Western media ignore crackdown on opposition in Taiwan by Lai
The Western news media have gone out of their way to report on every mass protest against the governments in Hungary and Serbia. But when there was a huge rally against the government in Taiwan, there was not a word.
Advertisement
The lack of reporting last week was positively wilful, considering
tens of thousands took to the streets of Taipei as part of an opposition rally against the island's president, William Lai Ching-te, and his increasingly, unpopular Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
The issues that prompted the mass rallies in all three places are quite similar – the use of legislative or judicial means to cripple the opposition in a system of government that either is, or is moving towards, what political scientists call illiberal democracy.
You can understand why, though. Those recalcitrant central Europeans have been very naughty so far as the European Union is concerned. Viktor Orban of Hungary has long been a thorn in the side of Brussels.
The EU has effectively blocked Serbia's application to become a member state because it has refused to join the pan-European sanctions against Russia. So those governments are put under a microscope, but their opposition is put on a pedestal.
Advertisement
Talk about double standards. In Taiwan, the opposition has been targeted since the pro-American and independence-seeking DPP lost its majority in the legislature.
The opposition Kuomintang (KMT), which helped organise the latest mass protests, claimed more than 200,000 people took part. Police reported about 60,000.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia Times
10 hours ago
- Asia Times
Taiwan's de-sinicization drive as geostrategic leverage
In an era where US-China tensions run high but full decoupling is unfeasible, Washington must seek new low-cost diplomatic tools. One such tool may lie in an unexpected domain: Taiwan's internal cultural policies. Specifically, the island's ongoing de-sinicization campaign—while locally motivated—has inadvertently become a geopolitical irritant, escalating Beijing's threat perception. This article proposes that the US quietly explore the recalibration of Taiwan's de-Sinicization policies as a symbolic, non-security concession in broader negotiations with Beijing. Such a move could provide a controlled way to reduce tensions while preserving America's core commitments to Taiwan's security and democracy. Since the early 2000s, Taiwan has taken deliberate steps to shift its cultural identity away from China. Curriculum changes, altered national symbols, and linguistic prioritization form part of a longer campaign to assert a distinct Taiwanese identity. While understandable domestically, these measures have consistently provoked sharp reactions from Beijing, feeding its narrative of Taiwan's irreversible drift toward independence. For the United States, de-Sinicization poses a strategic paradox. On the one hand, it reflects democratic agency. On the other, it may undercut regional stability by giving Beijing a perceived justification to escalate. Importantly, Taiwan's cultural trajectory does not directly impact US national security priorities such as freedom of navigation, semiconductor supply chains or military deterrence. Therefore, Washington could — discreetly — signal to Taipei that a soft pause or reframing of the de-Sinicization drive could serve broader strategic goals. This could manifest as a period of 'consolidation' rather than reversal, buying time to focus on national resilience, defense and external alignment. Such a move would not require a formal public endorsement. Instead, it could surface through Track II dialogues, think tank publications or behind-the-scenes diplomatic conversations. Allies like Japan or South Korea could reinforce this approach by advocating for cultural moderation as a path to regional confidence-building. This approach offers several advantages. It provides the US a symbolic concession to offer in potential high-level US-China discussions without undermining core deterrence postures. It demonstrates to Beijing that the US-Taiwan relationship is not driven by ideological maximalism. And it reinforces Washington's image as a responsible power seeking balance, not confrontation, in the Indo-Pacific. Public emotion variable While most Western observers tend to focus on the Chinese government's calculated use of nationalism, what is often overlooked is that the Chinese state itself is restrained by popular nationalist sentiment, especially on issues like Taiwan. On matters of cultural sovereignty and national unity, it is often the Chinese public—not the leadership—that demands hardline responses. This dynamic creates a powerful incentive for Beijing to avoid appearing 'weak' in the face of perceived provocations, even when the government itself may prefer strategic patience. In this context, Taiwan's highly visible cultural distancing from China—through language reforms, educational shifts, and symbolic removals—acts as a flashpoint that fuels public anger more than elite strategic concern. Therefore, if Taiwan were to partially moderate or reframe its de-Sinicization policies—emphasizing cultural heritage, continuity or mutual historical roots—it could significantly lower emotional hostility among the Chinese populace. Such a change would reduce the pressure on Beijing to escalate or retaliate and empower more flexible policy responses. For Washington, this presents a critical window: by encouraging symbolic de-escalation in the cultural sphere, the US can indirectly calm Chinese domestic sentiment, giving the central leadership more room to maneuver diplomatically without being seen as capitulating. In short, strategic signaling toward Beijing doesn't only happen through naval deployments or economic tools—it can also take shape in how narratives of culture and identity are modulated. By understanding and leveraging the emotional logic of Chinese public nationalism, Washington may gain more influence in managing the Taiwan issue than through deterrence alone. L. Y. Chu is a retired engineer and independent analyst focused on cross-strait relations, US-China strategy and the role of cultural signaling in geopolitical competition.
RTHK
19 hours ago
- RTHK
China 'better prepared' to deal with US tariff threats
A China expert on Monday said that Beijing is well prepared to deal with US President Donald Trump's tariff threats, with the nation now less dependent on American comments come ahead of expected trade talks between Vice Premier He Lifeng and a US delegation in Britain, the second round of such negotiations between the world's two biggest economies since Trump launched his trade war shortly after returning to the White House in Bo, a senior fellow at the Centre for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University, was speaking to RTHK's Hong Kong Today programme "I think China is becoming better prepared because China has dealt with him (Trump) before and China's dependency on America actually has been reduced," Zhou, who is a retired People's Liberation Army senior colonel, said."Throughout this kind of tariff war, you can see that China, from the very beginning, stand firm. China said it would fight to the end if necessary, while China is also open to last Thursday's phone conversation between President Xi Jinping and Trump, Zhou said the exchange was extremely important."Just imagine the largest economies not to talk to each other, then all other people would watch would be a huge relief for people around the world."Zhou also said he was optimistic that both sides will make progress at the talks in London."I think from the Chinese side, the requirement is very simple. China just wants to be respected, China just wants to be treated on an equal footing."I hope, and I'm sure, there will definitely be some kind of positive results," he on Truth Social platform, Trump said in a post that "the meeting should go very well".He added that US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would meet the Chinese delegation. (Additional reporting by AFP)
RTHK
19 hours ago
- RTHK
China 'better prepared' to deal with US tariff threats
A China expert on Monday said that Beijing is well prepared to deal with US President Donald Trump's tariff threats, with the nation now less dependent on American comments come ahead of expected trade talks between Vice Premier He Lifeng and a US delegation in Britain, the second round of such negotiations between the world's two biggest economies since Trump launched his trade war shortly after returning to the White House in Bo, a senior fellow at the Centre for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University, was speaking to RTHK's Hong Kong Today programme "I think China is becoming better prepared because China has dealt with him (Trump) before and China's dependency on America actually has been reduced," Zhou, who is a retired People's Liberation Army senior colonel, said."Throughout this kind of tariff war, you can see that China, from the very beginning, stand firm. China said it would fight to the end if necessary, while China is also open to last Thursday's phone conversation between President Xi Jinping and Trump, Zhou said the exchange was extremely important."Just imagine the largest economies not to talk to each other, then all other people would watch would be a huge relief for people around the world."Zhou also said he was optimistic that both sides will make progress at the talks in London."I think from the Chinese side, the requirement is very simple. China just wants to be respected, China just wants to be treated on an equal footing."I hope, and I'm sure, there will definitely be some kind of positive results," he on Truth Social platform, Trump said in a post that "the meeting should go very well".He added that US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would meet the Chinese delegation. (Additional reporting by AFP)
