Defence chiefs spent more than £200million of taxpayers' money on travel and luxury stays - while troops lived in squalid conditions
Defence chiefs spent more than £200 million of taxpayers' money on travel and luxury stays for senior staff last year while troops lived in squalid conditions.
Figures released by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) show that officers and civil servants stayed in five-star hotels often costing more than £300 a night.
The MoD spent almost £800 million on hotels and travel between 2018 and 2024 at locations such as the French Alps and Las Vegas.
In sharp contrast, the living conditions of troops in UK Armed Forces accommodation during the same period – some infested with vermin and harmful black mould – led to more than 60,000 complaints.
Meanwhile freedom of information requests obtained by The Mail on Sunday and National Security News revealed a huge leap in costs from £136 million in 2018 to £218 million by 2024 covering hotel accommodation, flights and travel by train and ferry.
The figures revealed numerous MoD personnel stayed in pricey hotels in central London including the Park Plaza and the Marriott – which can cost up to £400 a night.
Outside of the UK a £1,426 bill was submitted for a four-night stay at the Auberge Saint Hubert Hotel Val D'Isere ski resort in France, a bill of £1,032 was also racked up at the Novotel Sydney Harbour for three nights and one staff member spent seven nights at the Anantara The Palm Dubai Resort which cost £2,439.
And another staff member spent £323 for one night at the four-star Hampton Inn Tropicana in Las Vegas. Defending the costs, the MoD argued that more than 200,000 civil servants and military personnel are deployed overseas and often needed to be accommodated in hotels.
One commanding officer of an infantry battalion based in Bulford told the MoS: 'I have soldiers living in really poor-quality housing who are constantly battling to get repairs. I have soldiers on sick leave living in homes which are barely habitable.'
Callum McGoldrick, researcher at the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'Splashing hundreds of millions on hotels and flights raises questions about priorities in Whitehall. Ministers must get a grip on MoD spending.'
A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: 'These figures relate to spend under the previous government. This Government is committed to getting a grip of MoD budgets.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- The Telegraph
Nigel Farage promises a lot – but do Reform's sums add up?
Nigel Farage was in giveaway mode on Tuesday as he promised a Reform UK government would nearly double the personal income tax allowance, restore winter fuel support for pensioners and scrap the two-child benefit cap. The policies are appealing to voters, but are they affordable? Farage admitted people would be ' lined up in droves ' to ask how, or even if, his party could bankroll such policies. If Farage were prime minister, the promise to increase the personal income tax allowance from £12,570 to £20,000 a year would alone force him to find anything from £50bn to £80bn, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) estimates. Benefits giveaways would add billions on top of that. Scrapping the two-child benefit cap would cost £3.4bn a year, the IFS has estimated, while restoring the winter fuel allowance would cost around £1.5bn per year. A promise of a transferable tax allowance for married couples hasn't been costed. Farage has repeatedly attacked the Starmer Government for being 'hopelessly adrift' on public debt, which is hovering at about 95pc of GDP. He therefore wouldn't be borrowing his way towards honouring his pledges if he moved into Downing Street. Instead, the Reform UK leader has promised 'big savings'. 'Big' is no exaggeration. At the lower end of the IFS estimated cost of the income tax change alone, he's looking for savings equivalent to the Government's annual spending on defence, or on the entire disability and child benefit system. At the £80bn top end, it's more than the Government spends on schools each year, or, to take another measure, almost half the central government payroll. He probably isn't going to sack every second civil servant on day one. So how will he pull off the feat of balancing the books, when it has eluded governments of the Left and Right for decades? Farage has promised full details next year. In the meantime, his downpayment is a claim that ' scrapping net zero ' would save £45bn a year – a 50pc increase on the £30bn estimate that Reform MP Richard Tice floated as recently as two weeks ago. Ripping up public-sector diversity initiatives would yield another £7bn a year, which sounds as vague as it is optimistic. The traditional bonfire of the quangos will reap £13bn a year. Asylum seeker hotels would also go, which Reform says will yield £4bn a year despite the fact National Audit Office figures suggest the party might claw back less than half of that. In an interview with The Telegraph last week, Tice acknowledged that a Reform UK government taking office in 2029 would need a much clearer set of plans than this. 'These are the tax cuts I want to get to,' he said. 'But we can't implement them until I've proven that I can produce the savings.' Those comments came after stockbroking firm Panmure Liberum said the £80bn funding gap – which it had identified even before this week's fresh promises – could trigger an 'immediate and violent' sterling crisis, reminiscent of the market meltdown after Liz Truss's mini-Budget. Labour also invoked the spirit of Truss on Tuesday, with party chairman Ellie Reeves saying Farage's 'tens of billions of pounds of fantasy promises … are exactly how Liz Truss crashed the economy'. Unlike the impatient Truss, though, Farage seems ready to play a longer game. And he'll need to. As IFS deputy director Helen Miller said on Tuesday, cuts of the magnitude he envisions can't be achieved by scrapping the odd superfluous quango or diversity programme, as Farage seems to suggest. Instead, it requires a 'debate ... about the vision of the state and what role the government should play in coming years,' she said. In other words, Farage may theoretically be able to make the sums add up on his slate of policy promises but only if the state cuts back on, or even drops, huge amounts of what it does. This is a debate that Tice, at least, seems up for. In an article for The Telegraph last week, he was even prepared to take on the Westminster shibboleth that the NHS must remain untainted by the private sector. A tax break would encourage wealthier people to go private, he said, and the NHS should buy 'millions more' appointments from private healthcare providers. These appointments would still be provided free to NHS patients, so they would come at a cost to taxpayers. Tice's bet must be that the private sector would get bigger and more efficient as a result, making the service cheaper overall. Clearly, much more detail is needed. It may be hard, in many quarters, for Farage and Tice to get a hearing for any plan to fundamentally rewire the British state – if they come up with one. But it's a debate Labour should welcome, rather than seek to smother. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is boxed in, and constantly at risk of running out of fiscal headroom. If there is a politically palatable path to disrupting the fiscal status quo, she hasn't found it yet either. Farage says that what he offers is a chance to think differently. 'We're not ideologically tied to the same ideas upon which we believe the Conservative and Labour governments have gone so wrong over the course of the last few years,' as he put it. Reform UK wants to embrace a low-tax and high-benefit society, combining two positions that have traditionally been diametrically opposed in Britain.
The Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- The Telegraph
Nigel leans Left and hits the bullseye
Nigel Farage is finally a contender. How do I know? The press is playing nice. Could you be prime minister, asked a newspaper? 'History suggests no,' he replied, ' circumstances suggest yes.' The optics say: happy days are here again! Nigel has a quarter of a million members; he's on 30 per cent plus in the polls. He was flanked at this swanky press conference by two new mayors, Andrea Jenkyns in a psychedelic dress and Luke Campbell, a boxer, who looked ready to thump anyone who mentioned Rupert Lowe. He's the kind of old fashioned British stud one rarely sees in this effeminate age of yoga and Tai chi. The only whiff of the orient on that stage was Hai Karate. So Nigel, standing between a frock and a hard case, launched into an act worthy of the late Jim Bowen. 'Rachel from accounts' is now 'Rachel from complaints'. Ed Miliband is 'away with the fairies'. Robert Jenrick: he's lost weight, got a new suit, 'perhaps he's even had his teeth done'. As for the PM, 'I hold no personal malice' for a man who is 'dismal, uninspiring, disconnected, unpatriotic' and 'pointless' (and apart from that, a wonderful human being). Keir's 'veering off, Left and Right', which is ironic given Reform is now accused of doing the same. Keir used to be a Corbynite; Nigel used to be a Thatcherite. Today he told us he'd lift the two child benefit cap and return the winter fuel allowance, prompting accusations of inconsistency from online intellectuals with a 2:1 in politics (worth every penny). But, said Nigel, 'there is absolutely no contradiction' between being the party 'of workers and entrepreneurs' – and you know what? He's right. OK, so his numbers don't completely add up. Neither do the Treasury's; neither do mine (every time I put on a light, that's one less child I can put through college). What he's realised is that with faith in the state gone and hope for the future lost, politics is no longer Right vs Left but plebs vs patricians, and you've got to identify yourself with the larger half. Kemi fiddles while Rome burns Kemi chose to go quiet; wait for the economy to collapse and voters to dribble back. But all the while she is fiddling with policy groups, Nigel is out there, setting fire to Rome – and it's working. Starmer has challenged Nigel to a debate: Nigel accepts! He suggests they meet in 'a working man's club' over a 'few beers with the lads'. Assuming Reform sets the rules – likely given Keir's skills at negotiation – the debate will climax in a game of darts. First prize: the keys to No10 and a Bullseye speed boat moored on the pavement. There's so much to laugh at, what's to hate? A journalist meekly asked if it's true that Reform ran an advert accusing Anas Sarwar, Labour leader in Scotland, of saying he would 'prioritise the Pakistani community'. Nigel gleefully rolled the ad to prove critics wrong – but it showed Sarwar saying nothing of the sort, confirming that his words had been distorted. In the street outside, dogs heard a whistle and began barking. Inside, the hacks politely let the subject go. I guess it's a bit 2010s to bang on about racism.
The Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- The Telegraph
Landlords can force tenants to pay for insulation demanded by Miliband
Landlords will be able to pass on the cost of upgrading rental properties to tenants, the Government has admitted. Ed Miliband's net zero rules will require all rental properties to meet a minimum energy performance certificate rating of C by 2030. Despite the Energy Secretary's insistence that landlords will not put up rents to reach new efficiency targets, a minister has now said there are grounds for 'higher market rents'. The Conservatives say rents could rise as much as £4,000 a year to cover the cost of upgrading older properties or to match lower rental housing supply when landlords sell up. But Mr Miliband has previously said that when past standards were introduced 'we didn't see rent increases', and pointed to government schemes that help with the cost of insulation and heat pumps. The Government claims tenants will save £240 a year on their energy bills if their homes are better insulated. Sarah Sackman, a justice minister, has now admitted to Parliament that the cost of upgrading properties can legally be passed onto renters, paving the way for significant rises over the next five years. She was asked by Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, whether rents could legally be increased because of the cost of net zero upgrades if a tenant challenged a rise in court. Ms Sackman said that 'expenditure on the upgrading of an energy performance certificate to a higher level of energy efficiency is a material consideration, which may result, in certain circumstances, in a higher market rent being determined'. The admission comes despite Mr Miliband's insistence that the new rules will not push up rents. Asked in February whether the rules would impact the cost of housing, he told LBC: 'There is some government help, we're looking at what more can be provided. 'There are some local grants, there's the boiler upgrade scheme. When this was done before with a less exacting standard, we didn't see rent increases and half of landlords already do this.' Announcing the policy earlier this year, the Government said that it would 'save private renters £240 per year on average on their energy bills'. Calls to abandon net zero But Mr Hollinrake told The Telegraph: 'Red Ed promised to reduce everyone's bills but his mad dash to net zero is picking people's pockets. 'Not content with sending bills skyrocketing, hardworking families' rents are now in his crosshairs. Maybe this confession will make him finally realise that Labour's war on landlords just leaves renters worse off. 'He needs to heed our calls to abandon net zero by 2050 and fast, or working families and Middle England will continue to be clobbered by his eco cult.' Separate analysis found the policy is likely to push up rental prices by up to £4,000 a year for tenants. Some landlords say they would prefer to sell historic homes with poor energy efficiency than be forced to undertake extensive renovation to meet the standard. Ben Beadle, chief executive of the National Residential Landlords Association, called in February for ministers to pursue a 'realistic' version of the policy. 'The chronic shortage of tradespeople to carry out energy efficiency works needs to be addressed, alongside a targeted financial package to support investments in the work required,' he said. 'Gentler trajectory' Rob Wall, assistant director at the British Property Federation, said it would be ' challenging ' for all properties to meet the standard required. He said: 'We would like to have seen recognition of the time lost reflected through a gentler trajectory, to provide the sector with sufficient time and support to carry out necessary work.' A Department of Energy Security and Net Zero spokesman has said: 'Everyone deserves to live in a warm, comfortable home. 'We have recently consulted on plans to require private landlords to meet higher energy performance standards, which will help deliver cheaper-to-heat homes. 'These plans could lift up to half a million households out of fuel poverty by 2030, while also making renters hundreds of pounds better off.'
