Opinion - So was Poland a sucker when it supported the US in Iraq?
Vice President JD Vance shocked many across the Atlantic when in a recent interview with UnHerd he argued that Europe should have done more to stop the war against Saddam Hussein more than two decades ago. According to the vice president, standing by the United States when it was in particular need had been a mistake.
This offers an important signpost for U.S. allies charting their futures.
Much of Europe was rightly skeptical of the idea that democracy could be introduced by armed intervention in Iraq, believing war could only turn a rogue state into a failed state. Although a failed state is better than a rogue state that has weapons of mass destruction, Baghdad did not, as it turned out, possess such weapons. This upended all earlier calculations. Especially when the world learned that the new failed state had become a breeding ground for pathologies such as terrorism, organized crime, drug trafficking and illegal migration.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld contrasted the 'old Europe,' which under the leadership of French President Jacques Chirac and German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder was building an anti-American alliance, with the 'new Europe,' which supported the United States. The French president said at the time that Poland had wasted an opportunity to 'sit silent' — and Vance has now agreed with him.
Although Polish public opinion viewed the intervention in Iraq dimly, Poland's political elite saw it as a way to strengthen the alliance with the U.S. and the country's international standing. An 'instinctive Atlanticism' prevailed, regardless of which party was in power. Defense Secretary Rumsfeld was not far from the truth when he labeled Poland the most pro-American country on the globe, including even the United States.
Poland sent a contingent of 2,500 troops to Iraq in 2003. After Denmark's refusal, the Poles took command of the Multinational Division Central-South — MND-CS, taking responsibility for the South-Central-Zone, inhabited by nearly 4 million Iraqis. The Polish-led sector included 8,500 troops from 22 countries. Nor did Polish forces in Iraq avoid losses: 28 Poles lost their lives and 150 were wounded.
Participation in the Iraq operation was assessed by the Polish establishment as a military success, a political draw and an economic failure. The experience gained in logistics, operations and command over a significant multinational force was applied to the reform of the armed forces and the introduction of a professional army. Poland's political independence and agency on the international stage were also strengthened. However, hopes for economic benefits in the form of lucrative contracts for Polish companies did not materialize.
Thus, until recently we believed that — in the overall — we had been right to support the United States at the time. Vice President Vance, however, argues that we joined the wrong side: that by engaging militarily in Iraq as a U.S. 'vassal' we contributed to a strategic disaster. In other words, we were suckers: we should have opposed Washington along with 'old Europe.'
But the vice president's take is ahistorical. In 2003 no force existed that could have prevented the administration of President George W. Bush from invading Iraq and removing Saddam Hussein. The U.S. would have launched military operations even without its allies, no matter the diminished legitimacy of such a war. It was not until years after the invasion of Iraq that the enormous costs (human, financial, political) became apparent and turned the American public against the whole enterprise.
The vice president suggests to America's allies that they should actively oppose those U.S. moves they deem questionable or misguided. If they fail to do so, they will be declared co-responsible for the strategic disasters of U.S. policy such as the one in Iraq. But was this in fact JD Vance's intended message?
Jacek Czaputowicz was Poland's foreign minister from 2018 to 2020. He is professor at the University of Warsaw.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

2 hours ago
The implosion of a powerful political alliance: Trump and Musk in their own words
Last Friday, President Donald Trump heaped praise on Elon Musk as the tech billionaire prepared to leave his unorthodox White House job. Less than a week later, their potent political alliance met a dramatic end Thursday when the men attacked each other with blistering epithets. Trump threatened to go after Musk's business interests. Musk called for Trump's impeachment. Here's a look at the implosion of their relationship in their own words. 'Today it's about a man named Elon. And he's one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced. He stepped forward to put his very great talents into the service of our nation and we appreciate it. Just want to say that Elon has worked tirelessly helping lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations.' — Trump, May 30, Oval Office remarks ___ Trump invited cameras into the Oval Office last week to bid farewell to Musk, who said he was stepping away from his government work to focus on his businesses. Trump spoke effusively of Musk and his work with the Department of Government Efficiency for nearly 15 minutes straight. "I'll continue to be visiting here and be a friend and adviser to the president," Musk said. He marveled at the gold-tinged decorations Trump placed around the Oval Office. 'The oval office finally has the majesty that it deserves thanks to the president,' he said. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' — Musk, Tuesday, post on X. ___ Days after their Oval Office meeting, Musk escalated his previously restrained criticism of Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill, the president's top congressional priority. Still, he kept his critique focused on their policy disagreement. He did not go after Trump by name, even as he called on Republican lawmakers to vote down the bill and threatened political retribution against those who took Trump's side. 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' Musk wrote on X. Uncharacteristically for a man who rarely lets a snub go unanswered, Trump did not respond. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Musk's views on the bill were not a surprise to Trump, and his social media posting 'doesn't change the president's opinion.' Musk continued Wednesday, approvingly sharing social media posts and memes that criticized the budget's price tag and deficit impacts, though still directing his ire at Congress. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore." -- Trump, Thursday, Oval Office meeting with the German chancellor. ___ Trump said he was 'very disappointed in Elon" and was surprised by his benefactor's criticism. The war of words escalated rapidly from there. It all played out on their respective social media platforms, with Musk posting on X and Trump on Truth Social. Musk dismissed Trump's criticism. 'Whatever,' he wrote. He shared old Trump social media posts urging lawmakers to oppose deficit spending and increasing the debt ceiling. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk posted, a reference to Musk's record political spending last year, which topped $250 million. 'Such ingratitude,' he added. Trump said Musk had worn out his welcome at the White House and was mad that Trump was changing electric vehicle policies in ways that would financially harm Musk-led Tesla. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote. He added: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' — Musk, Thursday, X post. ___ In a series of posts, he shined a spotlight on ties between Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, the financier who killed himself while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. Some loud voices in Trump's 'Make America Great Again' movement claim Epstein's suicide was staged by powerful figures, including prominent Democrats, who feared Epstein would expose their involvement in trafficking. Trump's own FBI leaders have dismissed such speculation and there's no evidence supporting it. 'Yes,' he wrote.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Musk Demands Trump is Impeached—as He Threatens Elon's Money
Elon Musk's spectacular falling-out with President Donald Trump has escalated further, with the former DOGE chief suggesting the president should be impeached and replaced by Vice President JD Vance. The latest attack came not long after Trump threatened to cancel Musk's government contracts, claiming Musk had 'gone crazy' after not getting what he wanted in the mega-spending bill. In response, Musk then declared: 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' This could be damaging for the US, which relies on the SpaceX Dragon to transport people and cargo to the International Space Station. Musk also went nuclear on his former ally by replying 'Yes' to a post by an X user that asked: 'President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and Vance should replace him.' And earlier, he told his followers that Trump was named in the Epstein files, signing off by saying: 'Have a nice day, DJT!' The Trump-Musk bromance took a rapid turn on Thursday, when Trump broke his silence about Musk in a dramatic intervention after the Tesla billionaire's frenzied attacks on the 'big, beautiful bill.' After the Oval Office tirade, Trump then put out a Truth Social Post, saying: 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave,' Trump posted. 'I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' He added: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it.' Musk replied on X: 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.' Trump's latest threat could have financial implications for Musk if the president acts on them. As the head of SpaceX, Musk has has billions of dollars worth of contracts with the federal government, mostly with the Pentagon and NASA. He also has several other interests with the government related to SpaceX's satellite service, Starlink, and reportedly expressed an interest in helping Trump build his so-called 'golden dome' missile shield. But the spectacular falling out could make that highly unlikely—even though though it was only last week that Musk had said he would continue to visit the White House as an unofficial adviser. Standing in the White House with Musk on Friday to mark the end of his work with DOGE, Trump heaped praise on the Tesla chief, telling reporters Musk had 'delivered a colossal change in the old ways of doing business in Washington.' 'Elon has worked tirelessly helping lead the most sweeping consequential government reform program in generations,' Trump said. But much has rapidly deteriorated since—ever since Musk spoke out about Trump's mega-spending bill on Tuesday and declared it as a 'disgusting abomination.' White House sources say that Trump had become increasingly frustrated that Musk had spent the past few days using his social media platform to unload on the bill with his 220 million-plus followers. 'This was a person who the President had invited into his inner circle, to Mara-lago, to cabinet meetings,' one insider noted. But Thursday's Oval Office rant was a particularly stinging rebuke for Musk, who spent more than $300 million helping the president win back the White House. Musk had largely stayed out of the political arena until Trump was almost assassinated last year. But in the aftermath of Trump's near death experience, the billionaire immediately set up his America super PAC to help Trump and other Republicans win office, and later took up a post as Trump's DOGE slasher-in-chief. After hitting out at the spending bill, he declared this week that he wants to 'fire' people who voted for Trump's mega-spending bill. Such a move could dampen the efforts of Republicans at next year's midterms and in the lead up to 2028—and potentially make the Tesla chief an unlikely ally for the Democrats. Democratic National Committee chair Ken Martin said: 'As Trump faces national humiliation and Republicans scramble, each hour gets more pathetic for these guys.

2 hours ago
Trump and Musk break up, and Washington holds its breath
WASHINGTON -- Maybe it was always going to end this way, with two billionaires angrily posting about each other on social media, fingers flying across pocket-sized screens as their incandescent feud burned hotter by the minute. But even if the finale was predictable, that didn't make it any less shocking. After long months when Donald Trump and Elon Musk appeared united in their chaotic mission to remake Washington, their relationship imploded this week like a star going supernova. It began with Musk complaining about the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda, which the president at first took in stride. Eventually Trump let slip that he was disappointed in his former adviser, prompting Musk to unleash a flood of insults and taunts. He accused Trump of betraying promises to cut federal spending, shared a suggestion that the president should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about his association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Perhaps most viciously, Musk insisted that Trump wouldn't have won last year's election without his help. Trump, not one to slouch from a fight, could hold back no longer. He posted that Musk had been 'wearing thin,' that he had 'asked him to leave' his administration, that the tech titan had 'gone CRAZY.' Maybe, Trump threatened, he should save taxpayer money by canceling government contracts and subsidies for Musk's companies. On and on it went, as liberals savored the spectacle of their most despised political opponents clawing at each other's digital throats and conservatives reeled at the prospect of having to pick sides. Laura Loomer, a right-wing provocateur and conspiracy theorist, saw an opportunity to position herself as the voice of reason. 'This fight should be taken offline,' she said — on social media, of course. The question now is whether Trump and Musk find some way to step back from a battle that is tearing apart one of the most consequential relationships in modern American politics. If they don't, there's little telling how far the fallout could spread from a collision between the world's most powerful man and its wealthiest. At stake are the future of Musk's companies, including electric automaker Tesla and rocket manufacturer SpaceX; government programs that rely on the billionaire entrepreneur's technology; legislation for advancing tax cuts and Trump's other priorities in Congress; Republican chances in next year's midterm elections; and an entire political ecosystem that has orbited around Trump and Musk's deteriorating partnership. 'It's like India and Pakistan,' said Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke of Montana, referring to two nuclear-armed nations that recently skirmished along their border. 'It just escalates and neither one of them seem to back down and understand the strength of each other.' Trump and Musk were always an odd pairing, with contrasting world views and deep generational and stylistic differences. Trump, 78, comes from old-school New York real estate and never appears in public without a suit and tie unless he's on the golf course. Before running for president, he became a household name as a reality television star. Musk, 53, is an immigrant from South Africa who struck it rich in Silicon Valley. In addition to running Tesla and SpaceX, Musk owns the social media company X. He's fashioned himself as a black-clad internet edgelord, and his wealth vastly outstrips Trump's. But Trump and Musk are kindred spirits in other ways. They're experts at generating attention who enjoy stirring the pot by riling up their opponents. Each has sought more power to accomplish existential quests. Trump assails the federal 'deep state' that resisted him during his first term, while Musk warns about the country going bankrupt from excessive spending and promotes an interplanetary future powered by his rocket technology. Musk endorsed Trump after the Republican candidate was nearly assassinated in Butler, Pennsylvania, and he began spending millions to support him. His social media megaphone was a powerful addition to Trump's comeback campaign, magnifying his efforts to court tech leaders and young, very online men. Trump rarely tolerates sharing the spotlight, but he seemed enamored with his powerful backer, mentioning him in stump speeches and welcoming him onstage at rallies. After the election, Musk was a fixture around Mar-a-Lago, posing for photos with Trump's family, joining them for dinner, sitting in on meetings. Instead of growing tired of his 'first buddy,' Trump made plans to bring Musk along to Washington, appointing him to lead a cost-cutting initiative known as the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk tried to establish himself as the president's omniscient and omnipresent adviser. He held court in Cabinet meetings, slept over in the Lincoln Bedroom and helped himself to caramel ice cream from the White House kitchen. The federal bureaucracy practically trembled before Musk, who oversaw layoffs and downsizing with his team of acolytes and engineers embedded in various agencies. Musk appeared thrilled at his opportunity to tinker with the government and exulted in his bromance with Trump, posting on Feb. 7 that he loved the president 'as much as a straight man can love another man.' Trump returned the favor on March 11, allowing Musk to line up Tesla vehicles on the White House driveway as his company was struggling with declining sales. Trump made a show of choosing a cherry red electric car for himself. But cracks were emerging, especially as Trump pursued tariffs that could raise costs for Musk's businesses. Musk said Peter Navarro, the president's trade adviser, was 'truly a moron" and 'dumber than a sack of bricks" on April 8. The billionaire entrepreneur, who had never before worked in public service, seemed to be souring on government. He suggested there wasn't enough political will, either in Congress or in the White House, to adequately reduce spending. Trump started signaling that it was time for him to leave even though Musk said he would be willing to stay. Shortly before announcing his departure, Musk said he was 'disappointed' by legislation that Trump called the 'big beautiful bill" because it would increase the deficit. The measure includes tax cuts, more money for border security and changes to Medicaid that would leave fewer people with health insurance. 'I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful,' Musk said. 'But I don't know if it could be both.' The criticism didn't prevent Trump from giving Musk a send-off in the Oval Office, where he presented his outgoing adviser with a ceremonial key. 'Elon is really not leaving,' Trump said. 'He's going to be back and forth.' Musk said, 'I'll continue to be visiting here and be a friend and adviser to the president." It's hard to imagine that now. Musk escalated his attacks on the legislation Tuesday, calling it a 'disgusting abomination," and Trump tried to fend off the criticism. 'He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next,' the president said Thursday in the Oval Office during a meeting with the German chancellor. It was. Musk quickly took to X to vent his anger at Trump, saying his tariffs 'will cause a recession in the second half of this year' and accusing him of lying. He also said it was 'very unfair' that the legislation would eliminate tax incentives for electric vehicles. Trump fired back in real time as he tried to maintain momentum for his legislation, which faces a difficult debate in the Senate. 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,' the president posted. 'This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress.' Meanwhile, some of Trump's allies plotted revenge. Steve Bannon, a former Trump adviser who hosts an influential conservative podcast, said the president should direct the U.S. government to seize SpaceX. He also encouraged Trump to investigate allegations that Musk uses drugs and 'go through everything about his immigration status" in preparation for potential deportation. 'We'll see how good Elon Musk takes a little of that pressure," Bannon said, "because I happen to think a little of that pressure might be coming.'