
Central Empowered Committee to inspect Mohali villages over forest, wildlife violations
Acting on a complaint regarding violation of forest and wildlife laws in villages, such as Karoran, Nada, Masol, and adjoining areas in Mohali district, the Central Empowered Committee (CEC), constituted by the Supreme Court, is scheduled to visit the region on Monday at 9 am.
The CEC will assess the extent of damage caused to forest land, wildlife and the local environment. It will also evaluate the timely action taken by government departments, and based on its findings, will recommend appropriate measures.
The said villages under scrutiny fall within areas governed by the Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA), 1900. These areas are also protected under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and the Supreme Court's orders.
Even during the process of delisting certain areas from protected status, the court had explicitly banned any commercial activity without prior approval from the Government of India.
Despite these restrictions, large-scale violations—particularly illegal hill-cutting—have allegedly continued unabated for several years. These activities have led to the degradation of ecologically sensitive and biodiversity-rich areas in the Shivalik Hills.
Environmentalists and local residents have accused the forest department, district administration and urban agencies like Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA), along with panchayati raj institutions, of failing to prevent these encroachments, raising concerns over the alleged influence of the land mafia in the region.
The Shivalik forests are known for their ecological significance, and are home to many endangered plant and animal species, several of which are listed as threatened under the (International Union for Conservation of Nature) IUCN Red List.
The Central Empowered Committee (CEC) was constituted by the Supreme Court of India in 2002 (and reconstituted in 2008) to assist in matters related to forest, wildlife conservation and flag cases of official non-compliance with its orders related to conservation. It reports to the Union environment ministry.
The committee came into existence after a landmark Supreme Court judgment, dated December 12, 1996, in a 1995 case.
The apex court ruled that the term 'forest' should be interpreted in its dictionary sense, regardless of land ownership. This means any land that is forest in character on the ground must be treated as such and cannot be used for non-forest activities without prior approval from the Government of India, in accordance with the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, and other applicable laws.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
24 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Parliamentary panel to review IBC and propose reforms for efficiency
The Centre is expected to table an amendment Bill in the monsoon session as a parliamentary panel examines the Code amid concerns flagged by the Supreme Court Ruchika Chitravanshi New Delhi Listen to This Article A parliamentary panel is taking a comprehensive look at the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to suggest the changes and measures that need to be taken to make it more efficient, a senior government official said. 'The committee is looking at IBC in totality, just as they did with the Competition Law as well,' the senior official said. The government is expected to bring the IBC Amendment Bill in Parliament in the upcoming monsoon session. Several Supreme Court rulings in the recent past have pointed to gaps in the implementation of the IBC, the latest being the Bhushan Power and


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Arrest illegal, court orders release of 2 Pocso accused
Mumbai: In a strong rebuke to police procedure, the sessions court at Kalyan ordered the immediate release of two individuals arrested under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act, ruling that their detention was illegal due to violations of constitutional safeguards. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now VA Patravale, the special judge of the Pocso court, observed that the accused, arrested on May 13, 2025, by Vitthalwadi police, were not informed of the grounds of arrest at the time of detention, nor were any such details conveyed to their families. This omission, the court said, amounted to a gross breach of Article 22(1) of the Constitution. The minor girl's parents alleged that three boys, including one juvenile boy, allegedly sexually assaulted their minor daughter. According to the girl's mother, her daughter stepped outside their building around noon to relieve herself near a tree where construction work was underway. Shortly after, they heard the girl screaming. On rushing outside, the girl alleged three boys dragged her into a nearby room, physically assaulted her and then fled. — Ahmed Ali


New Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
NBE moves Supreme Court seeking permission to reschedule NEET-PG exam to August 3
NEW DELHI: The National Board of Examinations (NBE) has approached the Supreme Court seeking permission to reschedule the NEET PG 2025 exam to August 3, citing logistical challenges in conducting the exam earlier. Originally, the exam was set for June 15, but the Supreme Court had, on June 2, ordered that it must be held in a single shift, rather than two. Following the order, the NBE postponed the exam and has now submitted that holding the test before August 3 is not possible due to operational constraints. Sources in the Supreme Court registry said the matter is likely to be heard within the next couple of days. 'This is a sensitive issue involving students' futures. The hearing will be scheduled soon,' an official said. In its application, the NBE explained that TCS, its technology partner for conducting the exam, has said the earliest possible date to organise the exam in a single shift is August 3. TCS cited the need for additional exam centres across more cities, supply chain arrangements for technical hardware, and deployment of trained staff as reasons for the delay. "Each test centre needs to have trained technical staff, invigilators, administrative workers, and independent observers. Training and deploying such manpower at hundreds of new locations in just two weeks is not possible, especially during ongoing national and academic activities," the NBE said. The board also highlighted that safety checks like mock drills, load tests, and system audits must be completed in advance to ensure there are no technical failures on exam day. These cannot be completed without adequate preparation time. NBE further stated that more than 1,000 test centres need to be booked to accommodate over 2.42 lakh candidates (with buffer), and infrastructure for at least 2.70 lakh candidates must be arranged across the country. Additionally, the board said some of the earlier exam-related steps would now have to be redone due to the shift from a two-shift to a single-shift format. The Supreme Court is expected to consider the matter shortly and decide on the new schedule.