
On The Horizon? Wave Of Momentum For High Seas Treaty
A treaty to protect the high seas will not come to life by the time the UN Oceans Conference opens in June, but persistence by member states has nudged the landmark pact towards enactment.
Adopted in June 2023 after years of exhausting negotiations, the pact aims to protect marine habitats vital to humanity but threatened by pollution in vast waters beyond any national jurisdiction.
It now has 113 signatories, but just 21 have ratified it.
After the past two weeks of United Nations meetings in New York -- with the conspicuous absence of the United States -- negotiators came "one step closer to shaping the institutional backbone" of the agreement, said Nichola Clark of the Pew Charitable Trusts after the first preparatory commission for the treaty's entry into force.
However, as the treaty can only take effect 120 days after the 60th ratification, there is no chance of its enactment happening before the UN Oceans Conference gathers in Nice, France on June 9-13.
Experts now hope the 60-ratification threshold can be reached by June so the treaty can still take effect this year.
The Nice summit will feature dozens of heads of state and will be preceded by a conference bringing together 2,000 scientists from around 100 countries.
A special ceremony in Nice on June 9 will serve as "a unique opportunity to reaffirm our collective political commitment" to the treaty's implementation, French delegation head Sandrine Barbier said.
In a sign of growing enthusiasm, the opening preparatory commission moved more quickly than expected through discussions on multiple issues, including formulation of a system to exchange information between the parties.
There was "a lot of love in the room" for the treaty during the preparatory meetings, High Seas Alliance director Rebecca Hubbard told AFP, describing the text as "one of our best opportunities to deliver action to protect the ocean."
And beyond the technical elements, said Pew's Clark, "there's been some exciting progress and movement" on the issue of marine protected areas that are emblematic of the treaty.
Overall enthusiasm was dampened however by the absence of the United States -- which had signed on to the treaty under Joe Biden's administration but did not ratify it -- and a shock announcement by Donald Trump on a major, controversial issue for the oceans: deep-sea mining.
On Thursday, the US president opened the door to commercial extraction of rare earth minerals from the ocean floor, including in international waters, bypassing the jurisdiction of the International Seabed Authority, of which Washington is not a member.
Trump's executive order "is an insult to multilateralism and a slap in the face to all the countries and millions of people around the world who oppose this dangerous industry," said Arlo Hemphill, project lead on Greenpeace USA's campaign to stop deep-sea mining.
"This is a clear sign that the US will no longer be a global leader on protecting the oceans, which support all life on this planet."
Governments worldwide have put forward a goal to protect 30 percent of the world's land and ocean by 2030.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
5 hours ago
- DW
Ukraine: 'Decisive' pressure needed after Russia pounds Kyiv – DW – 06/06/2025
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called those not pressuring Russia to end its war "complicit and responsible" for lives lost after Russian bombs hit Kyiv. The call came after Russia launched hundreds of overnight strikes. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Friday called for allies to increase pressure on Russia to end its war of aggression after Moscow launched more than 400 drones and 40 missiles at targets in Ukraine overnight, killing at least four people and wounding 20 more. Three of those killed in the attack were emergency responders helping victims in the city, with the Interior Ministry saying, "they were working under fire to help people." "If someone does not put pressure and gives the war more time to take lives, they are complicit and responsible," Zelenskyy wrote in a social media post, adding, "we need to act decisively." Separately, the Ukrainian president said Russia's leaders are, "obsessed with war, consumed by hatred and the desire to destroy the lives of other nations." Zelenskyy said such people could only be defeated with force, "the force of diplomacy, sanctions, weapons and technology." On Friday, Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko confirmed the attack on the capital and said at least six other regions had been targeted in what was one of Russia's largest coordinated attacks in the three-year war. Klitschko cited Ukrainian air force intelligence that counted 407 drones and 4 missiles launched at the country overnight. An air force spokesman said roughly 30 of the missiles and more than 200 of the drones had been shot down. Russia's Defense Ministry said the attacks was in response to what it called Ukrainian "terrorist acts" against Russia. Ukrainian drones damage more than Russian aircraft To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump shifts from 'I'll end it on day one' to 'let 'em fight for a while' The United Nations estimates that more than 12,000 civilians have been killed since Russia launched its war of aggression against neighboring Ukraine on February 24, 2022. Dmytro Lubinets, Ukraine's commissioner for human rights, said "Russia is acting like a terrorist, systematically targeting civilian infrastructure." He, too, called for a tough international response. Ukraine has offered a 30-day unconditional ceasefire as an attempt to end the war but Russia has continuously rejected such overtures. On Thursday, US President Donald Trump — who has repeatedly boasted that he could easily end the war but has utterly failed to do so — changed course from his calls to immediately end the conflict, instead suggesting it, "might be better to let them fight for a while" before Zelenskyy sits down with Russian President Vladimir Putin to negotiate a peace agreement. Trump said that with children, "sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart," adding that he relayed the analogy to Putin in a call this week. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Trump had the right to his own opinion, but that the conflict for Russia was an "existential matter." "For us it is an existential issue, an issue on our national interest, safety, on our future and the future of our children, of our country," Peskov told reporters when asked about Trump's comments. Edited by: Louis Oelofse


DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Ukraine: 'Decisive' pressure needed after Russian attack – DW – 06/06/2025
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called those not pressuring Russia to end its war "complicit and responsible" for lives lost after Russian bombs hit Kyiv. The call came after Russia launched hundreds of overnight strikes. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Friday called for allies to increase pressure on Russia to end its war of aggression after Moscow launched more than 400 drones and 40 missiles at targets in Ukraine overnight, killing at least four people and wounding 20 more. Three of those killed in the attack were emergency responders helping victims in the city, with the Interior Ministry saying, "they were working under fire to help people." "If someone does not put pressure and gives the war more time to take lives, they are complicit and responsible," Zelenskyy wrote in a social media post, adding, "we need to act decisively." Separately, the Ukrainian president said Russia's leaders are, "obsessed with war, consumed by hatred and the desire to destroy the lives of other nations." Zelenskyy said such people could only be defeated with force, "the force of diplomacy, sanctions, weapons and technology." On Friday, Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko confirmed the attack on the capital and said at least six other regions had been targeted in what was one of Russia's largest coordinated attacks in the three-year war. Klitschko cited Ukrainian air force intelligence that counted 407 drones and 4 missiles launched at the country overnight. An air force spokesman said roughly 30 of the missiles and more than 200 of the drones had been shot down. Russia's Defense Ministry said the attacks was in response to what it called Ukrainian "terrorist acts" against Russia. Ukrainian drones damage more than Russian aircraft To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump shifts from 'I'll end it on day one' to 'let 'em fight for a while' The United Nations estimates that more than 12,000 civilians have been killed since Russia launched its war of aggression against neighboring Ukraine on February 24, 2022. Dmytro Lubinets, Ukraine's commissioner for human rights, said "Russia is acting like a terrorist, systematically targeting civilian infrastructure." He, too, called for a tough international response. Ukraine has offered a 30-day unconditional ceasefire as an attempt to end the war but Russia has continuously rejected such overtures. On Thursday, US President Donald Trump — who has repeatedly boasted that he could easily end the war but has utterly failed to do so — changed course from his calls to immediately end the conflict, instead suggesting it, "might be better to let them fight for a while" before Zelenskyy sits down with Russian President Vladimir Putin to negotiate a peace agreement. Trump said that with children, "sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart," adding that he relayed the analogy to Putin in a call this week. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Trump had the right to his own opinion, but that the conflict for Russia was an "existential matter." "For us it is an existential issue, an issue on our national interest, safety, on our future and the future of our children, of our country," Peskov told reporters when asked about Trump's comments. Edited by: Louis Oelofse


Local Germany
9 hours ago
- Local Germany
New Europe push to curb children's social media use
The European Union already has some of the world's most stringent digital rules to rein in Big Tech, with multiple probes ongoing into how platforms protect children – or not. There are now demands for the EU to go further as a rising body of evidence shows the negative effects of social media on children's mental and physical health. Backed by France and Spain, Greece has spearheaded a proposal for how the EU should limit children's use of online platforms as fears mount over their addictive nature. They will present the plan on Friday to EU counterparts in Luxembourg, 'so that Europe can take the appropriate action as soon as possible,' Greek Digital Minister Dimitris Papastergiou said. The proposal includes setting an age of digital adulthood across the 27-country EU, meaning children will not be able to access social media without parental consent. Since the proposal was published last month, other countries have expressed support including Denmark – which takes over the rotating EU presidency in July – and Cyprus. Danish officials say the issue will be a priority during their six-month presidency. France has led the way in cracking down on platforms, passing a 2023 law requiring them to obtain parental consent for users under the age of 15. But the measure has not received the EU green light it needs to come into force. France also gradually introduced requirements this year for all adult websites to have users confirm their age to prevent children accessing porn – with three major platforms going dark this week in anger over the move. Also under pressure from the French government, TikTok on Sunday banned the #SkinnyTok hashtag, part of a trend promoting extreme thinness on the platform. Advertisement Greece says its aim is to protect children from the risks of excessive internet use. The proposal does not say at what age digital adulthood should begin but Papastergiou said platforms should know users' real ages 'so as not to serve inappropriate content to minors'. France, Greece and Spain expressed concern about the algorithmic design of digital platforms increasing children's exposure to addictive and harmful content – with the risk of worsening anxiety, depression and self-esteem issues. The proposal also blames excessive screen time at a young age for hindering the development of minors' critical and relationship skills. They demand 'an EU-wide application that supports parental control mechanisms, allows for proper age verification and limits the use of certain applications by minors'. The goal would be for devices such as smartphones to have in-built age verification. The European Commission, the EU's digital watchdog, wants to launch an age-verification app next month, insisting it can be done without disclosing personal details. The EU last month published draft guidelines for platforms to protect minors, to be finalised once a public consultation ends this month, including setting children's accounts to private by default, and making it easier to block and mute users. Those guidelines are non-binding, but the bloc is clamping down in other ways. Advertisement It is currently investigating Meta's Facebook and Instagram, as well as TikTok under its mammoth content moderation law, the Digital Services Act (DSA), fearing the platforms are failing to do enough to prevent children accessing harmful content. In the Meta probe, the EU fears the platform's age-verification tools may not be effective. And last week, it launched an investigation into four pornographic platforms over suspicions they are failing to stop children accessing adult content. Separately, the EU has been in long-running negotiations on a law to combat child sexual abuse material, but the proposal has been mired in uncertainty, with worries from some countries that it would allow authorities to access encrypted communications. The legal proposal has pitted proponents of privacy against those working to protect children. Despite repeated attempts, it has failed to get EU states' approval.