's hard to envision how US space efforts would fill the gap,' Clayton Swope, deputy director of the Aerospace Security Project at the center for strategic and international studies, told AFP. 'Both sides have every reason to bridge the disagreement and get back to business.' Signs of a rift emerged last weekend, when the White House abruptly withdrew its nomination of e-payments billionaire Jared Isaacman – a close Musk ally who has twice flown to space with SpaceX – as NASA administrator. On a recent podcast, Isaacman said he believed he was dropped because 'some people had some axes to grind, and I was a good, visible target.' The broader episode could also reignite debate over Washington's reliance on commercial partners, particularly when one company holds such a dominant position. Swope noted that while the US government has long favored buying services from industry, military leaders tend to prefer owning the systems they depend on. 'This is just another data point that might bolster the case for why it can be risky,' he said. 'I think that seed has been planted in a lot of people's minds – that it might not be worth the trust.'
Malay Mail
9 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Letting it all out: Breaking the silence around men's mental health — Nurfilzah Emily Mohamad Khairuddin
JUNE 7 — Many men carry storms in their hearts that no one sees, just because the world often expects them to be silent warriors: strong, unshaken, and always composed. They walk through life bearing the weight of pain, pressure, expectations and grief all while being told to 'stay strong' and 'man up.' But this June, during Men's Mental Health Month we're breaking the silence. Because behind that silence, there is often a boy who was once told not to cry. A man who's tired of pretending. A heart that aches for someone to say, 'It's okay. You're allowed to feel.' Let's begin here, it's okay to cry. Tears are not a sign of weakness. They're a release, a cleansing. They say, 'This matters. I am hurting. I am human.' If only the world could hear the stories behind those tears such as the father trying to provide without losing himself, the young man struggling to find his worth, the husband silently grieving a miscarriage and the student battling anxiety behind good grades. These are not dramatic stories. They are real ones and they deserve to be spoken, heard and held with kindness. But men are often taught that silence equals strength. That showing emotions makes them 'less of a man.' That vulnerability is dangerous. So they bottle things up, mask their emotions, distract themselves with work, sports or scrolling but deep down they are running on empty and what happens when emotions don't have a voice? They find other ways to scream through anger, numbness, insomnia, health issues or sudden withdrawal. This isn't weakness. It's a sign he needs help. He needs a safe space. Here's the truth, asking for help is an act of bravery. There is no shame in seeing a counselor, reaching out to a friend or admitting that life feels overwhelming. — Chinnapong/Shutterstock pic via AFP Here's the truth, asking for help is an act of bravery. There is no shame in seeing a counselor, reaching out to a friend or admitting that life feels overwhelming. In fact, the moment you say 'I'm struggling', you take back your power. You allow healing to begin. You remind yourself that you're not alone and that pain doesn't have to be your permanent home. Professional help whether it's therapy, support groups or a warm conversation can be life-changing. No one should have to suffer in silence when healing is possible. And dear men, your emotions are valid. You don't have to 'get over it' quickly. You don't need to be okay just because others expect you to be. You're allowed to feel frustrated, confused, lost, broken, joyful, emotional, grateful all in the same breath. Your mental health matters just as much as your physical health. You matter. Not for how strong you appear but for who you are, deep down, when no one's watching. Find your safe people. Whether it's a friend who listens without fixing, a partner who understands your silence or a counsellor who creates space for your truth. Lean into that support. Healing happens in connection. You don't need to go through life feeling like you're a burden. You are not 'too much.' You are enough and there's space in this world for you to breathe, to rest and to be seen. Even the strongest trees bend with the wind, it doesn't make them weaker. It makes them real. This Men's Mental Health Month, let's break the silence. Let's check on our brothers, our fathers, our husbands and our friends. Let's normalise the words 'I'm not okay', and let's meet them with love not shame. Let's build a culture where men don't have to wear emotional armour all the time where they can feel, fall and rise again with support by their side. To every man reading this, know this with all your heart, you are not alone. You are not broken. You are not weak. You are a whole human being with a heart that deserves to be held gently. Speak your truth, cry when you need to, ask for help and never apologise for feeling. Because behind every silent man is not a void but a voice waiting to be heard. You don't have to hold it all in. Let it out. You are worthy of healing. You are worthy of peace. 'Even the moon has scars, yet it still shines. So will you.' * Nurfilzah Emily Mohamad Khairuddin K.B.; P.A. is a registered counsellor with Lembaga Kaunselor Malaysia. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Free Malaysia Today
10 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
From hot sauce to Vaseline, parents get creative to reduce pacifier use
Strategies to reduce pacifier use or thumb-sucking range from hiding pacifiers to using deterrents like hot sauce. (Envato Elements pic) PARIS : A pacifier and/or thumb or finger sucking can help lull babies to sleep in the first months and years of their life. So much so that giving up this habit can become a real challenge. A recent US survey, conducted by the University of Michigan CS Mott Children's Hospital among more than 2,000 parents with at least one child aged one to six years, serves as a reminder that this habit is widespread. Around half of parents (51%) said that their children currently or previously used a pacifier, while about one-quarter of parents (23%) reported that their child currently or previously sucked their thumb or fingers. According to their feedback, these methods of self-soothing were typically used at bedtime or nap time (79% for pacifiers, 57% for thumb/finger sucking), when children were stressed or fussy (47% for both), or when watching TV or videos (10% for pacifiers, 24% for thumb/fingers). Only 18% said their child used a pacifier almost all the time (14% for thumb/fingers). While some children were perfectly capable of giving up this habit on their own, quitting sucking a pacifier or the thumb or fingers may required some training. And there are plenty of strategies available, as the responses of the parents who took part in the survey demonstrated. The most frequently cited methods include limiting the pacifier to bedtime, hiding it, or even pretending to have lost it! While 33% say they prefered a gentler approach, letting the child decide when to stop, a majority of parents opted for more classic methods, such as keeping a child's hand away from their mouth (61%) or explaining to the child that they were 'too old' for this kind of behaviour (25%). Others turned to more extreme tactics, such as cutting a hole in the pacifier (10%) to make it less appealing. Some even went so far as to put an unappetising substance on their child's thumbs and fingers, such as hot sauce or Vaseline! Susan Woolford, MD, a paediatrician at U-M Health CS Mott Children's Hospital and co-director of the Mott Poll, points out that there are many strategies for helping a child give up thumb or pacifier sucking, like reading a book or watching a video on the subject, or encouraging the child with small rewards. 'Substituting a stuffed animal or soft doll may also provide an alternate self-soothing option for the child,' the expert suggested in a news release. Dental health and speech development The survey also revealed that, according to parents, the 'right' age to stop pacifier use is between zero and two years (79%), while 15% consider it acceptable to break the habit at age three or over. A small proportion felt that they acted too late to stop their child's pacifier use (9%) or thumb/finger-sucking (16%). So, at what age should a child be encouraged to kick the habit? Recommendations vary from country to country: the Canadian Paediatric Society, for example, recommends stopping as early as 12 months, while the American Academy of Paediatrics advises a gradual reduction in the use of pacifiers and/or thumb sucking from 18 months. However, health professionals generally agree that this habit should be stopped altogether between the ages of two and four. Beyond that age, the risks to the child's health become more significant. Prolonged sucking can lead to misalignment of the teeth, deformation of the palate or malpositioning of the tongue, all of which can result in speech disorders (stuttering, lisping), as well as delays in language and vocabulary.
