Do you recognize this truck? SLCPD asks for help identifying hit-and-run suspect
This is a developing story. ABC4 will update this post as new information becomes available.
SALT LAKE CITY () — The Salt Lake City Police Department is asking for the public's help identifying a suspect and vehicle that may have been involved in a hit-and-run crash.
According to a press release, on May 25, 2025, around 1:19 a.m., SLCPD received multiple calls about a pedestrian being hit by a pickup truck near 50 North and 800 West in Salt Lake City.
Monday morning police pursuit ends with one in custody near Kimball Junction
When police arrived at the scene, the pickup truck and driver involved had already left. Detectives believe that the pickup truck is a 'newer model GMC Sierra.' Photos of the truck were shared to help the public possibly identify the driver.
Police report that the truck had no license plate and was being driven by an unknown person. It was last seen travelling westbound on North Temple Street in Salt Lake City.
If you have any information or recognize the driver or vehicle from these photos, detectives ask that you contact SLCPD at 801-799-3000 and reference case number 25-118017.
Senate Republicans divided over 'big, beautiful bill'
Do you recognize this truck? SLCPD asks for help identifying hit-and-run suspect
BLM to remove over 3,000 wild horses from Wyoming land
Utah father and son duo charged for allegedly supporting Mexican drug cartel
Stage 1 fire restrictions issued for multiple southwest Utah counties
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
16 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Cuts to USAID severed longstanding American support for Indigenous people around the world
NEW YORK (AP) — Miguel Guimaraes Vasquez fought for years to protect his homeland in the Peruvian Amazon from deforestation related to the cocaine trade, even laboring under death threats from drug traffickers. A leader in an Indigenous rights group, Vasquez said such efforts were long supported by financial assistance from the U.S. Agency for International Development, which spent billions of dollars starting in the 1980s to help farmers in Peru shift from growing coca for cocaine production to legal crops such as coffee and cacao for chocolate. The agency funded economic and agricultural training and technology, and helped farmers gain access to international markets. But the Trump administration's recent sweeping cuts to the agency have thrown that tradition of U.S. assistance into doubt, and Indigenous people in the Amazon worry that without American support there will be a resurgence of the cocaine market, increased threats to their land and potentially violent challenges to their human rights. 'We don't have the U.S. government with us anymore. So it can get really dangerous,' said Vásquez, who belongs to the Shipibo-Konibo people and is vice president of the Interethnic Association for the Development of the Peruvian Rainforest. 'We think the situation is going to get worse.' Several Indigenous human rights defenders have been killed trying to protect their land, Vasquez said, and in some of those cases U.S. foreign aid provided money to help prosecute the slayings. 'We really needed those resources,' he said. Sweeping cuts began in January When Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, began dismantling USAID shortly after President Donald Trump began his second term, it all but eliminated U.S. foreign aid spending, including decades of support to Indigenous peoples around the world. USAID's work with Indigenous peoples sought to address a variety of global issues affecting the U.S., according to former employees. Its economic development efforts created jobs in South America, easing the need for people to work in illicit drug markets and reducing the likelihood they would migrate to America seeking jobs and safety. And its support for the rights of Indigenous peoples to steward their own land offered opportunities to mitigate climate change. That included Vásquez's organization, which was about to receive a four-year, $2.5 million grant to continue fighting illicit activity that affects Indigenous people in the region. Vásquez said that grant was rescinded by the new administration. In January, DOGE launched a sweeping effort empowered by Trump to fire government workers and cut trillions in government spending. USAID, which managed about $35 billion in appropriations in fiscal year 2024, was one of his prime targets. Critics say the aid programs are wasteful and promote a liberal agenda. Trump, Musk and Republicans in Congress have accused the agency of advancing liberal social programs. 'Foreign assistance done right can advance our national interests, protect our borders, and strengthen our partnerships with key allies,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement in March. 'Unfortunately, USAID strayed from its original mission long ago. As a result, the gains were too few and the costs were too high.' Musk last week announced his departure from the Trump administration, marking the end of a turbulent chapter that included thousands of layoffs and reams of litigation. Former USAID employees said political pressure from the U.S. often kept foreign governments from violating some Indigenous rights. In the three months since thousands of foreign aid workers were fired and aid contracts canceled, the Peruvian government has moved quickly to strip Indigenous people of their land rights and to tighten controls on international organizations that document human rights abuses. It's now a serious offense for a nonprofit to provide assistance to anyone working to bring lawsuits against the government. The National Commission for Development and a Drug-Free Lifestyle, the country's agency that fights drug trafficking, did not respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press. 'The impact was really, really strong, and we felt it really quickly when the Trump administration changed its stance about USAID,' Vásquez said. The U.S. spends less than 1% of its budget on foreign assistance. Tim Rieser, a senior foreign policy aide in the Senate who works for Democratic Vermont Sen. Peter Welch, called DOGE's cuts to USAID a 'mindless' setback to years of work. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Agency reached Indigenous communities worldwide USAID's work reached Indigenous communities around the world. It sought to mitigate the effects of human rights abuses in South America, created programs in Africa to enable Indigenous people to manage their own communities and led the global U.S. effort to fight hunger. One of the most recent additions to USAID's work was incorporating international concepts of Indigenous rights into policy. Rieser, for instance, was responsible for crafting legislation that created an adviser within USAID to protect the rights and address the needs of Indigenous peoples. The adviser advocated for Indigenous rights in foreign assistance programs, including actions by the World Bank. 'That provided Indigenous people everywhere with a way to be heard here in Washington,' Rieser said. 'That has now been silenced.' That adviser position remains unfilled. Vy Lam, USAID's adviser on Indigenous peoples, who said he was fired in March as part of the DOGE downsizing, said the idea of Indigenous rights, and the mandate to recognize them in foreign operations, was new to USAID. But it gained momentum under President Joe Biden's administration. He said concepts such as 'free, prior and informed consent' — the right of Indigenous people to give or withhold approval for any action that would affect their lands or rights — were slowly being implemented in American foreign policy. One of the ways that happened, Lam said, came in the form of U.S. political pressure on foreign governments or private industry to negotiate mutually beneficial agreements between Indigenous peoples and their governments. For instance, if an American company wanted to build a hotel in an area that could affect an Indigenous community, the U.S. could push for the deal to require Indigenous approval, or at least consultation. 'We had that convening power, and that is the thing that I grieve the most,' Lam said. U.S. foreign aid workers were also able to facilitate the reporting of some human rights violations, such as when a human rights or environmental defender is jailed without charges, or Indigenous peoples are forced off their land for the establishment of a protected area. Money supported attendance at international meetings In some cases, USAID supported travel to the United Nations, where Indigenous leaders and advocates could receive training to navigate international bodies and document abuses. Last year, under the Biden administration, USAID awarded a five-year grant to support Indigenous LGBTQIA people through the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Indigenous People, an agency that offers financial support to Indigenous peoples to participate in the U.N. At $350,000 per year, it was the largest grant from any member state in the U.N., fund Secretary Morse Flores said. The money would have paid for attendance at the U.N. and other international bodies to report human rights abuses and to testify on foreign policy. In February, the fund received notice that the grant would be terminated. The State Department does not plan to fulfill its pledge to fund the remaining four years of the grant. In most cases, people receiving assistance to attend major meetings 'are actual victims of human rights violations,' Flores said. 'For someone who's unable to come and speak up, I mean, it's really just an injustice.' ___ This story was published in partnership with Grist, a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.
Politico
32 minutes ago
- Politico
Nashville ICE raid reignites city's turmoil with GOP leaders
An unsteady truce between Nashville's Democratic mayor and Tennessee's Republican leaders just collapsed after an ICE dragnet in the city. Tension began to build in early May, when ICE started making traffic stops in partnership with the state highway patrol in the immigrant-heavy neighborhood of South Nashville, leading to the arrests of nearly 200 suspected undocumented immigrants. Mayor Freddie O'Connell quickly condemned the action as damaging to the community. And a GOP firestorm resulted, with Republicans accusing O'Connell of interfering with federal immigration enforcement. Four weeks later, a simple public policy spat has turned into a major conflict between some of the most powerful leaders in Tennessee, breaking a fragile peace between the city and the GOP supermajority legislature – and exposing Nashville to the wrath of the Trump administration. The feud, which shows no signs of ending soon, comes with real potential consequences for Nashville and other blue cities in red states being targeted over their immigration policies. 'It's unfortunate that he's willing to support the law breakers instead of supporting us as the lawmakers,' state Rep. Rusty Grills, a Republican, said of the mayor. O'Connell, who has worked to calm long-running tensions with Republicans since his election in 2023, is the latest target of GOP ire over perceived threats to President Donald Trump's deportations, and the onslaught against the mayor also represents a further escalation in the administration's attack on local officials. In New Jersey, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested in May on a trespassing charge outside an ICE facility. That charge was later dropped, but U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver is facing assault charges from the same confrontation. In Tennessee, Republicans in the state legislature told POLITICO that O'Connell was putting officers at risk by updating a longstanding executive order mandating that city officials disclose interactions with ICE to the mayor's office within 24 hours. They have latched onto that as evidence the mayor is impeding law enforcement operations. O'Connell, speaking at a press conference following the raids, said the city does not have the authority to enforce immigration laws, and noted that Nashville's crime rates are down. He has maintained that the city did not interfere with the ICE operation in early May. Yet GOP outrage has spread from Tennessee to Washington. O'Connell is facing a federal investigation from House Republicans announced last week, and a call for another from the Department of Justice by Sen. Marsha Blackburn, who all argue that O'Connell is impeding law enforcement's ability to crack down on crime committed by illegal immigrants. U.S. border czar Tom Homan has warned that Nashville could see larger immigration crackdowns as a result of O'Connell's opposition. 'We'll flood the zone in the neighborhoods to find the bad guy,' Homan said on Fox News last week. 'We'll flood the zone at work sites to find the bad guy, but we're going to do it, and [O'Connell's] not going to stop us.' Republicans have also gone after O'Connell for highlighting a donations fund that supports individuals affected by the arrests, like children whose parents were detained. Republicans say the fund is an improper use of taxpayer dollars, although the fund was created by a nonprofit that says it exclusively uses private donations. Tennessee Democrats and immigrant advocates say that Republicans are cheering ICE's involvement because of a bad-faith view of immigrant communities and that the criticism of O'Connell is purely GOP rhetoric lacking any basis. They also say the sweep shows how the Department of Homeland Security is taking in people that pose no threat to the public. DHS said about half of the people arrested have criminal records, but only identified four of them – leading Democrats to demand more information about those detained. 'For the politicians who care about nothing but the national news, this is a symbolic story,' said Democratic State Sen. Jeff Yarbro. 'But for those of us who represent communities where we've seen lawless dragnet policing, there are real life consequences to our community and to our neighbors.' The raid's scale and scope was 'unlike anything we've ever seen before,' said Lisa Sherman Luna, the executive director of the Tennessee Immigrants & Refugee Rights Coalition. The Tennessee Highway Patrol's cooperation with ICE underscores the role states will play in carrying out the Trump administration's immigration agenda – especially as DHS struggles to hit its deportation goals. GOP leaders eager to impress the president have taken steps in recent months to deputize local law enforcement as immigration enforcers, like in Georgia, where Gov. Brian Kemp recently signed a law requiring law enforcement to check the immigration status of detainees. 'They are building an infrastructure that we've never seen, especially for a non-border state, to really carry out the President's agenda of mass deportations,' Luna said of the ICE operation in Nashville. 'The devastation for families and local communities is going to be deep and broad, because everyone is a target now, and so it's really alarming to see our state government being used in this manner.' Tennessee Republicans have framed the conflict as a matter of law and order – arguing that the ICE raids were a necessary use of force to crack down on crime they blame on illegal immigrants. Under the leadership of Gov. Bill Lee, Tennessee has emerged as one of the most aggressive non-border states on immigration in the second Trump era. Lee, to the surprise of many Tennesseans, was the first Republican governor to say in January before Trump's inauguration he was readying the National Guard should they be called upon to aid in deportations. In January, a few days after attending a governors meeting at Mar-A-Lago, Lee tacked onto immigration legislation as part of a special session on school vouchers. Lawmakers then passed a sweeping law expanding local law enforcement's immigration purview and making it a felony for state officials to establish sanctuary cities. Nashville is not a sanctuary city. But Democrats there still view the law as a warning shot from the legislature, which has clashed with city leaders over a range of issues — from control of the airport to representation in Congress. 'We wanted to send a signal that Tennessee was ready to cooperate and welcomed ICE coming into our communities to get these violent people out,' said state Sen. Jack Johnson, a Republican. 'So I'm very, very happy with it and excited, and I hope they do more.' And many want to see ICE return. State Sen. Brent Taylor has asked Homan to send ICE to Memphis to address 'the violent crime epidemic' that he says is 'exacerbated by poor local leadership.' Shelby County, where Memphis is located, was included on a list of sanctuary cities and counties published by DHS last week that was soon taken down. Leaders of Shelby County, Memphis and Nashville — which was also on the list – disputed their designation as sanctuary cities, which have been outlawed by the Tennessee legislature. State Sen. Jody Barrett described relations between Nashville and the GOP legislature as a 'forced marriage,' complicated by the fact that Nashville serves as the state's economic engine. Nashville's population has exploded in recent years, and the city's tourism industry keeps the state coffers filled. 'And because of that, it's kind of a love-hate relationship,' he said.
Los Angeles Times
33 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: Democrats need to find more effective strategies than stooping to name-calling
To the editor: I appreciate columnist Mark Z. Barabak's report on the Democratic Convention in Anaheim, but it was very disappointing to read that name-calling and profanity (common with Republicans) have now become the language of Democrats ('Yelling, finger-pointing and cursing galore as California Democrats gather near Disneyland,' June 2). President Trump degraded all political rhetoric with his daily cursing and insulting, but I always expected that Democrats would not succumb to his level (remember 'when they go low …'?). But now they are calling Trump a 'punk' and 'the orange oligarch,' and Sen. Adam Schiff even commented, 'We say to bullies, you can go f— yourself.' Really? Does he think that makes him sound tougher? It certainly doesn't make him sound smarter. Instead of copying Republicans' boorish behavior, Democrats need to find a strong new leader who offers effective strategies and solutions instead of engaging in name-calling or resorting to juvenile and vulgar swearing. As a Democrat, I find it sad and embarrassing. I think it makes us look weak without any real ideas for leadership. Kendall Wolf, Encino .. To the editor: As someone who spent most of her adult life in Minnesota, it doesn't shock me that Gov. Tim Walz would use what some Minnesotans might call 'salty' or 'spicy' language when trying to make amends to California Democrats for the 2024 electoral losses. I learned early on that even the legendary 'Minnesota nice' has limits. You push Minnesotans too hard, or do something they consider far too wrong, and you might be called a 'dips—' or even worse. Still, they may later apologize for feeling compelled to employ such strong language. Mary Stanik, Tucson
