Government announces £50m for adoption fund after concerns over delay
The Government has announced it will continue to fund therapeutic services for families of vulnerable and adopted children, as it allocated £50 million to the adoption and special guardian support fund (ASGSF).
MPs from across the House criticised the Government for the delayed announcement, accusing it of leaving children who have experienced 'the deepest trauma' in 'limbo'.
Education minister Janet Daby recognised it has been a 'difficult time' for those who access the support, and said she regretted the delay in allocating funding for the scheme for the 2025/26 financial year.
Families of adopted children and families with a special guardianship order (SGO) or a child arrangement order (CAO) in place wanting to access therapy can request funding through local authorities or regional adoption agencies.
Responding to an urgent question on the fund, Ms Daby said: 'I very much appreciate that the delay in confirming continuation of this fund has been a very difficult time for many, and I am especially concerned about children and families, because many of those whom the adoption special guardianship support fund supports are in great need of help and in need of continued help.
'I do also recognise that there has been an impact on providers of therapy who have not been able to plan and prepare for the year ahead in the way they would have liked.
'However, the department has been clear with local authorities and regional adoption agencies about transitional funding arrangements, which means that therapy which started in the last financial year can continue into 2025/26, even ahead of full 25/26 budget announcements.
'Appropriate transitional funding has been agreed for a significant number of children.
'I do regret the delay in making this announcement, but I'm very happy to confirm that today that £50 million has been allocated for the adoption and special guardianship support fund this year.
'We will be announcing further details to the House in the coming days and opening applications to families and children across our country as soon as we can.'
Asking the urgent question, Liberal Democrat education, children and families spokeswoman Munira Wilson said families had been 'left hanging and in limbo'.
The Twickenham MP added: 'Many members on all sides of the chamber have spent the last few months asking question after question and being batted away, time after time, that answers will be forthcoming.
'Yet this vital fund is there to help those most vulnerable children who have experienced the deepest trauma.'
Ms Daby said she 'recognises the potential impact on children and families'.
Labour MP Rachael Maskell described the delay as a 'tragedy' because 'many services have closed and people's therapy (has) been stopped as a result of this hiatus in funding'.
The York Central MP added: 'Will she ensure that those people impacted by this gap in the funding will be able to have additional support for the trauma that it could have caused to those young people? And will she ensure that the Treasury sign off funding ahead of deadlines when funding ends?'
Ms Daby said the Government is 'committed' to adopted children and 'will continue to work together to make sure sufficient funding is in place and is more timely'.
Labour MP Ruth Cadbury (Brentford and Isleworth) also pressed the Government to 'guarantee that this doesn't happen again'.
Ms Daby said the Government 'will continue to support local authorities' to fulfil their statutory duty to have support services in place for adopted children.
Shadow education secretary Laura Trott questioned why the Government had not confirmed the funding sooner.
She said: 'It is utterly extraordinary that today we have had to summon the Government to the chamber to provide clarity on whether they have axed the programme which ended yesterday – so we thought – and supports 20,000 of our most vulnerable young people.'
Responding, Ms Daby said applications would be open 'as soon as possible'.
The Liberal Democrat MP for Torbay, Steve Darling, who was himself put up for adoption, said the information on the continuation of the fund had been dragged from the minister 'kicking and screaming'.
He said: 'The world is a much more complex place and children are so much more likely to have had adverse childhood experiences and then need this funding.
'One had hoped that after the general election, the adults were back in the room. Can the minister assure this chamber that the funding will continue for year after year after year?'
Ms Daby replied: 'This Government has no plans to prevent this funding at this time from continuing.'
Gareth Snell, Labour MP for Stoke-on-Trent Central, asked the minister to clarify if there would be 'a slight expansion of the remit of the fund so that it can help more people in kinship care', telling MPs that he had been raised in a kinship care setting.
Ms Daby said the Government is not 'looking to expand this fund' but that the funding announced would also be available to kinship carers.
The Labour MP for Cannock Chase, Josh Newbury, said he is an adoptive parent and foster carer and called for 'timely decision-making when it comes to support for vulnerable children and young people so that there's continuity of support'.
The minister said she agreed decisions needed to be made 'in a timely fashion' and she appreciates 'the concern that delay in this announcement has caused'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
25 minutes ago
- Sky News
Scotland's Labour weren't the only winners in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election
In the centre of Hamilton, stands the now derelict Bairds department store - a reminder of the past and a sign of the political present. Outside, people speak of a time when the high street was busy and the area buzzing. As in other areas of the country, the blame for this sense of decline is placed at the door of the established parties. "The SNP have done nothing for Hamilton… we need someone to do something and I'm not sure Labour will do it", said one woman stopping for a chat outside Belles Tearoom. Apathy once again prevails. But just over seven thousand people came up with a solution unusual for Scottish politics on Thursday. Nigel Farage. This by-election signals the arrival of Reform as an electoral force north of the border. From a standing start and with little in the way of campaigning infrastructure, the party finished just three percentage points behind the SNP. As he's become accustomed to in England, Nigel Farage ate up Tory votes here. But that does not account for the party's surge. "We took votes off all the parties… there's a huge surge of young people from the SNP, particularly young men, coming to us," said Thomas Kerr, a local Reform councillor and campaigner. For the party, this is explained by independence becoming less of a determinant of electoral support - and domestic issues like the cost of living and the NHS taking priority instead. It's just one factor that's causing traditional political axioms to be scrambled, chief among them - the assumption that Scots will never vote for Nigel Farage. His party can now be confident of picking up their first MSPs in next May's parliamentary elections. So for the established parties, this may all mean a strategic rethink. What is the politically expedient position on immigration in Scotland now? What of the socially liberal identity issues previously championed by the SNP? But there's a more fundamental tension, too. 2:57 Both the SNP and Labour ran campaigns casting this by-election as a two-horse race between them and Reform. The result clearly shows a three-way splintering. That could get messy in the world of coalitions that often comes from the proportionate voting system in Holyrood. For now though, Labour will take the win and try to use it to turn round their flagging ratings. This is no definite inflection point, though. Labour sources say the sophistication of their digital campaign in this race played a big role, with others pointing to the pull of a popular local candidate. But it's also worth remembering that before the SNP surge of 2015, this section of West Central Scotland would have been regarded as a Labour stronghold. It was painted red again last year, with convincing wins in the general election. So on paper, this could have been a tidying-up exercise for Labour. It speaks volumes about the party's wider standing that the win was so unexpected. SNP leader John Swinney may have a point when he says the close result shows his party making progress after the pummelling they took here just 11 months ago. There aren't any runner-up prizes in politics, though. Six hundred votes have denied the SNP a much-needed political shot in the arm and taught them they cannot just cruise to victory on the back of disdain for Sir Keir Starmer. Back in Hamilton, and Bairds is not the only monument of the past here. For the SNP, the town stands as an emblem of the electoral successes of yesteryear. A shock victory by Winnie Ewing in a 1967 by-election signalled the party's entry on to the political stage and triggered a rethink among their establishment rivals. It's an irony likely not lost on many in Scottish politics that Reform has used this slice of the central belt to do exactly the same thing.
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Miliband's latest misstep will pile unnecessary costs upon developers
Ed Miliband's attempt to lead this country was resoundingly rejected at the ballot box in 2015. Given his influence within the present Government, he may have had the last laugh. The Energy Secretary appears to have emerged triumphant in a clash with embattled Chancellor Rachel Reeves, securing the future of a £13 billion funding allocation for insulating properties across Britain, and very possibly triggering further tax rises this autumn. Having secured access to the fruits of your wallet, Mr Miliband has now turned his sights to redefining British architecture. Under plans revealed today, developers will be forced to install solar panels in the 'vast majority' of new houses, and gas boilers will effectively be banned in newbuilds in favour of heat pumps. The Energy Secretary claims that the moves could save households £500 a year on their energy bills, but appears to have neglected to consider the likely effect on development costs. There are few objections to people choosing to install solar panels, or choosing to buy a house with a heat pump. That builders confronted with market demand are not already supplying them suggests, however, that any premium people are willing to pay for these features will not cover the costs of installing them. The last thing Britain's capacity constrained housing market needs is another effort to pile unnecessary costs upon developers. Measures to ease building are drastically needed. Regrettably, Mr Miliband seems to think otherwise.
Channel 4
an hour ago
- Channel 4
Scottish Labour secures by-election win over SNP and Reform
Labour's been celebrating after winning a surprise victory over the SNP in a fiercely contested by-election. The result in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse will come as a relief for their Scottish leader, Anas Sarwar, who's hoping to become First Minister in the Scottish Parliament elections next year. It was also the first big test for Reform UK in Scotland, after their recent success in English local elections. They came a close third – a rise they've described as 'truly remarkable.'
