Guilty pleas revealed in Sons of Confederate Veterans campaign finance case
The State Board of Elections has revealed its first criminal convictions — two guilty pleas to a misdemeanor charge — in the six years after state lawmakers made campaign finance investigations secret.
That outcome drew little praise from a campaign finance watchdog whose complaint to the elections board prompted the case. He says it took too long and resulted in too little.
In January, two leaders of a political action committee for the Sons of Confederate Veterans pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of accepting cash contributions in excess of $50.
They were ordered to pay a $100 fine and court costs, according to a letter the board sent to Bob Hall, the retired executive director of Democracy NC.
Court records show Mitchell Flinchum of Burlington, the PAC's treasurer, and Thomas Smith of Raleigh, the PAC's assistant treasurer, pleaded guilty to the misdemeanors on Jan. 23.
Neither the board nor prosecutors announced the convictions at the time. Hall did not find out until he received a letter known as a 'closure notice' from the board that was dated May 16, nearly four months after the convictions in Wake County District Court.
'It's a pitiful settlement, but at least they admitted to engaging in criminal activity,' Hall said in a news release Tuesday.
Hall filed a lengthy complaint against the nonprofit North Carolina division of the Sons of Confederate and its Heritage PAC in January 2020. He did so after The Daily Tar Heel, the UNC-Chapel Hill student paper, revealed evidence of illegal donations to the PAC.
The nonprofit had struck a secret $2.5 million deal with the UNC System to take possession of the controversial Silent Sam statue memorializing Confederate soldiers at UNC-Chapel Hill, which protesters tore down. A judge later pulled the plug on the deal.
Prior to the 2018 law, the board would make public complaints and election records associated with them, until it found possible criminal conduct, Gary Bartlett, the board's executive director from 1993 to 2013, told the N&O last year.
At that point, the board withheld information until a public hearing before the board that included testimony from witnesses. Transparency from such hearings, which legislators ended, helped give the public confidence that campaign finance cases were being handled appropriately, Hall and other government watchdogs have said.
A public hearing would have shed light on claims Sons of Confederate Veterans members made that they were pressured to make cash donations to the PAC and that they had been listed as the source of other donations they did not make, Hall said.
'It would have triggered tax investigations and racketeering investigations by the federal investigators, it very much could have done that,' Hall predicted.
Smith could not be immediately reached for comment. Mitchell declined to talk about the case.
'As far as I'm concerned it's settled,' he said. 'I'm glad after all of it to hopefully have it in the past.'
Efforts to interview state elections officials and Wake County District Attorney Lorrin Freeman about the outcome of the Heritage PAC case were unsuccessful.
Patrick Gannon, a spokesman for the board of elections, said in an email that the board did not see a concern with issuing its notice of the case's outcome last week.
'Campaign finance investigations are confidential under state law,' he wrote late Tuesday afternoon. 'From our perspective, the case was open until just recently, and we provided notice of the status to the complainant.'
The board's letter to Hall said that it investigated the nonprofit and its PAC for roughly a year, turning over its findings to the State Ethics Commission for its recommendation. Requiring that referral was another change to campaign finance investigations from the 2018 legislation. The commission's recommendations are also confidential.
The commission's review added two months to the case, the board's letter showed. In June 2021 the board referred the case to the Alamance County district attorney to investigate Flinchum and to Freeman in Wake County to investigate Smith. The case was later consolidated in Wake County.
Freeman asked the SBI to investigate further.
When asked about the length of time it takes to resolve elections board cases referred to her, Freeman said the elections board is hampered by a lack of funding and staff and the SBI's financial crimes unit is taking longer to do its work.
Hall criticized Freeman's handling of the case, and others in recent years that did not lead to criminal charges, in his news release.
'It's disappointing that the District Attorney took so long to accomplish so little,' Hall said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
State NAACP Calls for Appeal in Fatal Atlanta Police Shooting After Judge Drops Charges
Jimmy Hill is determined to continue his fight for justice after a federal judge decided Tuesday to drop the charges against retired Atlanta police officer Sung Kim, who shot and killed his son Jimmy Atchison in 2019. 'Change ain't going to come if we sit back and wait on others,' Hill told Capital B Atlanta the morning after the judge issued his ruling. 'You know, we gotta be able to have the courage to step out on faith and be the change we've been looking for.' Atchison, a 21-year-old father of two, was accused of stealing a woman's purse and cellphone at gunpoint; however, after he was killed, a witness said he didn't have a gun. He had already evaded Kim and federal task force members on foot twice that day when they followed him into an Adamsville apartment, where he was hiding in a closet under a pile of clothes. According to the subsequent investigation, officers yelled conflicting commands at Atchison, like 'Don't move' and 'Show me your hands.' Other officers who were in the room told investigators that Atchison raised one or both hands quickly in the seconds before Kim fired his weapon. Last month, Kim — who was charged with murder, aggravated assault, involuntary manslaughter, and violation of oath — testified during an evidentiary hearing that he thought Atchison had a firearm and was going to shoot him. In his order dismissing the charges, U.S. District Judge Michael L. Brown wrote that the shooting was 'textbook self-defense.' In the months following his son's death, Hill's family and Atlanta's activist community led dozens of protests that led to the Atlanta Police Department pulling out of federal task forces entirely in 2019 because, at the time, they banned officers from wearing body cameras. The following year, the Department of Justice changed its policy to allow local and state law enforcement to wear body cameras while serving on a federal task force. Victories like APD's withdrawal from federal task forces have bolstered Hill's willingness to continue to fight for justice for his son. Read More: Judge to Decide Whether to Move Forward With Trial in Fatal Police Shooting of Jimmy Atchison 'People respond to pressure,' Hill said. 'I refuse to sit back, I refuse to be tired.' Next on his agenda is to have the Fulton County District Attorney's office appeal the judge's decision up to the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. Assisting Hill in this quest is Gerald Griggs, a local attorney and president of the Georgia NAACP. Griggs told Capital B Atlanta that he wrote a letter to the district attorney's office Wednesday morning to stress the importance of appealing this case because Atchison was unarmed at the time of the shooting. 'We're not gonna remain silent, we're just going to keep going.' Jimmy Hill, father of Jimmy Atchison 'We believe that [this] sets a dangerous precedent in the 11th Circuit, which covers most of the Southern states, that an officer can shoot an unarmed individual who's been given several conflicting commands and in the face,' Griggs said. A spokesperson for District Attorney Fani Willis' office told Capital B Atlanta in a statement Wednesday afternoon that they are reviewing the decision and considering next steps. The office has 30 days to notify the court of appeals; after which, there is then time allotted for it to file documents with the court explaining why it is appealing and what specifically it disagrees with in the judge's order. According to Griggs, the 11th Circuit can take anywhere from six months to several years to decide whether to accept an appeal. If it agrees to take the case, it will order a briefing and the case will be assigned to either a single judge or a three-judge panel. Griggs said he isn't certain what the outcome will be because he's seen the 11th Circuit deny appeals when the victim was armed, but hasn't seen many where they've upheld the lower court's decision when the victim was unarmed. 'It's hard to say because it is one of the more conservative circuits in the United States, but I think based on these facts there needs to be an appeal, otherwise this sets a very dangerous precedent for the South and for the nation,' Griggs continued. Regardless, Hill plans to continue to fight until he gets justice for his son. On Mother's Day weekend, Hill protested in honor of his son's late mother, Cynthia Atchison, outside the megachurch of a local pastor who told Black parents to stop blaming white cops for killing their children. Hill said he believes Cynthia's death in 2022 was due to a broken heart. Read More: Viral Sermon Blaming Black Parents for Police Killings Sparks Mother's Day Protest 'I'll get out there and fight in the rain, in the heat, whatever,' Hill said. 'I get out there and fight on days I didn't want to fight. But I knew it had to be done because that's my son and I love him. So we're not gonna remain silent, we're just going to keep going.' The post State NAACP Calls for Appeal in Fatal Atlanta Police Shooting After Judge Drops Charges appeared first on Capital B News - Atlanta.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bill to ban TikTok on state devices passes Pennsylvania Senate
PENNSYLVANIA (WTAJ) — A bill that would ban the use of the app TikTok on state devices and networks seems to have most Pennsylvania senators in agreement. The bill, sponsored by Senator Kristin Phillips-Hill, notes that the app on state devices presents 'an unacceptable level of cybersecurity risk.' Under Senate Bill 376, all agencies, departments or commissions that are state government entities must do the following: Remove the application from state networks Implement measures to prevent the installation of the app Implement network-based restrictions to prevent workers from using and accessing the app Pennsylvania Representative aims to repeal 'Johnstown Flood Tax' 'The people of Pennsylvania's personal safety and our national security are threatened by cyber vulnerabilities of systems that support our daily lives. It is imperative that Pennsylvania takes bold and decisive actions to prepare for and address cybersecurity threats,' Phillips-Hill noted in her memo about the bill to other lawmakers. Over half of the other states have already banned the app on government devices, along with several other countries. The bill passed the Pennsylvania Senate with 49 votes yes on Wednesday, June 4. This comes after it passed both the Communications and Technology and the Appropriations Committee. It will now head to the House for consideration. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bill to ban TikTok from state-owned devices in Pennsylvania advances
(WHTM) — Multiple cybersecurity bills, including one banning popular social media platform TikTok from state-owned devices in Pennsylvania, have advanced out of the Senate Communications and Technology Committee. Senate Bill 376, sponsored by state Senator Kristin Phillips-Hill (R-York), would ban TikTok on all state-owned devices and networks. According to the memo, this comes as a response to growing national security concerns. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now The bill would require Pennsylvania to follow federal guidelines regarding the use of TikTok on Government devices and networks. Many politicians across the United States consider TikTok a national security risk because the platform is owned by the Chinese internet technology company ByteDance. Senator Phillips-Hill's second proposed bill, Senate Bill 377, would require all state IT contracts to meet the cybersecurity standards set by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. According to the memo, this would reduce the risk of data breaches across state systems. 'Back in March, I made it clear that cybersecurity would be a top priority this session, and today, we're taking meaningful steps forward,' Sen. Phillips-Hill said. 'These measures reflect best practices that other states and the federal government are already implementing to protect against bad actors. If we want to stay ahead of cyber threats, we need to take proactive, proven steps to secure our data and defend our systems.' The bills are part of a larger legislative package introduced by Sen. Phillips-Hill that intends to better safeguard Pennsylvania's information technology. The bill will now go to the Senate for consideration. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.