Allied Universal Named Subcontractor of the Year for Security Work at Naval Shipyards
IRVINE, Calif., April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Allied Universal ®, the world's leading security and facility services company, is proud to announce it has been named BAE Systems 2024 Subcontractor of the Year. The global defense and aerospace company recognized Allied Universal for its successful expansion of high-level security operations at all three of BAE Systems U.S. shipyards, which support both U.S. Navy ships and commercial vessels.
'Allied Universal is honored to receive the 2024 Subcontractor of the Year award from BAE Systems,' said Steve Jones, global chairman and CEO of Allied Universal. 'This recognition reflects the dedication and professionalism of our security teams who work tirelessly to support mission-critical operations at BAE Systems' shipyards. We are proud to play a role in helping to safeguard facilities that are vital to national defense and maritime commerce.'
Allied Universal provides security services to all U.S.-based BAE Systems shipyards. They are located in in Jacksonville, Fla., Norfolk, Va., and San Diego.
BAE Systems is a leading provider of ship repair, maintenance and modernization services to the U.S. Navy's fleet of combatant ships in their homeports; refit and hauling services for commercial and privately held vessels; and fabrication services for the submarine industrial base.
About Allied Universal
The world's leading security and facility services provider and trusted partner to more than 400 of the FORTUNE 500, Allied Universal® delivers unparalleled customer relationships, innovative solutions, cutting-edge smart technologies and tailored services that enable clients to focus on their core businesses. With operations in over 100 countries, Allied Universal is the third-largest private employer in North America and seventh in the world. Annual revenue is approximately $22 billion. There is no greater purpose and responsibility than serving and helping to safeguard customers, communities and people. For more information, visit www.aus.com.
Kari Garcia
Director of Communications - North America
Allied Universal
Phone: 949-826-3560
Email: [email protected]
Newsroom: [email protected]
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/d2a82489-4fbc-49dd-b23f-d5c5f7fe9a9f
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
E-2 Hawkeye Replaces USAF E-3 Sentry, E-7 Cancelled In New Budget
A seismic shift has occurred in the Trump administration's new defense spending plan that is just emerging when it comes to the USAF's airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) predicament. The service's E-3 Sentry Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) aircraft are dwindling in number and rapidly aging into unsupportability. The proven and in-production E-7 Wedgetail, based on the Boeing 737 and serving with multiple allies, was supposed to bridge the gap between the E-3's retirement and pushing the sending part of the mission to space-based distributed satellite constellations. You can read all about this here. Now, if the administration gets its wish, that won't happen. The E-7 will be cancelled and the E-2D Hawkeye, currently flown by the U.S. Navy, will step in to fill the gap. This major turn of events came to light today as Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Air Force Gen. John Caine, and Bryn Woollacott MacDonnell testified before the Senate Appropriations Committee. MacDonnell is Special Assistant to the Secretary of Defense and is currently performing the duties of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and the Pentagon's Chief Financial Officer. In 2023, the USAF announced its intention to purchase E-7s, potentially as many as 26 of them, as replacements for a portion of the E-3 fleet. At the hearing today, the question of the current future of the USAF AEW&C force came from Sen. Lisa Murkowski late in the hearing. Murkowski is a Republican from Alaska, where fighters, tankers, and E-3 Sentry jets launch regularly to intercept foreign planes, primarily Russian fighters, bombers, and surveillance aircraft, over the vast arctic wilderness. Chinese H-6 missile carrier aircraft also appeared off Alaska last year for the first time, as part of a joint mission with Russia. Chinese air and naval presence in the region is only expected to grow in the future. China and Russia conduct joint air strategic patrol over Bering Sea on July 25. This marks the eighth air strategic patrol organized by the two militaries since from China PLA Air Force Weibo accounthttps:// — Ryan Chan 陳家翹 (@ryankakiuchan) July 25, 2024 With this in mind, just how big of an issue the age of the E-3 fleet has become was central to Murkowski's question. 'I have been concerned. We have E-3 capability up north, of course, but we were all counting on the E-7 Wedgetail coming our way. We're kind of limping along up north right now, which is unfortunate. And the budget proposes terminating the program. Again, the E-3 fleet [is] barely operational now, and I understand the intent to shift towards the space-based – you call it the 'air moving target indicators' – but my concern is that you've got a situation where you're not going to be able to use more duct tape to hold things together until you put this system in place. And, so, how we maintain that level of operational readiness and coverage, I'm not sure how you make it.' 'You know, the E-3 and the E-3 community have been really important to us for a long, long time, and I'll defer to the Comptroller, but I you know the Department has a bridging strategy through investing in some additional airborne platforms in order to gap fill while the space-based capabilities come online,' Kane replied in response to the senator's question. This is where the E-2D comes in. MacDonnell then added, 'Ma'am, we do have in the budget $150 million in FY26 [Fiscal Year 2026] for a joint expeditionary E-2D unit with five dedicated E-2Ds, and the budget also funds for additional E-2Ds to fill the near-term gap at $1.4 billion.' Currently, the only branch of the U.S. military that operates the E-2D is the U.S. Navy. The Alaskan senator then inquired, 'Can you tell me, will that have implications for what we're seeing up north in Alaska?' 'The answer is yes. I would. I would file this entire discussion under difficult choices that we have to make. But you know, the E-7, in particular, is sort of late, more expensive and 'gold plated,' and so filling the gap, and then shifting to space-based ISR [intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance] is a portion of how we think we can do it best, considering all the challenges,' Hegseth responded. At a separate hearing before the House Appropriations Committee yesterday, Hegsteth had also described the Wedgetail as an example of a capability that is 'not survivable in the modern battlefield' and mentioned broad plans 'to fund existing platforms that are there more robustly and make sure they're modernized.' An annual assessment of high-profile U.S. military procurement programs from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), a Congressional watchdog, which was released today, offers additional insight into issues with the USAF's effort to acquire E-7s. The original plan was to acquire a pair of production representative prototype (or RP) aircraft ahead of production of examples in a finalized configuration, starting this year. The service had then expected to reach initial operational capability with the Wedgetail in 2027. 'Air Force officials said that they now plan to begin production by the second quarter of fiscal year 2026 before completing the E-7A RP MTA [Middle Tier Acquisition] rapid prototyping effort by initiating a separate, concurrent program on the major capability acquisition pathway,' according to GAO. 'They said that it was necessary to begin production concurrently with the E-7A RP rapid prototyping effort to offset the lead time associated with the build and subsequent modification of the aircraft.' 'The program definitized its contract with Boeing since our last assessment. After the contract was definitized, Boeing delayed the first flight test by 9 months to May 2027,' the report adds. 'According to Air Force officials, the delay was due to a late-breaking, required critical security architecture change that affected the procurement of parts, qualification testing, and modification of the airframe.' 'The program stated that the Air Force definitized the MTA rapid prototyping effort contract in August 2024 to deliver two operationally capable E-7A prototype aircraft in fiscal year 2028,' GAO's new assessment further notes. 'The program added that the total acquisition cost increase of 33 percent resulted from updated methodologies to include additional scope related to non-recurring engineering, with the primary drivers being software and air vehicle subsystems.' Last year, the Air Force had been very open about the difficulties it was having finalizing a contract with Boeing for the RP jets. The two parties ended up agreeing on a deal valued at nearly $2.6 billion. A contracting notice the service put out earlier this year also pointed to significant expected differences between the RP aircraft and the full production examples, including the possibility of a new radar. Existing versions of the E-7 in service elsewhere globally today are equipped with Northrop Grumman's Multi-Role Electronically Scanned Array (MESA) radar. The USAF's move to drop the E-7 and leverage the E-2D, which is already in the Pentagon's stable, prompts many questions. For instance, just how many of these aircraft will the USAF end up with? As of 2024, the USAF's E-3 fleet stood at 16 aircraft. Above all else, there are major capability trades here. The Hawkeye is a much smaller aircraft than both the Sentry and the Wedgetail. It is extremely capable, but it is also optimized to exist within the confines of carrier operations. The crew size is just five individuals. This limits the amount of shear manpower to perform highly complex operations and other tasks beyond traditional AEW&C. The E-2 also has less range and is far slower than both the E-3 and E-7. This means longer transit times, and the aircraft doesn't fit in as seamlessly with the jet-centric operations for the counter-air mission the service currently enjoys. The E-2D's AN/APY-9 radar from Lockheed Martin is hugely capable, but many of its other advanced data fusion and relay systems are unique to the Navy. These systems would either be stripped or just left unused for USAF-focused operations. It's also possible that other systems will replace them, but this will cost money and take time to integrate and field. Hawkeyes, being turboprop aircraft, also operate at lower altitudes, giving their radar, radio systems, and electronic surveillance suites reduced line-of-sight, limiting their range and fidelity at distance for some targets and surveillance application, in some cases. Then there is the aerial refueling issue. The E-2D has gained this ability relatively recently, which expands its endurance. Typical missions can now last over seven hours. However, the aircraft uses the Navy-preferred probe-and-drogue refueling method, not the boom and receptacle one favored by the USAF. The USAF's KC-46 tankers do have a hose and drogue system and some of the service's KC-135Rs have podded hose and drogue systems. Otherwise, they require a basket attachment to their boom, often called the 'Iron Maiden' or 'Wrecking Ball,' due to its rigid metal frame and potential to smack into and damage airframes. This system makes the KC-135R useless for refueling receptacle-equipped aircraft when it is fitted. The E-2D also refuels lower-and-slower than jet aircraft. All these issues are not 'show-stoppers,' but they are ones that will impact operational planning and flexibility. The E-2D, being already a highly upgraded and a much smaller airframe, also lacks the same capacity for future expansion compared to the E-7. This could include adding more personnel for various non-traditional functions, including using its advanced radar to scan the surface more extensively or for unique battle management needs, such as controlling future drone swarms, or even for more extensive passive intelligence collection and exploitation and data fusion operations. High-bandwidth datalinks can possibly make up for some of the manpower differentials, allowing folks on the ground to execute critical functions in near real time as part of a distributed crew arrangement, but there are downfalls to this concept, as well. On the other hand, having commonality with the Navy's AEW&C aircraft should help reduce costs for both services and accelerate the type's entry into USAF service. It could also benefit the future evolution of the E-2D as more money will be flowing into the program. It's also a very capable and well-proven platform, lowering risk. Above all else, joint service E-2Ds could be absolutely critical to the USAF's Agile Combat Employment (ACE) combat doctrine that will see its forces distributed to remote forward locales and constantly in motion. The E-2D's turboprop performance, robust landing gear, and arrested landing capabilities mean it can be pushed far forward to very austere operating locations with limited runway length. And it can do this without sacrificing the quality of the data it collects or the efficacy of its use as a battle manager. This is something a 707 or 737 platform simply cannot match and could prove decisive in a major peer-state contingency. TWZ highlighted these exact benefits after U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) released a video last year showing a Navy Hawkeye refueling from a USAF HC-130J Combat King II combat search and rescue aircraft, which can act as a probe-and-drogue tanker, primarily for helicopters and Osprey tiltrotors. A @USNavy E-2D refuels inflight from an @usairforce HC-130 over the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility. — U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) August 6, 2024 While the USAF's move away from the E-7 is certainly surprising, and it will result in shortfalls in some areas, it also unlocks new capabilities, some of which are arguably more applicable to tomorrow's wars. It also buys down additional risk, which is looming very large as it isn't clear at this time, at least publicly, how far along the Pentagon's persistent space-based aircraft sensing constellation development actually is. All of this still has to make it through congressional approval, which could be a challenge considering the special interests involved. But as it sits now, the flying service is pivoting big once again when it comes to its increasingly dire AEW&C needs. Contact the author: Tyler@
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Troubled Constellation Frigate Is Now At Least 759 Metric Tons Overweight
The U.S. Navy's future Constellation class frigates are set to be at least 759 metric tons (close to 867 U.S. tons) heavier than expected, a 13 percent increase over earlier estimates. Concerns have previously been raised about how weight growth with the Constellation class design, which was still being finalized as of April, could negatively impact the ships' top speed and other capabilities. Overall, the frigate program, the entire point of which was to leverage an existing in-production design to help reduce risk and speed up delivery, remains years behind schedule and at risk of ballooning costs. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), a Congressional watchdog, included the new details about the Constellation class design's weight growth and other updates about the program in an annual assessment of major procurement efforts across the U.S. military released today. The U.S. Navy chose Marinette Marine in Wisconsin, a wholly owned subsidiary of Italy's Fincantieri, to build the new frigates in 2020. The ship's core design is derived from the Franco-Italian Fregata Europea Multi-Missione (FREMM). The Navy currently expects to take delivery of the first-in-class USS Constellation in 2029, three years behind schedule. The service has, to date, awarded Marinette Marine contracts to build six Constellation class frigates. 'In October 2024, the Navy reported 759 metric tons of weight growth from initial estimates – nearly a 13 percent increase – due in part to the underestimation of applying Navy technical requirements to a foreign ship design,' per GAO's new report. 'We previously reported that unplanned weight growth during ship construction can compromise ship capabilities, as the fleet seeks to alter and improve initial capabilities over the planned decades-long service life of the ship. Such alterations may leave frigates less combat capable, limit the ability to add capabilities to address evolving threats, and reduce planned service lives.' It is unclear from the GAO report whether this 759 metric ton increase is in terms of gross weight or displacement, and whether or not it is a total figure or additive on top of previous growth. By 2021, it had already emerged that the Constellation class' displacement was expected to be around 500 tons greater than that of the parent FREMM design, ostensibly to account 'for margins and future growth.' The targeted displacement of these vessels, at least originally, was 7,291 tons. The new Navy frigates will also be physically longer and wider. As it stands now, there is only some 15 percent commonality in the Constellation and FREMM designs, compared to the original goal of 85 percent. 'Navy personnel are working with the shipbuilder to reduce the ship's weight, but weight growth has only become more pronounced over the last year as the program further developed the frigate design,' the report also notes. This point speaks to further complications arising from the fact that, at least as of April of this year, the Constellation class design still had yet to be finalized. This is despite the construction of the future USS Constellation already being underway. As of April, construction of the ship was approximately 10 percent complete. 'In response to a recommendation we made in our May 2024 report, the program restructured its functional design metrics to more closely align with actual design progress. As a result, the program concluded that its functional design progress is significantly less than the 92 percent complete it reported in August 2023,' according to GAO's latest assessment. 'As of December 2024, the program reported that the functional design was 70 percent complete, as measured with the restructured design metrics. Although program officials expect to achieve a stable basic and functional design by late spring 2025, the program has yet to achieve its planned rate of design progress to meet this goal.' 'The Navy stated that it chartered an independent review team to perform a holistic assessment of the shipbuilder's production schedules, identify key issues, and recommend actions,' the report adds. 'Additionally, the Navy reported that it increased design and production efforts by bringing in both Navy and contracted engineering design support personnel at the shipbuilder's site to bolster and accelerate design stability completion and ramp-up of production.' GAO says the Navy declined to provide an estimated date for reaching initial operational capability with the Constellation class with this review still underway. In the past, the Navy has heavily blamed shipyard capacity and workforce issues – real and increasingly dire problems for the service in general that you can read more about here – for hampering work on the Constellation class. The service has also cited macroeconomic disruptions, such as inflation, stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic and other global crises, as being important factors. 'So I was at Fincantieri [Marinette] Marine two weeks ago. I was very impressed by the investments they've made in their shipyard and things they've done in an attempt to modernize,' Secretary of the Navy John Phelan told members of the Senate Armed Services Committee yesterday. 'And I think there's some things that some of the other shipyards can actually take and potentially adapt.' In November 2024, the Navy began formally seeking information about options for bringing in a second shipyard to help with Constellation class production, a possibility that had previously been raised. As of January, the service was still assessing the responses it had received, per GAO. At the same time, it is hard not to see the Constellation class' continued weight growth and persistent lack of a stable design as going beyond shipyard issues, and having undercut the central focus of the program. As noted, choosing an in-production parent design to serve as the basis for the new frigates was explicitly intended to avoid many of the problems the Navy is facing now. 'The Constellation class frigate will be three years late and will take nearly 10 years to deliver the lead ship. This is largely because the Navy cannot keep its requirements steady. Almost 70 percent of the requirements have changed since the Navy signed a contract,' Sen. Roger Wicker, a Mississippi Republican, chided Navy officials at a hearing last year. 'So the outcome that we see today is no surprise. This is not an example of the industry underperforming. This is senior officials unable to manage a program. This is acquisition malpractice and a terrible waste of time and resources.' All of this has already contributed to questions about the future of the Constellation class, overall. 'The question is, are we at a point where we either quickly recover and get back on track with this, get back to schedule, get back to budget – I don't know that you could make up schedule – or do you say, maybe we're too far along with this, and we go in a different direction,' Rep. Rob Wittman, a Virginia Republican, said during a panel discussion at the Navy League's Sea Air Space 2025 in April. 'The Navy is going to have to ask that question now. It can't push it off in the future.' At the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing yesterday, Wicker noted that procurement of additional Constellation frigates was halted last year 'because of design instability' and that the Navy did not appear to be requesting funding for any of the ships in the 2026 Fiscal Year. A public version of the U.S. defense budget request for the upcoming fiscal cycle has not yet been released. 'As it relates to the [Constellation class] frigate and in the force, [we're] still evaluating that, we're still trying to understand how it fits, when we can get it fixed, [and] what the plans are for it,' Phelan said at yesterday's Senate Armed Services Committee hearing. 'And so I will come see you soon as we get a handle on that. But it is something we're looking at very hard. And I do think that the shipbuilder there has done a great job. And so we need to figure out how to keep that going and add to it and understand that.' More details about the Navy's exact plans for the future of the Constellation class are likely to come when a public version of the Navy's budget request for the 2026 Fiscal Year is finally released. In the meantime, the core design has already diverged significantly in terms of weight and other aspects from what was originally expected. Contact the author: joe@
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Defense company with Richland Township facility gets $41M contract
JOHNSTOWN, Pa. – A defense manufacturer with facilities in Richland Township has received a $41 million contract to continue delivering combat management system hardware for the U.S. Navy, the Coast Guard and allied navies around the world. The contract has been awarded to Virginia-based Leonardo DRS by the Naval Sea Systems Command in Washington, D.C. Work to fulfill the contract will be performed at the Leonardo DRS production facility in the Johnstown area, the company said in a press release issued Monday. The local facility is set to provide hardware including multi-screen consoles and peripheral equipment for sailors to gather, process and display vital combat information and make rapid tactical decisions. Under the contract, Leonardo DRS' Johnstown-area site is tasked to provide hardware not only for the U.S. Navy, but also for its allied navies, including those of Australia, South Korea and Japan, company officials said in the press release. 'We are proud to continue our strong partnership with the U.S. Navy, the Coast Guard, and our closest allies on this critical program,' said Cari Ossenfort, senior vice president and general manager of the Leonardo DRS Naval Electronics business unit. 'Leonardo DRS remains the leading provider of critical combat and network hardware supporting surface ships and submarines, ensuring our maritime forces are equipped with the most advanced and reliable systems available.'
