
Public inquiry only current way to deliver truth to Sean Brown's family
A public inquiry is currently the only way to deliver a human rights-compliant investigation into the murder of GAA official Sean Brown, the Tánaiste has insisted.
Simon Harris reiterated his support for the Brown family on a visit to Belfast on Monday.
Advertisement
Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn has applied for a Supreme Court appeal on judicial rulings in Belfast that compel him to establish a public inquiry into the 1997 murder by loyalist paramilitaries.
People in the town of Bellaghy, Co Derry, which came to a standstill on Friday night as they took part in a march in support of the family of Sean Brown (Rebecca Black/PA)
Mr Brown, 61, the then chairman of Wolfe Tones GAA Club in the Co Derry town of Bellaghy, was ambushed, kidnapped and murdered as he locked the gates of the club in May 1997.
No-one has ever been convicted of his killing.
Preliminary inquest proceedings last year heard that in excess of 25 people had been linked by intelligence to the murder, including several state agents.
Advertisement
It had also been alleged in court that surveillance of a suspect in the murder was temporarily stopped on the evening of the killing, only to resume again the following morning.
This year Appeal Court judges in Belfast affirmed an earlier NI High Court ruling compelling the Government to hold a public inquiry.
However, Mr Benn is attempting to take the case onward for further appeal at the Supreme Court, insisting the case involves a key constitutional principle of who should order public inquiries, the Government or the judiciary.
Mr Harris met with members of the Brown family, including Mr Brown's 87-year-old widow Bridie, in Dublin last week.
Advertisement
After meeting with political leaders at Stormont to discuss legacy issues, the Tánaiste made clear he supported the family's call for a public inquiry.
'That's been the long-established position of the Irish government, and it remains the position of the Irish government,' he said.
'I want the Brown family to have a mechanism that has never been provided to them, which has to be Article Two (of the European Convention on Human Rights) compliant in terms of human rights and international law.
'I met the Brown family last week, and I was really, really taken by the huge level of pain and suffering, and the lack of answers that they are going on, that is continuing to this very day.
Advertisement
'A public inquiry is currently the only mechanism for it that is Article Two compliant.'
Asked about the potential Supreme Court appeal, Mr Harris added: 'My view in relation to the killing of Sean Brown is very clear.
People in the town of Bellaghy, Co Derry, during a march in support of the family of Sean Brown (Rebecca Black/PA)
'I want the family to have truth and justice that has been denied to them to date, and I want them to have it in a way that is Article Two compliant.
'I supported their calls for an inquiry.
Advertisement
'I don't want to comment on any ongoing legal processes out of respect to the different roles that I and the British Government have, but I very much support the Brown family.'
Bellaghy came to a standstill on Friday evening as thousands of people showed their support for the Brown family's call for a public inquiry.
People travelled from across the island of Ireland, including as far away as Co Kerry, to take part in a Walk For Truth event from St Mary's Church through the town to the home of Bellaghy Wolfe Tones club.
Those in attendance included First Minister Michelle O'Neill, Sinn Féin president Mary Lou McDonald, SDLP MLAs Patsy McGlone and Justin McNulty and GAA president Jarlath Burns.
Many wore GAA shirts from their home clubs or counties as they showed solidarity with the Brown family.
There was a spontaneous round of applause for Mr Brown's family who led the procession as it reached the town centre.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
38 minutes ago
- BBC News
Students campaign for school uniform rule changes in Northern Ireland
Rhea and Astrid, who are both 11-years-old, are two school pupils on a mission. The friends, from County Fermanagh in Northern Ireland, successfully campaigned for their school to change its uniform rules, so girls can choose between wearing skirts and they are trying to persuade the Northern Irish government to change the law so that every school has to offer the choice of whether to wear skirts or trousers to their and Astrid said it's "weird and unfair" that some schools still enforce told the BBC: "I didn't really like being made to wear a skirt, it just felt wrong. It's 2025".And Astrid said, she thought it was "important to have the choice for our privacy and for our comfort". Some schools in Northern Ireland, and around the rest of the UK, already allow girls to have a choice between wearing trousers and others still make skirts compulsory for female pupils. Astrid and Rhea's school changed its policy after the girls wrote a letter with the help of Dr Mairead Ryan, a mental health campaigner. Her research outlined a link between school uniforms and physical Ryan said: "Gendered uniforms can limit girls' movement and engagement in physical activities.""Uniform items like dresses and skirts can restrict certain movements and inhibit young girls from climbing, jumping, and participating in other forms of active play that are crucial for their development," she added."It's quite hard to run around without your skirt blowing up in the wind," Rhea added."All schools have the power to change it so if you have the power, then I think you probably should." The Minister for Education of Northern Ireland, Paul Givan, told BBC News the decision lies with individual schools and their boards of Rhea and Astrid have now taken their case to the home of the Northern Ireland government, Stormont, where they spoke at an education committee looking into broad changes to school uniform Quinn, Northern Ireland's Commissioner for Children and Young People, said: "The girls have articulated in their words how wearing trousers would make such a big difference. Not only to their education but also to their play time, to their privacy and to other areas of their lives."I believe that it needs to be legislated on because that would remove any doubt."We want to hear your thoughts on this matter - let us know in the comments section below...


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Gaza now worse than hell on earth, humanitarian chief tells BBC
Gaza has become worse than hell on earth, the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross has told the an interview at the ICRC's headquarters in Geneva, the organisation's president Mirjana Spoljaric said "humanity is failing" as it watched the horrors of the Gaza in a room close to a case displaying the ICRC's three Nobel Peace Prizes, I asked Ms Spoljaric about remarks she made in April, that Gaza was "hell on earth", and if anything had happened since to change her mind."It has become worse… We cannot continue to watch what is happening. It's surpassing any acceptable, legal, moral, and humane standard. The level of destruction, the level of suffering. "More importantly, the fact that we are watching a people entirely stripped of its human dignity. It should really shock our collective conscience."She added that states must do more to end the war, end the suffering of Palestinians and release Israeli words, clearly carefully chosen, of the president of the ICRC carry moral weight. The International Red Cross is a global humanitarian organisation that has been working to alleviate suffering in wars for more than a century and a half. It is also the custodian of the Geneva Conventions, the body of international humanitarian law that is intended to regulate the conduct of war and protect civilians and other non-combatants. The most recent version, the fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, was adopted after the Second World War and was intended to stop the mass killing of civilians from happening again. Israel, I reminded her, justifies its actions in Gaza as self-defence."Every state has a right to defend itself," she said. "And every mother has a right to see her children return. There's no excuse for hostage-taking. There is no excuse to depriving children from their access to food, health, and security. There are rules in the conduct of hostilities that every party to every conflict has to respect."Did that mean that the actions of Hamas and other armed Palestinians on 7 October 2023 - killing around 1200 and taking more than 250 hostage - did not justify Israel's destruction of the Gaza Strip and the killing of more than 50,000 Palestinians?"It's no justification for the disrespect or hollowing out of the Geneva Conventions. Neither party is allowed to break the rules, no matter what, and this is important because, look, the same rules apply to every human being under the Geneva Convention. A child in Gaza has exactly the same protections under the Geneva Conventions as a child in Israel."You never know, Ms Spoljaric added, when your own child might be on the weaker side and will need these ICRC is a reliable source of information about what is happening in Gaza. Israel does not allow international news organisations, including the BBC, to send journalists into the territory. The reporting of the more than 300 ICRC staff in Gaza, 90% of whom are Palestinians, forms a vital part of the record of the Spoljevic, the ICRC president, has been talking every day to their team leader in Gaza. The ICRC surgical hospital in Rafah is the closest medical facility to the area where many Palestinians have been killed during chaotic aid distribution by the Israel and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Like the UN, the ICRC is not taking part in the new operation. A fundamental flaw of the new system is that it funnels tens of thousands of desperate, starving civilians through an active war Spoljevic said there was "no justification for changing and breaking something that works, with something that doesn't seem to be working".In the last few days, the ICRC surgical teams at their field hospital in Rafah near the GHF zone have been overwhelmed at least twice by the volume of casualties in the turmoil of the food operation."Nowhere is safe in Gaza. Nowhere. Not for the civilians, not for the hostages," said Ms Spoljevic. "That's a fact. And our hospital is not safe. I don't recall another situation that I have seen where we operate in the midst of hostilities."A few days ago, a young boy was hit by a bullet coming through the fabric of the tent while he was treated."We have no security even for our own staff… they are working 20 hours a day. They are exhausting themselves. But it's too much, it's surpassing human capabilities."The ICRC said that in just a few hours on Tuesday morning its Rafah surgical teams received 184 patients, including 19 people dead on arrival and eight others who died of their wounds shortly afterwards. It was the highest number of casualties from a single incident at the field hospital since it was established just over a year happened around dawn on Tuesday. Palestinian witnesses and ICRC medics reported terrible scenes of killing as Israeli troops opened fire on Palestinians who were converging on the new aid distribution site in southern Gaza. It was "total carnage" according to a foreign official statement from the Israeli military described a very different picture. It said "several suspects" moved towards Israeli forces "deviating from the designated access routes". Troops "carried out warning fire… additional shots were directed near a few individual suspects who advanced towards the troops". A military spokesperson said they were investigating what happened. It has denied shooting Palestinians in a similar incident on Sunday. Ms Spoljaric said the ICRC was deeply concerned about talk of victory at all costs, total war and dehumanisation."We are seeing things happening that will make the world an unhappier place far beyond the region, far beyond the Israelis and the Palestinians, because we are hollowing out the very rules that protect the fundamental rights of every human being."If there is no ceasefire, she fears for the future of the region."This is vital. To preserve a pathway back to peace for the region. If you destroy that pathway forever for good, the region will never find safety and security. But we can stop it now. It's not too late.""State leaders are under an obligation to act. I'm calling on them to do something and to do more and to do what they can. Because it will reverberate, it will haunt them, it would reach their doorsteps."The ICRC is considered the custodian of the Geneva conventions. The fourth, agreed after the Second World War, is designed to protect civilians in Hamas attacks on Israel on 7 October 2023 were, she said, no justification for current events."Neither party is allowed to break the rules, no matter what," Ms Spoljaric launched a military campaign in Gaza in response to Hamas' cross-border attack, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken least 54,607 people have been killed in Gaza since then, including 4,335 since Israel resumed its offensive on 18 March, according to the territory's health to parties to stop the hostilities, she said: "We cannot continue watching what is happening."It defies humanity. It will haunt us."She called on the international community to do more. "Every state is under the obligation to use their means, their peaceful means, to help reverse what is happening in Gaza today," she said.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Alliance leader says abuse ‘unacceptable' as colleague targeted
Alliance Party leader Naomi Long has described homophobic abuse that one of party colleagues was subjected to as 'despicable'. Earlier this week Stormont Agriculture Minister Andrew Muir said he had experienced 'vile homophobic comments' and spoke out about misogynistic remarks directed at some of his officials, as well as racism against workers in the agri-food sector recently on social media. It comes during heated opposition from the farming community to Mr Muir's proposed Nutrients Action Programme 2026-2029 which is currently out for consultation. Mr Muir has been urged to scrap the proposals which are aimed at improving water quality and the wider environment by reducing and preventing pollution caused or induced by nutrients from agricultural sources. Opponents say the proposals could devastate agriculture, reduce livestock numbers and undermine food security. Speaking to media in Belfast on Wednesday, Ms Long urged constructive engagement around policy. 'I think it's despicable that any politician in any role is subjected to the kind of abuse, threat, intimidation that we see commonplace now being directed at politicians, and what Andrew has been subjected to in particular is appalling and unacceptable,' she said. ' People have a right to disagree with Andrew's policy, they have a right to disagree with his direction of travel as minister, they do not have a right to harass, intimidate, threaten and abuse him, and there needs to be a clear line drawn between the two. 'A constructive engagement around policy, around practice, is entirely reasonable. Abuse is unacceptable.' Speaking in the Assembly on Tuesday, Mr Muir contended there is 'a lot of misinformation' around the proposals, adding that social media commentary has been 'disgraceful'. 'There's been misogynistic comments against officials in my department,' he said. 'There's been racist comments in relation to people that we are very, very fortunate to have working within our agri-food sector. 'And not for a very long time have I seen such vile homophobic comments about myself. 'I am a gay man, and I am proud to be a gay man, and it has no relevance whatsoever to the Nutrients Action Programme nor my ability to do this job.' Disappointment was expressed at the social media comments referred to across the chamber, including from Opposition leader Matthew O'Toole, Sinn Fein MLA Aoife Finnegan, UUP MLA Robbie Butler and DUP MLA Trevor Clarke, who said opposition to the programme 'should not be personalised against anyone'.