Teacher was sacked after sharing his views on same-sex marriage during diversity day, tribunal hears
A teacher at an Anglican school was sacked after sharing his views about abortion and same-sex marriage during a during a diversity training day, a tribunal has heard.
Ben Dybowski, a Catholic, was dismissed from The Bishop of Llandaff Church in Wales High School near Cardiff following the training event in March 2023.
The school held a session delivered by Diverse Cymru Training in March 2023, and Mr Dybowski asked the trainer about expressing personal beliefs and if they amounted to discrimination.
He said his view was that true marriage is a union between a man and a woman, that human life begins at conception and abortion is the taking of innocent human life and he was critical of some aspects of Sharia law, the tribunal heard.
The trainer said that the claimant was free to hold such views but that expressing them might be 'regarded as discrimination', the Cardiff tribunal was told.
The hearing was also told he quietly took opportunities to discuss his views with pupils and staff on a number of occasions.
Mr Dybowski had a meeting with headteacher Marc Belli the next day after other members of staff expressed concern about the views, the tribunal heard.
During the meeting, Mr Dybowski discussed his social media activity and how he often expresses his beliefs, including topics like same-sex marriage and Islam, the tribunal was told.
Mr Belli reminded him of social media guidelines and the Education Workforce Council (EWC) regulations, explaining that expressing his views, when publicly expressed, could potentially harm students or staff, especially given the school's diverse community and values, the tribunal heard.
Mr Dybowski's employment at the school, where he had worked as a teaching assistant since October 2022, was later terminated.
His claims of harassment and direct discrimination related to his religious and protected beliefs were dismissed by the tribunal, with the judge saying the school could exercise a degree of control over how beliefs 'manifested' in accordance with its values.
The tribunal also ruled that his criticisms of Sharia law were an opinion and therefore not a protected belief.
Judge Samantha Moore said Mr Dybowski's views on marriage, abortion and gender amounted to protected beliefs but that his critical aspects of Sharia law were deemed an opinion and are not protected.
The judge said it was clear that Mr Belli wanted the claimant not to manifest the views in any way he had during the training event and found that 'none of what subsequently ensued was because the claimant held his particular beliefs'.
She said it was 'reasonable' for Mr Belli to have become very concerned and reach a conclusion that he could not trust that Mr Dybowski would refrain from inappropriate discussions with pupils.
The judge added: 'The claimant has a right to hold his beliefs and to manifest them but he is under the same prohibitions as the rest of society to not discriminate or harass others.
'Every circumstance turns on the particular facts of the claim.
'(The Bishop of Llandaff Church In Wales school) was entitled to want to exercise a degree of control over how beliefs were manifested within the school environment in accordance with the school's values given the potential power imbalance between teachers and pupils and in the context of potentially vulnerable pupils.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
6 hours ago
- Spectator
It's no surprise that Prevent has gone to the dogs
Conquest's Second Law states that the behaviour of an organisation can best be predicted by assuming it's controlled by a secret cabal of its enemies – and that certainly seems to apply to Prevent (although it's a 'programme' rather than an organisation). Prevent is a key strand of the counter-terrorism framework introduced after the 7/7 bombings and aims to stop people becoming radicalised. Given the historical context – and the fact that 75 per cent of MI5's counter-terrorism work involves monitoring Islamist extremists – you'd think the main focus would be radical Islam. At least, you would if you weren't familiar with Conquest's Second Law. Of the 6,817 people referred to Prevent in the year ending 31 March 2023, just 11 per cent were suspected of Islamist extremism, compared with 19 per cent in danger of succumbing to 'extreme right-wing terrorism'. And according to a Prevent Refresher Awareness Course on the Home Office website, one of the three most common subcategories of extreme right-wing terrorist ideology is 'cultural nationalism'.
The Guardian
19 hours ago
- The Guardian
Sydney Muslim cleric tells court Jewish people can't be offended by him calling them ‘vile' as lectures were private
A Sydney Muslim cleric being sued for alleged racial discrimination has told the federal court no Jewish person could be offended over a series of lectures in which he described Jewish people in the seventh century as 'mischievous', 'treacherous' and 'vile' because the lectures were delivered to a private Muslim audience. Wissam Haddad – whose legal name is William but who is also known as Abu Ousayd – is being sued by two senior members of Australia's peak Jewish body, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ), over a series of lectures he gave in Bankstown in November 2023 and subsequently broadcast online, in which he is alleged to have maligned Jewish people. Haddad allegedly breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits offensive behaviour based on race or ethnic origin. Haddad's defence argues the speeches were delivered to a known Muslim audience, in a private place, and fail the clause in 18C that the offensive act is unlawful when it is committed 'otherwise than in private'. In submissions filed before the federal court, Haddad argues four of the five speeches were delivered at his prayer centre, Al Madina Dawah Centre in Bankstown. 'The centre is a stand-alone building which is manifestly a private property – it is surrounded by high black fencing and its entrance carries a sign that says 'Private Property No Trespassing'.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Haddad's submissions to the court said there was no standing invitation for any non-Muslims to attend the centre. 'There will be no evidence that any of the speeches was attended or heard by anyone who was not a regular congregant of the centre and a practising Muslim.' The remaining speech was a conversation in a room between three people. Haddad was called as a witness late on Wednesday morning. He told the court uploading his speeches to social media was not part of his responsibilities. 'I'm not involved,' he told the court. But under repeated questioning from one of the applicant's barristers, Peter Braham SC, he told the court he knew his speeches would be posted online. 'Yes I did.' Haddad said the speeches were posted online by 'someone from the community'. Asked who it was, Haddad said: 'I'm not at liberty to give his name because I don't think it's relevant.' Peter Wertheim, one of the applicants in the case and ECAJ's co-chief executive, told the federal court on Tuesday that he was first alerted to the presence of Haddad's speeches online by coverage of them in mainstream media. He said Haddad's speeches used 'overtly dehumanising' language. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'Making derogatory generalisations, calling Jews a vile and treacherous people, calling them rats and cowards … are things which I think would be experienced by most Jews as dehumanising,' Wertheim said. His barrister, Braham, told the court Haddad's speeches repeated a range of offensive tropes and were designed to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish people. The court heard Haddad had sound recording and camera equipment installed to record his speeches, which Wertheim's barrister argued was for the purpose of disseminating his message far beyond his congregants. He would speak before a backdrop branded with the Al Madina Dawah Centre logo, but which also included logos of YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and other social media platforms. The applicants are seeking an injunction that Haddad's five offending sermons be removed from the internet, and an order that he refrain from publishing similar speeches in future. Wertheim and his co-applicant, Robert Goot, are also seeking publication of a 'corrective notice' on Haddad's prayer centre's social media pages, and to be awarded the legal costs of bringing their action. They have not sought damages or compensation. Haddad's barrister, Andrew Boe, argued the cleric's speeches were addressed to, and intended only for, a private Muslim congregation and that Haddad was not responsible for them being published online. Boe said it was unlikely a Jewish person would have discovered the speeches, to then be offended by them, if the recordings had not been covered and thus amplified by mainstream media. 'It would be analogous to a person of a prudish sensitivity seeking out pornography on the web and then complaining about being offended by it,' Boe told the court. Boe argued there must be room, in a democratic society, for 'the confronting, the challenging, even the shocking'. The hearing, before Justice Angus Stewart, is expected to run until the end of the week.
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
Hermer praised mosque where preacher urged Muslims to ‘spit on Israel'
Lord Hermer praised a mosque where a preacher urged Muslims to spit on Israel, The Telegraph can reveal. The Attorney General said he found the work of the Abdullah Quilliam Society 'inspiring', less than a year after it was named in a list of Islamic charities accused of harbouring 'hateful rhetoric'. The controversy stemmed from a talk at the mosque by Haroon Hanif, an Islamic scholar, roughly two weeks after the Oct 7 massacre in 2023. The nature of his affiliation with the mosque, if any, is unknown. In the sermon, livestreamed on social media, Mr Hanif told worshippers that Muslims should 'continue waging your war for Allah and his messenger, don't back down'. He added: 'We're large in numbers right now, two billion. If the two billion just marched on Israel it's all over, if you spat in the direction of Israel, two billion, it's all over.' He also said 'any Muslim who thinks the Palestinians are terrorists... you need to question your Imam' and 'no British Army can overpower you'. 'Fanning the flames of division' The comments prompted campaigners to refer the mosque, along with seven other Islamic charities, to the Charity Commission. In an open letter, they accused the organisations of breaching charity guidelines, which state that trustees should be alert to the dangers of 'extremist ideology' or 'extremist views'. Among the signatories were Gideon Falter, the chief executive of the Campaign Against Antisemitism, Maryam Namazie, from the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain, Lord Young, a free-speech campaigner, and Prof Richard Dawkins. At the time, Megan Manson, the head of campaigns at the National Secular Society, which also signed the letter, said: 'The Charity Commission must take these concerns seriously. 'The Israel-Hamas war has caused serious tension between different communities around the world, including in the UK. The hateful rhetoric churned out by these charities is fanning the flames of division when we most need to promote cohesion and tolerance.' In response to the referral, Stephen Roake, the Charity Commission's head of compliance visits and inspections, said: 'The Commission acknowledges the concerns that you have raised about the charities. 'I can confirm that we are currently assessing all of the information available to us, in order to determine what regulatory action, if any, may be required for each of the charities identified.' It is understood that the watchdog's assessment is ongoing. Lord Hermer went on to visit the Abdullah Quilliam Society in August 2024, where he discussed ways to keep the Muslim community safe in the wake of the riots triggered by the Southport killings. He said it had been 'truly wonderful' to hear about the community's response to the protests, which affected the mosque directly, and said he had come away with 'many ideas'. In a video posted on the Abdullah Quilliam Society's Instagram account, he said: 'It's been inspiring learning about the work of this mosque... It has been a huge, huge pleasure.' The mosque posted pictures of the trip, adding: 'Thank you for your visit Attorney General Sir Richard Hermer.' View this post on Instagram A post shared by Abdullah Quilliam Society (@aqsociety) The revelation has prompted further questions about Lord Hermer's judgment in light of recent headlines. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'This is a complete collapse of standards at the very top of our justice system. 'How on earth are the British people supposed to trust Labour to protect them when their top law officer is applauding mosques allegedly linked to extremism? 'If Starmer had a spine, Hermer would be out by now. But instead of upholding justice, he's upholding his old mate.' The charity's stated purpose is 'to promote correct knowledge and understanding of Islam and its true spirit faith for the benefit of all' and it has previously received around £8,000 in government grants. Earlier this month, The Telegraph revealed the Attorney General declined to review 'unduly lenient' sentences given to a rapist, a paedophile and a terrorist fundraiser despite signing off on the prosecution of Lucy Connolly. He was also forced to apologise over comparing calls for the UK to leave the European Convention on Human Rights to the rise of Nazism.
