Mike Braun got suckered into a tax-cut promise he couldn't keep
Few people so bad at politics have made it so far as Gov. Mike Braun.
Money can do that for you. It can open doors to halls of power. It just can't give you directions once you walk through. Eventually, you need to figure out where you're going.
Braun in three months as Indiana governor has shown he's as lost and rudderless as he ever was in the U.S. Senate. Braun adopted his lieutenant governor's top priority of slashing property taxes, aligned himself with conservative WIBC talk-show host Rob Kendall to gain favor with the conservative base, made promises he couldn't keep and now he's rammed through middle-of-the-night legislation that everyone hates.
Briggs: How Mike Braun can be a good governor (in spite of Micah Beckwith)
This was Braun's honeymoon. He threw it away. The job only gets harder from here.
Passing property tax cuts was supposed to make Braun more popular. Instead, his botched strategy has blown up his first term, turned all sides against him and limited his prospects for doing anything of consequence. Braun can look forward to three-plus years of constant conflict and an energetic primary challenge in 2028, should he decide to run again.
Braun is living every day with the consequences of his failure to choose a lieutenant governor who could win at last year's Republican Party convention.
Remember what Braun said after Lt. Gov. Micah Beckwith won and hitched himself to the Braun ticket?
"There's no doubt about this: I'm in charge," Braun told reporters at the time.
Wrong.
Braun let himself get suckered into campaigning for governor on an impossible Beckwith-inspired property tax cut plan and then adopted Beckwith's media strategy of appearing on Kendall's WIBC show.
WIBC is a conservative radio station, but Kendall is hostile to moderate Republicans. Former Gov. Eric Holcomb used to pretend Kendall didn't exist. Braun, once a target of Kendall's criticism, thought he could turn things around and make Kendall like him. It worked, for a minute, because Braun told Kendall's audience (and Beckwith's supporters) what they wanted to hear: The government is wasting your money and we can give it back to you.
Here's the thing: Beckwith can make crazy promises because he doesn't have real responsibilities. Braun has to govern, and he should have known that setting expectations too high would come back to haunt him.
Braun not only shot for the moon, but then doubled down when lawmakers watered down his proposed tax cut. Braun last month made himself the third wheel at a Kendall-Beckwith rally for lower property taxes at the Statehouse.
'We'll land this plane in a good place that gives real relief and keeps our governments healthy,' Braun promised during the rally, per the Indiana Capital Chronicle. 'But if it isn't for this (rally), they're going to keep trying to push for nothing. And nothing isn't good enough.'
Actually, nothing would have been Braun's best-case scenario — certainly better than the something he ended up with.
The Indiana General Assembly worked Monday into Tuesday to pass legislation centered on a $300 property tax credit that provides marginal, temporary tax relief for two-thirds of homeowners and costs hundreds of millions of dollars to schools and local governments, which can now respond by raising taxes to offset Braun's bill.
Briggs: The Braun-Beckwith plan to abolish Carmel
Braun and legislative leaders are framing the high-cost, low-reward bill as "historic property tax relief to Hoosiers," but no one is buying it — least of all Beckwith.
"NOBODY understands this thing… including me! The Gov needs to VETO this thing, call a special session and demand the legislature pass something that the average Hoosier can understand without hiring army of lawyers and accountants," Beckwith said on social media.
So begins the Braun-Beckwith breakup.
Much like when Braun pretended to object to 2020 election results because he thought it would earn him political points, Braun cozied up to Beckwith's supporters and Kendall's audience without considering what it would cost him when he failed to deliver. That's what Braun does. He's always riding the coattails of someone else's political movement, without any apparent consideration for where it's taking him.
This outcome was inevitable. Braun had no shortage of responsible Republican leaders telling him Indiana's towns and schools couldn't afford the kind of tax cut he was promising. He pledged to do it anyway, right up until the moment he caved.
In so doing, Braun sold out moderate Republicans, who have to defend this mess, and he sold out the party's right flank, which expected Braun to fight to the finish for major property tax cuts. Braun has wasted his political capital on a cause he didn't believe in, while emboldening Beckwith to oppose him and setting up Kendall to spend the next few years talking about "Back Room Braun."
After yet another bout of political malpractice, I have to ask: Why did Braun want this job? Why did he work so hard to obtain the power of a governor, just so he can drift in the wind? What does he actually believe in enough to fight for it?
If Braun can't demonstrate answers to those questions, he might follow up his inglorious Senate career by being an insignificant one-term governor.
Contact James Briggs at 317-444-4732 or james.briggs@indystar.com. Follow him on X and Bluesky at @JamesEBriggs.
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Mike Braun's property tax cut fails to deliver | Opinion

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicaid & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now
President Donald Trump's 'one big beautiful bill' has passed in the House and is now awaiting Senate approval. If passed, Trump's signature bill would extend the tax cuts granted by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and add additional tax cuts. While this might be welcome news to many, the bill also includes changes to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that could threaten seniors' access to these programs. Find Out: Read Next: 'The 'one big beautiful bill' passed by the House of Representatives, if it were passed into law today, would cut Medicaid and SNAP by a combined $1 trillion,' said Chris Orestis, president of Retirement Genius. 'In addition, because of the increase to federal debt of as much as $5 trillion, the bill would trigger an automatic reduction in Medicare funding of $500 billion,' he continued. 'This would represent the largest cut to social services and health insurance for the poor, disabled, children and the elderly in U.S. history.' Here's a look at the changes retirees can make now to secure care and avoid benefit disruptions if the bill were to pass. Before changes go into effect, check with your healthcare providers to ensure there won't be any interruption to your care if there are cuts to Medicaid. 'Check with your healthcare provider to see if they might cut back on services or cease accepting Medicaid-funded patients, and contact any nursing home where you or a loved one may reside to find out if they will be reducing the number of patients they can support — or even [if they are] possibly planning to close,' Orestis said. Knowing this ahead of time will allow you to find alternative care providers before it's too late. Learn More: If you are reliant on SNAP, start searching for alternatives that may be able to provide food assistance in the event your benefits are reduced or cut. 'Make sure you know where there are local support services through community or faith-based organizations to replace lost access through SNAP,' Orestis said. Many retirees plan to 'spend down' their savings so that they qualify for Medicaid to pay for their long-term care. However, this may no longer be a viable option. 'If you are considering going onto Medicaid for long-term care and are preparing to engage the 'spend down' process to impoverish yourself and get below the poverty level to qualify, you may want to reconsider that strategy, and instead look to leverage private pay resources to pay for your care,' Orestis said. 'If you are on Medicaid, you will primarily be reliant on nursing homes for your care, and their ability to withstand these cuts will be very challenging and up in the air,' he continued. 'If you are private pay, you are in control and can decide where and when you will receive care, such as at home or an assisted living community not funded by Medicaid.' Strategies to stay private pay for long-term care would include long-term care insurance, annuities, a life insurance settlement, a reverse mortgage or VA benefits. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicaid & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now

Wall Street Journal
36 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
GOP Senators' Competing Demands Risk Pulling Trump Megabill Apart
WASHINGTON—Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R., S.D.) is trying to release this week a revised version of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' But as he races to pass the legislation ahead of Republicans' self-imposed July 4 deadline, he has got about as many problems as there are GOP senators, with lawmakers battling over the additional borrowing and spending cuts that will be used to finance tax relief, plus spending on the border and military.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Speaker Johnson teases follow-ups to the ‘one big, beautiful bill'
The 'one big, beautiful bill' may not be so singular, after all. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is teasing follow-up legislation to the megabill of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities that Republicans can push though using the same special budget reconciliation process that requires only GOP votes. That tool can be used once per fiscal year, with the current fiscal year ending on Sept. 30. So after Republicans are done with the 'big, beautiful bill,' the GOP trifecta has, in theory, two more shots to muscle through party-line legislation before the next Congress comes into power after the midterms. Johnson floated plans for a second reconciliation bill while rebutting concerns from deficit hawks on the budget impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — which includes an extension of tax cuts and boosts to border and defense funding, with costs offset in part by new requirements on low-income assistance programs like Medicaid and food aid. 'Everyone here wants to reduce spending,' Johnson said Friday morning on CNBC. 'But you have to do that in a sequence of events. We have a plan, OK? This is the first of a multistep process.' 'We're going to have another reconciliation bill that follows this one, possibly a third one before this Congress is up, because you can have a reconciliation bill for each budget year, each fiscal year. So that's ahead of us,' Johnson continued, also pointing to separate plans to claw back money based on recommendations from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'We're also doing rescissions packages. We got the first one delivered this week from the White House, and that will codify many of the DOGE cuts.' The promise of another reconciliation bill is somewhat surprising given the crux of the debate that dominated the early weeks of the year: Should Republicans divide up their agenda into two bills, passing the first quickly to give Trump an early win on boosting funding for border enforcement and deportations? Or would putting all of Trump's priorities into one bill — which would contain both bitter pills and sweeteners for different factions of the razor-thin majority — be a better political strategy? Trump eventually said he preferred 'one big, beautiful bill,' a moniker that became the legislation's official title in the House last month. It's not clear what would be in a second piece of legislation. Multiple House Republicans who spoke with The Hill were unaware of plans for more reconciliation bills and were not sure what could be included in them. 'I think we need to see what's left on the table after the first one,' Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) said. And to muster through multiple reconciliation bills is a delicate prospect. If members know more reconciliation bills are coming, that complicates the argument that everything in the current package — even policies some factions dislike that others love — need to stay in one megabill. The Speaker declined to elaborate on what might be in such a package when asked in a press conference last week. 'I'm not going to tell you that,' Johnson said. 'Let's get the first one done.' 'Look, I say this is the beginning of a process, and what you're going to see is a continuing of us identifying waste, fraud, abuse in government, which is our pledge of common sense, restoring common sense and fiscal sanity. So we have lots of ideas of things that might be in that package.' Republicans had started planning for the current legislative behemoth months before the 2024 election so they would be prepared to quickly execute on their policy wish list if they won the majority. 'This isn't something we just drew up overnight. So, we'll go through that same laborious process,' Johnson said. But some members have ideas of what else they'd like to see. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) said that he'd hope a second bill would do more to tackle rolling back green energy tax credits and make further spending cuts. Ultimately, though, it will be Trump's call, Norman said: 'I know when the president gets involved, it adds a lot of value.' And Rep. August Pfluger (R-Texas) speculated that passing the 'big, beautiful bill' would inspire members to keep going with another bill. 'People like the feeling of winning,' Pfluger said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.